HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Edmonton - St. Louis

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-08-2012, 09:12 AM
  #1
I3ig13ig
Registered User
 
I3ig13ig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 467
vCash: 500
Edmonton - St. Louis

On draft day...



LW Magnus Paajarvi Svenson
RW Ryan Jones
D Theo Peckham
2nd Round Pick in 2012




D Kevin Shattenkirk



Yeah I went there. Shattenkirk is a dman we could use. I am not sure what Blues want, but this seemed fair value wise IMO. Oilers fans will probably think its too much and Blues might think its too little.

Realistically, what are St. Louis' needs for the team?


Last edited by I3ig13ig: 03-08-2012 at 09:24 AM.
I3ig13ig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:13 AM
  #2
TOGuy14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,013
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3ig13ig View Post
ilers

LW Magnus Paajarvi Svenson
RW Ryan Jones
D Theo Peckham
2nd Round Pick in 2012




D Kevin Shattenkirk



Yeah I went there. Shattenkirk is a dman we could use. I am not sure what Blues want, but this seemed fair value wise IMO. Oilers fans will probably think its too much and Blues might think its too little.

Realistically, what are St. Louis' needs for the team?
Lots of garbage in that package.

Doubt St. Louis would move Shats for anything resembling that package, they'd probably be asking for your 1st Rd Pick this year (and adding just a little to sweeten it)

TOGuy14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:18 AM
  #3
I3ig13ig
Registered User
 
I3ig13ig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOGuy14 View Post
Lots of garbage in that package.

Doubt St. Louis would move Shats for anything resembling that package, they'd probably be asking for your 1st Rd Pick this year (and adding just a little to sweeten it)
Wouldnt call it garbage by any strecth of the immagination.

MPS still has tons of potential and finally seems to have his confidence back. He is unreal fast and a huge body (6'3) so he just needs to have confidence in the NHL to be a solid top 6 guy.

Jones can be thrown on any line when injuries hit. He goes to the dirty areas and always gives 100%. Real heart and soul guy. Scores 15+ goals off the Oilers third line so thats impressive.

Peckham is just to thrown on your defense for toughness.

The 2nd is going to early (31-33) probably so its like a late first.

Just cause you dont watch them or have them, doesnt mean they are garbage.

I3ig13ig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:19 AM
  #4
HANDZ 57
Trap = 4 letter word
 
HANDZ 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Lou 'n I'm proud
Posts: 1,017
vCash: 57
Honestly, I don't know anything about Jones, but I don't really see why the blues would do this. They are in win now mode, and will be next season as well. They already have plenty of forward depth and are planning on Tarasenko coming next season. I don't see how that trade really helps the blues immediately. Shattenkirk is an important part of our defense.

HANDZ 57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:23 AM
  #5
Frenzy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,444
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3ig13ig View Post
:
Realistically, what are St. Louis' needs for the team?
A left handed Shattenkirk.

St. Louis doesn't move Shatty. There is no need to do so. It really doesn't matter the package (because lets face it, the Oilers aren't going to offer Hall, RNH, or Eberle). And beyond that there isn't much that makes the Blues a better team as a whole.

MPS doesn't offer the Blues anything they lack (which is scoring) and with the prospects ready to step a full time roll, he becomes redundant.

A guy to take a real look at may actually be Fairchild. Very simular player, but Cade spent all four years in college and is in his first year as a pro. At one point had the best +/- in the AHL. Like Shatty he is small, but moves the puck well and is very solid in the dzone. He played in a couple of games this year and has looked at home in the NHL. (It is a numbers game for the Blues - with 7 dmen on one way tickets, and then Cole).

Fairchild could be had and would be a better target then a core player.

Frenzy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:24 AM
  #6
I3ig13ig
Registered User
 
I3ig13ig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HANDZ 57 View Post
Honestly, I don't know anything about Jones, but I don't really see why the blues would do this. They are in win now mode, and will be next season as well. They already have plenty of forward depth and are planning on Tarasenko coming next season. I don't see how that trade really helps the blues immediately. Shattenkirk is an important part of our defense.
Sorry. I shouldve specified that this would be a draft trade. It would make no sense to do right now.

I3ig13ig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:30 AM
  #7
HANDZ 57
Trap = 4 letter word
 
HANDZ 57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Lou 'n I'm proud
Posts: 1,017
vCash: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3ig13ig View Post
Sorry. I shouldve specified that this would be a draft trade. It would make no sense to do right now.
Well, yeah, I figured that's what it was, since the trade deadline is past. But hypothetically speaking, the deal wouldn't help the blues immediately (or starting next season), since it downgrades our D and only adds more depth to the forwards. If the blues were a rebuilding team and shattenkirk was 28 or older, I could maybe seeing them send him off for a package with potential, but that isn't the case.

I almost wrote the same thing in my original post, that Frenzy did. That the blues needed a Left Handed Shatty, haha

HANDZ 57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:36 AM
  #8
ponokanocker
Registered User
 
ponokanocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,356
vCash: 500
No way St. Louis does this.

ponokanocker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:41 AM
  #9
Jepprey
Creeper
 
Jepprey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,534
vCash: 500
Garbage for Shattenkirk. hmmmm.

Jepprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:43 AM
  #10
Homesick
Registered User
 
Homesick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,517
vCash: 50
In the other Blues/Oilers thread there are claims that "Shattenkirk" is a franchise defenseman.

So if the OP would have read that he would have known it was pointless to make this thread

Homesick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:59 AM
  #11
Perro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,456
vCash: 500
MPS seems liek he may be one of those forwards who only has potential that never developes. I defniatley do not see him flourishing under Hitchcock. HIs value alone is probably a 2nd or 3rd rounder. So substitute that in there and ask your self if you would do it form a blues perspective.

Perro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:22 AM
  #12
GoofSlashFoig
I'm a troll
 
GoofSlashFoig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,845
vCash: 657
Paajarvi's value is at it's lowest and he looks too passive to play in the NHL. Jones is a decent bottom six forward, but nothing special. Peckham has been the whipping boy for the Oilers this season, why would we want a dman that apparently takes penalties at the worst time, and is lacking any hockey IQ? The 2nd round pick is useless, we don't want futures.

Awful proposal, if you want Shatty, put up one of the big three. You may not like it, but no one outside of those three interest me from EDM, and Shatty has proven he is a stud as well.

GoofSlashFoig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:23 AM
  #13
Falco Lombardi
LET'S GO BLUES
 
Falco Lombardi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 4,481
vCash: 713
Yeah no interest in this deal.

Falco Lombardi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:25 AM
  #14
Frenzy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,444
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homesick View Post
In the other Blues/Oilers thread there are claims that "Shattenkirk" is a franchise defenseman.
So if the OP would have read that he would have known it was pointless to make this thread
Find me that. No one thinks Shatty is a franchise dman - especailly Blues fans. But he has top pairing upside and is very, very good right now. No reason for the Blues to trade him. None - without addressing another team need.

We need an elite offensive center or a LH Shatty. Edmonton will not likely trade their 3 elite players. So there is no deal to be made between the 2 teams.

Frenzy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:27 AM
  #15
stlblues57
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 171
vCash: 500
The right side of our defense is not going anywhere.

I expect all 3 of them to be here for quite some time.

stlblues57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:36 AM
  #16
Alklha
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,882
vCash: 50
Terrible for the Blues. Even ignore the value, the pieces coming back don't address any needs.

Funnily enough, I was speaking to an Oilers fan about Shatty a week or so ago and he was thinking along the lines of the Oilers first and Marinčin for Shattenkirk, Cole and the Blues second. Even though the value would probably favour the Blues in the long term, even and offer like that wouldn't get Shattenkirk.

Alklha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:40 AM
  #17
Prussian_Blue
Registered User
 
Prussian_Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Country: Germany
Posts: 7,413
vCash: 500
The guy I want from Edmonton is Anton Lander, but unless Edmonton's first rounder and Ladislav Smid come with him, the Oilers aren't getting Shattenkirk.

Prussian_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:46 AM
  #18
SirPaste
Registered User
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 4,886
vCash: 50
No way

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:49 AM
  #19
Homesick
Registered User
 
Homesick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,517
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frenzy1 View Post
Find me that. No one thinks Shatty is a franchise dman - especailly Blues fans. But he has top pairing upside and is very, very good right now. No reason for the Blues to trade him. None - without addressing another team need.

We need an elite offensive center or a LH Shatty. Edmonton will not likely trade their 3 elite players. So there is no deal to be made between the 2 teams.
Quote:
Originally Posted by letmesleep View Post
It's actually pretty decent value but I think Edmonton says no. If we want to get one of their 3 young forwards, I think the asking price starts with Shattenkirk+. They need a franchise defenceman and it just so happens that we have two.
Shattenkirk is an upgrade over anything the Oilers have currently when it comes to offense but his defensive game isnt great(not poor either). He's not a 1st pairing defenseman so not sure why Blues fans would think he could return a player like Hall, Eberle, or RNH.

Homesick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:56 AM
  #20
Meatwagon
Now What?
 
Meatwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Despair Nation
Country: United States
Posts: 731
vCash: 500
Shattenkirk may very well become a 1st pairing dman it's just that he is stuck behind this guy named Pietrangelo.

Meatwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:26 AM
  #21
Frenzy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,444
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homesick View Post
Shattenkirk is an upgrade over anything the Oilers have currently when it comes to offense but his defensive game isnt great(not poor either). He's not a 1st pairing defenseman so not sure why Blues fans would think he could return a player like Hall, Eberle, or RNH.
Sorry about that. I think that is the only guy who said he was a franchise dman, and he was shot down right away by other blues fans.

His d zone game is actually pretty strong. Just moves the puck quickly that he doesn't get stuck in the zone much. With the game the Blues play, opponents dont get a ton of sustained pressure. But when they do, he does win a lot of board battles, and uses his stick well. Very strong on his skates despite his size. I think he very much combares to Boyle. (and I think Boyle is a top pairing guy).

Again, if you looking for a PP QB with high IQ, but solid in the zone. Cade Fairchild should be the target. Much more reasonable price.

I don't think you will find Blues fans saying that he can return one of the big 3, but I see no reason to deal him for prospects and picks. If we are NOT upgrading a position, there is NO REASON TO MAKE A DEAL.

The issue is we have wingers on MPS level in the NHL and in our pool. We don't need grinders to fill out the bottom 6 or 3 pairing dmen. WE HAVE A TON OF Depth, but nothing in the elite category for offense. Every Blues fan will admit the Oilers are not going to move one of the Big 3. But there isn't much else there that makes the Blues a better team. So there really isn't much to be done between the oilers and Blues unless it was a minor deal.

Frenzy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:48 AM
  #22
I3ig13ig
Registered User
 
I3ig13ig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 467
vCash: 500
What about something around Gagner + 2nd?

I3ig13ig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:49 AM
  #23
letmesleep
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 218
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homesick View Post
Shattenkirk is an upgrade over anything the Oilers have currently when it comes to offense but his defensive game isnt great(not poor either). He's not a 1st pairing defenseman so not sure why Blues fans would think he could return a player like Hall, Eberle, or RNH.
Yes, I said that. If you read my next post after that you would have seen how I admitted I was a bit too liberal with the phrase.

I disagree with your assessment of Shatty not being a 1st pairing defenseman, though. The kid can flat out play and he would be groomed to be a top pairing defenseman on a lot of other teams, including the Oilers. Being behind Petro on the depth chart kind of screws with that in St. Louis though. In that context, a trade of Shatty for Hall/Eberle could take shape. However, Edmonton would certainly be receiving one or two extra pieces along with Shatty.

What I could see happening:

Shatty + One of the top 4 Blues wingers (same side as whichever Oiler comes our way) + One of our top 5 prospects

for

One of Hall/Eberle + 3rd pairing defenseman type

It's a pretty steep price for either team but being a GM is about trading from strength to address weakness.

EDIT: Here is my follow-up post in case you missed it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by letmesleep View Post
He is a young guy that would challenge for a top pairing spot on a lot of clubs and can play point on a first pp unit. I've seen opposing fans say things like "man, it really isn't fair they have both Pietrangelo AND Shattenkirk." I realize I was a bit liberal with the phrase "franchise defenceman" but the point still stands that he is the player Edmonton would be targetting with a trade. So while I reluctantly agree he might not be a "franchise defencemen", I definitely disagree with your assessment of "not even close."


Last edited by letmesleep: 03-08-2012 at 12:03 PM. Reason: Added quote.
letmesleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:52 AM
  #24
letmesleep
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 218
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frenzy1 View Post
Sorry about that. I think that is the only guy who said he was a franchise dman, and he was shot down right away by other blues fans.
Please don't apologize for me. I'm a reasonably well informed hockey fan.

letmesleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:54 AM
  #25
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,161
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
If Magnus had put up like 50+ points in the NHL this year, I think Blues fans could appreciate the value of this deal... but.... no....

thadd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.