HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Van-CBJ: 1st overall for Schneider+

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-31-2012, 12:39 AM
  #26
Doug61
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Country: Aland Islands
Posts: 5,779
vCash: 1200
I'd also consider Kulikov and Markstrom but that's for another thread. If you want to trade Edler/Kesler and Schneider for the #1 pick then we can talk, but anything less than that and it makes no sense. Throwing a bunch of 2nd/3rd line forwards and 3rd pairing defenders on top of Schneider isn't going to help any either.

Doug61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 12:47 AM
  #27
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug61 View Post
I'd also consider Kulikov and Markstrom but that's for another thread. If you want to trade Edler/Kesler and Schneider for the #1 pick then we can talk, but anything less than that and it makes no sense. Throwing a bunch of 2nd/3rd line forwards and 3rd pairing defenders on top of Schneider isn't going to help any either.
Yeah lets just throw away being a top team by sending Kesler/Edler PLUS Schneider for a unproven draft pick, no team is sending you a 1st line centre or #1 D man plus a #1 goalie for that pick, I wouldn't give that up for Nash and that pick.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 12:51 AM
  #28
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crossbar View Post
Maybe Schneider, Booth, Schroeder and a 1st?
Why would we do that? take Booth out and I'll do it.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 12:52 AM
  #29
Royal Canuck
Moderator
Burr #14 <3
 
Royal Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,468
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAME CANADA View Post
Why would we do that? take Booth out and I'll do it.
were talking Nail Yakupov here, you're gunna have to overpay a bit.

__________________

Twitter | HFBoards Contact | Youtube | Tumblr

Record @ The Rogers Centre: 2-2 (3-1 W vs. CWS, 9-4 L, 5-3 L, 8-4 W vs. NYY)
Royal Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 12:59 AM
  #30
Proto
Registered User
 
Proto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,860
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crossbar View Post
were talking Nail Yakupov here, you're gunna have to overpay a bit.
He's an unproven prospect

Proto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:02 AM
  #31
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crossbar View Post
were talking Nail Yakupov here, you're gunna have to overpay a bit.
Booth is needed in the top 6 add in Yakupov and take out Booth and we are softer again, the whole reason we got Booth here was to add grit and a power forward to the top 6, we also traded Hodgson for grit and toughness with upside, I really don't see Gillis giving up Booth Schneider Schroeder(our best and NHL ready prospect) plus a 1st, we're in no need for that much of shake up. I don't mind Schneider Schroeder 1st if we're adding anything else the most I'd do is Raymond or maybe Ballard but not a key guy in the top 6(Booth) that brings an element we need in there.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:12 AM
  #32
vector209
Registered User
 
vector209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 527
vCash: 500
The Canucks, not the Jackets, are in a position of power here. If Columbus asks for something ridiculous, they can just politely decline, no harm done. People are making it sound as if Vancouver needs to unload Schneider. Like someone else said, Columbus doesn't have the leverage to ask for Kesler/Edler + Schneider for the 1st overall. That's insane for a highly touted but still unproven prospect.

vector209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:13 AM
  #33
Doug61
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Country: Aland Islands
Posts: 5,779
vCash: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAME CANADA View Post
Yeah lets just throw away being a top team by sending Kesler/Edler PLUS Schneider for a unproven draft pick, no team is sending you a 1st line centre or #1 D man plus a #1 goalie for that pick, I wouldn't give that up for Nash and that pick.
Then there really isn't any trade to be had, I don't know how else us Columbus fans can stress that if you aren't going to give up a key guy on your team or a top 3 goalie then you aren't going to get the #1 pick. Trading Yakupov for anything less than to upgrade our team on the top end isn't going to happen. A bunch of 2nd/3rd liners and 2nd/3rd pairing defenders on top of Schneider isn't a good trade for Columbus. How many goalies do you know that have been the center piece for a trade for a #1 pick?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vector209 View Post
The Canucks, not the Jackets, are in a position of power here. If Columbus asks for something ridiculous, they can just politely decline, no harm done. People are making it sound as if Vancouver needs to unload Schneider. Like someone else said, Columbus doesn't have the leverage to ask for Kesler/Edler + Schneider for the 1st overall. That's insane for a highly touted but still unproven prospect.
uhhh Columbus has the exact same leverage that the Canucks have. The Canucks have the leverage because they don't have to trade Schneider? So I guess your saying the Jackets have to trade Yakupov? Great reasoning.

Doug61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:16 AM
  #34
vancityluongo
snapback
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North of 60
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,808
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crossbar View Post
Maybe Schneider, Booth, Schroeder and a 1st?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crossbar View Post
were talking Nail Yakupov here, you're gunna have to overpay a bit.
Gross. Why would a team going for a cup do that deal?

Schneider and a 1st would be enough value wise IMO, but I doubt Columbus wants to do that.

vancityluongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:19 AM
  #35
Royal Canuck
Moderator
Burr #14 <3
 
Royal Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,468
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by vancityluongo View Post
Gross. Why would a team going for a cup do that deal?

Schneider and a 1st would be enough value wise IMO, but I doubt Columbus wants to do that.
you have to look to the window we have as a cup contender. IMO that window has shrunk a lot this year. The Sedins were inconsistent, Luongo has been good but not outstanding, and our Defense has looked shaky at times. At some point you have to look to the future.

Royal Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:20 AM
  #36
thestonedkoala
Minny Snow Da!
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,907
vCash: 500
Goalies are so hard to really gauge value.

I think they could get a decent goaltender without giving up the 1st overall. Markets a bit weak this year but still, there could be some names out there.

thestonedkoala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:20 AM
  #37
baldwinhouse
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 31
vCash: 500
@doug61

how do you see columbus improving their goaltending this summer? they will probably have a hard time adding thru UFA because of the thin goalie market and the fact it isn't the most desirable organization. if u don't see them targeting schneider, then who do u think they will be targeting?

baldwinhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:25 AM
  #38
nowhereman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,647
vCash: 500
Vancouver can do their best to entice Columbus with Schneider but, if the Jackets don't bite, teams like Toronto and Tampa could use a potential franchise goaltender.

A player like Forsberg, Dumba, or Trouba could certainly help ease Schneider's loss.

nowhereman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:27 AM
  #39
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,169
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
Schnider, Booth and Ballard.

Yakupov with the Sedins or Kesler would be so damn sick that there's no way Vancouver could turn it down.

Columbus, on the other hand will see a significant improvement with Ballard in their top 4, Booth in their top 6 and a damn good starting goalie.

Vancouver fans might say they're giving up too much, but this gives them the cap space they need to sign Weber and still have more than enough cap space to sign another top 6 forward. Heck, with how much the cap is going up, they could probably sign both Parise and Sutter in the off season if they wanted.

thadd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:28 AM
  #40
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crossbar View Post
you have to look to the window we have as a cup contender. IMO that window has shrunk a lot this year. The Sedins were inconsistent, Luongo has been good but not outstanding, and our Defense has looked shaky at times. At some point you have to look to the future.
I understand that and agree with that but you don't hurt your chances now, Booth is needed on the Canucks and we can't afford to trade him. We give up other assets Schneider, Schroeder/Rodin and a 1st is more than fair and Jackets get a lot better, if we have to we can add Raymond in there or Sauve but that's the max we could realistically afford to give up and not hurt the team now well building towards the future. That's a lot to give up.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:34 AM
  #41
JoeCool16
Registered User
 
JoeCool16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 645
vCash: 66
What about Schneider+1st for Columbus's first IF Columbus loses the lottery and ends up with 2nd overall?

JoeCool16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:52 AM
  #42
Anomander Rake
Registered User
 
Anomander Rake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 533
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thadd View Post
Schnider, Booth and Ballard.

Yakupov with the Sedins or Kesler would be so damn sick that there's no way Vancouver could turn it down.

Columbus, on the other hand will see a significant improvement with Ballard in their top 4, Booth in their top 6 and a damn good starting goalie.

Vancouver fans might say they're giving up too much, but this gives them the cap space they need to sign Weber and still have more than enough cap space to sign another top 6 forward. Heck, with how much the cap is going up, they could probably sign both Parise and Sutter in the off season if they wanted.
I would be ok with Booth + Ballard + Schneider + Van 1st for Yakupov. The thought of being able to afford Weber and picking up Yakupov is salivating. It's really difficult to assess the actual value for either Yakupov or Schneider though. One has never been an NHL starter and the other is still in junior.

Anomander Rake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:53 AM
  #43
Lonny Bohonos
Registered User
 
Lonny Bohonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: United Nations
Posts: 4,622
vCash: 500
I like how Schneider is "unproven" but the pick is somehow "proven".

Lol

For all we know the pick could be Stefan/daigle/svitov/brendl/faloon.

At worst where ever he ends up playing Schneider is an unbelievable "back up" who can play 1/2 the games with another decent tender.

Lonny Bohonos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:53 AM
  #44
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thadd View Post
Schnider, Booth and Ballard.

Yakupov with the Sedins or Kesler would be so damn sick that there's no way Vancouver could turn it down.

Columbus, on the other hand will see a significant improvement with Ballard in their top 4, Booth in their top 6 and a damn good starting goalie.

Vancouver fans might say they're giving up too much, but this gives them the cap space they need to sign Weber and still have more than enough cap space to sign another top 6 forward. Heck, with how much the cap is going up, they could probably sign both Parise and Sutter in the off season if they wanted.
We lose a power forward in the top 6 and we're now softer again, the thing Gillis is improving with Booth and Kassian now here and was the biggest and only knock on us last season. Is Booth really going to be the make it part for Columbus? cause I do think it's the break it part for the Canucks because we need him in the top 6, we can't afford to get weaker and smaller for skill, we traded Hodgson for this reason. I hope Kesler Booth and Higgins make a call to Parise and we get him here if he goes to UFA a 2nd line of Parise Kesler Booth would be epic, a far off dream but maybe us having a lot of Americans and being a cup contender would be enough to get him here, we also have deep pockets and maybe cap room if it goes up 5+ mil.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 01:54 AM
  #45
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anomander Rake View Post
I would be ok with Booth + Ballard + Schneider + Van 1st for Yakupov. The thought of being able to afford Weber and picking up Yakupov is salivating. It's really difficult to assess the actual value for either Yakupov or Schneider though. One has never been an NHL starter and the other is still in junior.
Weber is a RFA, unless you mean Suter?

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:00 AM
  #46
Anomander Rake
Registered User
 
Anomander Rake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 533
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAME CANADA View Post
Weber is a RFA, unless you mean Suter?
Yea my bad.

Anomander Rake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:02 AM
  #47
Falconator
Registered User
 
Falconator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,716
vCash: 500
If Columbus "WANTS" a top notch goaltender like Schneider, it'll simply be him and the Canucks 1st. Vancouver doesn't need the first overall pick, what they need is to build depth for the future. If Tampa Bay offers a 1st and a 2nd, same as Colorado paid for Varlomov, Gillis would be much better off accepting that!

The 8th overall and an early 2nd rounder would give the Canucks three picks in the top forty selections, thats what they need. Gillis was offered, allegedly, the 11th overall last year and turned it down. I don't see him being any different this year at all now that Schneider is much more established! People who say he's unproven are out to lunch, NHL people are saying he's got nothing left to prove to anyone. Schneider continually impresses with each game and he's played four less games than Brian Elliot who's getting consideration for the Vezina. (although Quick or Lundqvist will win) They are 1-2 in save %, Elliot and Schneider.

FYI - Tampa has two first round picks and FOUR second round picks, they are and will make an offer for Schneider that Columbus won't be able to match.

Falconator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:07 AM
  #48
Edgeworth*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,849
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAME CANADA View Post
Jackets are the ones in need of Schneder and don't have a lot that is attractive to us for Schneider.
Schneider doesn't get you the #1 pick.

It'd have to be: Schneider + 1st + Top four defensive shutdown guy + 1st next year + 2nd this year and even then I seriously doubt CBJ takes it.

They don't need points from the blueline, they already have Wiz and JJ.


And seriously Schneider has yet to play an entire NHL season as a starter. He just looks good, but then again look at Reimer LAST year. Toronto fans were hailing him as a starting goaltender and the next CuJo. All Schneider has is some pretty stats from 25GP behind one of the best teams in the league. He can stay in Vancouver because no one is taking Vancouver's asking price.

Edgeworth* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:08 AM
  #49
BLAME CANADA*
The Canucks did it
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,696
vCash: 500
Don't really see Suter as a fit for Vancouver with Edler and Hamhuis as the top 4 lefties, we really need a top pairing righty, aka Shea Weber, to play with Edler. I really hope Gillis puts a 1 year offer out there for Weber, he's the missing piece to make that D deadly, an Edler Weber pairing would be amazing, the hitting punishment they'd give the other teams would make me but adding Weber here is a pipe dream and has close to 0% chance happening this offseason.

BLAME CANADA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 02:13 AM
  #50
RespectYourEdlers
Registered User
 
RespectYourEdlers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Country: Canada
Posts: 567
vCash: 500
Schneider, 1st round pick aaaaand we'll even throw in Raymond

RespectYourEdlers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.