HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Ryan Smyth... I see trouble ahead

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-12-2012, 02:50 PM
  #26
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,658
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
Smyth is a bit of an egomaniac IMO. I will always appreciate what he has done for the Oilers over the years but i don't understand why he would demand to be traded here and now become an annoyance to sign YET AGAIN.
He's rich beyond his wildest dreams and he's playing in the city that he loves, why doesn't he just buck up and sign the contract if not then just move on, it's always drama between him and Oilers management. He should realize that he's not a top 6 player anymore and take whatever contract he can get here (i can't imagine that it's too much of a lowball).

I honestly don't think that his ego will allow him to take a paycut and a reduced role with the team. I'm just speculating here so don't kill me too much for it but i'm starting to think that he might have been a part of the locker room trouble that the team was going through towards the end of the year maybe due to being demoted to the 3rd line. Suck it up Ryan, you're not the same player that you were even 2 years ago, sign a short term deal play in the bottom 6 and be the leader that you are capable of being.
Its partly circumstantial. Smyth has been here up this alley before with the club paying more for the services of his linemates, Horc, and Hemsky, than they offer him.

I don't know that Smyth needs the money, but it probably dawns on him that two players that put up consistent cluster**** seasons are getting paid a whole lot more money.

I'm thinking thats a problem. No easy solution.

I can imagine its a lot of a lowball. The team offering 2.5M wouldn't surprise me. This is the same club that pays goofballs like Eager, Barker, Brule, Omark, Potter, Khabi, to be completely useless and unliked hockey players.

Replacement is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 02:51 PM
  #27
Moonlapse Vertigo
....
 
Moonlapse Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,765
vCash: 1025
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
Smyth is a bit of an egomaniac IMO. I will always appreciate what he has done for the Oilers over the years but i don't understand why he would demand to be traded here and now become an annoyance to sign YET AGAIN.
He's rich beyond his wildest dreams and he's playing in the city that he loves, why doesn't he just buck up and sign the contract if not then just move on, it's always drama between him and Oilers management. He should realize that he's not a top 6 player anymore and take whatever contract he can get here (i can't imagine that it's too much of a lowball).

I honestly don't think that his ego will allow him to take a paycut and a reduced role with the team. I'm just speculating here so don't kill me too much for it but i'm starting to think that he might have been a part of the locker room trouble that the team was going through towards the end of the year maybe due to being demoted to the 3rd line. Suck it up Ryan, you're not the same player that you were even 2 years ago, sign a short term deal play in the bottom 6 and be the leader that you are capable of being.
All of this.

Smyth can sit around all summer as far as I'm concerned and come crawling back to us in August/September. Or... if he prefers he can sign with Calgary.

Tambellini has made a lot of piss poor signings (and I despise the man) but I can't blame him for sitting tight here.

Moonlapse Vertigo is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 02:54 PM
  #28
Scoobs
2nd Rate Fan
 
Scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,400
vCash: 50
If Ryan truly wants to stay in Edmonton, he'll take a salary related to what his role will be on the club next year.

He may feel he has game left, but he's no spring chicken.

I'm not saying that Edmonton should lowball him, I'm just saying that if he's going to be a third liner, he should be paid as a third liner.

Scoobs is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:01 PM
  #29
joestevens29
Registered User
 
joestevens29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,093
vCash: 2407
I still don't know why they don't give him 2mil base and 2-3mil in bonuses.

joestevens29 is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:07 PM
  #30
Master Lok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,021
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohaj View Post
Smyth would need to reinvent his game completely post Yakupov....

I am all for it...but is he?

No more coasting and potting garbage goals....he will have to be a 200 ft energy player and play in the bottom six...and preferably be thankful for it.
Apparently you didn't watch the Oiler games nor were you aware of the role that Smyth played.

Early on he was playing in a scoring top six role, but for a majority of the season he was in a checking line role. He didn't get top line PP, instead he was the first Penalty killing unit and he faced the toughest opposition on a majority of defensive zone draws.

I'm fine if Smyth leaves but that just means he needs to be replaced by a capable winger who can defend and attack. That's a player that the oilers need MORE of, not less. Honestly what game are some of you people watching out there?

Master Lok is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:12 PM
  #31
Koto
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,006
vCash: 500
dont care. he can walk.


im not too concerned about cap hit (although i would prefer to keep it under 2M) but if we sign him for more than a year i will be upset. could be a disaster. hes not very good.


i love that tamby is playing hardball.

Koto is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:14 PM
  #32
Master Lok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,021
vCash: 500
I would sign Smyth for one year with the expectation of him playing the same role. But I would be grooming Paajarvi to take his place, I can see Paajarvi being a bigger version of Radek Dvorak.

Master Lok is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:15 PM
  #33
peck420
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 62
vCash: 500
I would give him slightly less than Hemsky, maybe 4.5.

Limit it to single year, and try to fold him into the organization.

All in the mind of showing the F/A market that we are loyal to those that are loyal to us.

Might hurt for a season or two, but would give us more appeal in the long run.

peck420 is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:17 PM
  #34
bzur
Registered User
 
bzur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,325
vCash: 500
Two year deal, and I'd be willing to offer 3 million to stick around and be a leader to the kids. I don't care about his production, as much as his leadership. If it's comes down to money like last time we traded him, I say sayonara. If it comes to that it's hard to believe that he wanted to come back to Edmonton for anything but a paycheque after his contract expired.

bzur is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:17 PM
  #35
Perfect_Drug
Registered User
 
Perfect_Drug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,632
vCash: 500
I personally really don't care if Smyth signs or not.

I just hope Tambo has learned his lesson when it comes to 35+ signings (1 year at a time is best).

For a guy with a supposedly 'tireless work ethic' who 'never took a shift off', he kinda looked like he coasted for large portions after December.



I guess what I expect from the veterans are a tireless work ethic, and never taking a shift off.

Perfect_Drug is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:19 PM
  #36
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,658
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Lok View Post
Apparently you didn't watch the Oiler games nor were you aware of the role that Smyth played.

Early on he was playing in a scoring top six role, but for a majority of the season he was in a checking line role. He didn't get top line PP, instead he was the first Penalty killing unit and he faced the toughest opposition on a majority of defensive zone draws.

I'm fine if Smyth leaves but that just means he needs to be replaced by a capable winger who can defend and attack. That's a player that the oilers need MORE of, not less. Honestly what game are some of you people watching out there?
I'm wondering the same. I'm thinking half the people here that want Smyth gone would be inserting somebody like Omark instead.

Few of the people in this convo are noting that Smyth was put into largely a checking line and pk role and thus the decreasing pts playing with guys like Belanger or Horcoff and on defensive assignments.

The guy still gets 38EV pts second only to Eberle who was god on this team.

Replacement is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:22 PM
  #37
Perfect_Drug
Registered User
 
Perfect_Drug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,632
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
I'm wondering the same. I'm thinking half the people here that want Smyth gone would be inserting somebody like Omark instead.

Few of the people in this convo are noting that Smyth was put into largely a checking line and pk role and thus the decreasing pts playing with guys like Belanger or Horcoff and on defensive assignments.

The guy still gets 38EV pts second only to Eberle who was god on this team.

It's not about wanting Smyth gone. For some reason based on Smyth's interview, it seemed like he wanted more than 1 year.

If that's the case, I'm all on Tambo's side. 1 year at a time. We can see what he brings on a year to year basis.

If not, then lets shuttle him up to the front office.

Perfect_Drug is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:27 PM
  #38
BoldNewLettuce
Registered User
 
BoldNewLettuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,869
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Lok View Post
Apparently you didn't watch the Oiler games nor were you aware of the role that Smyth played.

Early on he was playing in a scoring top six role, but for a majority of the season he was in a checking line role. He didn't get top line PP, instead he was the first Penalty killing unit and he faced the toughest opposition on a majority of defensive zone draws.

I'm fine if Smyth leaves but that just means he needs to be replaced by a capable winger who can defend and attack. That's a player that the oilers need MORE of, not less. Honestly what game are some of you people watching out there?
He had a good start to the season. So long as he plays less...hits more, blocks more shots...he will be a decent bottom six player to go with Petrell and Jones..amazingly he lead the team in takeaways...so yeah...he would be a good bottom six player pretty easily.

Once again, the question is does he want to be?

BoldNewLettuce is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:29 PM
  #39
nabob
#GETYOURBAGON
 
nabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HF boards
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,518
vCash: 1596
If he uses Calgary to leverage against us and is a PITA to sign again then let him walk. He let it be known at the deadline that he is only interested in doing what is best for #1. We don't need Smyth. But it would be a luxury we could afford one year at a time

nabob is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:29 PM
  #40
oilersfan11
Registered User
 
oilersfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,111
vCash: 50
Just let him walk.




Yakupov can replace what Ryan Smyth brought.

oilersfan11 is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:30 PM
  #41
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,658
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfect_Drug View Post
It's not about wanting Smyth gone. For some reason based on Smyth's interview, it seemed like he wanted more than 1 year.

If that's the case, I'm all on Tambo's side. 1 year at a time. We can see what he brings on a year to year basis.

If not, then lets shuttle him up to the front office.
1 or 2 yrs, I don't see the problem.

I remember people here shuddering at the thought of giving Roloson a two year extension and look how that turned out.

The club is better with Smyth in the lineup than not in the lineup, although we didn't get a chance to see that because he logged an entire 82GP, ironically on a club that suffers lots of injury problems. Smyth has been healthy in recent seasons and that alone is something the club could use more of. Not less of. NOBODY else on this club played 82games here.

Replacement is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:31 PM
  #42
Perro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,463
vCash: 500
Maybe he hasn't signed it yet cause he is debating retirement. It would not surprise me as it was kind of odd to ask for a trade out of LA to go back to Edmonton when he could have signed there at the end of this year.
I know last year in LA he was battling injures. You play the type of game he does it will wear on you.
I hope Smyth can return to forum and be productive, but am thinking he maybe done.

Perro is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:32 PM
  #43
Koto
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,006
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfect_Drug View Post
It's not about wanting Smyth gone. For some reason based on Smyth's interview, it seemed like he wanted more than 1 year.

If that's the case, I'm all on Tambo's side. 1 year at a time. We can see what he brings on a year to year basis.

If not, then lets shuttle him up to the front office.
??????????????????????????????


He's not smart at all.

Koto is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:44 PM
  #44
Perfect_Drug
Registered User
 
Perfect_Drug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,632
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
1 or 2 yrs, I don't see the problem.

I remember people here shuddering at the thought of giving Roloson a two year extension and look how that turned out.
We need to simply make a habit of not signing players after 35 for longer than 1 year. Same thing Detroit does.

We don't bury them in the minors, we don't trade them at the deadline, and we re-negotiate in a year based on what their role is, and what they can bring. We can call it the 'Khabby Rule'.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Koto View Post
??????????????????????????????


He's not smart at all.
Not management. Hire him in the same role as Savard in Chicago, or Fleury in Calgary.

A cheerleader that goes to event signings, promotes Oilers, and community service stuff. Heck involve him with Hockey Canada while he's at it.


Perfect_Drug is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:45 PM
  #45
hockeyaddict101
Registered User
 
hockeyaddict101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,871
vCash: 500
I was ok with a two year deal but with winning the draft lottery changes things. They have offered a one year deal, Smyth can take it or leave it.

Ball is in his park.

hockeyaddict101 is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:45 PM
  #46
Eytinge
Registered User
 
Eytinge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 10,015
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Its partly circumstantial. Smyth has been here up this alley before with the club paying more for the services of his linemates, Horc, and Hemsky, than they offer him.

I don't know that Smyth needs the money, but it probably dawns on him that two players that put up consistent cluster**** seasons are getting paid a whole lot more money.

I'm thinking thats a problem. No easy solution.

I can imagine its a lot of a lowball. The team offering 2.5M wouldn't surprise me. This is the same club that pays goofballs like Eager, Barker, Brule, Omark, Potter, Khabi, to be completely useless and unliked hockey players.
Smyth needs to realize he was vastly overpaid for what he brought this year. He made 6 million last year. He already got his big contract when he was a ufa. And now he wants to play hardball again?

1 year, 3 million is what I'd offer.

Eytinge is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:48 PM
  #47
gonzo11
Give the dog a bone
 
gonzo11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 47,643
vCash: 50
Both Stauffer and Milhouse more or less confirmed that Smyth wants 3 years and about 1.5million more a year then is being offered. Sounds like the oilers have just offered 2. Should be fun to see Smyth in a Flames uniform next year

__________________
trying to fend off exwife number 2
45000/010113
GO SHARKS GO
gonzo11 is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:48 PM
  #48
Beerfish
Registered User
 
Beerfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,680
vCash: 500
The horror of Horcoffs deal rears it's ugly head. The comments we see on these forums about. "It is what it is.", "It's no big deal because we have the caps space." and "It's not Horcoffs fault the team gave him that deal" are all tough to stomach for any player on this team when the oilers offer less than what the player thinks is fair.

Beerfish is online now  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:49 PM
  #49
oilersfan11
Registered User
 
oilersfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,111
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by DogEatDog View Post
Both Stauffer and Milhouse more or less confirmed that Smyth wants 3 years and about 1.5million more a year then is being offered. Sounds like the oilers have just offered 2. Should be fun to see Smyth in a Flames uniform next year
Bye Bye Smyth.

oilersfan11 is offline  
Old
04-12-2012, 03:51 PM
  #50
hockeyaddict101
Registered User
 
hockeyaddict101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,871
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DogEatDog View Post
Both Stauffer and Milhouse more or less confirmed that Smyth wants 3 years and about 1.5million more a year then is being offered. Sounds like the oilers have just offered 2. Should be fun to see Smyth in a Flames uniform next year
Not so sure that will happen. Flames now talking about rebuilding. Smyth may not be a fit.

hockeyaddict101 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.