HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Chicago Blackhawks
Notices

Quenneville loads up Hawks' No. 1 power-play unit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-09-2012, 11:39 PM
  #51
nds90
Registered User
 
nds90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 2,757
vCash: 500
put jimmy hayes in front of the net. but he has to not be scratched of course

nds90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 11:54 PM
  #52
LarmerAmonteSeabrook
Registered User
 
LarmerAmonteSeabrook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: City of Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 1,898
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nds90 View Post
put jimmy hayes in front of the net. but he has to not be scratched of course
For some reason, it seems as if he's in Q's doghouse with the decreased playing time he has had. Frig, he has even been a scratch for FROLIK!

LarmerAmonteSeabrook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:00 AM
  #53
swanny
Registered User
 
swanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 3,657
vCash: 751
I have never understood the way Sharp has been used on the PP the last couple years. He was the backdoor recipient for a while. But they went to that well too long and now he is back on the point. Yes....he is a sniper. But he is much more useful getting set up in the slot or positions like that to snipe. Not 'sniping' from the blue line. Seems like a waste of his talent. Leddy gets the puck on the net also besides Seabrook. He has a pretty good shot.

swanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 04:55 AM
  #54
HjamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzerspitze View Post
The PP was bad last year too, but the average fans on this board were blinded by the high "ranking".
LMAO

What a retarded argument.

HjamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 07:43 AM
  #55
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 20,563
vCash: 50
I like this 1st PP unit.

the 2nd? not really. Bolland over Krüger for sure in the POs

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:13 AM
  #56
BobbyJet
Registered User
 
BobbyJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dundas, Ontario. Can
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,852
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzerspitze View Post
The PP was bad last year too, but the average fans on this board were blinded by the high "ranking".

Where did I ever make playoff predictions? Show me.

This is correct. I opened a thread on our struggling PP last season when Kane sprained his ankle and was to be out for a while. The stats said we were doing alright and that was the argument thrown at me from all directions. It was obvious to me and a few others then that we had major issues and they have not gone away. In fact are now chronic. Q has made a big mistake by keeping Kitchen through all of this…. Not all franchises would be so forgiving.

If the ineptness doesn’t turn around in the PO’s, our chances are slim.

BobbyJet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 08:51 AM
  #57
MTP
I Love Shinpads
 
MTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Joliet, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,158
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to MTP
Their PP strategy should be to have Crawford skate over center ice as soon as they gain possession. Bam, back to ES.

MTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:06 AM
  #58
UsernameWasTaken
Let's Go Blue Jays!
 
UsernameWasTaken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,337
vCash: 450
At this point I think they should try just about anything if it has the potential of improving the PP.

UsernameWasTaken is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:16 AM
  #59
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18,758
vCash: 50
I love the unit but I don't like Sharp on the point, never have. He needs to be near the net, especially since he shoots high very well and that's the best way to get one by Smith. I'd put Toews on the point with Seabrook, (Toews taking draws and shifting back though), Sharp-Kane-Hossa up front.

coldsteelonice84 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 09:59 AM
  #60
Panzerspitze
Registered User
 
Panzerspitze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,080
vCash: 500
Most apparently learned I was absolutely right about the PP last year, but you're too **** retarded to learn to shut up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HjamSandwich View Post
LMAO

What a retarded argument.

Panzerspitze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 10:15 AM
  #61
BobbyJet
Registered User
 
BobbyJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dundas, Ontario. Can
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,852
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
I love the unit but I don't like Sharp on the point, never have. He needs to be near the net, especially since he shoots high very well and that's the best way to get one by Smith. I'd put Toews on the point with Seabrook, (Toews taking draws and shifting back though), Sharp-Kane-Hossa up front.
Havinf Toews on the point, makes some sense to me. It also serves the purpose of keeping Toews out of the traffic areas on the PP and helps ease him back into the line up.

That said, I'd still rather have Hayes in the slot, playing the Buff role. We can't continue with the periphery system in the playoffs. It's time to get dirty.

BobbyJet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 10:25 AM
  #62
HjamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 231
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzerspitze View Post
Most apparently learned I was absolutely right about the PP last year, but you're too **** retarded to learn to shut up.
I said all last year that Toews was injury prone, and people made fun of me.

"He played 80 games", they'd say.

Looks like I was right. He missed tons of time this year.

HjamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 10:28 AM
  #63
ChiHawk21
Registered User
 
ChiHawk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,414
vCash: 500
obviously this is just a thread so panzer can complain about Q again...
we dont know who this new power play will work out...maybe he will keep the first unit out for most of the time every power play. It could work unbelievably well, what is the point of complaining before we see it.

ChiHawk21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:37 AM
  #64
Sevanston
Moderator
 
Sevanston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,610
vCash: 500
Jesse Rogers ‏ @ESPNChiHawks
So you know who to yell at later, Kitchen is running most of these drills....lol

Even Jesse "Media Puppet" Rogers is laughing at this. That's how bad of an idea it is.

Sevanston is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:45 AM
  #65
rick hawk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 266
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba88 View Post
I like this 1st PP unit.

the 2nd? not really. Bolland over Krüger for sure in the POs
I totally agree. I don't understand how it could be otherwise.

rick hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:45 AM
  #66
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,165
vCash: 500
I don't think it's the players that are the cause of our woeful PP, but the system they run. No matter how you slice it, we should have a killer PP with Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Keith, Seabrook, Oduya, Leddy that all have good qualities for the PP.

Maybe loading up our first unit will do it, because obviously the system won't. It's worth a shot.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:47 AM
  #67
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 15,770
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
All I'm going to say is Sharp at the point is a disaster. It's Jeff Hamilton/Jason Williams back there.

DisgruntledHawkFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:49 AM
  #68
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18,758
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyJet View Post
Havinf Toews on the point, makes some sense to me. It also serves the purpose of keeping Toews out of the traffic areas on the PP and helps ease him back into the line up.

That said, I'd still rather have Hayes in the slot, playing the Buff role. We can't continue with the periphery system in the playoffs. It's time to get dirty.
Agreed on all points. We should have both. First unit loaded with stars, 2nd unit more of a workman like simple and effective PP:

Hayes (In front)-Bolland-Stalberg (If Hayes is in front, you need someone who can get around with the puck and chase it down)

Keith (could be Oduya here if you want to play the piss out of Keith even strength and PK)-Leddy

coldsteelonice84 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:50 AM
  #69
brtriad
Registered User
 
brtriad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Loop
Country: United States
Posts: 12,949
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to brtriad
Eh at least when Sharp was on the point last year we were converting. It couldn't hurt to try out at this point.

brtriad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 11:52 AM
  #70
Chelios
Registered User
 
Chelios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,693
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
I love the unit but I don't like Sharp on the point, never have. He needs to be near the net, especially since he shoots high very well and that's the best way to get one by Smith. I'd put Toews on the point with Seabrook, (Toews taking draws and shifting back though), Sharp-Kane-Hossa up front.
I guess we will have to wait and see how it works out, but I would assume that the reason for putting Sharp on the point is so that they can concentrate working from one side. I would guess that they will try to work the puck to Kane on the right half boards and then look for one timers from Seabrook at the top of the point and Sharp sliding down to the top of the left circle. Sounds like a good idea, but in order for it to work we have to gain entry and control the puck which has been the biggest problem on the PP all year.

Chelios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:00 PM
  #71
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18,758
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chelios View Post
I guess we will have to wait and see how it works out, but I would assume that the reason for putting Sharp on the point is so that they can concentrate working from one side. I would guess that they will try to work the puck to Kane on the right half boards and then look for one timers from Seabrook at the top of the point and Sharp sliding down to the top of the left circle. Sounds like a good idea, but in order for it to work we have to gain entry and control the puck which has been the biggest problem on the PP all year.
Right, last year they were able to attract enough attention to the right side to allow Sharp and Seabrook (at times) to be left open and slide down for the back door play. Like you said, you have to cycle well to throw the PK off. Most times this year they set up in a standard box and the Hawks can't do anything to get them to leave position so they end up shooting it into their shin guards.

coldsteelonice84 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:12 PM
  #72
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,165
vCash: 500
I think the biggest problem with our PP, as Olczyk and Foley like to point out, is that our entry into the zone is terrible. We try to skate it in every time... which worked in years past when teams didn't fully recognize that this is a big strength for us and how we set up quickly.

Now you notice the opponent's two forwards standing at the red line and angling the puck carrier to the outside for their defensemen to poke check us at the blue line. No matter who's on our PP unit, if we can't skate the puck in and we refuse to dump and chase... we're not setting up at all.

This is why I think we should have Stalberg on the 1st unit and try dumping the puck into the weaker defenseman's corner, Stalberg skates in and retrieves it and works it up to the half-wall/point. From there, send him to the slot/in front of the net and try to get shots on net. He's pretty decent in tight and has the speed and strength to retrieve the puck and make plays when we're cycling.

Also, I agree with those saying to send Hayes to the front of the net. He's huge, he's got pretty soft mitts for a big guy and seems to have a knack for deflecting pucks. That role utilizes all of his best assets pretty well... not sure why it hasn't been a more regular thing with how awful our PP has been.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:14 PM
  #73
Sarava
Moderator
 
Sarava's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 6,783
vCash: 500
I don't trust anything Q does with the PP anymore.

Sarava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:19 PM
  #74
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18,758
vCash: 50
I liked when Campbell and even Leddy at times (Campoli a little too), would get up to full speed entering the zone, everyone would come in with them, then they either keep puck and carry it all the way to the goaline and fire a shot or dish it back to an open man. I haven't seen the D-men willing (or having enough confidence) to go goal line to goal line with the puck.

coldsteelonice84 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2012, 12:25 PM
  #75
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,165
vCash: 500
^^

Leddy has done that quite a few times in the past few games, actually. I remember because I kept thinking about how he plays a better overall game when he is rushing the puck out of our zone and skating it from end to end... must be a show of confidence when he's playing like that.

But I agree that we don't do it nearly enough. We have Keith, Seabrook, Oduya and Leddy who have all shown that they're capable of doing it effectively but don't very often.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.