HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Winnipeg - Colorado

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-09-2012, 09:01 PM
  #1
Heebs21
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 608
vCash: 500
Winnipeg - Colorado

To Colorado:

D- Tobias Enstrom
C- Alexander Burmistrov
D- Cody Sol

To Winnipeg:

D- Tyson Barrie
C- Matt Duchene

Heebs21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 09:25 PM
  #2
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,048
vCash: 50
As an outsider, I would think a Stastny-Enstrom deal would be good for both sides. That is if both sides would even want to make a deal.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 09:27 PM
  #3
chet1926
Registered User
 
chet1926's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: greeley colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 2,977
vCash: 577
Not terrible...would rather it be:

Scheifele
Burmistrov
pick


for

Duchene
Barrie


Duchene is the best player in the deal by far so I'm still not even sure this would get it done, but its closer. Not big on Enstrom, rather go find a defenseman through UFA.

chet1926 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 09:30 PM
  #4
t0nedeff
Registered User
 
t0nedeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 784
vCash: 500
You aren't going to find a d-man in UFA that is better than Enstrom.

t0nedeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 09:51 PM
  #5
Gabriel Landeskog
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Gabriel Landeskog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 270
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by t0nedeff View Post
You aren't going to find a d-man in UFA that is better than Enstrom.
Suter

Gabriel Landeskog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 09:51 PM
  #6
King Woodballs
v Kings Fans
 
King Woodballs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Your Mind
Posts: 24,648
vCash: 50
sign me up

__________________
King Woodballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:24 PM
  #7
broc
Registered User
 
broc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 722
vCash: 500
The answer is no.

Not interested in Barrie. Two big pieces in burmi and Tobi do not go for an underachieving Duchene. Change burmi to something else.

broc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:24 PM
  #8
t0nedeff
Registered User
 
t0nedeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 784
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legendary Mark Keane View Post
Suter
Yeah, and the likelihood of that happening is.....................?

t0nedeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:29 PM
  #9
BarberioTheBarbarian
Registered User
 
BarberioTheBarbarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sarasota, Fl
Country: United States
Posts: 409
vCash: 500
If Colorado has a surplus of centers why would they trade for a center?

BarberioTheBarbarian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:39 PM
  #10
dahrougem2
Registered User
 
dahrougem2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 834
vCash: 500
I understand these are hypothetical proposals, but Matt Duchene will never get traded from the Avs unless he either requests a trade, or is playing so poorly that there is no hope for him, which is not likely to happen. To get Matt Duchene, you need to overpay, and Enstrom/Burmistrov/Sol, though a really good package that would likely get it done from an outsiders point of view, won't get it done from the avs' point of view

dahrougem2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:13 AM
  #11
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,977
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarberioTheBarbarian View Post
If Colorado has a surplus of centers why would they trade for a center?
Because they don't have a surplus of Centers? They have as many as they need, which is why if they trade one getting another center back would be very appealing.

I think Duchene and Elliott for Enstrom and Burmistrov is the smoothest fit. Avs give the greater potential but the Jets take the bigger risk of that potential getting reached. I think Burmi and Elliott or comparables while Enstrom and Duchene are the big difference in this trade. Could see the Avs trying to hold onto Elliott and offering Barrie with a second round pick instead.

cgf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:15 AM
  #12
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,977
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahrougem2 View Post
I understand these are hypothetical proposals, but Matt Duchene will never get traded from the Avs unless he either requests a trade, or is playing so poorly that there is no hope for him, which is not likely to happen. To get Matt Duchene, you need to overpay, and Enstrom/Burmistrov/Sol, though a really good package that would likely get it done from an outsiders point of view, won't get it done from the avs' point of view
I'm not so sure about that. We all love Dutchy because he grew up an Avs fan and has great talent. But if we strike out on finding EJ a partner this is the type of trade that we could be looking for. With the Staz playing well again and Factor breaking out, our need for Duchene isn't as huge as it once was, stick Burmistrov on the third line with Olver and Jones or Downie and the Avs still have 3 scoring lines and EJ has a legit partner so that we can stop cycling bottom 4 guys through that position.

cgf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 01:32 AM
  #13
Goulet17
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,482
vCash: 500
The idea of trading Duchene for Enstrom is rather preposterous if for no other reason than the fact that Enstrom has one year remaining on a contract before UFA status, while Duchene is years away from being a UFA.

That fact alone seems inconsistent with the recent philosophy of the Avalanche's management. Duchene is over 8 years younger than Enstrom, and Enstrom would immediately become one of te older players on the Avs' roster. It just doesn't seem like a move the Avs would make.

Goulet17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 02:44 AM
  #14
Ivan13
Another empty head.
 
Ivan13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Zagreb
Country: Croatia
Posts: 10,789
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarberioTheBarbarian View Post
If Colorado has a surplus of centers why would they trade for a center?
Burmistrov is better on the wing IMHO.

Ivan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:35 AM
  #15
Huffer
Registered User
 
Huffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,334
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heebs21 View Post
To Colorado:

D- Tobias Enstrom
C- Alexander Burmistrov
D- Cody Sol

To Winnipeg:

D- Tyson Barrie
C- Matt Duchene
I wouldn't do that. Enstrom has a lot of value on his own if he gets dealt. Not interested in adding Burmistrov to Enstrom to get Duchene.

This is not a good deal for the Jets IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chet1926 View Post
Not terrible...would rather it be:

Scheifele
Burmistrov
pick


for

Duchene
Barrie
No way in hell this gets done from a Jets perspective. Wow.

Huffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:37 AM
  #16
Huffer
Registered User
 
Huffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,334
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
As an outsider, I would think a Stastny-Enstrom deal would be good for both sides. That is if both sides would even want to make a deal.
Makes a lot more sense.

Huffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:50 AM
  #17
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 6,139
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huffer View Post
I wouldn't do that. Enstrom has a lot of value on his own if he gets dealt. Not interested in adding Burmistrov to Enstrom to get Duchene.

This is not a good deal for the Jets IMO.
As an Avs fan, I wouldn't be interested in trading Duchene to the Jets unless Burmistrov or Little are pieces of the deal along with Enstrom.

Barrie has a lot of value as well.

Quote:
No way in hell this gets done from a Jets perspective. Wow.
Doesn't make much sense either, why would the Jets move their first draftee?

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:54 AM
  #18
SoupNazi
Homerist!
 
SoupNazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Soup Kitchen
Country: Argentina
Posts: 5,995
vCash: 455
Quote:
Originally Posted by t0nedeff View Post
Yeah, and the likelihood of that happening is.....................?
About 1/30.

SoupNazi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:26 AM
  #19
Jack de la Hoya
Registered User
 
Jack de la Hoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,620
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupNazi View Post
About 1/30.
I get the point, but isn't it significantly better than that? Take out the teams that would be limited by the cap hit, and I think there are probably less than 10 serious contenders for Suter's services--and Colorado certainly has the space and need to make an attractive offer--a Suter-EJ pairing could anchor the blue-line for the next decade.

Jack de la Hoya is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:31 AM
  #20
Huffer
Registered User
 
Huffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,334
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolfe2015 View Post
As an Avs fan, I wouldn't be interested in trading Duchene to the Jets unless Burmistrov or Little are pieces of the deal along with Enstrom.

Barrie has a lot of value as well.



Doesn't make much sense either, why would the Jets move their first draftee?
I can see wanting to get a centre back if the Avs were dealing Duchene. But if we start with a hypothetical trade around Burmistrov and Duchene being the key pieces, and if the Jets needed to add because of higher potential, the additional piece is not Enstrom.

If the Jets and Avs were going to make a swap, it would make more sense for it to be either an Enstrom and Stastny type deal, or a Burmistrov / Duchene type deal. (with adds where necessary on both).

The former makes more sense from a team needs perspective while the latter just seems like a lateral for both teams.

Huffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:36 AM
  #21
Gabriel Landeskog
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Gabriel Landeskog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 270
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by t0nedeff View Post
Yeah, and the likelihood of that happening is.....................?
I didn't say Avs were lock to get Suter, But I answered your questioned and found a better dman then enstrom.

Gabriel Landeskog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:46 AM
  #22
Ivan13
Another empty head.
 
Ivan13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Zagreb
Country: Croatia
Posts: 10,789
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huffer View Post
I can see wanting to get a centre back if the Avs were dealing Duchene. But if we start with a hypothetical trade around Burmistrov and Duchene being the key pieces, and if the Jets needed to add because of higher potential, the additional piece is not Enstrom.

If the Jets and Avs were going to make a swap, it would make more sense for it to be either an Enstrom and Stastny type deal, or a Burmistrov / Duchene type deal. (with adds where necessary on both).

The former makes more sense from a team needs perspective while the latter just seems like a lateral for both teams.
As much as I like Burmistrov and Enstrom neither of them is close in terms of value to Duchene for various reasons.

Ivan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 02:52 PM
  #23
outoftune
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: 1000 Chopper Circle
Posts: 213
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by t0nedeff View Post
yeah, and the likelihood of that happening is.....................?
1/15

outoftune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 03:35 PM
  #24
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 6,139
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huffer View Post
I can see wanting to get a centre back if the Avs were dealing Duchene. But if we start with a hypothetical trade around Burmistrov and Duchene being the key pieces, and if the Jets needed to add because of higher potential, the additional piece is not Enstrom.

If the Jets and Avs were going to make a swap, it would make more sense for it to be either an Enstrom and Stastny type deal, or a Burmistrov / Duchene type deal. (with adds where necessary on both).

The former makes more sense from a team needs perspective while the latter just seems like a lateral for both teams.
Well it's not Burmistrov + Enstrom for only Duchene, Barrie is a young NHL-ready defender that formerly won defenseman of the year in juniors.

I like Burmistrov a lot, but I have a feeling that Sherman would target Little ('06 draftee).

So tell me, Little + Enstrom = Duchene + ?

If you'd rather talk Stastny than Duchene, I still am not comfortable with the Avs moving a center without targeting a guy like Burmi/Little in the deal who could play center or wing if needed. Stastny and O'Reilly more than Duchene due to the fact Duchy still has maturing to do.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:02 PM
  #25
KingJet*
Welcome Back
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,651
vCash: 500
I'd prefer just Kane and Burmi for Duchene and Barrie

KingJet* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.