HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Ottawa Senators
Notices

Gilroy makes me nervous

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-08-2012, 11:57 PM
  #51
Qward
Moderator
Because! That's why!
 
Qward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Behind you, look out
Posts: 6,140
vCash: 500
Gilroy went undrafted = sucks
Lee went above Doughty and Kopitar = Awesome.


Durrr

Qward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:08 AM
  #52
FolignoQuantumLeap
Wash away the debt
 
FolignoQuantumLeap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,022
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qward View Post
Gilroy went undrafted = sucks
Lee went above Doughty and Kopitar = Awesome.


Durrr
*****?

Anyways, Gilroy is not a good defenseman. He tries to play like Karlsson but has none of the natural talent or intelligence. He's a poor man's Corvo aka exactly what I expected. Looking forward to his contract expiring .

FolignoQuantumLeap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:55 AM
  #53
Beville
#ForTheBoys
 
Beville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Engerlanddd!
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,912
vCash: 787
I swear he's only played like, 4 games with us?

and you're already wanting out of him...


Beville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 05:58 AM
  #54
BonkTastic
Moderator
A Tasty Summer Treat
 
BonkTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bogor, IDN
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,000
vCash: 500
The only complaint I've had about Gilroy so far is that he is REALLY hesitant to take a shot when the opportunity is there. You can see him second-guess himself, and the result is a weak half-deke-snapshot that usually gets blocked. When he is confident in his shot, it's a nice one from the point, but when he hesitates back there, it's ugly.

Other than that, no complaints. Guys skates well, hustles back to his own zone, and doesn't really hurt anyone with his play. Like I said at the time of the trade, slight upgrade over Lee.

Honestly, I think I'm happiest that the "Brian Lee Saga" is over here in Ottawa. The "Lee Question" hung over the heads of everyone here for far longer than it should have. Good to just have closure on the annual "9th overall: Will He Make It?" soap opera.

BonkTastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 06:46 AM
  #55
OgieO
Registered User
 
OgieO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,364
vCash: 500
I like him better than Lee and think he still has some more upside if we can coach him up. Great skater.

OgieO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 08:10 AM
  #56
Tuna99
Registered User
 
Tuna99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,977
vCash: 500
The Rangers announcers last night were hinting that Gilroy might not be in the best shape, and said Tim Murray thought that if Gilroy signed in Ottawa and did an entire summer of the Sens Summer Camp he would take a huge step forward in his game and become a solid player in Ottawa.

I liked him so far, I think he is a bottom pairing Dman but he can skate with forwards in the Dzone and everyone once in a while he pops out of nowhere to make a nice offensive play.

Tuna99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 08:26 AM
  #57
Legend Killer
Registered User
 
Legend Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,995
vCash: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuna99 View Post
The Rangers announcers last night were hinting that Gilroy might not be in the best shape, and said Tim Murray thought that if Gilroy signed in Ottawa and did an entire summer of the Sens Summer Camp he would take a huge step forward in his game and become a solid player in Ottawa.

I liked him so far, I think he is a bottom pairing Dman but he can skate with forwards in the Dzone and everyone once in a while he pops out of nowhere to make a nice offensive play.
A 27 year old NHL player in his 3rd season might not be in the best shape? If that truly is the case then you would have to question his commitment..

Legend Killer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 08:29 AM
  #58
Indy on the Road
Powered by Alfie
 
Indy on the Road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country: India
Posts: 9,766
vCash: 500
He looks hesitant, which could either be a lack of confidence or just a transition to a new system. My only complaint. I'll trust the Murrays on this one.

Indy on the Road is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 08:45 AM
  #59
Manny*
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,152
vCash: 500
The Sens have a lot of faith in their training/fitness program. I'm sure they think Gilroy could benefit from a strong Summer and training camp.

It hasn't been mentioned a whole lot, but Karlsson looks pretty damn muscular these days. His muscle mass has increased a lot in a very short time. Guys like Gilroy and Turris can be expected to follow suit.

Manny* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:01 AM
  #60
Wondercarrot
Classless
 
Wondercarrot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,303
vCash: 500
so that's how it is? if you are not a big fan of Gilroy it has something to do with Lee?
I liked Lee and a week later could care less that he's not here.

I also like what the Sens are trying to do with a Gilroy style player over a Lee type player, more attacking etc.
So far i prefer Gilroy strictly on style of play for the sens but they are both nothing special (Lee and Gilroy)

If we had to decide right now to re-sign him or not, id say no - id want a similar kind of player but a better one. I find Gilroy seems to throw the puck away when he gets pressured - and that's not a trait im looking for in an offensive puck posession defenceman.

Hopefully he has more to show over the last 15 games.

Wondercarrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:18 AM
  #61
ChocolateLeclaire
Registered User
 
ChocolateLeclaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legend Killer View Post
A 27 year old NHL player in his 3rd season might not be in the best shape? If that truly is the case then you would have to question his commitment..
Not necessarily. Some teams just don't put the emphasis on off-season training that others do. The Rangers and the Senators (this year especially) are both known for investing a lot into trainers, nutrionists, etc. while other teams simply let their players do what they want.

Tortorella had a comment about how out-of-shape Blackhawk players seem to be when he acquired them for his teams.

Tim Murray said that once Gilroy and Turris "got on the program", they'd come back stronger and better. With respect to the Sens, I know they spent more this year than ever because Bryan was visibly angry watching practices last year and seeing guys lag on the ice.

ChocolateLeclaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:24 AM
  #62
Legend Killer
Registered User
 
Legend Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,995
vCash: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocolateLeclaire View Post
Not necessarily. Some teams just don't put the emphasis on off-season training that others do. The Rangers and the Senators (this year especially) are both known for investing a lot into trainers, nutrionists, etc. while other teams simply let their players do what they want.

Tortorella had a comment about how out-of-shape Blackhawk players seem to be when he acquired them for his teams.

Tim Murray said that once Gilroy and Turris "got on the program", they'd come back stronger and better. With respect to the Sens, I know they spent more this year than ever because Bryan was visibly angry watching practices last year and seeing guys lag on the ice.
I guess its something I've taken for granted then... It seems like thats what we always hear about with our young guys so I just figured most teams did... Maybe thats why Stamkos gets so much publicity for his regimen...Cause not many others go above and beyond??

Legend Killer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:26 AM
  #63
ChocolateLeclaire
Registered User
 
ChocolateLeclaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legend Killer View Post
I guess its something I've taken for granted then... It seems like thats what we always hear about with our young guys so I just figured most teams did... Maybe thats why Stamkos gets so much publicity for his regimen...Cause not many others go above and beyond??
Stamkos, Spezza, and other guys often spend their offseasons training with the physical man-beast known as Gary Roberts. Roberts is well known for being an extreme fitness & conditioning expert and he beats the crap out of guys.

You can actually see how Spezza's game changed when he started working out with him at the beginning of last season.

ChocolateLeclaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:42 AM
  #64
JustinYS
Registered User
 
JustinYS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,985
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocolateLeclaire View Post
Stamkos, Spezza, and other guys often spend their offseasons training with the physical man-beast known as Gary Roberts. Roberts is well known for being an extreme fitness & conditioning expert and he beats the crap out of guys.

You can actually see how Spezza's game changed when he started working out with him at the beginning of last season.
Can we ship Turris to wherever Roberts is nowadays?

JustinYS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:43 AM
  #65
crockpot
Registered User
 
crockpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: middle of nowhere
Country: Canada
Posts: 143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immanuel View Post
People had a stupid attachment for Brian Lee so they now have a stupid resentment for Gilroy.

At least that's what I've gathered.
Exactly. Personally, I never understood the attachment to Lee. So what if he was a 1st round pick. It was obviously a bad choice and he didn't pan out for us. On to bigger and better things, and if Lee can stick with another team, then good for him.

crockpot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:45 AM
  #66
otown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 171
vCash: 500
Gilroy has the chance to be mentored by some solid veteran dmen and has a pretty big learning curve coming into a new organization. It doesn't happen overnight.
This guy has the tools and the Murray approach to the new NHL is to have active dmen who can step up in the play. Gilroy is a calculated risk at minimal cost.

otown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:51 AM
  #67
ChocolateLeclaire
Registered User
 
ChocolateLeclaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockpot View Post
Exactly. Personally, I never understood the attachment to Lee. So what if he was a 1st round pick. It was obviously a bad choice and he didn't pan out for us. On to bigger and better things, and if Lee can stick with another team, then good for him.
I wonder if Blackhawks fans have threads on their boards about how much they miss Cam Barker?

ChocolateLeclaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 09:55 AM
  #68
otown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 171
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocolateLeclaire View Post
I wonder if Blackhawks fans have threads on their boards about how much they miss Cam Barker?
Great analogy! Pretty well sums it up.

otown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:00 AM
  #69
crockpot
Registered User
 
crockpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: middle of nowhere
Country: Canada
Posts: 143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocolateLeclaire View Post
I wonder if Blackhawks fans have threads on their boards about how much they miss Cam Barker?
Exactly. Another 1st rounder that didn't pan out.

crockpot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:25 AM
  #70
Karlssonlee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,364
vCash: 500
Gilroy played 13 minutes. He's physically weak and indecisive. Although he's a great skater he thinks he can take the same kin of risk as he did and college and that his speed will make up for it.

I rather he played on the wing instead to be honest lol.

Karlssonlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:31 AM
  #71
MandyAlwaysKnows
Erik Karlsson PJs!
 
MandyAlwaysKnows's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dagobah
Posts: 6,992
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karlssonlee View Post
Gilroy played 13 minutes. He's physically weak and indecisive. Although he's a great skater he thinks he can take the same kin of risk as he did and college and that his speed will make up for it.

I rather he played on the wing instead to be honest lol.
He's not even a good skater. Just terrible in every aspect of the game.

MandyAlwaysKnows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:33 AM
  #72
Sensfanman
Registered User
 
Sensfanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,175
vCash: 500
I like him. Our style is very good for aggressive pinches and puck entry into the zone. Notice his play on the Foligno goal. His aggressive pinch forces a turnover to O'Brien who covered for him on the point.

Gilroy has made mistakes defensively, no doubt, but our forwards are defensively responsible and this takes a lot of pressure off Karlsson, letting him cut back on the minutes a bit for the playoffs. You can already see teams are starting to key in on Karlsson physically, so we need to be very careful about risking injury and keeping him in tip top shape.

I like what Gilroy brings, definitely more good than bad, fits very well on the team IMO. And I did like Brian Lee a lot, I think the trade was a wash but Gilroy has more potential IMO as Lee clearly had 0 offensive ability to tap, Gilroy can be coached to be passable defensively.

Sensfanman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:45 AM
  #73
ubbe
Jävla grisapa!
 
ubbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stockholm
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,672
vCash: 50
Gilroy makes me moisty

ubbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:49 AM
  #74
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,844
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FolignoQuantumLeap View Post

Anyways, Gilroy is not a good defenseman. He tries to play like Karlsson but has none of the natural talent or intelligence. He's a poor man's Corvo aka exactly what I expected. Looking forward to his contract expiring .
Exactly. I'm shocked there aren't more people who feel this way. Must be alot of Brian Lee hate/Murray homers out there. He is supposed to add offensive balance and thus far he would be at best a minor upgrade on Brian Lee in that regard. Defensively he hasn't been a huge liability, but has been bailed out at least a few times by Bishop/Lehner due to his bad pinches. NYR game he wasn't that bad though defensively.

I want a defenseman that knows when to pinch, not a d-man that just does it because.... My main problem is the fact we traded a young solid d-man on good contract for him.

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 10:53 AM
  #75
BonkTastic
Moderator
A Tasty Summer Treat
 
BonkTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bogor, IDN
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubbe View Post
Gilroy makes me moisty

BonkTastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.