HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Ron MacLean: Flames owners believe Iginla should go get a cup.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-08-2012, 01:50 AM
  #76
NightBlazer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,651
vCash: 500
Iginla never gets traded. His legacy remains in Calgary.

Between the Bartschi pick, Cammallerri trade, Akim Aliu pickup, Blake Comeau pickup etc, Jay Feaster has been working a lot of magic lately. If he continues the way he's been going, such drastic action like trading the best player in franchise history won't be necessary.

NightBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:09 AM
  #77
judge301
Registered User
 
judge301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
He was surrounded by flames fan expecting an in depth view of how he sees the franchise a "no" would have been a slap in the face. He was pointing out that several teams have had top picks for a few years and haven't improved any, I don't see a problem with it.
Ok fine, i'm sure as a Flames fan you don't have an issue with it. The entire hockey world did take note of the comment at the time and it was widely viewed as a shot by major media groups. I could honestly care less what you think of it. It was a shot and now it's come back to kick him in the butt.

judge301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:13 AM
  #78
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,581
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge301 View Post
Ok fine, i'm sure as a Flames fan you don't have an issue with it. The entire hockey world did take note of the comment at the time and it was widely viewed as a shot by major media groups. I could honestly care less what you think of it. It was a shot and now it's come back to kick him in the butt.
How so everything he said was true, and what media groups out side of alberta thought it was a shot I have not seen one.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:23 AM
  #79
judge301
Registered User
 
judge301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
How so everything he said was true, and what media groups out side of alberta thought it was a shot I have not seen one.
TSN, Sportsnet, thescore, hell it even made ESPN. You are a tough person to reason with as most of your comments are based on non facts. I have nothing left to say to you. You've wasted enough of my time.

judge301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:27 AM
  #80
RobBrown4PM
Pringles?
 
RobBrown4PM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,229
vCash: 500
This is the year Calgary wants to trade Iginla. If they don't they risk creating a Sundin type scenario. And trust us Leaf Fans, Flames Fans, you don't want that.

RobBrown4PM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:28 AM
  #81
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,004
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightBlazer View Post
Iginla never gets traded. His legacy remains in Calgary.

Between the Bartschi pick, Cammallerri trade, Akim Aliu pickup, Blake Comeau pickup etc, Jay Feaster has been working a lot of magic lately. If he continues the way he's been going, such drastic action like trading the best player in franchise history won't be necessary.
How are those magic?

LiquidSnake is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:30 AM
  #82
LickTheEnvelope
Decertified Poster
 
LickTheEnvelope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19,006
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SB164 View Post
I don't believe they ever went through a proper rebuild, but you can definitely make a case for the Boston Bruins as well. Bergeron, Krejci, Lucic, Seguin, and Marchand were all originally drafted by the Bruins, and they were obviously key players to their Stanley Cup win last year.
It helped that the Bruins were getting handed picks and players from Toronto...

LickTheEnvelope is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 03:35 AM
  #83
Hammer79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,734
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge301 View Post
It was a shot at Edmonton directly. If he would have left the team and city out of it it wouldn't have been. You and the Flames owners call it pride and say the fans deserve better. Those are just 5 cent words and phrases to deflect attention from the crappy position that team is currently finding itself in. It's so funny to see people commenting on Edmonton's top draft picks three years in a row and ignoring the fact it is not out of the ordinary for crappy teams to get those high picks for a few years. Vancouver fans conveniently forget they essentially got two first overalls because the Sedins demanded to play together. how long has it taken for that team to rise to the top?
From wiki:

Quote:
The Canucks already possessed the 3rd overall pick in the 1999 NHL Entry Draft that was used to select Henrik Sedin. They then acquired the 2nd overall pick to select Daniel as follows.

The Canucks traded Bryan McCabe and their first-round pick in 2000 or 2001 to the Chicago Blackhawks in exchange for the Blackhawks' first round pick (4th overall).
The 4th overall pick acquired from the Blackhawks was then traded along with two third-round picks in the 1999 draft (75th and 88th) to the Tampa Bay Lightning in exchange for the Lightning's first-round pick (1st overall).
The 1st overall pick acquired from the Lightning, along with a conditional third-round pick in the 2000 draft, was then traded to the Atlanta Thrashers for the Thrashers' first-round pick (2nd overall) under the condition that then-Thrashers GM Don Waddell not select either Sedin with the first overall pick.
That 1999 draft was very weak, and Atlanta really struck out with their Patrik Stefan pick at #1. Just look at the first round from that year. There were a few that panned out, Havlat and Jackman, and a couple that played in this league, but it was a weak draft year.

http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/nhl1999e.html

Tanking from 1997 to 2000 didn't build this team, but it gave them a couple of key pieces to build around.

Hammer79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 03:48 AM
  #84
Noori
Moderator
 
Noori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,969
vCash: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
This wasn't even an interview.

It was at the STH event in the off-season. Somebody asked if he would do a full re-build like the Oilers, he told the fan to look at where Edmonton has finished in the last 2 seasons and where they will finish this season. And he wasn't wrong. It wasn't an unprovoked attack, he simply believes that fans, players... they deserve better.

He said he has too much pride to do what the Oilers are doing, and that "Ken can find another GM if he wants to blow up the team".
Thanks for that. My memory wasn't correct on that one.

Noori is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 03:55 AM
  #85
The Perfect Human
Bow Down to Lidas
 
The Perfect Human's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,839
vCash: 500
I overheard Kevin Lowe discussing Calgary management's position a few weeks back at a restaurant I was at (yes I know it's rude to eavesdrop). He basically said that the Calgary fan base is more fragile than places like Edmonton, Toronto, and Montreal - and that it'd be impossible to just do a re-build there like Edmonton has adopted.

He also said that management simply could not trade Jarome Iginla and expect to sell out games at the Saddledome like they've been doing for so long. He said trading Iginla would tell the fans that the team is giving up on being competitive and starting a re-build - and that interest in the team would dwindle with it. That the Flames would become less profitable as seats wouldn't be filled, and that Jarome was the face of the team and thus the main reason they're selling out every night, etc. He then pointed to the Flames late-90's/early-00's struggles as an example of how fragile their fan-base is to a non-competitive team, and suggested that them going for the "pure rebuild" like Edmonton has would simply mean 2-3 years of huge losses for ownership and fan interest.

I don't know if Lowe has any idea what he's talking about - but I'll admit that before 2004 and that Cup run, I don't remember Flames fan celebrating their team with nearly as much fan fare as they do these days.

The Perfect Human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:05 AM
  #86
Canuckaholic19
Registered User
 
Canuckaholic19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,890
vCash: 500
Sedin-Sedin-Iginla

Canuckaholic19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:10 AM
  #87
Devonator
Registered User
 
Devonator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Proud Darul Harbian
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,829
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightBlazer View Post
Iginla never gets traded. His legacy remains in Calgary.

Between the Bartschi pick, Cammallerri trade, Akim Aliu pickup, Blake Comeau pickup etc, Jay Feaster has been working a lot of magic lately. If he continues the way he's been going, such drastic action like trading the best player in franchise history won't be necessary.
Ha ha...magic...wow....Feaster must be one of the worse magicians I have ever seen in that case....Cammy, Comeau, Blake are all terrible pick ups and Akim is nothing as you will find out next year when he actually has to play with pressure.....Sven is it....that is reality...you guys are old, slow, aging and a cap team with one of the worse prospect pools in all of hockey.....honestly, some Flames are at least honest and realistic but some of you guys are going to be in for a rude shock as your team continues to decline badly over the years to come!

Devonator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:34 AM
  #88
Medium Rare*
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noori View Post
Woah, that's huge. Does anyone have the clip of MacLean saying that or remember the context he said this in. Was this his own speculation or did it sound like he had something to back up his claim?
Ron MacLean is someone I have alot of respect for, but he is hardly an insider. IMO it is likely speculation on his part.

That said if the only move the Flames make this summer is trading Iginla I think the Flames can battle through it and still be a playoff contender. Depth among our top 6 wingers is one of our strengths and I think a 1st line featuring Tanguay and Cammalleri has the makings of a solid line if we can improve our position at center ice (maybe addressed through a potential Iginla trade?) and add a top 4 defenseman (via free agency)

Medium Rare* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:35 AM
  #89
Ville82
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Finland
Posts: 978
vCash: 500
Should have traded years ago...

Ville82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:48 AM
  #90
Hackett
HF Needs Feeny
 
Hackett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,926
vCash: 500
What you say in your title and in your post are two very different things.

MacLean didnt say anything special. He said the flames may finally look into moving him.... anyone could have come up with that.

Hackett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:51 AM
  #91
Medium Rare*
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemsky_83 View Post
I overheard Kevin Lowe discussing Calgary management's position a few weeks back at a restaurant I was at (yes I know it's rude to eavesdrop). He basically said that the Calgary fan base is more fragile than places like Edmonton, Toronto, and Montreal - and that it'd be impossible to just do a re-build there like Edmonton has adopted.

He also said that management simply could not trade Jarome Iginla and expect to sell out games at the Saddledome like they've been doing for so long. He said trading Iginla would tell the fans that the team is giving up on being competitive and starting a re-build - and that interest in the team would dwindle with it. That the Flames would become less profitable as seats wouldn't be filled, and that Jarome was the face of the team and thus the main reason they're selling out every night, etc. He then pointed to the Flames late-90's/early-00's struggles as an example of how fragile their fan-base is to a non-competitive team, and suggested that them going for the "pure rebuild" like Edmonton has would simply mean 2-3 years of huge losses for ownership and fan interest.

I don't know if Lowe has any idea what he's talking about - but I'll admit that before 2004 and that Cup run, I don't remember Flames fan celebrating their team with nearly as much fan fare as they do these days.
The landscape of hockey in Canada has changed since the lockout. I think since the lockout attendance has risen in all Canadian markets (except those already selling out of course) sibe we lost that year. Sure you can look at the Flames poor attendance during their prolonged playoff drought, but you also have to look at the Oilers attendance during their leaner years prior to the lockout as a comparison if someone is going to make the claim the Flames fanbase is more fragile than that in Edmonton.

From 92-93 to 95-96 the Oilers struggled at the gate, hitting a low in 95-96 with an average attendance of 12,335 but never exceeded an average of 15,000 during that time period.

During the Flames long playoff drought. The Flames hit their all-time low in average attendance (not counting the days before the Saddledome) in 99-00 when it dipped to 15,320, one of only 2 seasons the average attendance dipped below 16,000.

So I am not so sure I buy into the Flames fan base being more fragile (or less loyal) than that in Edmonton. Obviously no one holds a candle to Montreal or Toronto in terms of fan support though.

I know attendance numbers can be fudged by buying the tickets yourself and using them as giveaways, so the numbers may not be entirely accurate ( I wouldn't be shocked if the real numbers were similar to Edmonton's). But I think it shows that at least traditionally the Flames fan base is not as fragile as many make them out to be in comparison to markets like Edmonton.

Medium Rare* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 04:58 AM
  #92
gonegonegone*
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego
Country: United States
Posts: 3,338
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halpysback View Post
Here you go
omg this is the funniest thing ive ever seen hahahahaha

gonegonegone* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:18 AM
  #93
UlaTek
Registered User
 
UlaTek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 267
vCash: 500
For his sake and the teams, I hope so

UlaTek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:27 AM
  #94
MISC
Negged.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,100
vCash: 500
After watching this I think he would agree to it.

http://video.flames.nhl.com/videocen...d=11&id=170785

MISC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:33 AM
  #95
Medium Rare*
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MISC View Post
After watching this I think he would agree to it.

http://video.flames.nhl.com/videocen...d=11&id=170785
he was asked about being part of a "full rebuild" which makes any comments irrelevant since the Flames can't have a full rebuild and not trade Iginla.

Medium Rare* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:42 AM
  #96
MISC
Negged.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,100
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Medium Rare View Post
he was asked about being part of a "full rebuild" which makes any comments irrelevant since the Flames can't have a full rebuild and not trade Iginla.
I was referring to his 'I can't say what will happen' etc.

I remember Jarome saying years ago 'No, I want to stay. I love it here'

His dialogue has changed very much, but it could just be that the season had just ended 15 min before that interview and he hadn't thought of it.

I can see him wanting a cup and willing to move.

MISC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:46 AM
  #97
aLus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 377
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tebowz View Post
Flames are only a couple of pieces away from being a top contender.
If those couple of pieces is Crosby, Datsyuk and Weber maybe.

aLus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:51 AM
  #98
Dylonus
Registered User
 
Dylonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 8,972
vCash: 500
I want to see Iggy and Teemu both traded to the same contender (as long as it's not the Flyers) and have them win a cup together, then both retire at that point.


Dylonus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:54 AM
  #99
Medium Rare*
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylonus View Post
I want to see Iggy and Teemu both traded to the same contender (as long as it's not the Flyers) and have them win a cup together, then both retire at that point.

honestly I almost made a proposal of Iggy and Tanguay to the pens. Can you imagine a line of Tanguay - Crosby - Iginla? I don't think it would be very easy under the cap and I am not sure the Pens will pay what it would cost.

Medium Rare* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 05:55 AM
  #100
Medium Rare*
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MISC View Post
I was referring to his 'I can't say what will happen' etc.

I remember Jarome saying years ago 'No, I want to stay. I love it here'

His dialogue has changed very much, but it could just be that the season had just ended 15 min before that interview and he hadn't thought of it.

I can see him wanting a cup and willing to move.
Irregardless, between the timing and the wording of the question I would take it all with a grain of salt.

Medium Rare* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.