HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Notices

Brule vs Johnson

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-22-2004, 04:13 AM
  #1
Barnaby
Registered User
 
Barnaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Jefferson, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,393
vCash: 500
Brule vs Johnson

Ok, the Rangers land the #2 pick in the draft so Crosby is gone. Who should the Rangers take at #2? The consensus seems to be Gilbert Brule, but American born Jack Johnson is flying up the charts!

I'll take Jack Johnson from my limited prospect knowledge. He sounds like the new Brian Leetch minus some offense, plus some hitting. If we are going to base our system on the Devils then we need a #1 d-man who can be a horse. We obviously need a franchise forward as well, but Johnson is too good to pass up IMHO.

What do you guys think?

Barnaby is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 04:17 AM
  #2
Bird Law
Daisy's back.
 
Bird Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NoVA / NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 67,863
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Bird Law
It's such a toss up now but I still take Brule and somehow hope to trade for the #3 pick! hahaha

Bird Law is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 07:05 AM
  #3
Kubera55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 323
vCash: 500
I'd probably trade down and take Johnson.

It's the stupid move, but I can't get this feeling out of my head that Johnson is just 'supposed' to be a Ranger.

Of course, I felt the same way about Komisarek a few years ago. I'm still bitter.

I'm going to be one dissapointed puppy when some other team gets him.

Kubera55 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 07:42 AM
  #4
Blueshirt13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Other side of the Ri
Posts: 733
vCash: 500
I think Johnson is flying up the charts. Not only is he physical but he is also very solid offensively. He doesn't have tremendous size (he's listed as 6'0") but he plays a bigger game. I would put him as a smaller version of Pronger.

From what I have read, Brule sounds like a Joe Thornton type player. He is physical, crashes the net and plays a bigger game than his size would suggest.

Personally I would love to get either one of them but think if we are building from the net out, Johnson would be the best choice. It's not too often you can add as complete of a defenseman as he is. There aren't too many elite defensemen in the league and down the road I see him as being one of them.

Blueshirt13 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 08:55 AM
  #5
NYR469
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
i REALLY like johnson and would LOVE to see him in a rangers uniform...i see johnson and brule as 2 and 2a

i'd be thrilled to get either but after his play at the 4 nations i'd give a slight edge to johnson...but there is still alot of season left and the difference is pretty small

NYR469 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 08:57 AM
  #6
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,710
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueshirt13
I think Johnson is flying up the charts.

From what I have read, Brule sounds like a Joe Thornton type player. He is physical, crashes the net and plays a bigger game than his size would suggest.
The thing is that there is a Russian and a Czech defensemen (can't remember their names, but isn't the Russian kid supposed to be nicknamed "the Russian tank"?) that coming into this year were rated ahead of Johnson. What I am getting at is that Crosby may be #1 & Brule may be #2, but Johnson may not be the next best available choice (defenseman or othewise).
As for Brule, comparing him to Thorton may be unfair. He will never have the body that Thorton does. He will never have the sheer size. Yes, Brule can play a scrappy game, but he will never be the wrecking ball center that Thorton is.

True Blue is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 08:58 AM
  #7
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,111
vCash: 500
rangers really couldn't go wrong with either of the...franchise forward vs. franchise D-man...and they need both

i might lean a little towards johnson though...i think he'd really pull the rangers D together and be the "crown jewel" in a very solid defense.

Levitate is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 09:09 AM
  #8
NYR469
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by True Blue
The thing is that there is a Russian and a Czech defensemen (can't remember their names, but isn't the Russian kid supposed to be nicknamed "the Russian tank"?) that coming into this year were rated ahead of Johnson. What I am getting at is that Crosby may be #1 & Brule may be #2, but Johnson may not be the next best available choice (defenseman or othewise).
As for Brule, comparing him to Thorton may be unfair. He will never have the body that Thorton does. He will never have the sheer size. Yes, Brule can play a scrappy game, but he will never be the wrecking ball center that Thorton is.

the 2 guys that you are thinking of are kindl and anikeenko and johnson is a LOT better then both of them...

kindl came over to play in the OHL and has struggled and is falling in the ranking and anikeenko has nose-dived down the rankings. so those 2 are dropping and johnson is sky-rocketing...

johnson is a top 3 pick, kindl will be lucky to hold onto a top 10 pick and anikeenko seems destined to fall out of the top 20...

NYR469 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 09:13 AM
  #9
NYR469
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
really johnson and brule are so close that it comes down to whether you think we need a forward or a dman more...imo we need BOTH a #1 center and #1 dman, but does it matter which order you get them??

on one hand you can say that we already have a pretty deep defense and you could do alot worse then having tyutin as the #1 guy, so brule fills a bigger need...but on the flip side going with the theory that you build from the net out johnson would really upgrade and solidify the defense in front of montoya/blackburn/lundqvist. at that point we'd be all be set in net and on the blueline...

NYR469 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:22 AM
  #10
Onion Boy
Registered User
 
Onion Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: Japan
Posts: 2,676
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubera55
I'd probably trade down and take Johnson.

It's the stupid move, but I can't get this feeling out of my head that Johnson is just 'supposed' to be a Ranger.
To be honest I have the exact same feeling. We need a clear cut number 1 D prospect. Johnson has that potential, is American, and is going to play in the NCAA next year, all charactistics the Rangers like to see in their picks.

The only comment I disagree with is that we should trade down to get him. If hypothetically we had the 2nd overall pick we should just take him since alot of people seem to think he's up there with Brule. Trading down to, say, 4 may be too big of a drop to still land him.

Of course things change over the season, but if Johnson is still on the board when we pick, we have to take him.

Onion Boy is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:26 AM
  #11
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,710
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR469
on one hand you can say that we already have a pretty deep defense and you could do alot worse then having tyutin as the #1 guy, so brule fills a bigger need...but on the flip side going with the theory that you build from the net out johnson would really upgrade and solidify the defense in front of montoya/blackburn/lundqvist. at that point we'd be all be set in net and on the blueline...
Like him as we all do, Tyutin is NOT a #1. If we are lucky, he will develop into a dependable #2 (a la Ohlund). What the defensive future needs is a true #1. Pair said #1 with Tyutin, Kondratiev, Baranka & Pock, and you have a hopefull semblence of top 2 pairs. After that, we can all hope for Lampman, Liffiton, & Taylor to produce a 3rd pair D-man.
They will not all make it, but it does give us a deep defensive prospects. Providing that there is a league at all.

True Blue is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:28 AM
  #12
Onion Boy
Registered User
 
Onion Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: Japan
Posts: 2,676
vCash: 500
Even though I was not thrilled with drafting Montoya at the time, it's nice to know that our goaltending is solid. Drafting Johnson would instantly make the same true for the defense. How many teams can boast that much potential both in goal and on the blueline?

Onion Boy is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:32 AM
  #13
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,111
vCash: 500
IMO you don't particularly NEED a true #1 blueliner as long as your overall D is good and solid...but it certainly helps a lot. i don't think tampa had anyone i'd consider a real #1 guy but they got the job done

Levitate is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:36 AM
  #14
Kodiak
Registered User
 
Kodiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ranger fan in Philly
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Kodiak Send a message via AIM to Kodiak Send a message via Yahoo to Kodiak
I like both of these prospects a lot, but I'm leaning towards Johnson at this point. At this point, we lack top notch forward and defensive prospects. Both Brule and Johnson are obviously top notch, but I'd lean towards Johnson for a couple of reasons. First, a successful team is built from the net out. We're set in goal, and we have a nice crop of D prospects, but a stud d-man would really solidify things. Second, d-men take longer to develop than forwards. We're still likely to have a very high pick in 2006. It might make more sense to take the d-man now and the forward next year so that they should be ready to become impact players at about the same time.

But really, no one is making any pick without the interviewing/fitness regimenting portion of scouting. It may come down to that in the end.

Kodiak is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:39 AM
  #15
nyr7andcounting
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,919
vCash: 500
I would like to have 6 #1 defenseman in my lineup if I could. Take Johnson, if he is the best defenseman. There are plenty of ways to get a forward in this league, even a top one, a la Messier 10+ years ago. We drafted Richter and Leetch and built around that, then we added the top forward when the time came. The same should be done now.

nyr7andcounting is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:39 AM
  #16
Kodiak
Registered User
 
Kodiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ranger fan in Philly
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Kodiak Send a message via AIM to Kodiak Send a message via Yahoo to Kodiak
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levitate
IMO you don't particularly NEED a true #1 blueliner as long as your overall D is good and solid...but it certainly helps a lot. i don't think tampa had anyone i'd consider a real #1 guy but they got the job done
I agree with that. Calgary didn't have a #1 d-man either. That had 5 guys that could log a good amount of time and still be effective. But a #1 d-man is a very nice luxury to have.

Kodiak is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 10:56 AM
  #17
NYR469
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levitate
IMO you don't particularly NEED a true #1 blueliner as long as your overall D is good and solid...but it certainly helps a lot. i don't think tampa had anyone i'd consider a real #1 guy but they got the job done
they won without a true #1, but how many teams that are consistantly at the top don't have a true #1??

there are always exceptions, teams that win without an elite goalie (red wings won with osgood), teams without an elite dman, teams without good special teams, etc but just because it is possible to win under those circumstances that doesn't mean that you should build that way...

simply put the better the defense is the better chances you have of success year after year

NYR469 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 11:03 AM
  #18
NYR469
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by True Blue
Like him as we all do, Tyutin is NOT a #1. If we are lucky, he will develop into a dependable #2 (a la Ohlund). What the defensive future needs is a true #1. Pair said #1 with Tyutin, Kondratiev, Baranka & Pock, and you have a hopefull semblence of top 2 pairs. After that, we can all hope for Lampman, Liffiton, & Taylor to produce a 3rd pair D-man.
They will not all make it, but it does give us a deep defensive prospects. Providing that there is a league at all.
I agree that tyutin isn't really an elite #1 which is why i said that 1 of the big needs is a #1 dman...but tyutin is closer to a #1 dman then lundmark & immonen are to being #1 centers.

so while i see a need for a #1 guy and pushing tyutin/kondratiev down to the 2nd pair instead of the 1st pair would be a HUGE upgrade to the blueline, but we also need a #1 center and probably a #1 winger...so do you upgrade the defense first, or do you say that we're 'ok' with tyutin as the top guy for now and upgrade the forwards?

NYR469 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 11:04 AM
  #19
Prucha73
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,879
vCash: 500
I would probably take Johnson over Brule.

Prucha73 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 12:56 PM
  #20
Son of Steinbrenner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Tromelin
Posts: 9,435
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prucha73
I would probably take Johnson over Brule.
why what are you reading about each player? From what i have read brule is the handsdown second pick in the draft but i haven't watched either guy play so my mind is not made up.

Son of Steinbrenner is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 02:21 PM
  #21
Anthony Mauro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Anthony Mauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,280
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiak
But really, no one is making any pick without the interviewing/fitness regimenting portion of scouting. It may come down to that in the end.
This may not be the part that decides who we take. Both guys seem like guys with the same work ethic and dedication to getting better. It wouldnt suprise me to see both of these guys in similar physical shape come time for the combine.

On the other hand, Johnson may win the pyschological test over Brule. Johnson is a pretty good interview, while others say that Brule is lacking in that area.

Anthony Mauro is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 02:23 PM
  #22
Onion Boy
Registered User
 
Onion Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: Japan
Posts: 2,676
vCash: 500
Maybe its just me, but I think its worth reiterating the Rangers' penchant for drafting both Americans and NCAA players.

Onion Boy is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 05:52 PM
  #23
AG9NK35DT8*
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bronx/Queens, NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,822
vCash: 500
well pretty tough options.I really think J.Johnson would be awesome here a #1 d-man for the club, but NYR is in need of top 1st/2nd line scoring talent.So I would say go for Brule, Cause he is most needed.NYR I think is looking ok with young D prospects so it can hold for the 2006 draft to pick a big time d-man.

AG9NK35DT8* is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 06:11 PM
  #24
Prucha73
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,879
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnaby
Ok, the Rangers land the #2 pick in the draft so Crosby is gone. Who should the Rangers take at #2? The consensus seems to be Gilbert Brule, but American born Jack Johnson is flying up the charts!

I'll take Jack Johnson from my limited prospect knowledge. He sounds like the new Brian Leetch minus some offense, plus some hitting. If we are going to base our system on the Devils then we need a #1 d-man who can be a horse. We obviously need a franchise forward as well, but Johnson is too good to pass up IMHO.

What do you guys think?
BTW, how do you expect to get 2nd overall pick? By trade?

Prucha73 is offline  
Old
11-22-2004, 06:17 PM
  #25
AG9NK35DT8*
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bronx/Queens, NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,822
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prucha73
BTW, how do you expect to get 2nd overall pick? By trade?
Prucha you dissapear for a while, you use to be so soft and kind now you are a raging animal......What the hell happened to you bro, your psycho man

Prucha is tearing this whole board a new one, your an animal


Last edited by AG9NK35DT8: 11-22-2004 at 06:23 PM.
AG9NK35DT8* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.