HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

3 assigned to OKC. Why not Omark?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-08-2012, 12:49 PM
  #1
Oilly
Registered User
 
Oilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Strathcona, AB
Posts: 179
vCash: 500
3 assigned to OKC. Why not Omark?

VandeVelde, Hartikainen and Teubert all assigned to AHL Oklahoma City. No Omark? Anybody know why that would ne?

Oilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:52 PM
  #2
dixs35
Registered User
 
dixs35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,405
vCash: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilly View Post
VandeVelde, Hartikainen and Teubert all assigned to AHL Oklahoma City. No Omark? Anybody know why that would ne?
He can be claimed on waivers.

dixs35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:52 PM
  #3
Krigaren*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,010
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilly View Post
VandeVelde, Hartikainen and Teubert all assigned to AHL Oklahoma City. No Omark? Anybody know why that would ne?
He has to go throw waivers.

Krigaren* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:54 PM
  #4
nabob
#GETYOURBAGON
 
nabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HF boards
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,478
vCash: 1596
Because the Oilers hate him

nabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:56 PM
  #5
SilverHaireDevil
Registered User
 
SilverHaireDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 500
because he would be gone to another team with no return to the Oilers for their player.

SilverHaireDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:56 PM
  #6
Oilly
Registered User
 
Oilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Strathcona, AB
Posts: 179
vCash: 500
So i guess he'll get his wish, and go play at the worlds

Oilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:00 PM
  #7
nabob
#GETYOURBAGON
 
nabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HF boards
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,478
vCash: 1596
It was foolish for the Oilers to call him up and waste his last few games of Waiver eligibility just to have him sit in the PB for most of the time. They should have just called up Green or Keller especially since Omark spent most of the games he played on the 3rd/4th line.

nabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:03 PM
  #8
Hockey Fan #751
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nabob View Post
It was foolish for the Oilers to call him up and waste his last few games of Waiver eligibility just to have him sit in the PB for most of the time. They should have just called up Green or Keller especially since Omark spent most of the games he played on the 3rd/4th line.
Between that and the Paajarvi fiasco makes you wonder if they know what they're doing.

Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:09 PM
  #9
jumptheshark
Give the dog a bone
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 47,631
vCash: 50
There is a rather large thread why omark didn't go down.

jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:24 PM
  #10
craiger17
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 33
vCash: 500
The Swedish coach said that Omark needs to try-out for team Sweden right?

craiger17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:27 PM
  #11
Sethis
Registered User
 
Sethis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,191
vCash: 500
Shhhhh, don't draw too much attention... the Swedish Omark-thumpers will see you!

Look! In the distance! Here they come now!

Sethis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:30 PM
  #12
hfboardsuser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,283
vCash: 500
Waivers. Also not eligible for AHL playoffs, so what's the point in such a risk?

hfboardsuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:32 PM
  #13
Mowzie
Asst. Dishwasher
 
Mowzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lebanon, Alberta
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 8,030
vCash: 50
Sheer stupidity by the management team. Let's take a very effective AHL player out of OKC in the middle of a playoff drive and bring him up to Edmonton who is in desperate need for offensive players, only to bench him and put guys like Jones on our top line... In the process, making said player unable to play any meaningful hockey, which in my opinion, keep in mind I'm also an idiot, would not only increase his trade value, which right now is probably a 4th or 5th rounder, but would also give OKC a top line player for the home stretch.

Short answer: inept management and coaching.

Mowzie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:44 PM
  #14
Sethis
Registered User
 
Sethis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mowzie View Post
Sheer stupidity by the management team. Let's take a very effective AHL player out of OKC in the middle of a playoff drive and bring him up to Edmonton who is in desperate need for offensive players, only to bench him and put guys like Jones on our top line... In the process, making said player unable to play any meaningful hockey, which in my opinion, keep in mind I'm also an idiot, would not only increase his trade value, which right now is probably a 4th or 5th rounder, but would also give OKC a top line player for the home stretch.

Short answer: inept management and coaching.
I don't quite see it so simply as that.

I think this was Renney and Tambellini not seeing eye to eye. I think Tambo wanted him up here and playing, similar to why he was up here in the press box for 5 or 6 (?) games before management mercifully sent him down earlier in the year. In the end, it's Renney who decides who dresses though. Not comparing players, but the situation is very reminiscent of MacT and Schremp IMO.

Tambellini can bring him up and say, "I want you to play him."

Renney can look at him and say, "that's cool. I'll play my best lineup."

Clearly, the best lineup wasn't the best. Like 'second last' not-the-best.

Sethis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:57 PM
  #15
Hockey Fan #751
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Bugg View Post
Waivers. Also not eligible for AHL playoffs, so what's the point in such a risk?
He is eligible. He's on Oklahoma City's Clear Day List:

http://theahl.com/2012-clear-day-lis...ounced-p176440

That's what makes me wonder if they don't know what they're doing. Why put him on that list then call him up? Do they not plan more than one week ahead??

Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 01:59 PM
  #16
Hockey Fan #751
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mowzie View Post
Sheer stupidity by the management team. Let's take a very effective AHL player out of OKC in the middle of a playoff drive and bring him up to Edmonton who is in desperate need for offensive players, only to bench him and put guys like Jones on our top line... In the process, making said player unable to play any meaningful hockey, which in my opinion, keep in mind I'm also an idiot, would not only increase his trade value, which right now is probably a 4th or 5th rounder, but would also give OKC a top line player for the home stretch.

Short answer: inept management and coaching.
Exactly. Meanwhile, the Barons have hit the skids and might lose top spot in the Western Conference.

Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:32 PM
  #17
Tedi
Registered User
 
Tedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,050
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mowzie View Post
Sheer stupidity by the management team. Let's take a very effective AHL player out of OKC in the middle of a playoff drive and bring him up to Edmonton who is in desperate need for offensive players, only to bench him and put guys like Jones on our top line... In the process, making said player unable to play any meaningful hockey, which in my opinion, keep in mind I'm also an idiot, would not only increase his trade value, which right now is probably a 4th or 5th rounder, but would also give OKC a top line player for the home stretch.

Short answer: inept management and coaching.
I'm puzzled as well, I still think there is more to it than we know or will ever know.

Tedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 07:09 PM
  #18
Seachd
Registered User
 
Seachd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Fail
Posts: 12,534
vCash: 500
If you got the email of the news release, it includes a picture of the 3. Hover your mouse over the picture and see what it says...

Seachd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 07:18 PM
  #19
Gret99zky
Worst Thread Ever
 
Gret99zky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rebuildington
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,340
vCash: 50
omark is on his way out.

too small to crack the lineup

Gret99zky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 07:40 PM
  #20
hyster110
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 714
vCash: 500
why send someone to OKC who doesn't want to be there?

hyster110 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 09:14 PM
  #21
Krigaren*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,010
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyster110 View Post
why send someone to OKC who doesn't want to be there?
Omark said it would be great to be down there in okc with the guys and try to win something but sense he was waiver eligible he thought oilers didnt want to risk loosing him for nothing and therefor hoped he would be allowed to go to wc.

Aint that bad eh..

Krigaren* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 04:12 AM
  #22
Mentallydull
Registered User
 
Mentallydull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oil Country
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,407
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gret99zky View Post
omark is on his way out.

too small to crack the lineup
I see the whole "size" thing get thrown around a lot in regards to Omark but from what I've seen his size is never an issue.

The way he uses his body/positioning allows him to keep the puck far longer than you'd think. Something I noticed he does is when someone's coming up behind him he'll give himself a 1 foot cushion or so. When he DOES get hit/pushed it just knocks him right towards the puck and he carries on.

Anyways, I'd heard from somewhere that they were going to send him down regardless and just hope he made it through waivers. Glad to see the management isn't quite THAT inept yet.

Mentallydull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 05:47 PM
  #23
nexttothemoon
Top 30 for 7 years
 
nexttothemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,651
vCash: 50
I remember Renney said in an interview maybe a month or so ago (maybe a little longer) that he wanted to see Omark up and playing... so I have no idea why management brought him up and then the coaches proceeded to bench him for most of the time.

I literally see no sense in that. Obviously he doesn't have any place within the org going forward but you'd think they'd want him playing and contributing "somewhere" to A) let him shake off the rust and get back into playing shape after his injury and B) let him actually increase his value by playing if the whole plan is to trade him away (which obviously is what they will do).

All I can think of is that Omark must be a complete ass in practice/ dressing room and Renney despises his attitude so much he can't see fit to play him over other 3rd/4th liners.

Maybe he legitimately isn't a good fit for the big club, but then play him in OKC where he can at least show his stuff instead of benchwarming in the bigs.

No I'm not Swedish and I describe myself as an Omark fan only in that just like every other Oiler prospect... I want them to develop and contribute as much as possible.

He'll most likely be dealt during the summer/draft and I wish him the best wherever he ends up.

nexttothemoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 07:40 PM
  #24
Thorulf
Registered User
 
Thorulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 128
vCash: 500
Oilers will try to raise the value on Omark before they ship him away.
If he makes the WC spot it will probably be the right choice. If he don't make the WC-tryout, well bummer.

My guess is that he has chances to make the WC, not in no way a shoe-in. He need to battle for the spot. Swedens team seams pretty good atm, depending on which teams that will leave the Stanly Cup early.
Personally i would like to see Landeskog (who said we would love to play the WC) with Omark

Thorulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 08:56 PM
  #25
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,923
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
All three of those guys are going to be beasts for our team.

thadd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.