HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Murray for NYI 2nd+Rakhshani proposal.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-25-2012, 11:15 AM
  #1
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,838
vCash: 500
Murray for NYI 2nd+Rakhshani proposal.

If the Sharks decided to shake up their team,go thru a mini rebuild,would your gm likely agree to something like Murray to LI, for the Isles 2nd + Rhett Rakhshani ?

Murray is a ufa next July.

Rakhshani is a skilled,but small rw.He looked good in a brief call up this season.The isles 2nd looks like it'll be somewhere bewteen 32-38.

Feedback is appreciated.


Last edited by slocal: 03-25-2012 at 12:52 PM.
CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 11:32 AM
  #2
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CREW99AW View Post
If the Sharks decided to shake up their team,go thru a mini rebuild,would your gm likely agree to something like Murray to LI, for the Isles 2nd + Rhett Rakhshani ?

Murray is a ufa next July.

Rakhshani is a skilled,but small rw.He looked good in a brief call up this season.The isles 2nd looks like it'll be somewhere bewteen 32-38.

Feedback is appreciated.
Sure, even if the Sharks make the playoffs, I can see Murray being dealt, especially if we sign Brad Stuart.

I'd do this deal simply based around the 2nd + OK fwd prospect.

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 11:35 AM
  #3
Thorntonfan97
José Bautista-31 HR
 
Thorntonfan97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Halifax, NS
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,518
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Thorntonfan97 Send a message via Yahoo to Thorntonfan97
Yeah I'd do it

Thorntonfan97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 11:39 AM
  #4
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,150
vCash: 2283
I'd probably do it. It would be nice for the Sharks to have a Californian prospect with a legitimate chance of playing in the NHL.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 11:42 AM
  #5
SharksFan1
Registered User
 
SharksFan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,014
vCash: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligans Island View Post
Sure, even if the Sharks make the playoffs, I can see Murray being dealt, especially if we sign Brad Stuart.

I'd do this deal simply based around the 2nd + OK fwd prospect.
I agree. Murray is just to slow in today's NHL, and provides 0 offense. with the development of Braun this year we don't need him. The only thing that bothers me about it is that the Sharks are the lowest hitting team in the league, and loosing Murray would just make them worse.

SharksFan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 11:56 AM
  #6
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharksFan1 View Post
I agree. Murray is just to slow in today's NHL, and provides 0 offense. with the development of Braun this year we don't need him. The only thing that bothers me about it is that the Sharks are the lowest hitting team in the league, and loosing Murray would just make them worse.
Stuart's no slouch in the hitting department and for whatever reason (age, increasing slowness, or coaching) Murray isn't much of a hitter this season. On the other hand, Stuart is a legit top 4 dman and much faster than Murray so I'd rather have him than Murray. You can see teams targeting Murray's side on dump ins with a faster forward. Murray just doesn't have much initial acceleration and that's what teams are picking on.

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 11:57 AM
  #7
Stickmata
Registered User
 
Stickmata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,489
vCash: 500
No. Murray's going to Toronto in a blockbuster trade for Phil Kessel after Burke decides his team needs to be tougher to play against.

Stickmata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 12:16 PM
  #8
Iron Chef
Registered User
 
Iron Chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,953
vCash: 500
Good proposal. I'd do it. I think he's exactly what NYI needs. Murray isnt a bad Dman, but hes just not the right fit for the Sharks system anymore

Iron Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:02 PM
  #9
magic school bus
***********
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 14,703
vCash: 1965
Done deal as long as it's this year's 2nd rounder.

magic school bus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:16 PM
  #10
DrFeelgood
Chairman Meow
 
DrFeelgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,441
vCash: 500
Who would replace Murray's physical element on our blueline? Is Petrecki ready for the NHL yet?

DrFeelgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:17 PM
  #11
Lazyking
Never Forget
 
Lazyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 3,591
vCash: 500
overpayment for Murray.. awesome.

Lazyking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:25 PM
  #12
magic school bus
***********
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 14,703
vCash: 1965
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFeelgood View Post
Who would replace Murray's physical element on our blueline? Is Petrecki ready for the NHL yet?
Brad Stuart.

magic school bus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:41 PM
  #13
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 55,965
vCash: 500
Andrew Murray and Douglas Murray will be UFAs this summer.


That said, if he wants to stay, I can't see Sharks letting him go.

(But they'd prefer him to go to Eastern Conference)

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:44 PM
  #14
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 23,718
vCash: 2810
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFeelgood View Post
Who would replace Murray's physical element on our blueline? Is Petrecki ready for the NHL yet?
Obviously Colin White.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:50 PM
  #15
Winky
Registered User
 
Winky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 3,279
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharksFan1 View Post
I agree. Murray is just to slow in today's NHL, and provides 0 offense. with the development of Braun this year we don't need him. The only thing that bothers me about it is that the Sharks are the lowest hitting team in the league, and loosing Murray would just make them worse.
Maybe DW can agree to some bonuses for our players. An extra million if player Y reaches X number of hits next year?

Hittinggate 2013 anyone?

Winky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:54 PM
  #16
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,838
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyStanley View Post
Andrew Murray and Douglas Murray will be UFAs this summer.

That said, if he wants to stay, I can't see Sharks letting him go.

(But they'd prefer him to go to Eastern Conference)
Cap central shows Doug Murray signed through next summer.Have they got it wrong?Is he a ufa this summer.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:56 PM
  #17
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CREW99AW View Post
Cap central shows Doug Murray signed through next summer.Have they got it wrong?Is he a ufa this summer.
You're right; LS is wrong.

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 01:57 PM
  #18
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,838
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by magic school bus View Post
Done deal as long as it's this year's 2nd rounder.
I expect a few NYI fans would howl because they want Thrower with that 2nd,but the isles have enough prospects.They need a few vets.

Murray for 1 yr, means they don't rush a rookie like De Haan into next season's top 4.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 03:33 PM
  #19
Stickmata
Registered User
 
Stickmata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,489
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CREW99AW View Post
I expect a few NYI fans would howl because they want Thrower with that 2nd,but the isles have enough prospects.They need a few vets.

Murray for 1 yr, means they don't rush a rookie like De Haan into next season's top 4.
Except Douglas Murray is not a Top 4 defenseman.

Stickmata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 03:46 PM
  #20
DrFeelgood
Chairman Meow
 
DrFeelgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,441
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by magic school bus View Post
Brad Stuart.
I'd rather keep Murray

DrFeelgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 04:02 PM
  #21
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFeelgood View Post
I'd rather keep Murray
Why? Assuming Stuart comes at a good price, he's better in many ways

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 04:13 PM
  #22
MadmanSJ
Know Your Onion!
 
MadmanSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 1,317
vCash: 500
Whenever possible, why wouldn't you sign as many FA's as possible when reasonably priced and trade signed players for picks? Win-win.

FA's just cost monies.

MadmanSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 04:15 PM
  #23
CommanderShepard15
Eberle=Clutch
 
CommanderShepard15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,258
vCash: 500
id relunctantly do it, but itd also prefer a different fwd prospect.

stuart and petrecki could both likely provide the hits we lose from murray

CommanderShepard15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 04:16 PM
  #24
Brent Burns
TROTZTROTZTROTZTROTZ
 
Brent Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coming in hot
Posts: 6,563
vCash: 500
This **** cray

Paul Gaustad got a 1st rounder, Murray is a legit NHL top 4 defenseman on most teams. Just because someone's having a bit of a down year doesn't mean they should be traded for scraps. I'd expect at least a 1st for Murray, AT LEAST.

Brent Burns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-25-2012, 04:25 PM
  #25
Oppa
#FunMustBeAlways
 
Oppa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,544
vCash: 157
Murray is definitely a top 4 D-man on many teams, not sure why there would be an argument made here

Oppa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.