HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Chris Stewart to the Leafs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-13-2012, 12:32 PM
  #26
Analyzer
#WeAreBoston
 
Analyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Renfrew, ON.
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,408
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabeliscious View Post
you evaluation of kulemin is based solely on statistics. it doesnt reflect kulemins 2 way game which in my opinion is vastly superior to that of stewarts. the difference in 6 goals is mitigated by this 2 way play.

i think gunnarson would be in play for stewart but im not sure about the 2nd. there is also a salary cap issue. im sure a prospect valued at around a 2nd round pick could be negotiated but i think st louis would need to take some salary back.

im thinking maybe gunnarson, ashton, and armstrong or lombardi (both have 1 year left)
Gotta take into account Stewart's ability to defend himself and teammates.

Analyzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 12:53 PM
  #27
Dr Robot
Registered User
 
Dr Robot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 149
vCash: 500
We are debating Kulemin for Stewart? None of us would ever make that trade. Coolaidman would be 3rd/4th line depth on our team while we still have hope that Stewy can be the 30/30 guy hes shown he can be. The blues don't need anything on the leafs except Kessel or the first, are you going to trade either? NOPE! Theres really no point in this thread.

Dr Robot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 01:29 PM
  #28
gabeliscious
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,876
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HooliganX2 View Post
If the Blues are moving Stewart they are not taking a cap dump in return.
thats fine but for the leafs to take on a player who is already making $2.75 million and is an rfa. he is likely going to get over $3.5 million but probably closer to $4 million. its a difference of ~$3 million for the leafs. without moving salary it would be flat out impossible. if you look to move stewart to another team for a player comparable to gunnarson + that player is likely going to be making over $1.35 million x term. at least you get gunnarson on the cheap for a little bit + 1 year of cap dump of $3 million. its still probably cheaper in the long run.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyzer View Post
Gotta take into account Stewart's ability to defend himself and teammates.
true, its 100% a valuable trait and an area the leafs especially need badly. having said that do you really want your best players fighting? didnt he already break his hand once in a fight? i think his appeal is his gritty play and ability to put the puck in the net.

being tough/able to fight and defend yourself while valuable, is not as valuable as being able to play above average defense imo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Robot View Post
We are debating Kulemin for Stewart? None of us would ever make that trade. Coolaidman would be 3rd/4th line depth on our team while we still have hope that Stewy can be the 30/30 guy hes shown he can be. The blues don't need anything on the leafs except Kessel or the first, are you going to trade either? NOPE! Theres really no point in this thread.
wasnt stewart playing on your 4th line for parts of this year? i missed the 1st playoff game, which line does hitch have him playing on?

i think most people would prefer stewart to kulemin, i dont deny that but the difference between the 2 is not nearly as drastic as you make it seem. stewart put up 30 points in 79 games, kulemin put up 28 points in 70 games. you hope that stewart will become a 30/30 guy, the leafs hope the same way with kulemin.

gabeliscious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:06 PM
  #29
wilco5886
Come On You Spurs
 
wilco5886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Champbana
Country: United States
Posts: 497
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by boredmale View Post
St Louis would be stupid to trade Stewart at this point(it would be a basic case of buy high, sell low). Only way I would trade Stewart is if a team offers me what he was worth at the end of last season
Unfortunately this is what I thought when Brad Boyes fell from 33g 39a 72pts to 14g 28a 42p. I can remember it now "It was one bad year. He's a previous 40 goal scorer. We will regret if he bounces back after trading him. His value is at its lowest and can't get any lower." Boy(es) was I wrong.

wilco5886 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:11 PM
  #30
SIDGENO8771
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,275
vCash: 500
Gunnarsson>Stewart

It would have to be Stewart + for Gunnarsson

SIDGENO8771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:20 PM
  #31
HooliganX2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,831
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabeliscious View Post
thats fine but for the leafs to take on a player who is already making $2.75 million and is an rfa. he is likely going to get over $3.5 million but probably closer to $4 million. its a difference of ~$3 million for the leafs. without moving salary it would be flat out impossible. if you look to move stewart to another team for a player comparable to gunnarson + that player is likely going to be making over $1.35 million x term. at least you get gunnarson on the cheap for a little bit + 1 year of cap dump of $3 million. its still probably cheaper in the long run.



true, its 100% a valuable trait and an area the leafs especially need badly. having said that do you really want your best players fighting? didnt he already break his hand once in a fight? i think his appeal is his gritty play and ability to put the puck in the net.

being tough/able to fight and defend yourself while valuable, is not as valuable as being able to play above average defense imo.



wasnt stewart playing on your 4th line for parts of this year? i missed the 1st playoff game, which line does hitch have him playing on?

i think most people would prefer stewart to kulemin, i dont deny that but the difference between the 2 is not nearly as drastic as you make it seem. stewart put up 30 points in 79 games, kulemin put up 28 points in 70 games. you hope that stewart will become a 30/30 guy, the leafs hope the same way with kulemin.
How about the Leafs keep their players and the Blues keep theirs. That solves everything. Nothing to discuss here.

HooliganX2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:21 PM
  #32
HooliganX2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,831
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDGENO8771 View Post
Gunnarsson>Stewart

It would have to be Stewart + for Gunnarsson
We will just keep Stewart thank you. We have enough #3-4 defenseman on the left side.

HooliganX2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:35 PM
  #33
Leafs03
Registered User
 
Leafs03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto On
Country: Albania
Posts: 1,117
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HooliganX2 View Post
How about the Leafs keep their players and the Blues keep theirs. That solves everything. Nothing to discuss here.
This is a board for everyone to come and talk hockey..So i don't know why your on here trying to tell people to not discuss.. If you don't really want to be part of it, your free to not be.. Stop coming on here and posting pointless posts....

Leafs03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 04:56 PM
  #34
HooliganX2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,831
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafs03 View Post
This is a board for everyone to come and talk hockey..So i don't know why your on here trying to tell people to not discuss.. If you don't really want to be part of it, your free to not be.. Stop coming on here and posting pointless posts....
The thing is there is no workable deal that we would agree on it has been talked about over and over and over. I have made posts that explain why non of the trades Leaf fans post make any sense for the Blues. If you would like to just talk to Leaf fans then just leave the posts on the Leafs board. If you want the opinions of the other teams fan bases post here. The Blues are a budget teams the Blues are full of young talent that will get raises. Trading for players that do not have a place on our team that are cap dumps for the other team makes no sense.

The Blues are full of depth players. The Blues do not need more depth players. The Blues major need is a superstar goal scoring forward. Most Blues fans understand the price of such a player. Trading for that type of player would cost the team to much and would end up hurting them in the end. That is why in general most Blues fans are content with our team the way it is. If the Blues were not a budget team it would make much more sense to wait until the offseason and try to sign Parise or Suter then to give up what it would cost to get a comparable player.

Kessel and possibly Gardiner are the players the Blues would be interested in on the Leafs. The Blues would not be willing to give up the assets that Toronto fans would want for either one. Also to a lesser extent Gardiner is still unproven after just one good season.

HooliganX2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 05:56 PM
  #35
PocketNines
Woyrika? Tyraid.
 
PocketNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt.Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 6,964
vCash: 500
The answer here is simpler than you think. End of season comes, Blues submit the qualifying offer of 1 year, 3.25M. It sits while they negotiate. Toronto comes in and offers 3 yrs, 4M, Blues don't even consider matching, Blues get Leafs' 2013 1st and 3d round picks. Done.

PocketNines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 06:07 PM
  #36
SteenMachine
Registered User
 
SteenMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fenton, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 3,381
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabeliscious View Post
you evaluation of kulemin is based solely on statistics. it doesnt reflect kulemins 2 way game which in my opinion is vastly superior to that of stewarts. the difference in 6 goals is mitigated by this 2 way play.

i think gunnarson would be in play for stewart but im not sure about the 2nd. there is also a salary cap issue. im sure a prospect valued at around a 2nd round pick could be negotiated but i think st louis would need to take some salary back.

im thinking maybe gunnarson, ashton, and armstrong or lombardi (both have 1 year left)
We don't need help in the 2-way department we need top end scoring and a legit top pairing d-man to help carry the load. That's why it's completely ignored when comparing Kulemin and Stewart.

SteenMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 06:29 PM
  #37
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,096
vCash: 50
We have been over this plenty of times. Sure, we would be interested in Gunnarsson, but he wouldn't be on top 10 list of targets. The only way Stewart goes to Toronto is if we settle or Burke overpays.

For the record, I believe Tarasenko will force Stewart to be traded in the summer.

bleedblue1223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2012, 11:57 PM
  #38
Meatwagon
Now What?
 
Meatwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Despair Nation
Country: United States
Posts: 726
vCash: 500
If tarasenko is signed by the draft I would do

Tor:
Stewart
STL 1st( depending on how they finish in the P.O.) I'm assuming pick will be 20-24th

STL:
Tor 1st

I really want Reinhart

Or

Forsberg

Meatwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:06 AM
  #39
Edgeworth*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,849
vCash: 500
Doesn't Stewart play the LW? I can't remember. If so he is moving Lupul off the team pretty much, not that it's a bad thing since Lupul could get us a shot at a 1st round pick or a defensive prospect to slide in for Gunnarsson.

Edgeworth* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:07 AM
  #40
Edgeworth*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,849
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatwagon View Post
If tarasenko is signed by the draft I would do

Tor:
Stewart
STL 1st( depending on how they finish in the P.O.) I'm assuming pick will be 20-24th

STL:
Tor 1st

I really want Reinhart

Or

Forsberg
Toronto wouldn't do that. The need for a #1 C vastly outweighs the need for a big body winger and Wilson/Subban.

Galchenyuk/Forsberg/Grink have the Leafs licking their chops and sewing up a need in a very important spot.

Edgeworth* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:44 AM
  #41
TerminatorBlue
Registered User
 
TerminatorBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,328
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatwagon View Post
If tarasenko is signed by the draft I would do

Tor:
Stewart
STL 1st( depending on how they finish in the P.O.) I'm assuming pick will be 20-24th

STL:
Tor 1st

I really want Reinhart

Or

Forsberg
I was about to make the same trade proposal.

I don't know if that would be enough to get us Toronto's 5th overall but maybe Tampa Bay's 10th or Washington's 11th overall pick could get it done... right around where Griffin Reinhart is projected to be drafted.

TerminatorBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:48 AM
  #42
PocketNines
Woyrika? Tyraid.
 
PocketNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt.Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 6,964
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgeworth View Post
Doesn't Stewart play the LW? I can't remember. If so he is moving Lupul off the team pretty much, not that it's a bad thing since Lupul could get us a shot at a 1st round pick or a defensive prospect to slide in for Gunnarsson.
It's possible that one game since he arrived in St. Louis he played LW, maybe. It's been 99%-100% RW with the Blues.

PocketNines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:49 AM
  #43
PocketNines
Woyrika? Tyraid.
 
PocketNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt.Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 6,964
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgeworth View Post
Toronto wouldn't do that. The need for a #1 C vastly outweighs the need for a big body winger and Wilson/Subban.

Galchenyuk/Forsberg/Grink have the Leafs licking their chops and sewing up a need in a very important spot.
Yeah, this trade idea would interest the Blues but I agree Toronto wouldn't/shouldn't do it.

PocketNines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:04 AM
  #44
The K Man
Registered User
 
The K Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,240
vCash: 500
I'd most likely do Gunnar+2nd for Stewart from a Leafs POV.

Just curious, what has been holding him back from producing?

The K Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:09 AM
  #45
SteenMachine
Registered User
 
SteenMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fenton, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 3,381
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The K Man View Post
I'd most likely do Gunnar+2nd for Stewart from a Leafs POV.

Just curious, what has been holding him back from producing?
He's not earning extra minutes to get more chances by playing the "200 ft. game" Hitchcock demands of his players, and doesn't have a superb playmaker making his job that much easier when he was in the top 6 McDonald and Perron were hurt and since then he just doesn't deserve it.

SteenMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:19 AM
  #46
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,096
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteenMachine View Post
He's not earning extra minutes to get more chances by playing the "200 ft. game" Hitchcock demands of his players, and doesn't have a superb playmaker making his job that much easier when he was in the top 6 McDonald and Perron were hurt and since then he just doesn't deserve it.
This combined with our offense style. Stewart is much more suited for a run n gun style, and not the cycle. He just looks so awkward and uncomfortable on the ice.

bleedblue1223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:20 AM
  #47
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,858
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatwagon View Post
If tarasenko is signed by the draft I would do

Tor:
Stewart
STL 1st( depending on how they finish in the P.O.) I'm assuming pick will be 20-24th

STL:
Tor 1st

I really want Reinhart

Or

Forsberg
Isn't 24 the lowest they can go? And that would require St Louis, Vancouver and NYR to lose in the 1st 2 rounds.

smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 03:13 AM
  #48
PocketNines
Woyrika? Tyraid.
 
PocketNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt.Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 6,964
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoke meat pete View Post
Isn't 24 the lowest they can go? And that would require St Louis, Vancouver and NYR to lose in the 1st 2 rounds.
Correct.

PocketNines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:51 PM
  #49
QMJHLfollower
Go Leafs!Our target:
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,285
vCash: 500
Berglund + Stewart + St. Louis 1st for Gunnarsson + Toronto 1st.

Berglund + St. Louis 1st=Toronto 1st.
Stewart=Gunnarsson.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:11 PM
  #50
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,096
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by QMJHLfollower View Post
Berglund + Stewart + St. Louis 1st for Gunnarsson + Toronto 1st.

Berglund + St. Louis 1st=Toronto 1st.
Stewart=Gunnarsson.
We aren't trading Berglund. This trade makes us worse for next season.

bleedblue1223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.