HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Notices

Playoffs Round 1 Discussion: (2) St. Louis Blues vs. (7) San Jose Sharks

View Poll Results: Series Prediction
Blues in 4 16 7.66%
Blues in 5 16 7.66%
Blues in 6 24 11.48%
Blues in 7 4 1.91%
Sharks in 4 3 1.44%
Sharks in 5 17 8.13%
Sharks in 6 90 43.06%
Sharks in 7 39 18.66%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-08-2012, 12:42 AM
  #101
Fistfullofbeer
No Soup For You
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: India
Posts: 5,091
vCash: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan View Post
Some of you need to get a grip. The Blues are now the hunted..this will be new territory for them. Sharks for the first time in a long time are the underdogs. They have nothing to lose.
Totally agree.

Its great to be an 8th seed. Nobody expects much out of you. The Blues swept us 4-0 regular season and will possibly be overconfident too.

They may be boring games but we are playing with confidence right now. Looking forward to the series.

__________________
What?! Look, he thinks he's people!
Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:43 AM
  #102
Tomahawk214
i'm not even mad
 
Tomahawk214's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Davis, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistfullofbeer View Post
Totally agree.

Its great to be an 8th seed. Nobody expects much out of you. The Blues swept us 4-0 regular season and will possibly be overconfident too.

They may be boring games but we are playing with confidence right now. Looking forward to the series.
Well we're the 7th seed sooo....

Tomahawk214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:44 AM
  #103
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,336
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomahawk214 View Post
Well we're the 7th seed sooo....
...what

Finished it for you

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:44 AM
  #104
Fistfullofbeer
No Soup For You
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: India
Posts: 5,091
vCash: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomahawk214 View Post
Well we're the 7th seed sooo....
My bad. 7th seed. Low expectations. Same difference.

Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:45 AM
  #105
dwood16
Registered User
 
dwood16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: L.A.
Country: United States
Posts: 1,502
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KpopandHockey View Post
Blues in 4, 4 goals in the series, all during 5 on 3s.
Damn you!!! you're totally right

dwood16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:46 AM
  #106
sbet1998
Registered User
 
sbet1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 601
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lsx View Post
This.

In all honesty I think we should fare better against the blues than the canucks if the coaching staff can pull their heads out of their ***** and setup the system to beat the trap.

Of course goal tending is a huge ****ing question mark....
I hope that the Sharks do waste a lot of time beating the Blues' trap... As a Blues fan, of course.

sbet1998 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:47 AM
  #107
sharkohol
only posts drunk
 
sharkohol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Country: United States
Posts: 4,578
vCash: 500
over/under on number of 5 on 3s for the blews?

sharkohol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:51 AM
  #108
murdock1116
Registered User
 
murdock1116's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 800
vCash: 500
In 2000 when the Sharks played the Blues we were 0-4 or 1-5 against them as well. Regular season means nothing. It's all about how your team is playing now.

No reason we can't beat the Blues here. This is way better than playing Vancouver.

That Blues team was well coached by Joel Quenville as well, so who cares about the Hitchcock factor.

murdock1116 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:51 AM
  #109
mtylerjr
Registered User
 
mtylerjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 245
vCash: 500
I just bought my ticket for Sharks Home Game "A"

I wonder what the head-to-head playoff pucks will look like this year.

mtylerjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:56 AM
  #110
sbet1998
Registered User
 
sbet1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 601
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by murdock1116 View Post
In 2000 when the Sharks played the Blues we were 0-4 or 1-5 against them as well. Regular season means nothing. It's all about how your team is playing now.

No reason we can't beat the Blues here. This is way better than playing Vancouver.

That Blues team was well coached by Joel Quenville as well, so who cares about the Hitchcock factor.
Lightning doesnt strike twice in the same place. These are two different teams, different era, different players, different expectations on STL's part and STL doesnt have the same pressure of having a PT and a top 5 payroll, Just sayin'

sbet1998 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:00 AM
  #111
MadmanSJ
Know Your Onion!
 
MadmanSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 1,317
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistfullofbeer View Post
My bad. 7th seed. Low expectations. Same difference.

MadmanSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:00 AM
  #112
Sniper Archetype
RIP Локомотив
 
Sniper Archetype's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 15,387
vCash: 500
Why are you guys such a bunch of whiny little children? The Blues are not this invincible juggernaut. All this "we'll be lucky to score a goal" or "lucky to win a game" talk is embarassing. Go into the threads of every one of the 15 other teams in the playoffs and you will hear confidence and people finding reasons their team can win. I'm shocked by the *****ing in here. We need a positivity thread where we can realistically talk about what the Sharks could do to win rather than have the rest of you (majority, not all) mope here in the dark alone.

Sharks in 6, etc

Sniper Archetype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:02 AM
  #113
murdock1116
Registered User
 
murdock1116's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 800
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sbet1998 View Post
Lightning doesnt strike twice in the same place. These are two different teams, different era, different players, different expectations on STL's part and STL doesnt have the same pressure of having a PT and a top 5 payroll, Just sayin'
Sure that's true, but the same reasoning can be applied to regular season and the playoffs. These are two different teams than the ones that played a month and a half ago.

I still say regular season record has no barring on how this series plays out.

murdock1116 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:05 AM
  #114
SC2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,847
vCash: 500
Don't let the regular season record fool you.

Don't let the season series record full you.

This is a very good Sharks team. They take this in 5. All games will be nail-biters.

This Sharks team is made for the playoffs. We have many 3rd/4th line players that can outshine their regular season performances: Moore, Winnik, Gally, Desjdy.

Our D is much better than last year. Our weak PK is offset by Stl's weak PP.

Blues on the otherhand are built like the 03-04 Sharks. No real elite forward talent, exceptional goaltending, play great as a team. Hitchcock teams are always tough in the playoffs too...but my gut says the Sharks take this series.

SC2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:05 AM
  #115
Squeeven
Registered User
 
Squeeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,072
vCash: 500
Does anyone else think that since Martin Havlat missed the last 2 games against the Sharks, that the spark he's provided lately could maybe change the outcome of this series slightly? I think his speed will definitely prove useful against a very stingy Blues defense. I'm not saying he's going to win us the series but he'll definitely help us.

Squeeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:10 AM
  #116
ilikebigjoe
Registered User
 
ilikebigjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 706
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Les Wynan View Post
Blues in 5. This isn't going to be a contest. Trying to win that game in the third period was the stupidest decision the Sharks made all year. Watch the Kings coast by Vancouver.
before any games today i was saying anyone but st louis....i was ok with van. but honestly, the blues limped in, had great breaks against us all 4 games, got all the calls. not denying they were the better team, but i think the sharks are starting to play for eachother and have realized that is how they are going to win games. i think they hadnt figured out yet what their identity is when they played st louis, and i think they look determined out there. van has been quitely shutting teams down lately in the home stretch, and no, they arent scoring at the same clip as last year, but i like SJ's odds vs the blues simply even beacuse for the first time in years, they come in as the underdogs in the first round. this team has potential to disappoint a young blues team who's sick goalie tandem has looked...well...human, in the last two weeks.

ilikebigjoe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:10 AM
  #117
ChompChomp
SACK T-MAC
 
ChompChomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas, TX (Ugh)
Country: United States
Posts: 8,461
vCash: 500
What sucks about this series is start times for games in St. Louis. If the games in STL on a weekday have a 5:00pm Pacific opening faceoff, local ratings will suffer. I know most here don't care about that, but it's worth pointing out.

I'm hoping due to the fact that now all games are televised nationally (and supposedly every game in its entirety so no possiblity of JIP because of an earlier game you don't care about), games in STL could possibly start at 6pm Pacific / 8 pm Central.

__________________
2011: Outcoached by Vigneault. 2012: Outcoached all season and postseason by Hitch.
2013: Outcoached by most coaches in the NHL. Who's left? 12 year olds on Xbox Live? SACK T-MAC NOW
ChompChomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:13 AM
  #118
NWShark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,105
vCash: 500
The sharks will actually prep specifically for the blues now. When effort is equal the more talented team wins the majority of the time. As long as the sharks don't get outworked they will win in 5 or 6. If the sharks would have backed into the playoffs I would be more concerned. Instead they just won 4 must win games against tough opponents in a row. They have a monster powerplay, more than 12 NHL forwards, 8 NHL defensmen and at least 2 good goalies. They are ready.

Ken Hitchcocks system is good but he only gets good results in the playoffs with a good amount of talent. The blues aren't there yet. This will be a good learning experience for them. They haven't faced playoff Thorton, Marleau and Boyle yet. Also very interested to see how Burns reacts. He's a gamer I think he steps up another level just as he has this last couple weeks. Havlat will be a force too.

Oh and a blues defensman will score on his own net.

NWShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:13 AM
  #119
juantimer
Registered User
 
juantimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,617
vCash: 500
Starting on the road is going to give this team a little jump, I believe. Home playoff games are basically must-win, so it will help them a lot to not be in a must-win from the start. I think they will surprise some people.

juantimer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:13 AM
  #120
SactoShark
Integrity.
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sactopotato
Posts: 8,216
vCash: 50
For the love of Toews.... just stay out of the box.

SactoShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:17 AM
  #121
Tomahawk214
i'm not even mad
 
Tomahawk214's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Davis, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
These Blues fans thinking they have a cakewalk are pissing me off.

Tomahawk214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:17 AM
  #122
ilikebigjoe
Registered User
 
ilikebigjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 706
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChompChomp View Post
What sucks about this series is start times for games in St. Louis. If the games in STL on a weekday have a 5:00pm Pacific opening faceoff, local ratings will suffer. I know most here don't care about that, but it's worth pointing out.

I'm hoping due to the fact that now all games are televised nationally (and supposedly every game in its entirety so no possiblity of JIP because of an earlier game you don't care about), games in STL could possibly start at 6pm Pacific / 8 pm Central.
i am worrying about JIP for myself up here in canada due to the odd start time. we get most games at 6pm and 9pm central. but with this one starting at 7, i could see a JIP or a non-showing. tsn or cbc up here will obviously show the van games (boo!) and the sens games... and the pit games im sure will be on cbc cuz of crosby. sj/stl could be on tsn. likely tsn2 i guess. just hope it doesnt get trumped by other stupid ****ing series, but i think i might get first and second round games on my CI no?

ilikebigjoe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:18 AM
  #123
WTFetus
Registered User
 
WTFetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 10,527
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
No they aren't. I won't be happy, but after we're swept I'll come back and say it.
That hardly means anything. It's a win-win for you. Sharks get swept: I told you so! Sharks win: who cares, Sharks win!

The series should be close, and regular season really means nothing going into the playoffs. Not to mention Blues play well when they sit on the lead, if the Sharks get the first goal, they'll be on their heels. From what I remember, 2 of the games, the Blues first goal was a 5/3. Another game, it was an extremely lucky bounce off the boards into an empty net.

WTFetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:19 AM
  #124
Inub0i
Dashing Rogue
 
Inub0i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UC Irvine, Irvine
Country: United States
Posts: 7,988
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to Inub0i Send a message via MSN to Inub0i Send a message via Skype™ to Inub0i
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomahawk214 View Post
These Blues fans thinking they have a cakewalk are pissing me off.
Let them talk. They should know to never count their chickens before they hatch.

We just gotta hit them. HARD. No injury type hits, but hard enough to tire them out.

Inub0i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:20 AM
  #125
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,336
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomahawk214 View Post
These Blues fans thinking they have a cakewalk are pissing me off.
They would have thought that no matter who they are playing. We will see what happens.

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.