HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

What would you offer Edmonton for that 1st pick?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-12-2012, 03:25 PM
  #251
SmythesMinions
Tyler Perogzak
 
SmythesMinions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,000
vCash: 500
whatever


Last edited by SmythesMinions: 04-15-2012 at 12:44 PM.
SmythesMinions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 03:30 PM
  #252
SmythesMinions
Tyler Perogzak
 
SmythesMinions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBeL13f View Post
Yakupov really does remind me of Pavel Bure. Pavel Bure who can hit lick a truck.
So it would be like adding a prime Pavel Bure who could hit like a truck.
Bure could hit like a truck too, he just never really did he preferred to let his wheels/hands do the talking for him. But if you still don't believe me ask Shane Churla.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oYABjkWiJc

SmythesMinions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 03:42 PM
  #253
SmythesMinions
Tyler Perogzak
 
SmythesMinions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by South Indian Stunna View Post
Hall and RNH look to be injury prone?

RNH got knocked out for twenty games due to concussions and a shoulder bump...he returned to the lineup for the entire stretch run and played at the same high level as always.
Concussion and then he lost an edge and fell into the boards shoulder first injured it, missed 13 games rehabbed it, then came back Mike Brown hit him and he missed another week after that. Remember when he got drafted they said he needed to get bigger? That's why they said that.

SmythesMinions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 03:51 PM
  #254
diceman934
Registered User
 
diceman934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NHL player factory
Posts: 2,481
vCash: 500
I would rather trade our pick and move down to draft a D man. Reilly is a stud we could make a trade with Edmonton for some forward help. Edmonton may be willing to trade the top pick but not to us but likely the islanders.

diceman934 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 04:08 PM
  #255
Falon
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 1,660
vCash: 500
Schenn or Franson

Falon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 04:22 PM
  #256
danyo
Rookie User
 
danyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 13
vCash: 500
I've been thinking about a 3-way trade between CLB, EDM, and TOR.
This trade would make sense for all teams involved, and I've included a rationale for these moves at the bottom of this post.
Feel free to chime in with your thoughts!

To CLB:
TOR 2012 1st (5th overall)
TOR 2013 1st
Nazem Kadri
Nikolai Kulemin

To EDM:
CLB 2012 1st (2nd overall)
TOR 2012 2nd (35th overall)
Carl Gunnarson

To TOR:
EDM 2012 1st (1st overall)
Rick Nash

-----

Columbus:
- 2nd Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
- Rick Nash
+ 5th Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
+ 2013 TOR 1st Round
+ Nazem Kadri
+ Nikolai Kulemin

Rationale: Columbus gives up flexibility in their selection, but still stays within top 5 picks where players are seen as the same "Tier" (outside of Yakupov) and trades Rick Nash to a team on his shortlist (Toronto is said to be on this list). In return, Columbus gets Toronto's 5th pick (and still picks a player from that same tier, with less flexibility in their selection), pick up another Toronto 1st rounder in 2013, a highly touted prospect in Nazem Kadri, and a season removed 30-goal young scorer with a strong two way game.

Edmonton:
- 1st Pick (Yakupov)
+ 2nd Pick (Murray)
+ 35th Pick
+ Carl Gunnarson

Rationale: Edmonton, a team that's already stacked up front, moves down a pick and picks Murray because they need a young player who can step in immediately and Murray can be that guy. In return for moving down to 2nd overall (which makes sense for them anyway), they also get Toronto's 35th overall pick and further bolster their blue line with a young but proven Carl Gunnarson.

Toronto:
- 5th Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
- 35th Pick
- 2013 TOR 1st Round
- Nazem Kadri
- Carl Gunnarson
+ 1st Pick (Yakupov)
+ Rick Nash

Rationale: Toronto gives up their 5th and 35th pick along with their 2013 1st Round. In addition, Toronto also gives up highly touted prospect Nazem Kadri as well as proven young defenceman Carl Gunnarson. In return, Toronto moves up and is able to select Yakupov with the 1st overall, as well as bring in perennial 30-goal scorer and hometown boy Rick Nash.

danyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 04:26 PM
  #257
Rockinz
Leafs 4 the cup
 
Rockinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leaf Land
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,886
vCash: 500
Schenn + 5th

Done.

Rockinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 04:29 PM
  #258
Rockinz
Leafs 4 the cup
 
Rockinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leaf Land
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,886
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by danyo View Post
I've been thinking about a 3-way trade between CLB, EDM, and TOR.
This trade would make sense for all teams involved, and I've included a rationale for these moves at the bottom of this post.
Feel free to chime in with your thoughts!

To CLB:
TOR 2012 1st (5th overall)
TOR 2013 1st
Nazem Kadri
Nikolai Kulemin

To EDM:
CLB 2012 1st (2nd overall)
TOR 2012 2nd (35th overall)
Carl Gunnarson

To TOR:
EDM 2012 1st (1st overall)
Rick Nash

-----

Columbus:
- 2nd Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
- Rick Nash
+ 5th Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
+ 2013 TOR 1st Round
+ Nazem Kadri
+ Nikolai Kulemin

Rationale: Columbus gives up flexibility in their selection, but still stays within top 5 picks where players are seen as the same "Tier" (outside of Yakupov) and trades Rick Nash to a team on his shortlist (Toronto is said to be on this list). In return, Columbus gets Toronto's 5th pick (and still picks a player from that same tier, with less flexibility in their selection), pick up another Toronto 1st rounder in 2013, a highly touted prospect in Nazem Kadri, and a season removed 30-goal young scorer with a strong two way game.

Edmonton:
- 1st Pick (Yakupov)
+ 2nd Pick (Murray)
+ 35th Pick
+ Carl Gunnarson

Rationale: Edmonton, a team that's already stacked up front, moves down a pick and picks Murray because they need a young player who can step in immediately and Murray can be that guy. In return for moving down to 2nd overall (which makes sense for them anyway), they also get Toronto's 35th overall pick and further bolster their blue line with a young but proven Carl Gunnarson.

Toronto:
- 5th Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
- 35th Pick
- 2013 TOR 1st Round
- Nazem Kadri
- Carl Gunnarson
+ 1st Pick (Yakupov)
+ Rick Nash

Rationale: Toronto gives up their 5th and 35th pick along with their 2013 1st Round. In addition, Toronto also gives up highly touted prospect Nazem Kadri as well as proven young defenceman Carl Gunnarson. In return, Toronto moves up and is able to select Yakupov with the 1st overall, as well as bring in perennial 30-goal scorer and hometown boy Rick Nash.

Well done!

Don't know if a 3 way that big can get done but i guess you never know...

AND i might add Nash/Kessel/Yakupo/Lupul/Frattin/Ashton/Armstrong are all natural RWers.

Might make sense to stick with Yakupov + Nash and deal Kessel + for Getzlaf

Rockinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 05:38 PM
  #259
IBeL13f
Registered User
 
IBeL13f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,483
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmythesMinions View Post
Bure could hit like a truck too, he just never really did he preferred to let his wheels/hands do the talking for him. But if you still don't believe me ask Shane Churla.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oYABjkWiJc
Yeesh, that was nasty. Thanks for that, though. Bure's best days were behind him by the time I started following hockey beyond just the Leafs, so I never saw much of that feistiness that I'm sure he displayed some more of earlier on.

IBeL13f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 05:54 PM
  #260
South Indian Stunna
Registered User
 
South Indian Stunna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sunnydale
Country: Canada
Posts: 278
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmythesMinions View Post
Concussion and then he lost an edge and fell into the boards shoulder first injured it, missed 13 games rehabbed it, then came back Mike Brown hit him and he missed another week after that. Remember when he got drafted they said he needed to get bigger? That's why they said that.
Sorry, I forgot that the first shoulder injury was a fluke and labeled it as a concussion.

You're right, he needs to beef up, but that doesn't mean he has to be considered "injury prone". Aside from the Mike Brown hit, he was able to absorb hits and withstand physicality almost effortlessly at the NHL level.

South Indian Stunna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 06:02 PM
  #261
FreeBird
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,731
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash35 View Post
I would offer our 5th + Any defencemen we have of their choosing except for Gardiner.
Kessel or Phaneuf, Edmonton declines.

FreeBird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 06:19 PM
  #262
Chandrashekhar Limit
ITS PLAYOFFS TIME!!!
 
Chandrashekhar Limit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON
Country: Bangladesh
Posts: 14,410
vCash: 17006
Nothing.

We can't piss away our prospect depth for a position of strength.

Chandrashekhar Limit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 06:47 PM
  #263
Kibago
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 651
vCash: 500
I'd do Schenn/Franson and our pick. i might throw in the 2013 2nd rounder as well, though it'd be nice if they took Komisarek as well for that (he might be a 2nd-pairing D there!)

Kibago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2012, 09:13 PM
  #264
teddygmr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,502
vCash: 500
I'm sure that Yakupov will be an effective NHL'er but I don't think he will be a star. He was mediocre in the WJC...didn't score a single goal! This season he hadsome injuries but didnt really increase his stats from last year. He certainly didnt dominate in the playoffs: only 2 goals 3 assists and -7 in 6 games. Last year Huberdeau rose to the occasion and improved his scoring rate in the playoffs and then won MVP of the Memorial cup. Thats what a top prospect does to prove that he can perform under pressure in important games!
I dont think he is built for the game the Burke and Carlyle want to play so why give up top players/assets to move up 4 spots to take him?

teddygmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 11:27 AM
  #265
danyo
Rookie User
 
danyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 13
vCash: 500
Slight edit to provide a little more for CLB, thoughts?

I've been thinking about a 3-way trade between CLB, EDM, and TOR.
This trade would make sense for all teams involved, and I've included a rationale for these moves at the bottom of this post.
Feel free to chime in with your thoughts!

To CLB:
TOR 2012 1st (5th overall)
TOR 2013 1st
Nazem Kadri
Nikolai Kulemin

To EDM:
CLB 2012 1st (2nd overall)
TOR 2012 2nd (35th overall)
Carl Gunnarson

To TOR:
EDM 2012 1st (1st overall)
Rick Nash

-----

Columbus:
- 2nd Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
- Rick Nash
+ 5th Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
+ 35th Pick
+ 2013 TOR 1st Round
+ Nazem Kadri
+ Nikolai Kulemin

Rationale: Columbus gives up flexibility in their selection, but still stays within top 5 picks where players are seen as the same "Tier" (outside of Yakupov) and trades Rick Nash to a team on his shortlist (Toronto is said to be on this list). In return, Columbus gets Toronto's 5th pick (and still picks a player from that same tier, with less flexibility in their selection), they also get Toronto's 35th overall pick and pick up another Toronto 1st rounder in 2013, a highly touted prospect in Nazem Kadri, and a season removed 30-goal young scorer with a strong two way game.

Edmonton:
- 1st Pick (Yakupov)
+ 2nd Pick (Murray)
+ Carl Gunnarson

Rationale: Edmonton, a team that's already stacked up front, moves down a pick and picks Murray because they need a young player who can step in immediately and Murray can be that guy. In return for moving down to 2nd overall (which makes sense for them anyway) and further bolster their blue line with a young but proven Carl Gunnarson.

Toronto:
- 5th Pick (Murray/Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg)
- 35th Pick
- 2013 TOR 1st Round
- Nazem Kadri
- Nikolai Kulemin
- Carl Gunnarson
+ 1st Pick (Yakupov)
+ Rick Nash

Rationale: Toronto gives up their 5th and 35th pick along with their 2013 1st Round. In addition, Toronto also gives up highly touted prospect Nazem Kadri as well as proven young defenceman Carl Gunnarson. In return, Toronto moves up and is able to select Yakupov with the 1st overall, as well as bring in perennial 30-goal scorer and hometown boy Rick Nash.

danyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 02:43 PM
  #266
Briecheeze
Registered User
 
Briecheeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 593
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by danyo View Post
I've been thinking about a 3-way trade between CLB, EDM, and TOR.
This trade would make sense for all teams involved, and I've included a rationale for these moves at the bottom of this post.
Feel free to chime in with your thoughts!

To CLB:
TOR 2012 1st (5th overall)
TOR 2013 1st
Nazem Kadri
Nikolai Kulemin

To EDM:
CLB 2012 1st (2nd overall)
TOR 2012 2nd (35th overall)
Carl Gunnarson

To TOR:
EDM 2012 1st (1st overall)
Rick Nash
[/I]
Columbus gets shafted hard. Take a look at the package they declined from the Rangers at the deadline for Nash alone. And you want them to deal both Nash AND the 2nd overall for less?

Columbus has needs all over the place, but you're not even considering what they want in a package. They want to upgrade at defense and net, in addition to what they can get at forward. Kadri and Kulemin's stock right now are both at their lowest - why would Columbus take this package over any others?

Edit: I see you added the 35th overall to Columbus. Still much less than what they would've gotten from the Rangers alone. You're making the assumption that the Leafs 2013 1st round pick will be Top-5/Top-10, when adding Nash plus the #1 to the Leafs in that trade would probably move it to around the 10-20 range. Still terrible value to Columbus. They refused more than that for Nash alone.


Last edited by Briecheeze: 04-13-2012 at 02:51 PM.
Briecheeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:28 PM
  #267
Alexander Baigle
Registered User
 
Alexander Baigle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Great White North
Country: Ethiopia
Posts: 706
vCash: 500
To CLB:
TOR 2012 1st (5th overall)
TOR 2013 1st
Cory Schneider
Joe Colborne
Nikolai Kulemin

To VAN:
Luke Schenn
TOR 2012 2nd (35th overall)

To TOR:
CLB 2012 1st (2nd overall)
Rick Nash

This is just an adjusted version, using Vancouver as the intermediate instead of Edmonton, swtiching Kadri with Colborne and Gunnarson with Schenn. We also get the second overall pick instead of the first. This sets up Toronto for:

Nash - Grigorenko - Kessel
Lupul - Grabovski - Kadri
Frattin - Bozak - (Big veteran FA?)
Brown - Steckel - Crabb

This should be fair for Columbus, they get a starter, a two high picks, a top prospect and a former 30 goal scorer.

Alexander Baigle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 10:30 PM
  #268
jukon
#freeyakupov
 
jukon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,158
vCash: 500
If there were any year for Burke to pull off another "Sedin" draft this is it. Anything he could do to draft both Yakupov and Galchenyuk without giving up Kessel, I would allow it. Yes, I would put Gardiner on the table if you could get both.

jukon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 11:59 PM
  #269
BlueStorm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 419
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander Baigle View Post
To CLB:
TOR 2012 1st (5th overall)
TOR 2013 1st
Cory Schneider
Joe Colborne
Nikolai Kulemin

To VAN:
Luke Schenn
TOR 2012 2nd (35th overall)

To TOR:
CLB 2012 1st (2nd overall)
Rick Nash

This is just an adjusted version, using Vancouver as the intermediate instead of Edmonton, swtiching Kadri with Colborne and Gunnarson with Schenn. We also get the second overall pick instead of the first. This sets up Toronto for:

Nash - Grigorenko - Kessel
Lupul - Grabovski - Kadri
Frattin - Bozak - (Big veteran FA?)
Brown - Steckel - Crabb

This should be fair for Columbus, they get a starter, a two high picks, a top prospect and a former 30 goal scorer.
If we could get Schneider for schenn and a second rounder I would stop there and keep our two first rounders.

BlueStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 07:25 AM
  #270
SmythesMinions
Tyler Perogzak
 
SmythesMinions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukon;4794[B
[/B]8087]If there were any year for Burke to pull off another "Sedin" draft this is it. Anything he could do to draft both Yakupov and Galchenyuk without giving up Kessel, I would allow it. Yes, I would put Gardiner on the table if you could get both.
I have a strong feeling that he'll do this, I had it just after the draft lootery*(it's supposed to be a typo guys),I turned to my cousin told him that and explained who/what I'd trade if was him. Normally, my cousin is a realist and shoots down ANY proposal. This time, he thought about it and then agreed it would probably work.

SmythesMinions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 08:17 AM
  #271
Hawaiinleaf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Honolulu
Country: United States
Posts: 1,379
vCash: 500
Yakupov has had 2 not 1 concussions. Players who have had 1 concussion are more likely to have another concussion than players who have not had a concussion. Players who have had 2 concussions are more likely to have another concussion than players who have had 1 concussion.

Players with 4-5 concussions never play again

So tell me again how trading our core assets makes sense again???

Hawaiinleaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 08:28 AM
  #272
beer123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 154
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmythesMinions View Post
Bure could hit like a truck too, he just never really did he preferred to let his wheels/hands do the talking for him. But if you still don't believe me ask Shane Churla.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oYABjkWiJc
Anyone can look like a truck if they skate at someone full speed and elbow an unsuspecting victim.

beer123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:52 AM
  #273
Espher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fredericton, N.B.
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,027
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Espher Send a message via AIM to Espher Send a message via MSN to Espher Send a message via Yahoo to Espher
Quote:
Originally Posted by Briecheeze View Post
Columbus gets shafted hard. Take a look at the package they declined from the Rangers at the deadline for Nash alone. And you want them to deal both Nash AND the 2nd overall for less?
The question ends up being whether or not Nash's value increases or decreases outside of the trade deadline and as he gets a) older and b) closer to the year of his contract.

I honestly don't think they get a deal comparable to what the Rangers were offering at the deadline, even at next year's deadline.

Espher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:54 AM
  #274
BobbyFischer*
 
BobbyFischer*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,864
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukon View Post
If there were any year for Burke to pull off another "Sedin" draft this is it. Anything he could do to draft both Yakupov and Galchenyuk without giving up Kessel, I would allow it. Yes, I would put Gardiner on the table if you could get both.
Lol.. Gardiner isn't that good, bro.

BobbyFischer* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:54 AM
  #275
Edgeworth*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,849
vCash: 500
I would just draft Galchenyuk cause I don't want to **** this up.

Edgeworth* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.