I see our defense being uber-depleted first. If it was a forward that has played D, ie Burrows, or someone that possesses the instincts, say Hansen or, assuming his versatility carries over, Higgins, I think that would be more useful to us. I hope we have no injuries instead though
Yeah...unlikely that we get that low on forwards. The worry is always on defence....top 4 especially. Our 3rd pairing(#6 position) is pretty interchangeable.
Yeah...unlikely that we get that low on forwards. The worry is always on defence....top 4 especially. Our 3rd pairing(#6 position) is pretty interchangeable.
When it comes to the 3rd pairing in the playoffs....I'll still choose the veteran physical dman with some scoring upside, over a young, less experienced, less physical, non-offencive defenceman.
Well that's your opinion and IMO a ridiculous one. There is nothing wrong with his locks at all and if you had ANY sense of style or grooming you would understand that his hair suits his facial structure very well. I mean of all the hockey players hair styles you can rag on you pick David Booth? really? His hair is beautiful, he's a very handsome and well spoken guy who just happens to be in a little slump that he will break out of thanks to his positive attitude and willingness to drive to the net.
Predicting a 4-1 win. Schneider will play well and all we will do over the next couple of days is continue the goaltending debate. Ahh the life of the canuck fan.
Sadly not. If the Blues win their 2 games we will need 3 points.
You sure? Blues can finish with 111 points and 50 wins. If the Canucks win tomorrow, we'll have 51 wins and 111 points...or is there another "first tiebreak"?
I think they'd win on head to head wins against us, if we win tomorrow, and they win the next two...leaving us tied in point and wins. However, we'd have a game in hand, to collect 1 or 2 points to break that tie and break it with most wins overall.
You sure? Blues can finish with 111 points and 50 wins. If the Canucks win tomorrow, we'll have 51 wins and 111 points...or is there another "first tiebreak"?
Asking myself the same question. Someone on team 1040 keeps saying st louis has the tie breaker?
3 points clinches it for sure for the Canucks. But I think a single point in the final 2 should do it. Expecting St.Louis to crumble under atleast one of Phoenix/Dallas playing for the playoff lives.
3 points clinches it for sure for the Canucks. But I think a single point in the final 2 should do it. Expecting St.Louis to crumble under atleast one of Phoenix/Dallas playing for the playoff lives.
