HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

STL Blues speculation on goalies

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-09-2012, 07:26 AM
  #26
Iamok
#Panic
 
Iamok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,259
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteenMachine View Post
They both had and still have terrible defense.
Doesn't seem too bad for Anderson.

I doubt you watched Elliott play much in a Sens jersey, but he was good for one terrible goal a game consistently. Unscreened shots from 20+ ft away were his worst nightmare, he was terrible.

Plus, let's not forget when he totally crapped the bed against the Pens two years ago and had Leclaire take over.

Iamok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:20 AM
  #27
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,059
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamok View Post
Doesn't seem too bad for Anderson.

I doubt you watched Elliott play much in a Sens jersey, but he was good for one terrible goal a game consistently. Unscreened shots from 20+ ft away were his worst nightmare, he was terrible.

Plus, let's not forget when he totally crapped the bed against the Pens two years ago and had Leclaire take over.
We are not talking about Elliott of the past, we are talking about Elliott now. There is a thing called late-bloomers.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:59 AM
  #28
SirPaste
Registered User
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 4,720
vCash: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamok View Post
Doesn't seem too bad for Anderson.

I doubt you watched Elliott play much in a Sens jersey, but he was good for one terrible goal a game consistently. Unscreened shots from 20+ ft away were his worst nightmare, he was terrible.

Plus, let's not forget when he totally crapped the bed against the Pens two years ago and had Leclaire take over.
God forbid a young goalie getting better

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:22 PM
  #29
mizzoublues29
Unregistered User
 
mizzoublues29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbia, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 1,805
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirPaste View Post
God forbid a young goalie getting better
No kidding, he's only 26.

mizzoublues29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:22 PM
  #30
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,059
vCash: 50
Would anyone trade a goalie with numbers that look like: 22-4-5, 1.56 GAA, .939 SV%?

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:26 PM
  #31
Mizral
Registered User
 
Mizral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Earth, MW
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,036
vCash: 500
St. Louis, Vancouver and Boston have IMO the best goaltending in the league for the reason that each team has two goaltenders that can do the job. I guess knock Boston down for a bit as Turco is not nearly as good as Rask is when healthy but that's not a permanent thing.

Having that other goaltender goes a long way to earning W's along a long season. Many #1 goaltenders would play every game but coaches are now realizing how beneficial it is to give a guy such as Thomas or Luongo time off to allow them to rest up through the 'dog days' of the season. It also throws off the opposition, especially if they are expecting one goalie and suddenly are given one that the don't know as well.

Blues would be wise to lock up both guys long-term even if it costs them $7-8 million to do so. It's possible though that one of them may seek a big deal elsewhere so it depends on the type of people Elliot & Halak are.

Mizral is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:28 PM
  #32
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,059
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizral View Post
Blues would be wise to lock up both guys long-term even if it costs them $7-8 million to do so. It's possible though that one of them may seek a big deal elsewhere so it depends on the type of people Elliot & Halak are.
Well they are already signed for 2 more seasons after this.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:42 PM
  #33
kimzey59
Registered User
 
kimzey59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,400
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamok View Post
Doesn't seem too bad for Anderson.

I doubt you watched Elliott play much in a Sens jersey, but he was good for one terrible goal a game consistently. Unscreened shots from 20+ ft away were his worst nightmare, he was terrible.

Plus, let's not forget when he totally crapped the bed against the Pens two years ago and had Leclaire take over.
He didn't seem to be that bad when he lead Ottawa to the 5th seed in the East back in 09.

Seems to me you're basing a lot of this Elliott hate on one bad year.
Elliott had a ton of hype coming out of College and until 10-11 was considered one of the best up and coming goalie in the League. His numbers this year are higher than expected, but he did not come out of nowhere.

kimzey59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:43 PM
  #34
SpezDispenser
Registered User
 
SpezDispenser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,822
vCash: 500
How about this:

They keep both! Shocking? No.

SpezDispenser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:44 PM
  #35
Ill Dangle For You
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Ill Dangle For You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 3,296
vCash: 500
keep them both, keeps them well rested and creates competition

Ill Dangle For You is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:50 PM
  #36
Falco Lombardi
LET'S GO BLUES
 
Falco Lombardi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 4,402
vCash: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimzey59 View Post
He didn't seem to be that bad when he lead Ottawa to the 5th seed in the East back in 09.

Seems to me you're basing a lot of this Elliott hate on one bad year.
Elliott had a ton of hype coming out of College and until 10-11 was considered one of the best up and coming goalie in the League. His numbers this year are higher than expected, but he did not come out of nowhere.
Wait what?

We're talking about a guy who was signed to a 2 way, 600k contract that was signed really to force Ben Bishop to earn the job.

I'm thrilled with the success he's having, but I'm willing to bet at least 75% of Blues fans (and really i think the percentage is higher) didn't think he would make the roster out camp.

He absolutely came out of nowhere.

Falco Lombardi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:50 PM
  #37
ChocolateLeclaire
Registered User
 
ChocolateLeclaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,641
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimzey59 View Post
He didn't seem to be that bad when he lead Ottawa to the 5th seed in the East back in 09.

Seems to me you're basing a lot of this Elliott hate on one bad year.
Elliott had a ton of hype coming out of College and until 10-11 was considered one of the best up and coming goalie in the League. His numbers this year are higher than expected, but he did not come out of nowhere.
Elliott is a solid goalie, but I don't think that he'd be able to put on performances like Thomas and Lundqvist do when they steal games putting aside 40 to 50 shots.

He's perfect for St. Louis as they do a great job of limiting goal-scoring opportunities. But he'd put up mediocre numbers on teams that needed to rely on their goaltending more. Like Philly, Ottawa, or even Boston.

Elliott won't lose you games anymore like he did in Ottawa, but I think he wouldn't win you games either like Halak could.

ChocolateLeclaire is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:51 PM
  #38
SirPaste
Registered User
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 4,720
vCash: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocolateLeclaire View Post
Elliott is a solid goalie, but you'd be naive to think that he'd be able to put on performances like Thomas and Lundqvist do when they steal games putting aside 40 to 50 shots.

He's perfect for St. Louis. But he'd put up mediocre numbers on teams that needed to rely on their goaltending more. Like Philly, Ottawa, or even Boston.

Elliott won't lose you games anymore like he did in Ottawa, but I think he wouldn't win you games either like Halak could.
Except that Elliott has won us games this year

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:53 PM
  #39
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,059
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocolateLeclaire View Post
Elliott is a solid goalie, but you'd be naive to think that he'd be able to put on performances like Thomas and Lundqvist do when they steal games putting aside 40 to 50 shots.

He's perfect for St. Louis. But he'd put up mediocre numbers on teams that needed to rely on their goaltending more. Like Philly, Ottawa, or even Boston.

Elliott won't lose you games anymore like he did in Ottawa, but I think he wouldn't win you games either like Halak could.
Proves you didn't watch any Blues games early in the season.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:58 PM
  #40
Shrimper
Registered User
 
Shrimper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 32,938
vCash: 50
They'd be stupid to part with either of the goalies. Getting a goal tending tandem as good as that is nigh-on impossible due to the fact that a player that good would be a #1 on another team and would probably look at leaving if the money is right.

Shrimper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:02 PM
  #41
kimzey59
Registered User
 
kimzey59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,400
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Inglorious One View Post
Wait what?

We're talking about a guy who was signed to a 2 way, 600k contract that was signed really to force Ben Bishop to earn the job.

I'm thrilled with the success he's having, but I'm willing to bet at least 75% of Blues fans (and really i think the percentage is higher) didn't think he would make the roster out camp.

He absolutely came out of nowhere.
1) The Bishop love was more to do with the hometown kid and homegrown prospect factor than his actual ability.

2) Elliott had a 29-18-4 record with a 2.57 GAA and a .909 SP in 09 and was Ottawa's starting goalie for most of the year leading them to the 5th seed in the East.

No, he did not come out of nowhere. There were a large number of people who ignored that season and wrote him off as a bust, but there were also a large number of people thinking he could get back to that level given a proper defense to play behind.

kimzey59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:05 PM
  #42
bert
Registered User
 
bert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
We are not talking about Elliott of the past, we are talking about Elliott now. There is a thing called late-bloomers.
In one summer at 26 years old he just all of a sudden got twice as good... It has nothing to do with his situation or his confidence... Common. Just look at Phoenix/Philly Ilya Bryzgalov/Mike Smith.

Elliot still gets beaten clean on good shots by good players nothing has changed. The difference is the blues are really good at limiting these opportunities.

Here is a telling goalie stat for talented goalies how has elliot done in shootouts? Elliot is .500 good for 37th in the league.

He is good on the first save when its not a snipe atleast when his confidence isnt down. His last 35 games in Ottawa he had lost his confidence so he wasnt even good on the easy ones. He clearly has it now, good for him he is a really nice guy hard worker and good teamate but he isnt very talented atleast when it comes to elite nhl goaltending.

Halak will play all playoff games unless he collapses or the Blues need a momentum shift in the series.

No one is trading a first rounder for Elliot he has been scouted heavily by every team in the nhl he couldnt even get a 1 way contract this summer.

bert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:11 PM
  #43
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,059
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by bert View Post
In one summer at 26 years old he just all of a sudden got twice as good... It has nothing to do with his situation or his confidence... Common. Just look at Phoenix/Philly Ilya Bryzgalov/Mike Smith.

Elliot still gets beaten clean on good shots by good players nothing has changed. The difference is the blues are really good at limiting these opportunities.

Here is a telling goalie stat for talented goalies how has elliot done in shootouts? Elliot is .500 good for 37th in the league.

He is good on the first save when its not a snipe atleast when his confidence isnt down. His last 35 games in Ottawa he had lost his confidence so he wasnt even good on the easy ones. He clearly has it now, good for him he is a really nice guy hard worker and good teamate but he isnt very talented atleast when it comes to elite nhl goaltending.

Halak will play all playoff games unless he collapses or the Blues need a momentum shift in the series.

No one is trading a first rounder for Elliot he has been scouted heavily by every team in the nhl he couldnt even get a 1 way contract this summer.
OMG, he isn't great in shootouts, because that is that stat that determines if you are a good goalie.

Funny thing is, his shootout SV% is .714. You were only looking at his home shootout sv%.

I guess that also means Conklin and Gustavsson are some of the best goalies in the league because of their shootout SV%. And, Reimer, Garon, and Crawford to go along with the other 2 are all way better than Rinne.


Last edited by bleedblue1223: 03-09-2012 at 02:22 PM.
bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:23 PM
  #44
HooliganX2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bert View Post
In one summer at 26 years old he just all of a sudden got twice as good... It has nothing to do with his situation or his confidence... Common. Just look at Phoenix/Philly Ilya Bryzgalov/Mike Smith.

Elliot still gets beaten clean on good shots by good players nothing has changed. The difference is the blues are really good at limiting these opportunities.

Here is a telling goalie stat for talented goalies how has elliot done in shootouts? Elliot is .500 good for 37th in the league.

He is good on the first save when its not a snipe atleast when his confidence isnt down. His last 35 games in Ottawa he had lost his confidence so he wasnt even good on the easy ones. He clearly has it now, good for him he is a really nice guy hard worker and good teamate but he isnt very talented atleast when it comes to elite nhl goaltending.

Halak will play all playoff games unless he collapses or the Blues need a momentum shift in the series.

No one is trading a first rounder for Elliot he has been scouted heavily by every team in the nhl he couldnt even get a 1 way contract this summer.
Shootouts are a poor way to tell how talented a goalie is......Lundqvist is 15th in shootout SA%. Rinne is 23rd, Quick 39th, Price 36th, Rask 36th are they all bad goalies?? BTW Elliott is 20th....


Last edited by HooliganX2: 03-09-2012 at 02:33 PM.
HooliganX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:36 PM
  #45
bert
Registered User
 
bert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
OMG, he isn't great in shootouts, because that is that stat that determines if you are a good goalie.

Funny thing is, his shootout SV% is .714. You were only looking at his home shootout sv%.

I guess that also means Conklin and Gustavsson are some of the best goalies in the league because of their shootout SV%. And, Reimer, Garon, and Crawford to go along with the other 2 are all way better than Rinne.

Shootouts are a good measure at raw physical talent yes. You are also right I looked at only home stats his percentage is 714 this season. I will eat crow on that one

Ok well how about I have watched video on him play since he was in Wisconsin? Is that good enough for you or how about I shot on him at a goalie development camp....

Or how about I watched him in Bingo and in Ottawa ALOT.

No doubt he is getting better because right from a pro goaltending coachs mouth he is more receptive then any nhl/ahl pro level goalie he has taught. That being said he does not posses elite top end NHL talent. Thus you have a positionally sound goaltender playing in the best defensive system in the NHL and his confidence is high... Weird he has good stats.

You're all way too defensive he is a good backup and you blues fans have a great starter. With that being said dont pretend he is something he isnt, he wouldnt have been a 9th rounder he would have got a 1 way deal this summer.


Last edited by bert: 03-09-2012 at 03:41 PM.
bert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:48 PM
  #46
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,059
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by bert View Post
Shootouts are a good measure at raw physical talent yes. You are also right I looked at only home stats his percentage is 714 this season. I will eat crow on that one

Ok well how about I have watched video on him play since he was in Wisconsin? Is that good enough for you or how about I shot on him at a goalie development camp....

Or how about I watched him in Bingo and in Ottawa ALOT.

No doubt he is getting better because right from a pro goaltending coachs mouth he is more receptive then any nhl/ahl pro level goalie he has taught. That being said he does not posses elite top end NHL talent. Thus you have a positionally sound goaltender playing in the best defensive system in the NHL and his confidence is high... Weird he has good stats.

You're all way too defensive he is a good backup and you blues fans have a great starter. With that being said dont pretend he is something he isnt, he wouldnt have been a 9th rounder he would have got a 1 way deal this summer.
No one ever said that he was a top end goalie. He is playing great for us, is very consistent, and we have no reason to move either goalie. We have 2 goalies that are playing incredible hockey right now. I have more confidence in Halak sustaining his success, but at Elliott's price, we only need him to be a solid backup.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:50 PM
  #47
mizzoublues29
Unregistered User
 
mizzoublues29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbia, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 1,805
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by bert View Post
Shootouts are a good measure at raw physical talent yes. You are also right I looked at only home stats his percentage is 714 this season. I will eat crow on that one

Ok well how about I have watched video on him play since he was in Wisconsin? Is that good enough for you or how about I shot on him at a goalie development camp....

Or how about I watched him in Bingo and in Ottawa ALOT.

No doubt he is getting better because right from a pro goaltending coachs mouth he is more receptive then any nhl/ahl pro level goalie he has taught. That being said he does not posses elite top end NHL talent. Thus you have a positionally sound goaltender playing in the best defensive system in the NHL and his confidence is high... Weird he has good stats.

You're all way too defensive he is a good backup and you blues fans have a great starter. With that being said dont pretend he is something he isnt, he wouldnt have been a 9th rounder he would have got a 1 way deal this summer.
Halak was selected only 10 spots from Elliott. So does draft position determine how talented or productive they will be at the NHL level?

mizzoublues29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:57 PM
  #48
seafoam
Halcyon Regulation
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 12,548
vCash: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prussian_Blue View Post
A. Who's "Halek?"B. If you mean Halak, you should know that no one who knows their @$$ from a hole in the ground about the Blues is suggesting, or even discussing, a trade involving Halak.

C. Maybe Elliott was "terrible with Ottawa and Colorado" because Ottawa and Colorado are terrible clubs?
Speling arrors happin all the time dude, chill

seafoam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:58 PM
  #49
Broshie74
Registered User
 
Broshie74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lethbridge, Ab
Country: Canada
Posts: 181
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimzey59 View Post
1) The Bishop love was more to do with the hometown kid and homegrown prospect factor than his actual ability.

2) Elliott had a 29-18-4 record with a 2.57 GAA and a .909 SP in 09 and was Ottawa's starting goalie for most of the year leading them to the 5th seed in the East.

No, he did not come out of nowhere. There were a large number of people who ignored that season and wrote him off as a bust, but there were also a large number of people thinking he could get back to that level given a proper defense to play behind.
To be fair bishop did out play Elliott but halak struggled so they went with the more experienced goalie. If Halak was hot Preseason Elliot would have been in the ahl

Broshie74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 04:04 PM
  #50
PocketNines
Woyrika? Tyraid.
 
PocketNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt.Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 6,943
vCash: 500
Are we really picking apart Elliott in the shootout? He's faced seven shootout attempts this year and stopped five.

Saves: Letang, Neal, Kovalchuk, Elias, Parise
Goals: Malkin, Kunitz

Let's all draw tons of conclusions from that.

Goalies are generally the latest of bloomers among forwards, defensemen, goalies. Every time Elliott is discussed, bitter Ottawa fans descend on the thread to say how terrible Elliott really is, they know the truth, he's secretly terrible and whatever lights-out performance he's having game after game after game after game after game after game after game this year is some other reason. Yes, it's all Hitchcock, that's why he was busy stealing games in San Jose or Philly or Vancouver before Hitchcock showed up.

Maybe, just maybe, if we accept that he was terrible in his second year for the Sens, Sens fans can accept Blues fans in good faith telling them how exceptional he's been for us. He's made tons of game-saving stops for us this year. You think we're LYING about that? He's a month older than Halak, they're both 26. Bishop was always meh for us in the NHL, so will you be happy with us telling you if he performs well that he can't really be good? [By the way, despite what some Blues fans insist, Bishop and Elliott were a draw in camp, with Elliott posting the better numbers. Since he had 110+ NHL games he was always going to get the nod in a tie. I'd have been shocked if Bishop had gotten it once they tied in camp.]

Much of goaltending is confidence. All these guys are skilled. Elliott has earned his confidence and that's why he's doing what he's doing.

A final note, Elliott wasn't the first choice in the offseason. It was Mike Smith. Our beat reporter told us that this summer when Smith and Theodore signed that the Blues tried to sign one of those guys, and then said it wasn't Theodore. They wound up signing Elliott later that same day.

PocketNines is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.