HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Nucks-Leafs (Schenn/Schneider)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-08-2012, 12:54 AM
  #1
The Velvet Hammer
Registered User
 
The Velvet Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: leafville
Country: Canada
Posts: 881
vCash: 500
Nucks-Leafs (Schenn/Schneider)

ok so instead of boring everyone with a long explanation i will try to keep it short and sweet..

soo

schenn+mac+Reimer+2nd(34-42)

for

Schneider, Schroeder, 1st (26-30)


Toronto needs goalies, depth + picks never hurt.

Van gets more depth for a good playoff run, a hard hitting dman with awesome upside.. goalie on a decent contract and not that much of a downgrade on picks...


so hows the value?

The Velvet Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 12:56 AM
  #2
Canucks5551
Registered User
 
Canucks5551's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,690
vCash: 500
No way from a Vancouver perspective.

Canucks5551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 12:58 AM
  #3
The Velvet Hammer
Registered User
 
The Velvet Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: leafville
Country: Canada
Posts: 881
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canucks5551 View Post
No way from a Vancouver perspective.
what has to add?? why is it such a definite no... we can take salary...

The Velvet Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:03 AM
  #4
NugentHopkinsfan
Also Wil Fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,449
vCash: 500
Schenn does not fit the Canucks system at all. He's not a mobile puck mover who can play the power play, we need somebody to replace Salo not somebody who is basically Aaron Rome at this point.

We already have a Clark Maccarthur making 1.7 million compared to 3.1 million who has 2 less points even though he's spent a lot of the year on the third line and battling infections. His name is Chris Higgins. Not interested in Mac or his cap hit.

Reimer no thanks we'll take our chances with Lack.

NugentHopkinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:06 AM
  #5
Nuckles37
Moderator
( ͡° ᴥ͡°)
 
Nuckles37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,633
vCash: 50
Cant see the Canucks wanting a bottom pairing with a combined cap hit of $7.8 mil.
I find it funny how the Canucks have to add Schroeder and their 1st. With Hodgson gone, I think Schroeder wont be moved any time soon.

__________________
COME AT ME BRO!
Nuckles37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:06 AM
  #6
Winroba
Keep Calm, Kassi On
 
Winroba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,083
vCash: 500
Gillis says no, Schenn, Reimer and MacArthur are all decent pieces but I don't think they'd fit in the VAN system

Winroba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:08 AM
  #7
VeteranNetPresence
u wot m8
 
VeteranNetPresence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,210
vCash: 500
schenn is so overrated- no to this deal

VeteranNetPresence is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:11 AM
  #8
The Velvet Hammer
Registered User
 
The Velvet Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: leafville
Country: Canada
Posts: 881
vCash: 500
ok, understandable.

What if you do

Franson, Blacker(good puck moving prospect, probably #2 or3 behind holzer for readiness), 2nd, one of kadri/colborne/aston ?

for

Schneider, Schroeder, 1st.. ? plus we will take salary if we have to...

The Velvet Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:17 AM
  #9
NugentHopkinsfan
Also Wil Fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,449
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Velvet Hammer View Post
ok, understandable.

What if you do

Franson, Blacker(good puck moving prospect, probably #2 or3 behind holzer for readiness), 2nd, one of kadri/colborne/aston ?

for

Schneider, Schroeder, 1st.. ? plus we will take salary if we have to...
Personally I didn't like Franson in Nashville and still don't even though he's looked good at times in Toronto, if he's the main piece in a Schneider deal everyone in Vancouver will be pissed. Shane O'Brien played more than him in Nashville and he's been a healthy scratch for a non playoff team with a shaky defence, he is not a complete player.

Rather just keep Schroeder than bring in Blacker.

First for Kadri hell yeah but that wouldn't make the deal. Even though it does make it really tempting.

NugentHopkinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:27 AM
  #10
The Velvet Hammer
Registered User
 
The Velvet Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: leafville
Country: Canada
Posts: 881
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NugentHopkinsfan View Post
Personally I didn't like Franson in Nashville and still don't even though he's looked good at times in Toronto, if he's the main piece in a Schneider deal everyone in Vancouver will be pissed. Shane O'Brien played more than him in Nashville and he's been a healthy scratch for a non playoff team with a shaky defence, he is not a complete player.

Rather just keep Schroeder than bring in Blacker.

First for Kadri hell yeah but that wouldn't make the deal. Even though it does make it really tempting.
so what do you think of gunnarson? maybe something like

gunnar+kadri+2nd

schiender+schroeder+1st



my valuing is

kadri+2nd = schroeder+1st...

gunnar has to have more value than scheinder...

The Velvet Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:36 AM
  #11
Ryp37
Registered User
 
Ryp37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 833
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Velvet Hammer View Post
so what do you think of gunnarson? maybe something like

gunnar+kadri+2nd

schiender+schroeder+1st



my valuing is

kadri+2nd = schroeder+1st...

gunnar has to have more value than scheinder...
canucks are not giving up schneider, their first and one of their top prospects for a 7th round pick and kadri

Ryp37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:48 AM
  #12
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
**** that from Vancouver!!! we're giving up way too much.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:49 AM
  #13
The Velvet Hammer
Registered User
 
The Velvet Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: leafville
Country: Canada
Posts: 881
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryp37 View Post
canucks are not giving up schneider, their first and one of their top prospects for a 7th round pick and kadri

kadri > schroder
gunnar > schneider
2nd < 1st

The Velvet Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:52 AM
  #14
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,143
vCash: 500
No thanks to any of that. There's a reason why Hodgson wasnt shipped to Toronto, it's because they had nothing that was attractive to the Canucks.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:56 AM
  #15
TheJuxtaposer
#healHavlat
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 17,670
vCash: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryp37 View Post
canucks are not giving up schneider, their first and one of their top prospects for a 7th round pick and kadri
I understand that you don't like the deal, but Gunnarsson is extremely underrated. He'd definitely be a decent Salo replacement.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:56 AM
  #16
JAK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 849
vCash: 500
Bozak, Franson, 2012 1st & 2013 2nd (With Conditional bump to 1st if Raymond resigns).

for

Schneider, Ballard, Schroeder & Raymond's rights.


FLAME SUIT ON

JAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:59 AM
  #17
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAK View Post
Bozak, Franson, 2012 1st & 2013 2nd (With Conditional bump to 1st if Raymond resigns).

for

Schneider, Ballard, Schroeder & Raymond's rights.


FLAME SUIT ON
prepare to be nuked.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:59 AM
  #18
NothingLikeAnEJ
Jimmies: Rustled
 
NothingLikeAnEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 3,287
vCash: 50
delete read post wrong.

NothingLikeAnEJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 02:00 AM
  #19
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Velvet Hammer View Post

kadri > schroder
gunnar > schneider
2nd < 1st
Vancouver has no need for this trade, Gunners durability is a concern as in the West it's a tougher game and travel, and Vancouver isn't easy on it's D man for some reason check Hamhuis and Ballard before and after coming to Vancouver. We're also loaded on the left side Edler and Hamhuis are better than Gunner so he won't be making our top 4, we have Ballard on the 3rd pairing left side, all our left hand D man play their best on the left side. Vancouver is high on Schroeder as well and he has really started to develop a strong 2 way game.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 02:05 AM
  #20
JAK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 849
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
prepare to be nuked.
In that case, BIOHAZARD SUIT ON!

JAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 02:12 AM
  #21
canadianmagpie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,058
vCash: 500
1) There isn't a defenseman on Toronto that makes sense for Vancouver, either not good enough or makes too much.

2) Gunnarsson does not have more value than Schneider, just because he plays every night doesn't mean that he has more value than one of the best backups in the league.

3) Gunnarsson shoots left, we need a right handed shot.

4) In his years with the Canucks, Gillis has shown an aversion to trading high draft picks.

5) Also, the overwhelming reason why a deal would never happen between the two teams is that Gillis and Burke hate each other and will probably never do a deal with each other.

Value-wise, the deal is way off. Just because Kadri was a top ten pick doesn't mean anything, I watched him at the world juniors and couldn't understand why he was selected that high. He's got a decent wristshot but I remember every time he went for a slapshot he missed, whiffed or fanned on them. Don't rate him highly as a prospect and would rather stay away from him.

Gillis had Schroeder in his top ten picks in his draft year and so when he fell to them in the mid-20's, they were chuffed to get him. Doubt he's moved any time soon.

If you're looking at a strictly value deal, then Toronto needs to part with Gardiner and/or Colbourne in a wider deal to get Schneider.

canadianmagpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 06:49 AM
  #22
Habsfanatical
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 787
vCash: 500
How far away is Kevin Connauton from being ready for some seasoning in the bigs? IMO that's who's going to replace Salo but I haven't heard much about Connauton this year, update?

Habsfanatical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 07:11 AM
  #23
SIDGENO8771
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,275
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Velvet Hammer View Post
ok, understandable.

What if you do

Franson, Blacker(good puck moving prospect, probably #2 or3 behind holzer for readiness), 2nd, one of kadri/colborne/aston ?

for

Schneider, Schroeder, 1st.. ? plus we will take salary if we have to...
Schneider, Schroeder, 2012 1st for Schenn, Holzer, 2012 2nd

SIDGENO8771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 07:14 AM
  #24
wedge
Registered User
 
wedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: victoriaville
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,050
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeteranNetPresence View Post
schenn is so overrated- no to this deal
tbh I'm starting to find him underated.

wedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 07:47 AM
  #25
QMJHLfollower
Go Leafs!Our target:
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,285
vCash: 500
No thanks from the Leafs.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.