HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

Guys doesnt it take 6-8 years to really build a pro franchise from the ground up

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-31-2012, 03:25 PM
  #1
wichitaleafs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 55
vCash: 500
Guys doesnt it take 6-8 years to really build a pro franchise from the ground up

Just from prior experience watching other previously barren franchises like the leafs it seems to take many years to get the farm system going and turn them into solid pros. Did the leafs have any prospects prior to Burke?

wichitaleafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:27 PM
  #2
Sokil
Ukraine Specialitsky
 
Sokil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 3,251
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wichitaleafs View Post
Did the leafs have any prospects prior to Burke?
Grabovski, Kulemin, Schenn, Stalberg, Stralman, Gunnarsson, Reimer, Hayes, Tlusty

Sokil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:31 PM
  #3
Shimso
Registered User
 
Shimso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 961
vCash: 135
But Burke basically said we weren't building from the ground up, and that we weren't even going to need 5 years....

Shimso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:32 PM
  #4
LC
Registered User
 
LC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SW Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimso View Post
But Burke basically said we weren't building from the ground up, and that we weren't even going to need 5 years....
Yeah and he's had his "Welcome to Toronto" moment.

LC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:38 PM
  #5
wichitaleafs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 55
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimso View Post
But Burke basically said we weren't building from the ground up, and that we weren't even going to need 5 years....
True. But what else could he have said. If he said longer everyone woulda been wtf no thanks.

wichitaleafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:40 PM
  #6
Sokil
Ukraine Specialitsky
 
Sokil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 3,251
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wichitaleafs View Post
True. But what else could he have said. If he said longer everyone woulda been wtf no thanks.
Um, no. Alex Anthopolis came in to the Jays and said straight up that they were going to rebuild from the ground up and do it right.

Burke said he didn't need to do it that way, and that he could make the team competitive immediately. He then traded away 2 1sts for short-term fixes. He wasn't playing lip service - his actions speak in line with his words.

If we're going to start talking about 6-8 year rebuilds, then it starts in 2012, not when Burke was hired.

Sokil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:40 PM
  #7
weems
Registered User
 
weems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wichitaleafs View Post
True. But what else could he have said. If he said longer everyone woulda been wtf no thanks.
He could have said were going to build the slow and methodical way (ie thru the draft).

weems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:45 PM
  #8
JackJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by weems View Post
He could have said were going to build the slow and methodical way (ie thru the draft).
Exactly and shut his trap after that statement.

That initial five year statement, followed by the Kessel deal signals to fans that he lacks the patience for a 6-8 year (possibly longer) build and wants to get this done asap.

JackJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:47 PM
  #9
VanJaysFan*
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,805
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sokil View Post
Um, no. Alex Anthopolis came in to the Jays and said straight up that they were going to rebuild from the ground up and do it right.

VanJaysFan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:47 PM
  #10
Sokil
Ukraine Specialitsky
 
Sokil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 3,251
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoGetThis View Post
Doc's awesome, what's your point?

Sokil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:51 PM
  #11
Shimso
Registered User
 
Shimso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 961
vCash: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoGetThis View Post
The Doc trade isn't the reason why the Jays are where they are and why AA is deified.

Subtract every prospect returned from the Halladay trade and the team still has one hell of a farm system and a very good major league team.

TDA and Gose are going to be in the minors this year, and we're unsure if Drabek will even be the #5 starting pitcher.


eg: Marcum for Lawrie, Vernon Wells for someone who isn't Vernon Wells, Gonzalez for Escobar, JMac&Hill for KJ, Patterson/Stewart/Rzep/Dotel for Rasmus, compensation draft picks, etc. Unlike Burke, AA has paid a TON of attention to the draft and that's in a sport where draft picks and prospects might not materialize for 10 years (eg signing a 16 year old Osuna) if at all.

-He gave up Marcum, a solid #2 pitcher and a potential ace for some teams to get a minor league prospect in Lawrie who some people thought had character issues; now it looks like Lawrie could be an all-star 3rd baseman and a huge fan favourite
-He found value for VW when everyone thought (and still thinks) he has negative trade value
-Took a chance on Escobar when ATL was fed up with him and he's blossomed into very good SS
-Got rid of a utility INF and a underperforming 2nd for KJ who isn't doing that well but we hope can turn it around as he's had a really good season not that long ago
-Same as KJ, we got Rasmus at an all-time low in value in exchange for minor pieces (I don't see Stewart every being a mainstay on our roster) and paying quite a bit
-Obtained so many compensatory draft picks that it seems that the new MLB CBA was made to purposely block getting draft picks like this and capping draft spending
-Took a risk and traded a top pitching prospect for a promising closer with a very favourable contract


Last edited by Shimso: 03-31-2012 at 04:00 PM.
Shimso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:53 PM
  #12
pooleboy
Registered User
 
pooleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 4,374
vCash: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sokil View Post
Um, no. Alex Anthopolis came in to the Jays and said straight up that they were going to rebuild from the ground up and do it right.

Burke said he didn't need to do it that way, and that he could make the team competitive immediately. He then traded away 2 1sts for short-term fixes. He wasn't playing lip service - his actions speak in line with his words.

If we're going to start talking about 6-8 year rebuilds, then it starts in 2012, not when Burke was hired.
Everyone focuses on the kessel deal. If he didn't trade for kessel then maybe he doesn't sign beauchemin which means no lupul or gardiner. And maybe he wouldn't have traded for Phaneuf?

Also short term fix? Kessel is 24 he's here for the long term, lol. Imo Burke hasn't made one mistake, prospects are taking longer than expected which is fine, but in a hockey craved city people start to ntoice.

pooleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:54 PM
  #13
pooleboy
Registered User
 
pooleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 4,374
vCash: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by weems View Post
He could have said were going to build the slow and methodical way (ie thru the draft).
How is that plan working out for the NYI?

pooleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:55 PM
  #14
weems
Registered User
 
weems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pooleboy View Post
Everyone focuses on the kessel deal. If he didn't trade for kessel then maybe he doesn't sign beauchemin which means no lupul or gardiner. And maybe he wouldn't have traded for Phaneuf?

Also short term fix? Kessel is 24 he's here for the long term, lol. Imo Burke hasn't made one mistake, prospects are taking longer than expected which is fine, but in a hockey craved city people start to ntoice.
Is he?
I could easily see him bolting in 2 years to some smaller market where he doesnt have camera's in his face 24/7 and papers ripping on his non existant 2 way game every week or so.

weems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:57 PM
  #15
wichitaleafs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 55
vCash: 500
Minor leagues have better future players than in the pros right now apparently from what everyone says. Not exactly ideal but there is hope. I know everyone has hope but still hates the word also

wichitaleafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:57 PM
  #16
pooleboy
Registered User
 
pooleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 4,374
vCash: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoGetThis View Post
One of the Leaf "greats" let us trade him or even retired a leaf I wouldn't have cared but if sundin let us trade him we would have a better farm system right now

pooleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:57 PM
  #17
Duke Silver
Truce?
 
Duke Silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. John's, NL
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,149
vCash: 500
Somebody get the OP a meeting with Brian Burke! He has all the answers we've been looking for!

Duke Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:59 PM
  #18
weems
Registered User
 
weems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pooleboy View Post
How is that plan working out for the NYI?
I never said it was a gurantee that "that" way works but what the Leafs have been doing forever hasnt worked either, so why not try something different for once? The definition of insanity is doing time after time and expecting different results. Just because the Isles havent succeeded in there attempt at a full blown rebuild doesnt mean the Leafs shouldnt attempt one. They could have some of the worst scouts in the business for all we know?

weems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:59 PM
  #19
Stephen
Registered User
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 27,269
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pooleboy View Post
Also short term fix? Kessel is 24 he's here for the long term, lol. Imo Burke hasn't made one mistake, prospects are taking longer than expected which is fine, but in a hockey craved city people start to ntoice.
Kessel is only under contract for 2 more years, by which time guys like Colborne and Blacker will have probably completed their rookie years and the 2012 and 2013 picks are barely in the NHL.

Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 04:01 PM
  #20
madab
Registered User
 
madab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pooleboy View Post
Everyone focuses on the kessel deal. If he didn't trade for kessel then maybe he doesn't sign beauchemin which means no lupul or gardiner. And maybe he wouldn't have traded for Phaneuf?

Also short term fix? Kessel is 24 he's here for the long term, lol. Imo Burke hasn't made one mistake, prospects are taking longer than expected which is fine, but in a hockey craved city people start to ntoice.
Connolly, Komisarek and Armstrong say hello... I do agree that Burke's reign has not been the disaster some have made it out to be. Considering what he inherited, this team is certainly headed in the right direction.

madab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 04:02 PM
  #21
ForSpareParts*
agreement
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,747
vCash: 500
i'll come back to this thread in 8 years and tell you the answer.


ForSpareParts* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 04:03 PM
  #22
Stephen
Registered User
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 27,269
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pooleboy View Post
One of the Leaf "greats" let us trade him or even retired a leaf I wouldn't have cared but if sundin let us trade him we would have a better farm system right now
The best package out there for Sundin was Grabovski, Higgins and a first, so we would have Higgins. The Habs first in 2008 was used to pick Greg Nemisz.

Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 04:07 PM
  #23
weems
Registered User
 
weems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,643
vCash: 500
The ILSE's rebuild would also look much better if they didnt pick a dud in Neidereiter and instead took Skinner, Fowler or even Burmistrov. There rebuild would look better if they took Hodgson, Myers, Karlsson, Gardiner, MDZ instead of Bailey. A fullout rebuild can easily go off the rails with bad scouting. Everyday around here I hear about how great the Leafs scouts are so we really shouldnt have this issue?

weems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 04:08 PM
  #24
dirk41
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pooleboy View Post
Imo Burke hasn't made one mistake
Straight out trolling.

dirk41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 04:08 PM
  #25
birddog*
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,988
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimso View Post
But Burke basically said we weren't building from the ground up, and that we weren't even going to need 5 years....
He was right -- we aren't going to need 5 years -- more like 8.

birddog* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.