HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Victory? Oilers fall to Habs 5-3

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-09-2012, 11:20 AM
  #301
Joe Hallenback
Registered User
 
Joe Hallenback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,118
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joestevens29 View Post
I don't know what exactly this is suppose to mean?

I guess after 2 game road trips it's an issue, but losing a home game after a long trip isn't exactly rare.
Means something is really wrong with the way they prepare themselves after a road trip.

Actually if you look at most teams they will win that 1st home game after a long road trip.

Whether it is the players or the coaching they are just prepared to play these games.

Joe Hallenback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:20 AM
  #302
Soundwave
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,198
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joestevens29 View Post
That's the million dollar question.

Ott?

We saw what VAN did to get Kassian, and if you really wanted the player it is available, but you have to be willing to spend.
Would love Steve Ott, my guess is the asking price would be Gagner though. If he was 2-3 years younger I'd do it.

It's too friggin' bad we couldn't have gotten in on that James Neal deal, I can't believe Pittsburgh got him for that type of a return.

Soundwave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:22 AM
  #303
Joe Hallenback
Registered User
 
Joe Hallenback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,118
vCash: 500
No point in bringing in guys when our current coach doesn't know how to utilize the guys that already do that.

Joe Hallenback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:10 PM
  #304
nally
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 584
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilhawks View Post
Composure, skill and drive. It's obvious that he developed on another team.
I LOL'd to this. Quite funny and fitting

nally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:25 PM
  #305
SilverHaireDevil
Registered User
 
SilverHaireDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 500
If we lose but gave it our all I'm ok with that.

What fans are really pissed about, is the obvious misuse of the guys

in order to secure the highest pick possible.

This is where management has gone off the tracks, time for the lot of

them (except for our scouting) to hit the road.

K Lowe, T Renney, S Tambellini this means you.

SilverHaireDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:54 PM
  #306
OILERS91
Registered User
 
OILERS91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 550
vCash: 300
Oilers should try this

Smyth-Gagner-Jones
Barker-Peckham

and by try this I Mean get rid of the whole lot of them.

Also who should leave
Lowe, Tambo, and Renny

OILERS91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:59 PM
  #307
cpnfantstk
Registered User
 
cpnfantstk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Orlando. Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 158
vCash: 500
Its really bad when your numb to whether they win or lose. After three seasons of losing, its done something to me. I hope I snap out of it by next season.

cpnfantstk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:08 PM
  #308
Great One
Registered User
 
Great One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 444
vCash: 500
Just heard on Oilers Now that someone mentioned in an email that Edmonton should make a deal involving Hall for either Subban or Price. Just wanted to say to the guy who made the proposal if he is on here and reading this...GO **** YOURSELF!

Great One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:39 PM
  #309
CorpseFX
Registered User
 
CorpseFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 7,229
vCash: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moongoose McQueen View Post
super into this

CorpseFX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:41 PM
  #310
CorpseFX
Registered User
 
CorpseFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 7,229
vCash: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundwave View Post
It's too friggin' bad we couldn't have gotten in on that James Neal deal, I can't believe Pittsburgh got him for that type of a return.
that trade was a rip off even before Neal rose to prominence. that's the hilarious part.

CorpseFX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 03:22 PM
  #311
LaGu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Taino
Posts: 1,131
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponokanocker View Post
Why is everyone not calling Khabby out for this game? He did make some solid saves, but he let one in from behind the goal line. BEHIND THE FRICKIN' GOAL LINE! That was brutal! On top of that, it was a one goal game, in the 3rd period. Just pathetic.
Give me keeper who has never let in a goal from behind the line... Lay off dude, it's not way out of the ordinary.

LaGu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 04:27 PM
  #312
Truth Movement
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 268
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CardMonkey83 View Post
What? He took 3 penalities, and was one the ice for 3 of the Habs goals
Peckham is by far the Oilers worst player, get rid of him, fast
Haha, you turned your sarcasm detector off.

Truth Movement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 04:28 PM
  #313
Truth Movement
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 268
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joestevens29 View Post
I like to cut Peckham some sort of slack, but the fact remains he was brutal. He should've been benched.
He was. It was just too late.

Truth Movement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 04:57 PM
  #314
plikestechno
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Gagner and Omark combined don't generally get much done.
I don't think they work well together because I don't think Sam likes him. Don't ask me for a link or ask exactly what day last year he was on but I was listening to Gregor late last season and Gagner said flat out that he thought Omark was a good player, had some skills, but wished that he would share the puck with his linemates once in awhile. Then he kind of laughed a bit like he was joking but you can tell it pissed him off a bit. Basically, the nicest way you could call someone a puckhog. Even Gregor paused for a second or two and there was nervous laughter (I think Rishaug or Brownlee was with him).

I thought it was pretty poor form for Sam to say that on the radio to those guys. Who doesn't want the puck? Earlier in his career, Sam held on to it for way too long too and was always getting pushed off of it or turning it over.

If that thought is always in the back of his mind, it probably doesn't help them work together but Sam needs to be a pro and do the best he can regardless of who his teammates are. Trust is important and if Sam doesn't think he's going to get the puck back or that Linus is always going to cough it up, they'll never be able to play together.

Linus was a bit cocky last year, then angry. But I think that Linus is trying really hard now this time to use his teammates more, come back on defence and just generally do the things the Oilers wanted him to work on. You do those up and down trips a few times and it grates on your nerves, you want to stay. Maybe he's finally getting it, like Petry got it after yo-yoing for awhile. It's one thing to get a shot, it's a lot more work to stay.

plikestechno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:06 PM
  #315
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,272
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by plikestechno View Post
I don't think they work well together because I don't think Sam likes him. Don't ask me for a link or ask exactly what day last year he was on but I was listening to Gregor late last season and Gagner said flat out that he thought Omark was a good player, had some skills, but wished that he would share the puck with his linemates once in awhile. Then he kind of laughed a bit like he was joking but you can tell it pissed him off a bit. Basically, the nicest way you could call someone a puckhog. Even Gregor paused for a second or two and there was nervous laughter (I think Rishaug or Brownlee was with him).

I thought it was pretty poor form for Sam to say that on the radio to those guys. Who doesn't want the puck? Earlier in his career, Sam held on to it for way too long too and was always getting pushed off of it or turning it over.

If that thought is always in the back of his mind, it probably doesn't help them work together but Sam needs to be a pro and do the best he can regardless of who his teammates are. Trust is important and if Sam doesn't think he's going to get the puck back or that Linus is always going to cough it up, they'll never be able to play together.

Linus was a bit cocky last year, then angry. But I think that Linus is trying really hard now this time to use his teammates more, come back on defence and just generally do the things the Oilers wanted him to work on. You do those up and down trips a few times and it grates on your nerves, you want to stay. Maybe he's finally getting it, like Petry got it after yo-yoing for awhile. It's one thing to get a shot, it's a lot more work to stay.
Well Sam is right. Linus rarely gives him the puck. Which is odd considering one player hovers below .500ppg and another has always been over .600ppg. Everything about Omarks possession of puck on that line suggests that he thinks he owns it. I'd be pissed too. Who wouldn't.

Its on Gagner though that he didn't confront that **** face on.

I said the same earlier in the thread. Gagner doesn't like Linus. See Sam doing the Linus spin around behind the net in the SJ game in OT? Sam basically telling Linus I can do your dimestore **** any day of the week.

As per Gagner how could he like the assignment? Heres Dumbcoff making 5.5M/yr and he doesn't have to the heavy lifting and 21yr old Gagner is lugging around 2 rookies last year all the way to his personal worst season ever. Thats gotta weigh a little bit.

But heres the kicker. I think Sam gets to play with Linus because a few other people on the team have possibly been more vocal about expressing their opinion. If anything Sam is the complain about nothing guy on the club so gets this short straw assignment.

Absolutely I don't think Gagner likes Linus and doesn't want to be on the same line, as for the lack of Linus passing to Gagner its bang on. Last year Linus and Maggie would work a give and go as if Sam wasn't even on the ice.

I'm sure Linus figured some things out but last year would leave a lot of issues. Schremp type issues.

Some people just don't get team sports and they grate on everybody.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:20 PM
  #316
Rawg
Get your hands offme
 
Rawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Berlin
Country: Germany
Posts: 977
vCash: 500
Im going to catch some flak for this but, I honestly don't think omark is the type of player I want on this team, or is going to be skilled enough to play on it. Hes vastly overated because he makes a cute move once in awhile, Entertaining yes but part of a winning team, No

Rawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:42 PM
  #317
Brokenhead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 549
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobBrownHero View Post
Im going to catch some flak for this but, I honestly don't think omark is the type of player I want on this team, or is going to be skilled enough to play on it. Hes vastly overated because he makes a cute move once in awhile, Entertaining yes but part of a winning team, No
I don't think that is a very uncommon opinion. It may be different if we had a bunch of giant forwards already, but we already have too many small skill guys to have another one on the team. He needs to be traded to a team like Columbus or Minnesota, he may be able to carve out a spot on a team like that.

Brokenhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:49 PM
  #318
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,272
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobBrownHero View Post
Im going to catch some flak for this but, I honestly don't think omark is the type of player I want on this team, or is going to be skilled enough to play on it. Hes vastly overated because he makes a cute move once in awhile, Entertaining yes but part of a winning team, No
Quickest way to burst Omarks stats bubble is to point out his GFON.

Normally a good player makes other players better and not only contributes pts but helps other linemates production. With Linus what you get is that his pts happens to be almost equal to his GFON. Meaning that no other production goes on during his minutes and that the team overall isn't producing much of anything with him on the ice.

Which is a much different look than the superficial view that he creates a lot of offense. He really doesn't so far at this level. Maybe he'll find it, but on a teamsport you have to use everybody better than he does. I think his personal success prevented from learning how to be a hockey player in a teamsport.

Omarks GFON needs to be better for a topsix player on an offensive club.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:51 PM
  #319
dnicks17
Moderator
Bill Ranford!
 
dnicks17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,431
vCash: 50
I thought Sam not giving the puck to Omark was a lot more noticeable than the other way around.

dnicks17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 11:56 PM
  #320
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,272
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnicks17 View Post
I thought Sam not giving the puck to Omark was a lot more noticeable than the other way around.
Of course you did. Last night it was the case.

Think theres any issues there from last season?

Sam knows once you give the puck to Omark you're not getting it back. I never sense this kind of dynamic with Sam playing with anybody else. For instance Eberle, Hemsky, Hall, Nilsson, Cogs, etc.

Sam's not a selfish player, never has been. Omark has been.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 12:56 AM
  #321
flashy
Fire Tambellini.
 
flashy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,564
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Of course you did. Last night it was the case.

Think theres any issues there from last season?

Sam knows once you give the puck to Omark you're not getting it back. I never sense this kind of dynamic with Sam playing with anybody else. For instance Eberle, Hemsky, Hall, Nilsson, Cogs, etc.

Sam's not a selfish player, never has been. Omark has been.
why you lookin bitter? cause omark be looking better.

flashy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 04:45 AM
  #322
Hockey Buddha
Yakupov
 
Hockey Buddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,780
vCash: 500
Omark is a good player, and he's earned himself this chance at the big club with his exceptional play for the Barons. He got off to a slow start, was sent to the minors, got injured, returned, played extremely well and was called up. He's had to earn every inch with this team, and he deserves to be given the opportunity. I hope that he makes the most of it. As for the selfish player comments, some players log the puck a lot. Jagr used to annoy me with this. I don't think Omark is on that level, and I wouldn't call him all that selfish. He's just skilled with the puck, and I'm certain that he's quite used to handling it when he's on the ice. Puck possession is a key to the game. So it's good to have players with the ability to log it.

Omark has dominated at every other level, and looked quite good last year at the NHL level. He's also looked good since his return so far, and I'm hoping for the guy. I think that he'll figure out what he needs to do to stay in the line up; he's a dynamic player.

Hockey Buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 05:13 AM
  #323
Panda Bear
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 374
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Of course you did. Last night it was the case.

Think theres any issues there from last season?

Sam knows once you give the puck to Omark you're not getting it back. I never sense this kind of dynamic with Sam playing with anybody else. For instance Eberle, Hemsky, Hall, Nilsson, Cogs, etc.

Sam's not a selfish player, never has been. Omark has been.
Sam has issues with passing to players that he doesn't completely trust.

The most obvious game that I've seen this was when he played a game with Cornet on his line.

Panda Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 09:43 AM
  #324
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,272
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panda Bear View Post
Sam has issues with passing to players that he doesn't completely trust.

The most obvious game that I've seen this was when he played a game with Cornet on his line.
Yep, good eye. I noted that as well. But in fairness Sam wouldn't have known much about this player who was just briefly called up and also Cornet I don't think is a possession type player.

The interesting thing is why Sam is getting these assignments. I have to think its because he's one of the more reasonable players on the club who won't complain.

In terms of playing style I would expect Omark to be paired with players like Horc, Smyth, who could, one would think, possibly benefit(hypothetically, I'm not concluding they would benefit) from Omarks setup passing game. I just find it interesting that the Oilers have pretty much avoided those matchups and went with Omark-Gagner so much.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 09:57 AM
  #325
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,272
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Buddha View Post
Omark is a good player, and he's earned himself this chance at the big club with his exceptional play for the Barons. He got off to a slow start, was sent to the minors, got injured, returned, played extremely well and was called up. He's had to earn every inch with this team, and he deserves to be given the opportunity. I hope that he makes the most of it. As for the selfish player comments, some players log the puck a lot. Jagr used to annoy me with this. I don't think Omark is on that level, and I wouldn't call him all that selfish. He's just skilled with the puck, and I'm certain that he's quite used to handling it when he's on the ice. Puck possession is a key to the game. So it's good to have players with the ability to log it.Omark has dominated at every other level, and looked quite good last year at the NHL level. He's also looked good since his return so far, and I'm hoping for the guy. I think that he'll figure out what he needs to do to stay in the line up; he's a dynamic player.
While this is well written and sounds nice Omark unfortunately hasn't to this point been effective with puck possession and has not demonstrated that his style of play is "the key to the game".

You mentioned Jagr, while leaving out the important distinction of how many times, and with what probability, that Jagr's play would eventually overwhelm D coverage and result in a goal. With Jagr it was a case of a battle of attrition over D coverage that he was winning for fun. Conversely Omarks puck possession usually results in him staying in one spot too long with the puck, eventually losing the puck, and being trapped low while the puck is turned over.

In fact his GFON last season was 1.83/60mins which is poor for a topsix player. Puts him in the same range as people like Stortini, Cogliano, Ryan Jones, Brule. So very limited production but while fostering far worse GAON than any of those players. Case in point being Omarks tenure with Gagner last season and a precipitous drop for Gagner from -3 to -16 and an alarming increase in Gagner's GA rate during that time.

This suggests anything but a player that is being effective and smart with the puck and that is contributing to the key of the game. If anything last season Omark was a key to drafting RNH.

Hopefully he turns out better. But Omark, despite his skill with the puck, didn't further many W results last year. Certainly he wasn't a player who made the team more competitive.


Last edited by Replacement: 03-10-2012 at 10:04 AM.
Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.