HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

'Moneyball'-ing the Western Conference Playoff Teams

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-09-2012, 04:22 PM
  #1
unintelligence
Registered User
 
unintelligence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: lurking
Posts: 149
vCash: 500
'Moneyball'-ing the Western Conference Playoff Teams

Saw this post over on ***********/r/hockey (and sourced from his blog originally) where a guy tries to 'Moneyball' the Western Conference playoff series based on certain stats. Although I don't think it goes in depth enough to provide an extremely insightful analysis, it does give some idea of relative strengths and playoff experience going into the post-season. edit: to clarify, these are career playoff stats

sources: ******, this guy's blog

overview:


sharks:


blues:


Last edited by unintelligence: 04-09-2012 at 04:25 PM. Reason: clarified
unintelligence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 04:35 PM
  #2
USF Shark
Zôion politikòn
 
USF Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DC Area
Country: United States
Posts: 20,528
vCash: 500
yeah...that's hardly "moneyballing" it....

__________________
"I hate books; they only teach us to talk about things we know nothing about."
-Jean Jacques Rousseau
USF Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 05:55 PM
  #3
SJGoalie32
Registered User
 
SJGoalie32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: TealTown, USA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,089
vCash: 500
First off, "Moneyball" itself was not really about statistical analysis as much as it was about maximizing a player's value and utilizing statistical analysis to maximize player value and find players who were undervalued by the market and who could produce the most benefits for the least cost.

Second, using statistical analysis as a way of assessing player value was not new to baseball, or any other sport for that matter. Teams had been doing it for more than a century. The difference brought to light by Sabremetrics and brought into the mainstream by "Moneyball" was the fact that teams had just been using the wrong statistics.....or at least, a less accurate set of statistics. Sabremetrics showed that OBP was a far more accurate predictor of the future and component of team success than batting avg., HR's, or RBI's.....or ERA, saves, etc.

Third, just as goals are the key to hockey success, runs are the key to baseball success. A player can score runs in baseball just like a player can score goals in hockey. But as the Sabremetric analysis showed, merely looking at a player's statistic run totals does not give a truly accurate prediction of the player's benefit nor his likely contribution to team success. In baseball, the trick was not in figuring out which player scored the most runs (a stat that has been tracked since well back into the 19th century), but in figuring out what specific component of the game most directly correlated to producing those runs for a team (and/or keeping them off the board on defense). This guy's stats are just telling you (sort of) who has previously scored the most goals in the past. It does nothing to tell you how to best generate those goals (which is where Sabremetrics struggles a bit outside of a statistically predictable game like baseball) or which players are the best at doing so.

Fourth, even in "Moneyball," there was some important focus on the defensive side. On defense, it was all about who could keep runners OFF base, regardless of how they looked while doing it. Most of the book/movie focused on the offense because that was the biggest hole on the A's roster needing to be filled at the time, whereas the starting pitching was largely well set. But the defensive side (preventing opponents from scoring) was just as important to the A's.....and I see no mention of any defensive or goaltending stats among that guy's numbers. Kind of a rather blatantly obvious omission.

Finally, even ignoring all that other stuff I posted and ignoring any of the merit of this guy's numbers......this guy didn't even do his own calculations right. 87 / 602 does not equal 6.92 goals per game. That last column doesn't show goals per playoff game for each team.....it shows playoff games per goal.

That's not "Moneyball"......that's just "Math Fail"


Last edited by SJGoalie32: 04-09-2012 at 06:00 PM.
SJGoalie32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 06:06 PM
  #4
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,391
vCash: 567

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 06:11 PM
  #5
Phu
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
lol and to think no one ever misspells pietrangelo

Phu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 07:46 AM
  #6
Plowevelski
:-)) Torres Fan Club
 
Plowevelski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Giants, Dynasty
Country: Madagascar
Posts: 1,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
That was the first thing I noticed

Plowevelski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:51 AM
  #7
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,611
vCash: 500
Plus those are terrible numbers to use.

I was goofing around with some more interesting numbers in a bored attempt to come up with a semi usefull 'total stat' and it looked like this:

It is incomplete, and as I said just goofing around, but I think these stats are a LOT more useful than the ones above. I had a little over half the teams done before I got busy and never finished.

There is an equation to figure out the total score with some crazy weighting, and its slightly different for defensemen.


Last edited by hockeyball: 03-09-2014 at 10:41 PM.
hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:49 AM
  #8
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,166
vCash: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
I thought the Winchester typo was even better.

And then I looked at the Blues and saw Alaexander Steen.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:28 PM
  #9
Derick*
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,624
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Derick*
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Awesome gif

Anyone have that angry Brady face image from 2007 that says "WERE ONLY UP BY 50."

Derick* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 01:01 PM
  #10
Linkster
LTIR'ed off
 
Linkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Coastal Sharkifornia
Country: United States
Posts: 5,226
vCash: 500
Most interesting stat on that list: playoff games-played for the Sharks:

Patrick Marleau - 124
Colin White - 111
Joe Thornton - 109
Dan Boyle - 84

Whatever switch they have to flip on White to live up to that number, I hope they find it before Thursday.

Linkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.