HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Vancouver Canucks
Notices

can anyone please explain the powerplay?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-14-2012, 01:16 PM
  #26
CanucksSayEh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,098
vCash: 500
Have a player stand behind our net and play 4 on 4.............................

CanucksSayEh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:30 PM
  #27
PRNuck
Voucher for Boucher
 
PRNuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,781
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by David71 View Post
get rid of the ****ing drop pass. teams can see it a mile away coming. change the personall on the pp units. get rid of raymond put kassian tell him to park his ass in front of the net. ebbett on the 2nd unit..??? makes me miss cody controlling the halfwall and acutally firing the puck on the net. the guys always pass pass. stop looking for the pretty plays. simpler is always better. take a shot. crash the net.
This. It's not a coincidence that the only time the drop pass has worked in last 6 ****ing months was against the Oilers. I was scared after that game because I knew they'd think they were outsmarting people again

PRNuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 01:52 PM
  #28
flack
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,366
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmon View Post
2. Fact is ehrhoff was our best dman in skating the puck up the ice. Thats a huge missing ingredient. His point shot and passing is pretty good as well.

And while ehrhoff is not the best defensive dman, the fact that he was a plus + 55 during his time in Vancouver, shows he wasn't that bad on defense?
He is a Dman that is good on the pp and for our offence. But imo he costed us more than produced last time in the playoffs. Check his stats he is the worst minus player on the team in the playoffs. The real reason we are losing is because we have turnovers by our D. We do not need a poor defensemen in this series. It would hurt us more than it helps even if he was more offensively gifted.

flack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:26 PM
  #29
ProspectProphet
Registered User
 
ProspectProphet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 807
vCash: 426
This rests squarely on AV's shoulders. Its not just the PP that needs fixing. Team defense is not good enough, our PP looks confused, and our passes out of our own zone are a joke. LA's PP gains our blueline with ease, while we are pressured all 200 feet and never really get set up.

Our coaching is so bad right now, that the Kings are a better team than us when we have an extra player on the ice.

Wake the hell up AV - or you will be made available for the Habs.

ProspectProphet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:36 PM
  #30
pahlsson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,831
vCash: 500
it's both a system and a personnel thing

they keep trying the same **** over and over again, no adjustments at all, definitely sounds like an AV thing

burrows and kesler have totally been ineffective at both moving the puck smartly and puck retrieval

edler and salo have gone way downhill since the start of the season, can't even get their shots through when they do try a shot, don't even get me started on that drop pass

second unit doesn't really know what they're doing, but it's been that way for a while. the only time i can remember the second unit consistently looking organized was when hodgson was on it

pahlsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:40 PM
  #31
Wetcoaster
Registered User
 
Wetcoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 41,949
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRNuck View Post
Ballard was a powerplay contributor for Phoenix and Florida, and is the most talented player on the entire damn team at entering the zone, get him out there.
Ballard has shown little or no offensive capability since arriving in Vancouver.

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:41 PM
  #32
Wetcoaster
Registered User
 
Wetcoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 41,949
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker24 View Post
Please play catch at the point. Please! I just want to see a few consecutive passes at the point between the defenseman. Nothing would make me feel happier. It is a no risk play and it can open things up, create lanes, and it can catch the penalty killers out of position.

It's as if the PP units have been instructed not to pass laterally at the point.
LA has been having a forward high between the points on the PK.

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:43 PM
  #33
PRNuck
Voucher for Boucher
 
PRNuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,781
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetcoaster View Post
Ballard has shown little or no offensive capability since arriving in Vancouver.
In little or no chances though. Really, what's wrong with trying? At the very least he could catch the guys on shorthanded breakaways.

PRNuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:45 PM
  #34
Dolemite
Registered User
 
Dolemite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 36,082
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetcoaster View Post
LA has been having a forward high between the points on the PK.
You mean the one that prevents Salo from winding up and launching his cannon from the point?

Dolemite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 03:23 PM
  #35
Wetcoaster
Registered User
 
Wetcoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 41,949
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRNuck View Post
In little or no chances though. Really, what's wrong with trying? At the very least he could catch the guys on shorthanded breakaways.
He has shown poor offensive decision-making at ES.

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 03:27 PM
  #36
Wetcoaster
Registered User
 
Wetcoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 41,949
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite View Post
You mean the one that prevents Salo from winding up and launching his cannon from the point?
The one that prevents the D from passing back and forth to set up a shot.

Perhaps time to rotate one point man closer to the middle of the ice and move the puck to the half boards while bring the other D in down low for a back door play - that is where Gragnani could be useful on the PP but then you have to live with his defensive deficiencies at ES.

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 04:26 PM
  #37
biturbo19
Registered User
 
biturbo19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,159
vCash: 500
As much as 'Ehrhoff' sounds like an easy answer and a bit of a cop-out, i think there's a lot more truth to it than some would like to admit. There are other problems as well, but the PP and even the even strength breakout have missed what he brought to the table. And for all the complaints of his suspect defensive reliability and lack of toughness, he was still a significant positive net contributor.

The thing that is missed there, is not only his instincts and ability in quickly bringing the puck up ice and making decisions on those drop-passes and other options quickly and correctly, but also his quick decisionmaking at the point once the zone was gained as well. So often he and Henrik would play pitch and catch in tight quarters on the half boards and point, which broke down the box and allowed them to get set up. He was a true 'QB' on the Powerplay, something we no longer necessarily have. Moving up ice and holding the line, he had a knack for 'reading defences' just like a good quarterback, and making the appropriate adjustments on the fly.

In contrast, we now have a guy like Hamhuis on the point, who isn't nearly as confident in his offensive decisionmaking, makes slow reads on what the penalty-killers are doing, and often those reads are poor when then eventually do get locked in.


However, this also falls on Brown. Fact of the matter is, Ehrhoff is gone. He was the straw that stirred the drink and made that PP setup really work. Sure it got by alright for a little while this year without him, but it's become robotic and predictable, without Ehrhoff to improvise and make subtle adjustments on the fly. Teams caught on to the initial nuances, and it's made the whole operation predictable and fairly easily neutralized (or worse in the case of the shorthanded chances against). But instead of reworking the plan to suit the personel that we do still have available...they just rotate various different players through different roles trying to make the same predictable old PP work again.

Every so often they add 1 new wrinkle. When the put Kesler on the point, it looked good for a couple attempts, but then it became clear as day that they were trying to set up that particular one-timer. That's been the PP this year in a nutshell. Trying to implement one new wrinkle here or there, and stubbornly forcing it until it's well beyond dead and neutralized.

biturbo19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 04:40 PM
  #38
LiveeviL
No unique points
 
LiveeviL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jämtland, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 3,862
vCash: 50
Send a message via ICQ to LiveeviL Send a message via MSN to LiveeviL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid_Roll View Post
It is funny because it is true.

LiveeviL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:00 PM
  #39
PG Canuck
SnazzyNazzy
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,557
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetcoaster View Post
He has shown poor offensive decision-making at ES.
Yeah, so? That just means he fits right in wtih everyone else on defense.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:03 PM
  #40
David71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,102
vCash: 500
according to jim jamison on the twitterverse. the nucks arent using the "drop pass" anymore in their powerplay. Burrows now out with second unit (7-36), plus 3-6 on d. First unit: 20-33-17; Ds 23-2.

David71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:10 PM
  #41
PG Canuck
SnazzyNazzy
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,557
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by David71 View Post
according to jim jamison on the twitterverse. the nucks arent using the "drop pass" anymore in their powerplay. Burrows now out with second unit (7-36), plus 3-6 on d. First unit: 20-33-17; Ds 23-2.
Beat me to it. Looks like the thick headed coaching staff finally figured it out.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:13 PM
  #42
David71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,102
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximLapierre View Post
Beat me to it. Looks like the thick headed coaching staff finally figured it out.
this is why i hate the coaching staff. they can't even adjust in game. but have to wait to lose 2 games before making any changes...

David71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:16 PM
  #43
PG Canuck
SnazzyNazzy
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,557
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by David71 View Post
this is why i hate the coaching staff. they can't even adjust in game. but have to wait to lose 2 games before making any changes...
When did we start this drop-pass stuff? It worked for the first little bit, then once January came around it was terrible and predictable and the coaching staff has FINALLY changed it. After now being down 0-2 in a playoff series. Talk about too little too late.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:18 PM
  #44
David71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,102
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximLapierre View Post
When did we start this drop-pass stuff? It worked for the first little bit, then once January came around it was terrible and predictable and the coaching staff has FINALLY changed it. After now being down 0-2 in a playoff series. Talk about too little too late.
i think around november/december into jan after the 4 goal pp in boston. the pp has been horrific. 5 on 3's are the worst... they pass pass but never shoot. ****ing

David71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:21 PM
  #45
David71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,102
vCash: 500
Vancouver has gone 8-for-69 on the power play for a conversion rate of just 11.6% the percentage is probably way lower now.

David71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:21 PM
  #46
canuck4life16
Registered User
 
canuck4life16's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,544
vCash: 209
Neville Brown needs to fix this up soon.........

canuck4life16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:32 PM
  #47
AvantiCanada*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,407
vCash: 500
Darryl Sutter and the LA Kings can probably describe the Canucks PP better than anyone, and that includes the Canucks coaching staff.

AvantiCanada* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:36 PM
  #48
Scurr
Registered User
 
Scurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Whalley
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,018
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinka Dene View Post
Darryl Sutter and the LA Kings can probably describe the Canucks PP better than anyone, and that includes the Canucks coaching staff.
How many top 5 PP's have you coached?

Missing Daniel is tough for this team because realistically, we have two players that can make a play under pressure, Hank and Dank. Sutter is a very good defensive coach, they are working hard to deny Henrik the puck and pressure everyone else. Someone else needs to step up and make a play.

Scurr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:38 PM
  #49
Shareefruck
Registered User
 
Shareefruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,256
vCash: 500
What's really disappointing is that the powerplay looked really good just before Daniel got injured.

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows
Kesler - Edler (Salo?)

Shareefruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:47 PM
  #50
AvantiCanada*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,407
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scurr View Post
How many top 5 PP's have you coached?
None. I think that still qualifies me for an opinion on a message board, though.

How in gods name is Daniel the excuse when the PP has been miserable for months?

Any scapegoat as long as no spotlight is put on Coaching and management, right?

AvantiCanada* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.