HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trading Pavelski

View Poll Results: Should be trade Pavelski
Yes, trading Pavelski will help us 24 20.87%
No, Trading Pavelski hurts us to much 91 79.13%
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-22-2012, 08:15 PM
  #1
CommanderShepard15
Eberle=Clutch
 
CommanderShepard15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,257
vCash: 500
Trading Pavelski

In the armchair GM thread many, including myself have expressed interest in trading pavelski. Many others have said that this would be stupid.

Do you think trading pavelski is a good idea.

Any trade in which Pavelski is involved in would be fair value for him, no overpayemnt, no underpayment so there is no anyone can be had for the right price arguements. the trade is fair to both parties.

CommanderShepard15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:16 PM
  #2
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,384
vCash: 567
Make him available, but don't shop him. I'm 80% on keeping him.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:18 PM
  #3
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,130
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by CloweForbidzYou View Post
In the armchair GM thread many, including myself have expressed interest in trading pavelski. Many others have said that this would be stupid.

Do you think trading pavelski is a good idea.

Any trade in which Pavelski is involved in would be fair value for him, no overpayemnt, no underpayment so there is no anyone can be had for the right price arguements. the trade is fair to both parties.
It depends on what you get back. Fair value is all nice and dandy but this team needs a particular skill set and a lot of it to get back into Cup level contention. If Pavelski yields them something like that, and believe me he won't by himself, then it's something absolutely must be considered.

The real problem is that the Sharks problem is not something that one trade will fix. They lack team speed and they currently lack a reliable third line. Depth on the blue line and depth up front is required to get to where we want this team to be at and we fall well short of that when it comes to the forwards at this point.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:23 PM
  #4
USF Shark
Zôion politikòn
 
USF Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DC Area
Country: United States
Posts: 20,528
vCash: 500
I wouldn't trade Pavelski. I see Pavelski, Couture, Burns, and Thornton as the only untouchables on this team.

No way do you trade a 28 year old center who not only gets better every year, but does so many things well (face-offs, scoring, back-checking, solid board play, etc) that you can't easily replace his skill set. He's our future captain if he stays until Jumbo is gone.

Yes, he had a terrible playoff series. He was bad. He admitted he was bad. His accountability should tell you everything you need to know about the type of person and teammate he is.

__________________
"I hate books; they only teach us to talk about things we know nothing about."
-Jean Jacques Rousseau
USF Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:25 PM
  #5
murdock1116
Registered User
 
murdock1116's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,551
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Make him available, but don't shop him. I'm 80% on keeping him.
I agree. Pavelski is solid a key piece to our team.

It really depends on what you can get back for him.

murdock1116 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:26 PM
  #6
Inub0i
I will Q
 
Inub0i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UC Irvine, Irvine
Country: United States
Posts: 8,615
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Inub0i Send a message via MSN to Inub0i Send a message via Skype™ to Inub0i
No please.

I think USF sums it up quite nicely.
I also think Pavs was injured during the series.

Inub0i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:29 PM
  #7
Nighthock
**** the Kings...
 
Nighthock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Country: United States
Posts: 15,814
vCash: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Make him available, but don't shop him. I'm 80% on keeping him.
About how I feel. Overpayment may entice me ...

He also needs to go back to center. I know he takes draws on the first line, but he shouldn't play wing

Nighthock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:30 PM
  #8
wtfisthis
Registered User
 
wtfisthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 2,781
vCash: 500
Depending on whats coming back, everybody should be trade-able. Even Burns, Couture, etc. no such thing as untouchables.

wtfisthis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:35 PM
  #9
HBSauce
Dirts McGirts
 
HBSauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberta, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 133
vCash: 500
Shop him, only let him go if the return is high.

Very good player but undersized, slower, and can get knocked off the puck fairly easily (or atleast in this series). He will be better centering his own line, which should happen next year.

HBSauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:37 PM
  #10
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,384
vCash: 567
XXX-Thornton-XXX
Couture-Marleau-Havlat
Winnik-Paveski-Wingels
XXX-Desjardins-Galiardi

Is what I've decided on so far.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:38 PM
  #11
Nighthock
**** the Kings...
 
Nighthock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Country: United States
Posts: 15,814
vCash: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejuxtaposer View Post
xxx-thornton-xxx
couture-marleau-havlat
winnik-paveski-wingels
xxx-desjardins-galiardi

is what i've decided on so far.
... ಠ_ಠ

Nighthock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:45 PM
  #12
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,384
vCash: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighthock View Post
... ಠ_ಠ
I know, shocking.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:51 PM
  #13
KpopandHockey
HFBoards Sponsor
 
KpopandHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 8,588
vCash: 50
Don't try to give him away but if there are pieces we need I and he's the asking price I say go for it. Particularly if it brings our team more speed and youth + goalscoring.

KpopandHockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 08:57 PM
  #14
lsx
Registered User
 
lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 2,946
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by USF Shark View Post
I wouldn't trade Pavelski. I see Pavelski, Couture, Burns, and Thornton as the only untouchables on this team.

No way do you trade a 28 year old center who not only gets better every year, but does so many things well (face-offs, scoring, back-checking, solid board play, etc) that you can't easily replace his skill set. He's our future captain if he stays until Jumbo is gone.

Yes, he had a terrible playoff series. He was bad. He admitted he was bad. His accountability should tell you everything you need to know about the type of person and teammate he is.
This. Trading Pavelski would be a big mistake.

lsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 09:08 PM
  #15
Mafoofoo
:facepalm:
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 12,969
vCash: 500
Depends on the return. If someone wants to overpay ridiculously for him by all means let him go. But if all you're gonna get is Toronto offering Schenn + 3rd or something forget it.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 09:10 PM
  #16
StalockSuperfan
Registered User
 
StalockSuperfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,681
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KpopandHockey View Post
Don't try to give him away but if there are pieces we need I and he's the asking price I say go for it. Particularly if it brings our team more speed and youth + goalscoring.
This. If he can bring us a young dynamic speedster, I'd trade him. But certainly don't give him away just for the hell of it.

StalockSuperfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 09:15 PM
  #17
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,130
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by USF Shark View Post
I wouldn't trade Pavelski. I see Pavelski, Couture, Burns, and Thornton as the only untouchables on this team.

No way do you trade a 28 year old center who not only gets better every year, but does so many things well (face-offs, scoring, back-checking, solid board play, etc) that you can't easily replace his skill set. He's our future captain if he stays until Jumbo is gone.

Yes, he had a terrible playoff series. He was bad. He admitted he was bad. His accountability should tell you everything you need to know about the type of person and teammate he is.
Pavs is a great player and there's no doubt that he is a versatile player that offers a lot but the team has to look at its options to make them quicker and deeper as a team. There are definitely things I would hope they do before trading Pavs but if they can get a very good deal out of them, it's something they have to consider.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 09:44 PM
  #18
Kegsey
#joeMONEY
 
Kegsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,845
vCash: 500
If we don't trade Marleau and Pavs I would love to see this
Couture-thornton-xxx
Marleau-Pavelski-havlat
winnik-xxx-wingels
xxx-desjardins-galiardi

Edit: Actually for that matter, why hasn't Havlat really been given a chance with Joe? I could see him and Logan as great wingers for Joe. Who's the decoy?

Kegsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 09:46 PM
  #19
Gene Parmesan
Ice up, son.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 31,354
vCash: 500
He won't be traded unless its a great deal that fills needs.

Gene Parmesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 10:16 PM
  #20
crunchyblack*
juice monkey
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,448
vCash: 500
I really really really want pavs centering the third line. Only trade him for a massive overpayment.

crunchyblack* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 10:34 PM
  #21
StalockSuperfan
Registered User
 
StalockSuperfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,681
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by crunchyblack View Post
I really really really want pavs centering the third line.
Didn't DW make it pretty clear last year that he didn't like that?

StalockSuperfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 10:35 PM
  #22
Tealblood
Registered User
 
Tealblood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern California
Country: United States
Posts: 2,572
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by crunchyblack View Post
I really really really want pavs centering the third line. Only trade him for a massive overpayment.
So you want a third line that's small, can't check, and can't score. Nice.

I vote trade his ass. He's too slow for a small player, doesn't get to the gritty areas around the net as well as couture does, and we have plenty of playmakers who don't score often.

Tealblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 10:38 PM
  #23
Internazionale
Registered User
 
Internazionale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 227
vCash: 500
With a coaching change for the better, Pavelski will be fine. Don't trade him!

Internazionale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 10:39 PM
  #24
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,384
vCash: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tealblood View Post
So you want a third line that's small, can't check, and can't score. Nice.

I vote trade his ass. He's too slow for a small player, doesn't get to the gritty areas around the net as well as couture does, and we have plenty of playmakers who don't score often.
It's refreshing to see irrational hatred not directed at Patty or Nemo.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2012, 10:50 PM
  #25
Phu
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
It's refreshing to see irrational hatred not directed at Patty or Nemo.
First part's rational, second part not so much.

Phu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.