HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Prospects
Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

Edmonton at the draft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-09-2012, 12:27 PM
  #26
IkeaMonkey*
HF Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: derderderderderderde
Country: Sao Tome e Principe
Posts: 12,073
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrForever View Post
Take the BPA always.
Yep.

Hockey 101 right here.

IkeaMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:33 PM
  #27
nightfighter
Registered User
 
nightfighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,433
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearFax1991 View Post
The competitive nature surrounding the franchise goes to show why you guys are year after year the **** of the league. Maybe start setting higher expectations fro yourself (starting from the front office) and you'll win a playoff spot in the next 5 years. Pretty pathetic...
It's called a rebuild. Deal with it.

nightfighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:35 PM
  #28
HabsHockey
Registered User
 
HabsHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,907
vCash: 500
Best move imo, trade down to 3,4,5 for a D and draft D.

HabsHockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:40 PM
  #29
Jepprey
Creeper
 
Jepprey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,534
vCash: 500
BPA when you're drafting that high.

Jepprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:41 PM
  #30
BearFax1991
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 35
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundwave View Post
We'll be in the playoffs soon enough. But then you'll probably be complaining that we shouldn't be there because we stole all that talent from the draft in years prior.
You didn't steal anything. The fans of Edmonton deserve the elite talent you've drafted for the miserable seasons they've had to endure. But you really do have to start wondering about the organizational set-up and development capabilities of a franchise like Edmonton when you can't seem to get out of the basement. Despite drafting Eberle, Hall & Nuge you guys have year after year fail to fill the major organizational holes of goaltending and defencemen. It's pretty pathetic from a management perspective and even sadder from a fan base perspective.

Your goal of getting in the playoffs "soon enough" demonstrates the flawed mentality of the franchise. I read earlier today that Renney was criticizing the fans of Edmonton for not being patient enough...how patient does he expect you guys to be!?

BearFax1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:53 PM
  #31
Seachd
Registered User
 
Seachd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Fail
Posts: 12,538
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearFax1991 View Post
You didn't steal anything. The fans of Edmonton deserve the elite talent you've drafted for the miserable seasons they've had to endure. But you really do have to start wondering about the organizational set-up and development capabilities of a franchise like Edmonton when you can't seem to get out of the basement. Despite drafting Eberle, Hall & Nuge you guys have year after year fail to fill the major organizational holes of goaltending and defencemen. It's pretty pathetic from a management perspective and even sadder from a fan base perspective.

Your goal of getting in the playoffs "soon enough" demonstrates the flawed mentality of the franchise. I read earlier today that Renney was criticizing the fans of Edmonton for not being patient enough...how patient does he expect you guys to be!?
I think you're misunderstanding the rebuild concept. Did you expect drafting Hall and Nugent-Hopkins would instantly lift the team out of the basement? It takes time.

Until then, we thank you for your concern, but it's not needed. I think most of us understand what we're in for in the coming years.

Anyway, what does this all have to do with the thread?

Seachd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 12:56 PM
  #32
Seb
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,907
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Seb
Quote:
Originally Posted by seadawg View Post
Yakupov goes first overall to Columbus. Then, if I were Edmonton, I'd trade the 2nd overall pick to Montreal for the 3rd overall pick. Let Montreal take Grigorenko (who they want and need) and then Edmonton can take either Murray or Dumba at #3.
If anything, Edmonton will trade with the 4th or 5th overall team, knowing the habs will take a forward. The 4th or 5th overall team will be much more willing to trade better assets in order to pick Grigorenko or Galchenyuk instead of what's left.

Seb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:05 PM
  #33
jebs
Registered User
 
jebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,383
vCash: 885
I want Dumba. If the Oilers won the lottery however, you have to take the Yak.

jebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:56 PM
  #34
Ebs14
Rookie User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5
vCash: 500
I'm all for the rebuild and can see our teams weakness. I think if we did win the lottery we take yakupov, smaller yes but that didn't stop Patrick Kane now did it. If we are second pick then move the pick. Im sorry but I do not see highly of grigorenko. Murray is the best damn and then dumba but if we can move the pick and per say gagner ( probably take heat for this) for a defenseman and a top 5 pick and a second either this year or next, I highly say we take galchenyuk. After yakupov galchenyuk is the best forward available, yes he has a injury and yes he had yakupov as a line mate but he is far beyond grigorenko. It fills a center need behind rnh, people will say he has points because of yakupov, to compare them as a team to another it's similar to pitsburgh they have crosby and malkin, it hasn't stopped malkin from performing losing Crosby. Galchenyuk is ahead of grigorenko and I'm betting many would agree. A good reason why he is not mentioned is cause of injury if he wasn't injured he would be in the talk of going 2nd and maybe even a far reach of some teams taking him 1st based on position need. I'm aware of our defensive need but as pitsburgh did with Crosby malkin I think we follow with rnh and galchenyuk. If Crosby wasn't around malkin would receive a lot more attention that he deserves same goes for galchenyuk with grigorenko. Don't let the injury make you think less. He would go 2nd over grigs.

Ebs14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 01:59 PM
  #35
seadawg
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 400
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seb View Post
If anything, Edmonton will trade with the 4th or 5th overall team, knowing the habs will take a forward. The 4th or 5th overall team will be much more willing to trade better assets in order to pick Grigorenko or Galchenyuk instead of what's left.
true, but if you are the Oilers, do you risk losing out on both Murray and Dumba if you drop to the 5th spot?

I say deal the pick to Montreal, threatening to take Grigorenko with the #2 pick. Even if you only get a modest return in addition to the #3 pick, at least you get something and grab the player you likely most wanted anyway.

seadawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:10 PM
  #36
waffledave
Kaberle?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,930
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrForever View Post
I agree. Personally I hope we draft Grigs because Grigs + Gagner's return > Gagner + Murray/Dumba

@waffledave the drop off in value between Yak/Grig and everyone else is much higher than a 2nd rounder..
I don't think Gagner will get a d-man that's even comparable to the d-men in this year's draft. Doubt his return is as much as most think.

waffledave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:30 PM
  #37
Fozz
Registered User
 
Fozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,685
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by waffledave View Post
If I'm Edmonton, I trade the 2nd to Montreal for the 3rd + a 2nd rounder, maybe more. They know Montreal needs a centre.
I'm far from convinced that Montreal has Grigorenko rated 2nd on their list and i really don't think they'll trade up to grab the 2nd pick.

Fozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2012, 02:38 PM
  #38
Beerfish
Registered User
 
Beerfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,489
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozz View Post
I'm far from convinced that Montreal has Grigorenko rated 2nd on their list and i really don't think they'll trade up to grab the 2nd pick.
Well there are the Patrick Roy rumours. I would guess that if he went to the Habs their interest in Grig would be high.

And as an oilers fan I would be upset with the oilers if they just drafted a D man at #2. I view Yakupov and Grigorenko a solid notch above all of the D prospects. The only way it would be palatable would be if they traded down a a spot or so.

Beerfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 03:53 AM
  #39
Tyrolean
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Country: Austria
Posts: 5,898
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrForever View Post
Take the BPA always.
agreed

Tyrolean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 04:21 AM
  #40
Dosing
Registered User
 
Dosing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Skåne
Country: Sweden
Posts: 1,851
vCash: 500
Bpa can be very subjective, Personally i'd be terrified with the scenario to just assume other teams will trade their franchise defensemen to my team.. they should take a defensemen ainec

Dosing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 08:01 AM
  #41
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,082
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearFax1991 View Post
You didn't steal anything. The fans of Edmonton deserve the elite talent you've drafted for the miserable seasons they've had to endure. But you really do have to start wondering about the organizational set-up and development capabilities of a franchise like Edmonton when you can't seem to get out of the basement. Despite drafting Eberle, Hall & Nuge you guys have year after year fail to fill the major organizational holes of goaltending and defencemen. It's pretty pathetic from a management perspective and even sadder from a fan base perspective.

Your goal of getting in the playoffs "soon enough" demonstrates the flawed mentality of the franchise. I read earlier today that Renney was criticizing the fans of Edmonton for not being patient enough...how patient does he expect you guys to be!?
And yet if you look at the teams prospect pool outside of the NHL they are far deeper on the back end than they are up front.

So perhaps what we are really looking at here is that it takes time for dmen who are drafted to make an impact. So proposing that they ignore the potential bpa, who by the way may be able to have a real impact next year, to take a dman that might not even play for a year or two seems to contradict your own statement about winning sooner.

Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 08:05 AM
  #42
Analyzer
#WeAreBoston
 
Analyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Renfrew, ON.
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,450
vCash: 500
What type of D does Edmonton needs ?

2nd overall to the habs for Montreal's 1st, a 2nd and maybe one of Weber/Diaz? Edmonton can draft d, plus another defenseman and gets an nhl ready one.

Though, I think the habs would stand pat at 3rd.

Analyzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 09:19 AM
  #43
canovin
Klefbom's charm
 
canovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: McDougall School
Posts: 750
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyzer View Post
What type of D does Edmonton needs ?

2nd overall to the habs for Montreal's 1st, a 2nd and maybe one of Weber/Diaz? Edmonton can draft d, plus another defenseman and gets an nhl ready one.

Though, I think the habs would stand pat at 3rd.
Nope, it'll take the Habs at least 3rd overall+Beaulieu. And that's probably still not enough. The difference between Grigorenko and Murray/Dumba is huge.

But honestly, drafting Galchenyuk would be the 2nd best thing for the Habs. No point in losing assets.

canovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 09:49 AM
  #44
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,082
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyzer View Post
What type of D does Edmonton needs ?

2nd overall to the habs for Montreal's 1st, a 2nd and maybe one of Weber/Diaz? Edmonton can draft d, plus another defenseman and gets an nhl ready one.

Though, I think the habs would stand pat at 3rd.
To be honest I don't see either Weber or Diaz being worth much to the Oilers at all.

The problem with the Oiler defense this year has been due to two factors.

1) Injuries
2) They lack at least one and possibly two true top pairing guys.

Both of these have forced the Oilers to play people above their pay grade.

That said, Smid has had a great year. He is a solid second pairing shut down guy who can play lots of minutes.

Petry has also played way better than expected. Particularly in the last 20 games. The kid has all the tools to be a very good NHL dman, perhaps even a legit first pairing guy in the near future. But right now as it is he is certainly capable of playing in the top 4.

Schultz has looked very good for the Oilers so far. He has been solid defensively and has surprisingly been quite active offensively.

If Whitney is healthy, he is certainly capable of having an impact. He may never be the cornerstone he looked like he might be at the beginning of last year, but he is a top four dman in this league.

Any trade they make that involves significant assets needs to bring back someone who is clearly better than what they already have in these four.


Last edited by Fourier: 03-10-2012 at 10:14 AM.
Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 10:12 AM
  #45
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,082
vCash: 500
As an Oiler fan I would have the following as my top five:

1) Yakupov
2) Grigorenko
3) Galchenyuk
4) Dumba
5) Murray

To be honest I might even put Galchenyuk second. I watched him play a fair bit last year and was really impressed. But perhaps more so I love everything I hear about his character and his desire to succeed. I think he would be a great complement to RNH.


Last edited by Fourier: 03-10-2012 at 10:19 AM.
Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 10:16 AM
  #46
millax
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,330
vCash: 500
Take the best player always that high in the first round.

If you really need a dman, dominate players that are drafted that high like Hall, RNH, and whoever the Oilers take this year will fetch ANY dman in the league in trade.

Always take the most valuable asset. Always.

millax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 10:27 AM
  #47
Philly85
Registered User
 
Philly85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,943
vCash: 500
Gagner for a top 4 d-man of some sort or a defensive prospects, draft Grigorenko at #2 and the Oilers are looking a whole helluva lot stronger down the middle for the future. Centre depth is what wins championships. We've heard rumblings of motivational issues with Grigorenko but I think it's all for naught. Ultimately once he's in the pro team environment, sees guys like Nuge, Hall and Ebs, how can one not get excited and willing to show your worth.

People were saying the same things about Malkin before he came over to North America (not trying to compare the two players, obviously Malkin is a generational talent but they are both bigger, more skilled Russian born players coming into the NHL), questioning his motivation and willingness to compete when the goings got tough, but when surrounded by talent, when duty calls, their natural skill and elite offensive instincts take over.

The Oilers need D but they also need a better #2 centre moving forward. BPA always and for now it looks like the drop off in talent between 2nd and 3rd overall could be significant. I have no problem with the Oilers draft Grigorenko, even if the fact remains they need defense.


Last edited by Philly85: 03-10-2012 at 01:41 PM.
Philly85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 10:56 AM
  #48
Man Bear Pig
Registered User
 
Man Bear Pig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 6,755
vCash: 500
One thing all great teams have is a top-end dman. You aren't going to get that guy by dealing Sam Gagner. Use the pick to grab a dman or trade down, pick up a dman and draft another. Like others have suggested, something like Schenn plus the Leafs pick or a similar move would seem like a great move for the Oilers and this is coming from a Leafs fan who wouldn't want to see a deal like that.

Man Bear Pig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 11:07 AM
  #49
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,082
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Man Bear Pig View Post
One thing all great teams have is a top-end dman. You aren't going to get that guy by dealing Sam Gagner. Use the pick to grab a dman or trade down, pick up a dman and draft another. Like others have suggested, something like Schenn plus the Leafs pick or a similar move would seem like a great move for the Oilers and this is coming from a Leafs fan who wouldn't want to see a deal like that.
Schenn is not a great defensemen. I like the kid and expect he will bounce back but right now he would clearly be at best 5 on the Oilers depth chart.

Nor is it all clear that there is one in this draft. Murray might be very good, he may even turn out great. But is he around for the Leaf's pick? Is Dumba?

Unless the Leafs are top 5 this would not be a deal I think many Oiler fans would consider. I might at 5 because I really like Galchenyuk. Though if the Leafs picked Grigorenko, the Canadians will probably pick Galchenyuk so perhaps this does not work either.

Go back over the last 5 years (including this one) and look at the teams in the top 10 in the standings. Then find the players that fit the following:

1) Franchise defensemen
2) Drafted in the top 10
3) Playing for the team that drafted them.

Off the top of my head I can probably think of one such player and that is Alex Peitrangelo.

If you eliminate 3) I would add Pronger, but I don't think there are many others if any.


Last edited by Fourier: 03-10-2012 at 11:26 AM.
Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-10-2012, 11:22 AM
  #50
s7ark
Moderator
Yak Attack
 
s7ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,869
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilsands View Post
Do you have a link for this?
Nah, it was going around HFOil a couple of months ago and I am too lazy to go find it for you right now. So if you don't want to be believe me that's cool.

s7ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.