HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

This Year's 1st Overall pick (Yakupov) to Your Team [MOD: ALL Yakupov/1st talk here]

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-09-2012, 11:09 PM
  #101
Viqsi
battered but unbowed
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 17,735
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuccarello Awesome View Post
I'm in the minority, but I'm also a genius.

I'd give Gaborik and two 1sts for Yakupov. We could then afford to sign Parise AND Suter. Cue "Rangers at it again! Throwing money at stars!" I love it!

Parise Richards Callahan
Hagelin Stepan Kreider
Dubinsky Anisimov Yakupov
Rupp Boyle Prust
Zuccarello
Mitchell

Staal Suter
McDonagh Girardi
Del Zotto Stralman
Erixon
Bickel
McIlrath

Lundqvist
Gustavsson/Johnson



I made myself hard.
I think if the Rangers called us we'd immediately say "swap out one of those 1sts with McDonagh, kthx" and Sather would be all "lol no way" and we'd be all "ok we'll take MDZ" and Sather'd be like "kthxbye".

__________________
Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:18 PM
  #102
ZetterBurger
Registered User
 
ZetterBurger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 6,211
vCash: 500
LA

Drew Doughty

ZetterBurger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 03:53 AM
  #103
n0rthstar
Registered User
 
n0rthstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 410
vCash: 500
Edm-Ana, @ the draft

To Oilers: Folwer or Sbisa, +Ducks 2012 1st.

To Ducks: Oilers 2012 1st(2nd overall?)+whatever that doesnt include the obvious


EDIT: Hah, didnt notice a similar trade thread below involving the leafs instead of the Ducks, screw it, its a better deal for the Oilers anyway


Last edited by n0rthstar: 04-10-2012 at 04:00 AM.
n0rthstar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:04 AM
  #104
Oilmageddon*
What are you hearing
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home of 5 Stanley's
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,142
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
To Oilers: Folwer or Sbisa, +Ducks 2012 1st.

To Ducks: Oilers 2012 1st(2nd overall?)+whatever that doesnt include the obvious


EDIT: Hah, didnt notice a similar trade thread below involving the leafs instead of the Ducks, screw it, its a better deal for the Oilers anyway
Oilers would jump on Fowler for a drop of 4 spots expect Duck fans to come after you with pitchforks Sbisa would probably get it done as well.

Oilmageddon* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:12 AM
  #105
mightyquack
*insert witty title*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perth, WA
Country: Germany
Posts: 11,597
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to mightyquack
Trading up 4 spots isn't worth one of Fowler or Sbisa IMO. Both are already top 4 defenceman, and Sbisa has taken massive leaps and one of the few young players we have with a nasty edge as such.

Can't really see what Edmonton could realistic add to make me think otherwise.

mightyquack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:18 AM
  #106
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 441
We trade one of our young building blocks to move up 4 spots in the draft? Image the rolls we reversed but I asked for Eberle for you to move up 4 spots. You laugh at me until I leave the thread crying.

Gliff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:23 AM
  #107
oilsands
NHL Supertar
 
oilsands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Halland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,666
vCash: 500
There is no way Anaheim would do this deal, others have voiced the reasons why.

oilsands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:23 AM
  #108
n0rthstar
Registered User
 
n0rthstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 410
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
We trade one of our young building blocks to move up 4 spots in the draft? Image the rolls we reversed but I asked for Eberle for you to move up 4 spots. You laugh at me until I leave the thread crying.

Im not sure that either Fowler or Sbisa even come close to equaling Eberle, but this move would undoubtably fill your biggest need which is center depth isnt it? And you would be still left with 1 of your 2 young D studs.

n0rthstar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:40 AM
  #109
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,445
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Im not sure that either Fowler or Sbisa even come close to equaling Eberle, but this move would undoubtably fill your biggest need which is center depth isnt it? And you would be still left with 1 of your 2 young D studs.
All it's going to cost us is a brand new problem with blue line depth. We're not moving either of these guys just to move up 4 spots.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:55 AM
  #110
Vipers31
Moderator
Hostile Environment.
 
Vipers31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bergisch Gladbach
Country: Germany
Posts: 6,780
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Vipers31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Im not sure that either Fowler or Sbisa even come close to equaling Eberle, but this move would undoubtably fill your biggest need which is center depth isnt it? And you would be still left with 1 of your 2 young D studs.
That may be true, but it doesn't change the fact that moving up four spots is absolutely not worth a very good young defenseman in Sbisa, in a draft that doesn't exactly have a proclaimed cut-off after that 2nd spot.

Vipers31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:55 AM
  #111
n0rthstar
Registered User
 
n0rthstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 410
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
All it's going to cost us is a brand new problem with blue line depth. We're not moving either of these guys just to move up 4 spots.
Right then, I guess you can find that Center somewhere else, maybe hope for next year draft eh? Im curious as to how you plan to solve your needs at Center? I thought Grigs would be perfect.

n0rthstar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:56 AM
  #112
oilsands
NHL Supertar
 
oilsands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Halland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,666
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
All it's going to cost us is a brand new problem with blue line depth. We're not moving either of these guys just to move up 4 spots.
Exactly,

And how big is the gap between players at 2 and 6? If there is a plateau in between, it is minimal.

oilsands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:00 AM
  #113
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Right then, I guess you can find that Center somewhere else, maybe hope for next year draft eh? Im curious as to how you plan to solve your needs at Center? I thought Grigs would be perfect.
All we do is get a center and lose a 20 year old top 4 PMD. Just counter productive. Holland deserves a chance.

Gliff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:01 AM
  #114
Vipers31
Moderator
Hostile Environment.
 
Vipers31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bergisch Gladbach
Country: Germany
Posts: 6,780
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Vipers31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Right then, I guess you can find that Center somewhere else, maybe hope for next year draft eh? Im curious as to how you plan to solve your needs at Center? I thought Grigs would be perfect.
In about every draft there is at least one player at each position that would solve one team's biggest area of need. That doesn't have GMs throw out every sensible idea of value and go for it. While free agency doesn't appear to be a solution this summer, there's always other options. And the draft is one even without this deal - first of all, because we still have a shot at that spot in tonight's lottery (), and secondly, because there's no guarantees that Grigorenko/Galchenyuk/Forsberg (although no natural center) will all be gone at the time of our pick. The most common ranking tends to not translate to the outcome of a draft to the degree HF seems to expect about every year.

Vipers31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:03 AM
  #115
n0rthstar
Registered User
 
n0rthstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 410
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
All we do is get a center and lose a 20 year old top 4 PMD. Just counter productive. Holland deserves a chance.
Gotta give to get, and maybe im overvaluing Grigs? It seems I am.

n0rthstar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:06 AM
  #116
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Gotta give to get, and maybe im overvaluing Grigs? It seems I am.
The difference is we would be giving up a 6th AND a 20 year old top 4 PMD. way too much to give to get.

Gliff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:08 AM
  #117
n0rthstar
Registered User
 
n0rthstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 410
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
The difference is we would be giving up a 6th AND a 20 year old top 4 PMD. way too much to give to get.
Is there nothing from the Oilers outside of the big 3 that could get it done?

n0rthstar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:10 AM
  #118
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,445
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Right then, I guess you can find that Center somewhere else, maybe hope for next year draft eh? Im curious as to how you plan to solve your needs at Center? I thought Grigs would be perfect.
Grigorenko or Galchenyuk won't fix that problem next year. Holland would still be the leading prospect for next season's roster, and possibly the season after that. Even then they have to beat out Bonino, who was pretty good when he was asked to center a scoring line with Bobby and Devo.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:14 AM
  #119
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,445
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Is there nothing from the Oilers outside of the big 3 that could get it done?
None. We don't need to load up on futures, and there's nothing that makes tearing a hole in our top 4 worth considering.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 05:17 AM
  #120
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,614
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Is there nothing from the Oilers outside of the big 3 that could get it done?
Nothing. We have young Defensemen and a great prospect pool. I'm not high on Gagner so not him either. I would be willing to trade up but I cant remember a trade up of 4 positions costing a former 1st rounder who has 70 points in his first 2 years in the NHL by age 20.

Gliff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 10:19 AM
  #121
ShadowDuck
Captain Anaheim
 
ShadowDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,022
vCash: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Right then, I guess you can find that Center somewhere else, maybe hope for next year draft eh? Im curious as to how you plan to solve your needs at Center? I thought Grigs would be perfect.
Holland has developed very well up to this point, he'll likely be a 2nd Center in at most two years. Bonino made a huge jump this year and is good enough as 3rd C. We'll still have Koivu on the roster next year.

If we keep our 6th, we have a chance at Grig and Galy if they drop or Forsberg. It's not worth one of our best D to move up.

ShadowDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:04 AM
  #122
Darcy Regier
Registered User
 
Darcy Regier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,926
vCash: 500
This would be an absolutely terrible deal for the Ducks, 4 spots is not worth Cam Fowler. Ducks may need center depth but their are much better ways to fill than than giving up your best young defenceman. Maybe try Peter Holland at center first? their is no reason he cannot become a 2nd center, maybe they cant draft Radek Faksa and go with Getzlaf, Faksa, Holland for the future, that would be very good depth down the middle.

Darcy Regier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:06 AM
  #123
Darcy Regier
Registered User
 
Darcy Regier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,926
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Gotta give to get, and maybe im overvaluing Grigs? It seems I am.
you may just be underrating Fowler who alone could likely get a top 7 pick in this draft, so essentially its 6th and 7th overall for 2nd overall, doesnt make sence from the Ducks persepective.

Darcy Regier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:21 AM
  #124
Ducksgo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakewood CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,922
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ducksgo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant View Post
Gotta give to get, and maybe im overvaluing Grigs? It seems I am.
I wouldn't want to move up 4 spots for Grigs anyway. He just seems like he wouldn't fit here on our team. Sure if he drops I'll take him. But to actually put in an effort to move up to get him??.... I'll pass and get a player that drops. We been doing really well with drop of players lately.

Fowler dropping out of top 5 in our laps and Etem looking like a GEM at the end of the first round. I have a feeling this year will be no different!

Ducksgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 02:34 PM
  #125
Ginu
Registered User
 
Ginu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,293
vCash: 500
If Montreal wins the lottery and wants to draft Galchenyuk, at say 3rd or 4th overall, what would the difference be? A top 6 forward?

Ginu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.