HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Ana pick for #2 center

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-11-2012, 05:26 PM
  #26
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
Grabovski? dont know if i would move him now... but if Galchenyuk is available (assuming we take Forsberg) i would do it

Grabovski + 35th overall?


i dont know.. just trying to gauge value
Grabo makes too much for what he brings. If we get somone who is making 5 mil+ they need to be potential #1s. Grabo is what he is, a solid #2 he just makes too much for the Ducks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
i also added the 35th overall pick

similar output, 1.3 mil less on the contract
Stastny point totals:
79
78
71
57
53

Grabovski point totals:
58
51
48
35

I would rather pay the extra 1.5 mil for Stastny. His worst year would be as good as an extremely good year for Grabo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeisruff View Post
assuming we can flip Ana 1st, Buffalo's 1st and Nashville's 1st for Yakupov

Roy and Armia?
My problem with Roy is the Length of his contract. Not signed as long as I would like, but more importantly, he is a UFA the same offseason as we have to resign Getzlaf Perry Fowler. Thats too much for 1 offseason if you add another top 6 forward.

He is the type of guy I would want if we wernt getting a really young guy. What about St.Louis. I know you guys are happy with your team right now but any interest in the 6th overall for 1 of your centers?

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:27 PM
  #27
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafer97 View Post
Grabo is a hard-working, 2 way, plays bigger than he is 60 pt player and in a few years, 70 so.. and Paul S. is 6.6 M, not the same as Grabo and worth more to COL's franchise than Grabo to ours IMO
In a few years he will be a 70 point guy? He is 29 lol he is probably at, or very close to, his peak point wise.


Last edited by Gliff: 04-11-2012 at 05:35 PM.
Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:28 PM
  #28
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,961
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by airforceones25 View Post
A hell of a lot better than Ganger or Grabovski...

I would do that.. the only problem that lurks for the Ducks is Roy being UFA the same time as Getzlaf, Perry + RFA for Fowler...


Still would make this trade either way.
yes because being smaller, older, getting more money and producing less makes a player that much better.

Not saying that Gagner is worth a top 10 pick but he is not any worse then Roy.

Petro Points is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:31 PM
  #29
mytor4*
 
mytor4*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,175
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petro Points View Post
yes because being smaller, older, getting more money and producing less makes a player that much better.

Not saying that Gagner is worth a top 10 pick but he is not any worse then Roy.
Roy is twice the Player Gagner is.

mytor4* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:44 PM
  #30
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Ok I'm not really interested in Gagner and Roy's contract kind of eliminates him. Anyone esle?

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:45 PM
  #31
mytor4*
 
mytor4*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,175
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
Ok I'm not really interested in Gagner and Roy's contract kind of eliminates him. Anyone esle?
As in another thread the Habs could do Pleks ++

mytor4* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:46 PM
  #32
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,627
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
Ok I'm not really interested in Gagner and Roy's contract kind of eliminates him. Anyone esle?
I wouldn't expect anything. Remember how long LA spent looking their 2C?

Exit Dose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:50 PM
  #33
Darcy Regier
Registered User
 
Darcy Regier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
what are you looking at for a #2 center? certainly not getting Kelser or Zetterberg for that pick. Roy is one of the best 2nd line centers in the NHL, and he would love ANA.

Darcy Regier is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:53 PM
  #34
Koto
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,006
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by letmesleep View Post
You'll be better off with the pick.
this.



no one is giong to offer anything better than gagner/roy

Koto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 05:53 PM
  #35
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,627
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972 View Post
what are you looking at for a #2 center? certainly not getting Kelser or Zetterberg for that pick. Roy is one of the best 2nd line centers in the NHL, and he would love ANA.
The issue is his contract expires at the same time that Getz and Perry's do. I guess if he was willing to give a commitment to a reasonable extension with us, then I'd do that Roy+Armia offer.

Exit Dose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:08 PM
  #36
airforceones25
Registered User
 
airforceones25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 2,812
vCash: 500
Guys I would like...


Duchene
Courtier
Stepan
Brassard
Burmistrov
Johansen


Pretty much the players that aren't available. Lol

airforceones25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:11 PM
  #37
WTFMAN99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,509
vCash: 500
Grabovski and 35th for the 6th is actually good value. You have an interest in Roy but he only makes 500k less then Grabo, but with Grabo you have the term and security. You know he won't walk.

Grabovski also missed some times with injuries and put up 51 pts. He also was with Kulemin and MacArthur for a good portion of the year, Kulemin went from 30 goals to 7 goals, good player but that line did not do as well this year.

Grabovski is a 60 pt 2nd line centre.

WTFMAN99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:15 PM
  #38
Duckstudd269
HF needs an App
 
Duckstudd269's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Country: United States
Posts: 8,214
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockies94 View Post
You'd have to add, a substantive piece.
6th overall+ holland + Cogliano

For

Duchene

Enticing? Close?

Duckstudd269 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:18 PM
  #39
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972 View Post
what are you looking at for a #2 center? certainly not getting Kelser or Zetterberg for that pick. Roy is one of the best 2nd line centers in the NHL, and he would love ANA.
Like I said before, Roy and Stastny are PERFECT for the QUALITY of player. But Stastny gets paid too much and Roy is a UFA the same offseason as Perry Getzlaf and Fower is a RFA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by topdog View Post
As in another thread the Habs could do Pleks ++
Ya so far your proposal is the best we have heard. It is good for both sides I think. My only concern is his age but out of the Grabo Roy and Plekanec type players he is the guy i would want. His contract works for us and he is the type of player who can fill that hole perfectly.

IMO Stastny would be a better but that contract...

Quote:
Originally Posted by airforceones25 View Post
Guys I would like...


Duchene
Courtier
Stepan
Brassard
Burmistrov
Johansen


Pretty much the players that aren't available. Lol
We would have to add significantly to those guys. And I totally understand why they wouldn't want to trade them. So the Roy Grabo Pleks types are what we are looking at.

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:22 PM
  #40
Jack de la Hoya
Registered User
 
Jack de la Hoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,214
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by airforceones25 View Post
Guys I would like...


Duchene
Courtier
Stepan
Brassard
Burmistrov
Johansen


Pretty much the players that aren't available. Lol
If Murray somehow drops to 6 (it would have to go Yakupov, Forsberg, Grigo, Dumba, Galchenyuk), I'd consider swapping Schenn for the pick.

(I think most of my fellow Flyers fans will disagree, but I'm just a bit less sure about Schenn's ultimate ceiling, and I'm probably a bit higher on Murray--I think he's this year's Couturier, without the mono--a bit over-analyzed, and a sure-fire 2nd pairing defenseman with higher potential).

Thoughts?

Jack de la Hoya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:25 PM
  #41
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Rather have someone that has proven a little more but its defiantly interesting.

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:25 PM
  #42
airforceones25
Registered User
 
airforceones25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 2,812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post


We would have to add significantly to those guys. And I totally understand why they wouldn't want to trade them. So the Roy Grabo Pleks types are what we are looking at.
You wouldn't have to add to get those guys.. Simply put they just wouldn't trade them period. Basically what Ducks fans want is a young proven stud on a ELC. So basically this doesn't help any team we would be offering the 6th pick too. We want them to develop the player then we capitalize when they are ready to play. It would be starting from scratch for the other teams...

If Jeff Carter nets the 8th pick and Voracek then for these players you don't add. They just aren't available..

As for everyone saying Stastny would be perfect is his contract was better is a moot point as well because if his contract was better the Avs wouldn't be inclined to move him either. Lol

airforceones25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:27 PM
  #43
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by airforceones25 View Post
You wouldn't have to add to get those guys.. Simply put they just wouldn't trade them period. Basically what Ducks fans want is a young proven stud on a ELC. So basically this doesn't help any team we would be offering the 6th pick too. We want them to develop the player then we capitalize when they are ready to play. It would be starting from scratch for the other teams...

If Jeff Carter nets the 8th pick and Voracek then for these players you don't add. They just aren't available..

As for everyone saying Stastny would be perfect is his contract was better is a moot point as well because if his contract was better the Avs wouldn't be inclined to move him either. Lol
And every other team would want him

How would you like Pleks?

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:34 PM
  #44
airforceones25
Registered User
 
airforceones25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 2,812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
And every other team would want him

How would you like Pleks?
He's not exactly what I'd be looking for but he certainly is a decent option and signed long term which is a plus..

TBH with you i'm extremely high on Grigorenko but I would rather give up some to move up in the draft to land the big fish than try to sort through other peoples mess. The problem is nothing is guaranteed.

airforceones25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:36 PM
  #45
Emerald Duck
Registered User
 
Emerald Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 595
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeh82 View Post
If Murray somehow drops to 6 (it would have to go Yakupov, Forsberg, Grigo, Dumba, Galchenyuk), I'd consider swapping Schenn for the pick.

(I think most of my fellow Flyers fans will disagree, but I'm just a bit less sure about Schenn's ultimate ceiling, and I'm probably a bit higher on Murray--I think he's this year's Couturier, without the mono--a bit over-analyzed, and a sure-fire 2nd pairing defenseman with higher potential).

Thoughts?
Not likely that Murray would drop to #6 unless he has a horrible combine/interview or some other unknown problem, and then I'm not sure Philly would still want him.

However, if Murray was available at #6, I'd consider that trade for Schenn. It would address our problem of a young #2C, and he's further along to becoming a NHL 2C than Holland at this point.

Emerald Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:41 PM
  #46
Jack de la Hoya
Registered User
 
Jack de la Hoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,214
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emerald Duck View Post
Not likely that Murray would drop to #6 unless he has a horrible combine/interview or some other unknown problem, and then I'm not sure Philly would still want him.

However, if Murray was available at #6, I'd consider that trade for Schenn. It would address our problem of a young #2C, and he's further along to becoming a NHL 2C than Holland at this point.
I don't think it will happen either, but it isn't impossible--

1. EDM - Yakpov (if they don't trade the pick, he goes here)
2. CBK - Forsberg (just a rumor that seems to be going around on their boards, plausible--they seem happy with their young D corps)
3. MON - Grigorenko (big C, Roy connection)
4. NYI - Dumba (this is the one stretch--I can't see why they would take him over Murray--but who knows).
5. TOR - Galchenyuk

I really don't think it is that crazy. To be honest, I can only see two of those five teams taking D anyway--I think one of Dumba or Murray will be there at 6--but I wouldn't move Schenn for Dumba.

Jack de la Hoya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:43 PM
  #47
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,627
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emerald Duck View Post
Not likely that Murray would drop to #6 unless he has a horrible combine/interview or some other unknown problem, and then I'm not sure Philly would still want him.

However, if Murray was available at #6, I'd consider that trade for Schenn. It would address our problem of a young #2C, and he's further along to becoming a NHL 2C than Holland at this point.
I'd do it as well. Schenn is further than what we have and what we would draft.

Exit Dose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:45 PM
  #48
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Exit Dose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,627
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeh82 View Post
I don't think it will happen either, but it isn't impossible--

1. EDM - Yakpov (if they don't trade the pick, he goes here)
2. CBK - Forsberg (just a rumor that seems to be going around on their boards, plausible--they seem happy with their young D corps)
3. MON - Grigorenko (big C, Roy connection)
4. NYI - Dumba (this is the one stretch--I can't see why they would take him over Murray--but who knows).
5. TOR - Galchenyuk

I really don't think it is that crazy. To be honest, I can only see two of those five teams taking D anyway--I think one of Dumba or Murray will be there at 6--but I wouldn't move Schenn for Dumba.
Would you do it for Dumba and a small plus like Karlsson?

Exit Dose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 06:55 PM
  #49
FiveForDrawingBlood
Registered User
 
FiveForDrawingBlood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,477
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gliff View Post
Any team with center depth interested in the 6th overall pick for a YOUNG center who is signed longterm or a RFA? This center cannot be making alot of money. So no Stastny type salaries please.

To me I would be happy with any of the top 6 guys if we draft at 6 but we need a center and I seriously seriously doubt either of the top 2 centers will be there at 6.

My top 6:
Yakupov
Grigorenko
Galchenyuk
Murray
Forsberg
Dumba

I would totally be willing to add for the right guy.

EDIT: When I say #2 I mean a CLEAR #2. Please no Gagner.
Eller in Montreal?

FiveForDrawingBlood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2012, 07:00 PM
  #50
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveForDrawingBlood View Post
Eller in Montreal?
More like Plekanec+

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.