HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2

More expensive future: Grossmann vs. Kubina

View Poll Results: Who will have the more expensive future?
I'd rather have Grossman and he will cost more 7 58.33%
I'd rather have Grossman but Kubina will cost more 3 25.00%
I'd rather have Kubina and he will cost more 2 16.67%
I'd rather have Kubina but Grossman will cost more 0 0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-07-2012, 08:52 AM
  #1
Mathradio
Go Roy Munson!
 
Mathradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,581
vCash: 500
More expensive future: Grossmann vs. Kubina

Both are pending free agents this summer. Who would you rather have?

Mathradio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2012, 11:01 AM
  #2
ELab2
Registered User
 
ELab2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlantic City
Country: United States
Posts: 5,348
vCash: 500
Rather have Grossmann (you spelled his name wrong, as he's been allowing people to do for some time apparently) but Kubina will be paid more.

Kubina has a better pedigree and brings more offense. I think he'll get paid pretty substantially, definitely over $4mil.

Grossmann doesn't have a great pedigree and was the man out in Dallas. So I think that makes him less ripe for overpayment I suspect he'll get under $4mil. But I think he plays substantially better defense than Kubina does and he won't be an over 35 contract.

ELab2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2012, 02:37 PM
  #3
Mathradio
Go Roy Munson!
 
Mathradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,581
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELab2 View Post
Rather have Grossmann (you spelled his name wrong, as he's been allowing people to do for some time apparently) but Kubina will be paid more.

Kubina has a better pedigree and brings more offense. I think he'll get paid pretty substantially, definitely over $4mil.

Grossmann doesn't have a great pedigree and was the man out in Dallas. So I think that makes him less ripe for overpayment I suspect he'll get under $4mil. But I think he plays substantially better defense than Kubina does and he won't be an over 35 contract.
I haven't seen much of Grossmann or Kubina but on what pair would Grossmann play on a bottom-feeding D?

Mathradio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 04:56 PM
  #4
Kusic
Be The Thunder
 
Kusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Karlovy Vary
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 1,565
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Kusic
I'd rather have Grossman and he will cost more.

Kusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.