HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > Other Leagues > Canadian Junior Hockey > QMJHL
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2

Top teams in 2012-13

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-04-2012, 03:31 PM
  #51
CH4
Registered User
 
CH4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicoutimi
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
The Sags will have a very decent tesm; in the 4-8 range IMO (lack of def).

Hudon-Sedlak-Asselin
Roy-Grégoire-Dauphin
Desbiens-X-Tremblay
X-X-X

O'brien-Gagnon
Tremblay-Cloutier
Euro-X

Desrosiers

That's 13.
traded: Bourret, Poulin, Lebel so that is 16 protected

availables for Sherbrooke:
Sylvestre
Poudrier
Vermette
Pinette

I think they go with one of Poudrier or Sylvestre (the other goes on our 3rd line) and Vermette.

CH4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2012, 04:24 PM
  #52
chsb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,288
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
depends if Bissonnette and/or O'brien gets an AHL tryout...

wouldn't surprise me at all for Bissonnette.
Having a tryout does not mean they will stay up.....

IF one of these two is gone pro, the Titan would probably add Hoefflin or get another OA.

chsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2012, 04:29 PM
  #53
CH4
Registered User
 
CH4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicoutimi
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
Having a tryout does not mean they will stay up.....

IF one of these two is gone pro, the Titan would probably add Hoefflin or get another OA.
It would be extremely hard/costly to get another one of these quality.

especially given that you probably won't be contenders.

IMO you should trade away these top quality OA for 17/18 yo guys that will fit your core; build around lalancette's 19 years old.

CH4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2012, 04:44 PM
  #54
chsb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,288
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
It would be extremely hard/costly to get another one of these quality.

especially given that you probably won't be contenders.

IMO you should trade away these top quality OA for 17/18 yo guys that will fit your core; build around lalancette's 19 years old.
I doubt very much that Morissette will think like you!

The Titan might not be contenders, but they have a crowd to bring back to the rink and they are in a similar position to where the Sags were last season.
The D and goaltending will be very solid and IF we get these two back, I expect them to load up.....

chsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 08:57 AM
  #55
CH4
Registered User
 
CH4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicoutimi
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
I doubt very much that Morissette will think like you!

The Titan might not be contenders, but they have a crowd to bring back to the rink and they are in a similar position to where the Sags were last season.
The D and goaltending will be very solid and IF we get these two back, I expect them to load up.....
If both are back and steeves play like he didin the playoffs against us buying make sense as with your experience and the quality of your offence you are surefire top 4.

You would need def though a guy like mathieu gagnon could do wonders for you. Who will be your 3rd overager?


You canpay with lalancette on his 19yo deal?

CH4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 09:33 AM
  #56
howitzermoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by #57 View Post
Are you kidding me? The Armada will have one of the best team on paper in the CHL next year, and that's without any ''big move'' by Bouchard this summer. Sakaris is supposed to be coming over as a compensation, he would be our 3rd 20 years old player.

EURO - Tanguy - Matteau
Clapperton - Paquette - Roy
Hodhod - Sakaris - Laflamme
Aquin - Plouffe - Hawes

Ouellet - Picard
Micallef - EURO
Berube - Hoyles

Marcoux - Phaneuf

The only ?'s are whether or not Bouchard can attract some interesting european players. That 1st line should be dirty, the 2nd line is all speed and skill and was our best line against Rimouski and that 3rd line is fricking awesome. The only weakness I see up front is a lack of a physical edge and that's something I feel Bouchard will address, possibly upgrading the 4th line.

On defense, Ouellet is the best D in the league, and if a good euro comes over, that's probably the best 2nd-pair in the league as well. Berube and Hoyles are excellent young players with a year of experience under their belt.

Marcoux will probably be the best G in the league.

That's a cup contender and, like I said, that's without any significant move by Bouchard.
How is BLB getting Sakaris? Futures in the Narbonne deal?

howitzermoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 10:40 AM
  #57
CH4
Registered User
 
CH4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicoutimi
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by howitzermoose View Post
How is BLB getting Sakaris? Futures in the Narbonne deal?
Yes that is pretty much a lock.

Rumours of compensations:

Sakaris to bb
Hache to cape breton
Dubeau and veilleux to moncton
Poulin and bourret to gatineau
Lebel to bb.

Blainville gets lebel and sakaris without protecting them. This is well played by joel bouchard.

CH4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 07:25 PM
  #58
RJQuack
Registered User
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,608
vCash: 500
Lol Bathurst contending/loading up? Knock yoursleves out, but the Armada, Remparts and Mooseheads will put you in there place when you realize the Titan are lead by two guys not guaranteed to come back and can't play defense


RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 11:17 PM
  #59
CH4
Registered User
 
CH4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicoutimi
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks View Post
Lol Bathurst contending/loading up? Knock yoursleves out, but the Armada, Remparts and Mooseheads will put you in there place when you realize the Titan are lead by two guys not guaranteed to come back and can't play defense

If you take time to read i specified if both are back they could do well. To me they are on par with moncton andnot far from armada (no one think they might have overachieved?) solid in net and good def. They should sell to aim in 2013-14 but it isn't LGM style.

CH4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 11:19 PM
  #60
CH4
Registered User
 
CH4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicoutimi
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
On a related note; we are going to sell some assets next year (gagnon and asselin)

Who would have needs there? Halifax sure needs some def.

CH4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2012, 11:56 PM
  #61
IHaveNoCreativity
HFB Partner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Somewhere in Quebec.
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,215
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
On a related note; we are going to sell some assets next year (gagnon and asselin)

Who would have needs there? Halifax sure needs some def.
Armada ??? Win with D ala Moncton 2010 ? Mind you they had a LOADED offence !

Halifax needs a big scorer IMO to compliment Drouin And Mackinnon...

There's no garuntee that Ciampini and Frk will be 40 goal guys next year...

Ciampini may not belong in that category but when drafted he was said to be a goal scorer, iirc.

Frk could score 40 if healthy.


Quebec will need some depth, however I think Grigs will return.

BlainVille would need a big time scorer, I think they lack that, but IMO the have the better coach out of the big 3..

To the guy who said they overachieved, your right, however, they do have a good team.

Now SJ could go for it if Huberdeau came back (not happening I know)

IHaveNoCreativity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 02:13 AM
  #62
RJQuack
Registered User
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IHaveNoCreativity View Post
Armada ??? Win with D ala Moncton 2010 ? Mind you they had a LOADED offence !

Halifax needs a big scorer IMO to compliment Drouin And Mackinnon...

There's no garuntee that Ciampini and Frk will be 40 goal guys next year...

Ciampini may not belong in that category but when drafted he was said to be a goal scorer, iirc.

Frk could score 40 if healthy.


Quebec will need some depth, however I think Grigs will return.

BlainVille would need a big time scorer, I think they lack that, but IMO the have the better coach out of the big 3..

To the guy who said they overachieved, your right, however, they do have a good team.

Now SJ could go for it if Huberdeau came back (not happening I know)
Moose need D to be competitive before looking at a forward to compliment the Big 3 (Nate, Drouin, Frk).. Like Fournier, Duffy, EURO. I think Gagnon would be a great fit and we should target him.

How would Houle affect the Armada's scoring (or lack there of)? I also think Ducharme was one of the better coahes, to guide a team that's been in the ******* for years and is so young... To guide them to the semis and not be on the ballot is short of ridiculous (I could go into the anti-maritime thing, but that's for another time )

Also, if Hubey were too return, he'd be dealt as SJ couldn't contend with just him...

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 08:32 AM
  #63
howitzermoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
On a related note; we are going to sell some assets next year (gagnon and asselin)

Who would have needs there? Halifax sure needs some def.
I think Gagnon would be a good fit in Halifax.

howitzermoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 10:15 AM
  #64
IHaveNoCreativity
HFB Partner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Somewhere in Quebec.
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,215
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks View Post
Moose need D to be competitive before looking at a forward to compliment the Big 3 (Nate, Drouin, Frk).. Like Fournier, Duffy, EURO. I think Gagnon would be a great fit and we should target him.

How would Houle affect the Armada's scoring (or lack there of)? I also think Ducharme was one of the better coahes, to guide a team that's been in the ******* for years and is so young... To guide them to the semis and not be on the ballot is short of ridiculous (I could go into the anti-maritime thing, but that's for another time )

Also, if Hubey were too return, he'd be dealt as SJ couldn't contend with just him...
Sorry my point wasn't clear, what I mean is that Houle gets the most out his players.

Yes Halifax is D is mediocre,

Would Rouyn trade Fournier ? What are they building there ?

Maybe one of the SJ D gets moved ? They're not all gone....

I think Blainville could win it, but Matteau's not enough, they need someone else... Huberdeau ???? Lol, he is from around that area...

I like Ducharme, did wonders for the Moose, Houle did wonders for Kabby(Kabanov) just like he did with the Lewiston team.

Hali can add a euro, Blainville can add 2 I believe, and then Quebec will have Sorensen returning...

Also Moncton will try to load up, cause its their last go with the Saulnier's.

And Gatineau will be strong if they get a goalie...

I'm not expert but out of those 2 who's best to contend ?

IHaveNoCreativity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 03:56 PM
  #65
RJQuack
Registered User
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,608
vCash: 500
Of which two?

I'd put it this way

Top Contenders:
Halifax
Blainville
Quebec

Mid Level Contenders
Moncton
Gatineau
Baie Comeau

I don't expect Hubey to be back. He probs coulda made Florida this year.

Out of the Sj D, Beaulieu and Roussel will be gone, and Gagne and Durepos would be the only ones that would interest the Moose... And they're a slight upgrade on Gillard/Hannay

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 05:20 PM
  #66
howitzermoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IHaveNoCreativity View Post
Sorry my point wasn't clear, what I mean is that Houle gets the most out his players.

Yes Halifax is D is mediocre,

Would Rouyn trade Fournier ? What are they building there ?

Maybe one of the SJ D gets moved ? They're not all gone....

I think Blainville could win it, but Matteau's not enough, they need someone else... Huberdeau ???? Lol, he is from around that area...

I like Ducharme, did wonders for the Moose, Houle did wonders for Kabby(Kabanov) just like he did with the Lewiston team.

Hali can add a euro, Blainville can add 2 I believe, and then Quebec will have Sorensen returning...

Also Moncton will try to load up, cause its their last go with the Saulnier's.

And Gatineau will be strong if they get a goalie...

I'm not expert but out of those 2 who's best to contend ?
He was talking about Stefan Fournier from Victo.........not Dillon Fournier from RN.

howitzermoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 06:27 PM
  #67
chsb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,288
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks View Post
Of which two?

I'd put it this way

Top Contenders:
Halifax
Blainville
Quebec

Mid Level Contenders
Moncton
Gatineau
Baie Comeau

I don't expect Hubey to be back. He probs coulda made Florida this year.

Out of the Sj D, Beaulieu and Roussel will be gone, and Gagne and Durepos would be the only ones that would interest the Moose... And they're a slight upgrade on Gillard/Hannay
Add Bathurst to the mid level ones.

chsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 08:05 PM
  #68
howitzermoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
Add Bathurst to the mid level ones.
Why?

howitzermoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 08:37 PM
  #69
rocketfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 322
vCash: 500
because its chsb's team howitzer didn't u know bathurst is always conyending.

rocketfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 08:46 PM
  #70
howitzermoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketfan View Post
because its chsb's team howitzer didn't u know bathurst is always conyending.
Yip....same old same old.

howitzermoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 10:45 PM
  #71
IHaveNoCreativity
HFB Partner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Somewhere in Quebec.
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,215
vCash: 500
Barhrust have been average for awhile... Plus didn't they attempt to contend last year ?

And about earlier, Gatineau or Moncton was then question..

IHaveNoCreativity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 11:39 PM
  #72
RJQuack
Registered User
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
Add Bathurst to the mid level ones.
No... Chsb being chsb

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-06-2012, 11:46 PM
  #73
RJQuack
Registered User
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by howitzermoose View Post
He was talking about Stefan Fournier from Victo.........not Dillon Fournier from RN.
Yes, that's who I'm thinking of, Dillon would cost a fortune.

Drouin - Nate - Frk
Fournier - Duffy - Euro
Ashley - Andrews - Falkenham

Sigh, I wish lol. Any way we could make that happen? Trade Boudreau, Ciampini (picks, Lovell, Sills) and it might happen... But I have a feeling Duffy would cost a lot.

Altho... I doubt Moncton or Gatineau would make an offer for him, He wouldn't play in BC, Quebec is a wildcard and Blainville will probably draft some euro forwards... Which leaves the Moose lol. Most likely to go here, but will Cam break the bank to get him here? I don't think so, price has to be right...

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2012, 12:13 AM
  #74
chsb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,288
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IHaveNoCreativity View Post
Barhrust have been average for awhile... Plus didn't they attempt to contend last year ?

And about earlier, Gatineau or Moncton was then question..
NOPE!

They did two years ago and then rebuilt last season having 10 players 16 and 17 years old.

If you add to these rookies players like O'Brien,Bissonnette,Murray,Girard,Steeves,
it is far from far fetched that, with a couple of other additions, they could be a top-6 thus making that list incomplete.

chsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-07-2012, 02:39 PM
  #75
RJQuack
Registered User
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
NOPE!

They did two years ago and then rebuilt last season having 10 players 16 and 17 years old.

If you add to these rookies players like O'Brien,Bissonnette,Murray,Girard,Steeves,
it is far from far fetched that, with a couple of other additions, they could be a top-6 thus making that list incomplete.
What do you mean they didn't contend last year? I remember they loaded up finished in the top6 and choked... This year was they're "rebuilding" altho that wasn't a rebuild.

Think what you want but you're the only person who thinks they're capable of being a contender (big surprise)... I see them maybe having home ice for the playoffs next year,

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.