HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Flames miss playoffs for 3rd year in a row - Feasters off season promise FAILED

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-30-2012, 02:38 PM
  #51
JurassicTunga
Rebuild in Progress
 
JurassicTunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,334
vCash: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Where's your list?

And why should I exclude Bartschi? He's part of our prospect pool. Him alone would make it better than the Canucks' pool.

Who on the Canucks is comparable to these players?

Ferland: 96 points in 68 games, a physical force on the ice, one of the most feared players in the WHL
Reinhart: 78 points in 61 games on one of the lower scoring teams in the WHL. Little offensive help and still puts up good numbers. One of the best skaters in the CHL.
Johnny Gaudreau: Small 41 points in 42 games for Boston College. A small, but pure skill player. Will take longer to develop him, but he has high potential.

Jensen? Schroeder? lol
Markus Granlund rookie of the year in his leauge ( Probably with some help from his brother but still he has improved)
Bill Arnold also one of the top players along with Gaudreau

JurassicTunga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:39 PM
  #52
bananaz
Registered User
 
bananaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 971
vCash: 500
Hopefully Feaster and Resibrod can really put their stamp on the Flames during this offseason. One of the more important off seasons in recent memory for the Flames, they must continue to get younger and more offensive. Some major help up front (1a/b centre) is sorely needed, as well as depth on the backend.

The only untouchables heading into the offseason should be Kiprusoff, Giordano and Glencross. Absolutely everyone else should be available for the right price. (especially Iginla)

bananaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:40 PM
  #53
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
lol, check again. What are you talking about?

Chris Tanev better that Brodie!? LOL!!!!!! Even the HF writers disagree with that!
4th year with the Kootenay Ice and he's 20 years old. He's OVERAGE. What part didnt you understand about that?

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:41 PM
  #54
Ashasx
Registered User
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,024
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
Read the post above yours for those "star" prospects of yours.

THN ranked the Flames one of the worst prospect pools in the league. INCLUDING Sven.

Maybe you guys should keep them there so that they can look better than they really do.
But they're wrong. You're wrong. The Flames have better prospects than the Canucks in every position besides goaltending, and even that's debatable.

Take out Bartschi, they're still better. Add Bartschi, it's a ton better. Plus another decent prospect we will get in this next draft.

Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:42 PM
  #55
CorsiCounter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajuabju View Post
Sucks for Iggy. I dont like or care for Calgary much, but Iggy deserves to be on a team that has a chance. he's such a classy player.

Its long overdue to blow up and start over for the flames.
Iginla is a part of the problem.

CorsiCounter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:42 PM
  #56
bananaz
Registered User
 
bananaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 971
vCash: 500
Let's not turn this into a pissing match. Fact is, the Flames will need some major changes within the roster to regularly compete for a playoff spot.

bananaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:43 PM
  #57
Ashasx
Registered User
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,024
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
4th year with the Kootenay Ice and he's 20 years old. He's OVERAGE. What part didnt you understand about that?
You are wrong. You don't even know what an overagger is. Max Reinhart is not an overrager.

Reinhart's next season would be his overage season. Look at Brendan Shinnimin if you want to see an example of an overager.

Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:43 PM
  #58
pahlsson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,833
vCash: 500
it's ok they still have bouwmeester, things will definitely go more smoothly next year

pahlsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:44 PM
  #59
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
But they're wrong. You're wrong. The Flames have better prospects than the Canucks in every position besides goaltending, and even that's debatable.

Take out Bartschi, they're still better. Add Bartschi, it's a ton better. Plus another decent prospect we will get in this next draft.
Yup I'm going to take the advice of a CP poster over THN and anyone with a pair of eyes about how dire the situation in Calgary is. This is starting to sound like Toronto 5 years ago when they were hyping any average prospect they had.

Just wait, and when the Flames miss the playoffs for the next 5 years and get some legit prospects you'll think back to now and realize how barren your prospect pool is.

The Canucks' prospect are pretty bad as well but atleast we have been a team making the playoffs consistently and trying to get to the final vs Just making it and bowing out in the first round every season.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:44 PM
  #60
SmellOfVictory
Registered User
 
SmellOfVictory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,904
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
4th year with the Kootenay Ice and he's 20 years old. He's OVERAGE. What part didnt you understand about that?
He turned 20 this year. Would that not make his next season his overage season?

SmellOfVictory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:45 PM
  #61
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bananaz View Post
Let's not turn this into a pissing match. Fact is, the Flames will need some major changes within the roster to regularly compete for a playoff spot.
Agreed although if they actually move kipper and Iginla, the rebuild or retool will be much faster with the potential returns they could get.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:46 PM
  #62
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmellOfVictory View Post
He turned 20 this year. Would that not make his next season his overage season?
Yes, I re-read that. He just turned 20 so you would be correct.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:46 PM
  #63
Auger
Registered User
 
Auger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,515
vCash: 1005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
But they're wrong. You're wrong. The Flames have better prospects than the Canucks in every position besides goaltending, and even that's debatable.

Take out Bartschi, they're still better. Add Bartschi, it's a ton better. Plus another decent prospect we will get in this next draft.
Not really. Also what does it matter that your prospects are very slightly better than ours, we have better younger players actually making an impact in the NHL. I don't know why you want to compare to one of the ********* prospect pools in the league right now. For a team trending to the abyss you should aim higher.

Auger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:49 PM
  #64
bombers15
Registered User
 
bombers15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,769
vCash: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
Yup I'm going to take the advice of a CP poster over THN and anyone with a pair of eyes about how dire the situation in Calgary is. This is starting to sound like Toronto 5 years ago when they were hyping any average prospect they had.

Just wait, and when the Flames miss the playoffs for the next 5 years and get some legit prospects you'll think back to now and realize how barren your prospect pool is.

The Canucks' prospect are pretty bad as well but atleast we have been a team making the playoffs consistently and trying to get to the final vs Just making it and bowing out in the first round every season.
Yeah. Calgary right now is honestly similar to where Edmonton was right after our cup run. We barely missed the playoffs and over-hyped prospects like Gagner, Cogliano and Nilsson. I see much of the same from Calgary right now.

bombers15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:51 PM
  #65
CanadianPantherFan
Registered User
 
CanadianPantherFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,906
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalan2 View Post
They need to pull a Florida Panthers.
What???

Oh , get rid of JayBo you mean


Non Flames fan whose lived in Calgary for nearly 30 years who can look at situation with objective view..... blow it up. Move Iggy this summer, Kipper next calendar year, Bou after that etc...

CanadianPantherFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:51 PM
  #66
Kronwalled55
Eatin' your hats
 
Kronwalled55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 2,987
vCash: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Howie View Post
Does it matter??

Till that franchise accepts that they need a rebuild, they are going nowhere.

-trade kipper
-trade iggy

-trade cammy
-trade Jbow (if someone will take him)

Just blow this team up and start over.
Neither one of those moves help the team.

Kronwalled55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:52 PM
  #67
crazycanuck
Registered User
 
crazycanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,874
vCash: 500
Fire Feaster, well just move him across to the Flames new acquisition the Stampeders, he can be the Offensive Lineman nutritionist...

The Flames need a true #1 centerman. Yes it's an obvious answer to what's wrong with them but having strong depth and talent at the center position is a big key to winning in todays NHL. Where are they going to find a center? Other than selling their weak farm, they need to draft and develop one, they have a very strong winger prospect in Baertschi and they cannot let him become a lost winger.

crazycanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:52 PM
  #68
WarriorofTime
Registered User
 
WarriorofTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,734
vCash: 500
Flames shouldn't be comparing their prospect pool to the Canucks. Vancouver has a younger core and better young players making an impact currently. They are a Stanley Cup contender while the Flames are a dark horse 8th place contender. The fact that their young talent and prospect pool are worse than the other non-playoff teams should be a concern.

WarriorofTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:52 PM
  #69
CorsiCounter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronwalled55 View Post
Neither one of those moves help the team.
Moving Iginla helps. It will keep Baertschi away from his contagious poor attitude.

CorsiCounter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 02:57 PM
  #70
bananaz
Registered User
 
bananaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 971
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auger View Post
Not really. Also what does it matter that your prospects are very slightly better than ours, we have better younger players actually making an impact in the NHL. I don't know why you want to compare to one of the ********* prospect pools in the league right now. For a team trending to the abyss you should aim higher.
This is the first time in quite a while that the flames have some good prospects coming up. What makes flames fan even more proud is that the majority of them were taken in the later rounds. Sven Bartschi, Michael Ferland, Max Reinhart, Bill Arnold, Johnny Gaudreau, John Ramage, Greg Nemisz and Leland Irving are all making solid impacts at the leagues they are currently in and almost all of them project to be NHL players.

The Flames havent made the playoffs in a few seasons now and have never been known as a team for developing prospects. So now that we actually do have some good prospects that are ready to make an impact in the next few years, it takes some of the disappointment away from the main team.

bananaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 03:08 PM
  #71
old time hockey4
Registered User
 
old time hockey4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 482
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auger View Post
Not really. Also what does it matter that your prospects are very slightly better than ours, we have better younger players actually making an impact in the NHL. I don't know why you want to compare to one of the ********* prospect pools in the league right now. For a team trending to the abyss you should aim higher.
2 years ago, our prospect pool was barren, had nothing. Somehow we have been able to finally start loading up on NHL level prospects, even though we didn't even have a draft pick in the first 2 rounds 2 seasons ago. Our prospect pool is still a lot smaller than most others, that's why it still gets rated so low compared to other teams. Any team has a multitude of prospects that still have a chance that are 21-25 years old. The Flames on the other hand do not.

What we do have is a growing prospect base from the past 2 drafts that has been more impressive than any the Flames have had since probably when we drafted Cory Stillman.

We have a bona fide blue chip prospect in Baertschi, a future Langkow type player in Reinhart, and a player that is looking eerily similar to Jamie Benn in Michael Ferland. On top of that we have a incredibly highly skilled Fin in Granlund, probably the most skilled player not in a professional league in Gaudreau, and one of the top USA players in the world juniors this season with Bill Arnold.

On defence we have at least 3 defensive prospects that will see NHL time in the future drafted in the past 3 drafts. Joey Leach is one of the best Defensemen in the Western Conference of the WHL, Tyler Wotherspoon is looking like one of the steals of the draft, he just impresses so much every time I see him. Those 2 were drafted in the last 2 drafts, then we have University of Wisconsin Captain John Ramage, who I hope to hell decides to not stay for a senior year, because he could already be a force in the NHL with his size, speed and leadership ability.

So there you have it. In 2 years we've stocked our prospect cupboard with NHL potential prospects of every ilk you can have. Another strong draft this summer and our prospect pool will be looking really strong. None of those forward are overagers, as it's been implied earlier. Both Ferland and Reinhart were late cuts to Team Canada this year, and both would have fit just fine on the roster.

To be honest out of all the players, I'm actually most excited about Gaudreau. He has stepped up his game so much this season, his vision on the ice, and ability to not get hit is the best I've ever seen from a Flames prospect. I really believe he has the tools to be one of the best players in the league in 10 years. I don't care about his size, if you can't hit him, who cares if he's 5'6''.

old time hockey4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 03:12 PM
  #72
WarriorofTime
Registered User
 
WarriorofTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,734
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bananaz View Post
This is the first time in quite a while that the flames have some good prospects coming up. What makes flames fan even more proud is that the majority of them were taken in the later rounds. Sven Bartschi, Michael Ferland, Max Reinhart, Bill Arnold, Johnny Gaudreau, John Ramage, Greg Nemisz and Leland Irving are all making solid impacts at the leagues they are currently in and almost all of them project to be NHL players.

The Flames havent made the playoffs in a few seasons now and have never been known as a team for developing prospects. So now that we actually do have some good prospects that are ready to make an impact in the next few years, it takes some of the disappointment away from the main team.
That's a very average prospect group in the eyes of the majority of people who analyze Hockey Prospects. You might want to look around the league at what other team's prospects are doing and what their cores and ask how you see it as likely that the Flames are going to pass all those teams up.

WarriorofTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 03:13 PM
  #73
Fehr Time*
The Don of Hockey
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,787
vCash: 500
Maybe if the Flames' owners were not so cheap they may actually get somewhere. It is disgusting that anyone would blame the players for this.

Fehr Time* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 03:29 PM
  #74
wiredmaverick
Registered User
 
wiredmaverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 966
vCash: 500
I think they're in for a rough go for the next few years. Maybe they should try a Florida. Just trade everyone for draft picks and then sign every available free agent you can.

wiredmaverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2012, 03:33 PM
  #75
King Of The North
Jankowski Is Coming
 
King Of The North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton, On
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,949
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
Outside of Sven you guys are grasping for straws with the garbage collection that the Flames have accumulated.

This is where you list off players from the Flames that wouldnt make a decent NHL team.

How many of your draft picks do you guys have playing for you again?
The "outside your best prospect" argument is garbage.

King Of The North is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.