HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Best goalie of the first-round?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-24-2012, 02:00 AM
  #1
Al Bundy*
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 5,073
vCash: 500
Best goalie of the first-round?

Which goalie has been the best so far in this first round of the playoffs?

My top 3: Rinne, Mike Smith, Quick

Al Bundy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:03 AM
  #2
McNashty
HATERS GON' HATE!
 
McNashty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 2,506
vCash: 827
Send a message via AIM to McNashty Send a message via MSN to McNashty
Quick.

McNashty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:04 AM
  #3
PhillyPhaithful
Registered User
 
PhillyPhaithful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 219
vCash: 500
Toss up between Bryz and Fluery both kept their respective teams in the game...





In all seriousness though I am going with Quick who basically put the team on his back.

PhillyPhaithful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:05 AM
  #4
XtremeofParanoia
Registered User
 
XtremeofParanoia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,122
vCash: 500
Quick, Rinne, Smith

HM: Holtby

XtremeofParanoia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:13 AM
  #5
King Richards
Dry Island II
 
King Richards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 823
vCash: 500
Smith.

I love Quick (think he deserves the Vezina) and I think he'll really shine in round 2, but I don't personally believe he was tested quite as much against Vancouver as some people seem to think. He faced a lot of low percentage perimeter shots.

King Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:15 AM
  #6
Ari91
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,453
vCash: 500
Smith. Blackhawks peppered him with shots all throughout the series and he's had to come up with some incredible saves. I would give Quick the nod after that.

Ari91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:16 AM
  #7
SimplySensational
Heard of Hough
 
SimplySensational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: VA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,806
vCash: 888
Quick... Smiths composure after late tying goals puts him down a notch.

SimplySensational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:17 AM
  #8
Acetylene
The Legacy of Jarmo
 
Acetylene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 398
vCash: 500
Hard to overlook Quick on this one


Last edited by Acetylene: 04-24-2012 at 02:18 AM. Reason: Grammar
Acetylene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:18 AM
  #9
Habitat
Registered User
 
Habitat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,824
vCash: 500
Quick AINEC

You have to remember Smith let chicago tie it THREE times (twice within 10 seconds of the game ending). Quick did not let this happen.

Habitat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:19 AM
  #10
Raym11
Phaneuf sucks
 
Raym11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,782
vCash: 500
every goalie in the West

Raym11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:26 AM
  #11
klog1
Registered User
 
klog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 244
vCash: 500
Quick, Smith, Rinne (no particular order)

klog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:35 AM
  #12
sal00
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quick and Smith pretty much were the key contributor to their series. While Rinne was his old self, Nashville's team defense was a bigger problem for the Wings. (I do see Rinne being the key player in the later rounds though)

Holtby should also be up there. He is the biggest reason why Washington is still in the race to knock Bruins out.

sal00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:39 AM
  #13
klog1
Registered User
 
klog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 244
vCash: 500
I agree about Holtby. Think he's the #1 in Washington next year?

klog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:42 AM
  #14
EdwardBlake
This is all a joke.
 
EdwardBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 5,139
vCash: 500
Quick without question.

EdwardBlake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:43 AM
  #15
sal00
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by klog1 View Post
I agree about Holtby. Think he's the #1 in Washington next year?
Who knows? They said the same thing about Neuvirth last year

sal00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:46 AM
  #16
Penslaaja
Registered User
 
Penslaaja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Finland
Posts: 195
vCash: 500
Quick
Elliott
Rinne
Smith

Penslaaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:47 AM
  #17
StandingCow
Registered User
 
StandingCow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 3,551
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by XtremeofParanoia View Post
Quick, Rinne, Smith

HM: Holtby
This.

StandingCow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 02:50 AM
  #18
mrjimmyg89
'13-'14 East Champs
 
mrjimmyg89's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,858
vCash: 500
Anderson and Hank have been really good in their series. A lot to do with the reason the series is 3-3.

Quick has been the best tendy so far. Rinne has been the next best IMO. San Jose didn't pose much of a threat to STL, while Detroit controlled a lot of the games in the series and Rinne was unreal in Detroit.

Despite the 10 goal game, Bryzgalov played well in the defense-less Pitt/Phi series. He's a big reason they advanced as well, even with Giroux putting up 14 points.

mrjimmyg89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 03:48 AM
  #19
BDEuph
Hotty Toddy
 
BDEuph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 276
vCash: 500
Smith (Jedi Master), Elliott, Quick, Rinne

Remember Elliott came in cold in Game 2 and won 4 straight (officially 3) with a 1.37 GAA and a .949 Save pct...gave up only 5 goals whilst seeing 98 shots in 4 games-ish

I know...i am bathing in the Blues kool aid again

BDEuph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 03:52 AM
  #20
Kreider Typical
flex
 
Kreider Typical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,548
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDEuph View Post
Smith (Jedi Master), Elliott, Quick, Rinne

Remember Elliott came in cold in Game 2 and won 4 straight (officially 3) with a 1.37 GAA and a .949 Save pct...gave up only 5 goals whilst seeing 98 shots in 4 games-ish

I know...i am bathing in the Blues kool aid again
elliot also has the best defensive team in the league in front of him.

Kreider Typical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 03:57 AM
  #21
VanCanucks14
Registered User
 
VanCanucks14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,655
vCash: 500
It was Smith IMO.
For those saying Quick, he was good but I think he's getting overrated in the sense that people seem to think he was amazing in this series. LA plays a great system and their defense did a terrific job of limiting quality shots and the Canucks really sucked at testing him by putting traffic in front of the net and going to the dirty areas. Quick really wasn't anything special in this series. He didn't need to be.

And don't take offense in that I'm saying he wasn't anything special. He was still solid and made every save he needed to. Just not amazing like I've been hearing and seeing for the past week. Mostly because he didn't have to be.

VanCanucks14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 04:21 AM
  #22
Kreider Typical
flex
 
Kreider Typical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,548
vCash: 500
personally quick stood out more than anybody else i saw, especially in the first few games. seems like smith had to deal with less shots, but when they came he was huge, for the most part. tough between these two, but i'd have to put it on quick. rinne is always a beast. i have to admit i didn't see much of this series, but from what i did see he came up huge.


lundqvist(homer in me) had a ton of incredible sequence saves, but also has a defensive team in front of him that kept games alive. (like 50 blocked shots a few games ago?) same reason he's not up top-- defensive team puts less onus on him.

fleury, luongo, brodeur, thomas, bryz(g1/2)... all sucked.

whoever said anderson was good, imo it's the same problem that the above guy said about quick-- not challenged enough. he did fine with the belly shots, but let almost every tough shot in. no slight at him, his positioning is always great and he absorbs everything.

holtby stood out this series to me. his positioning has been great for a kid. he's got potential in his career.

Kreider Typical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 04:21 AM
  #23
markisonfire
Registered User
 
markisonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 3,492
vCash: 500
Quick made some great saves, especially in game 5, but he wasn't tested regularly against he Canucks. The Kings kept a lot of pressure on the Canucks and didn't let up too many stellar quality chances. He kept the game close in game 4 and stole the show in game 5, however.

I'd still put him at the top though. Smith has been great, but he has been anything BUT clutch when they needed him the most (less than one minute to go).

markisonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 04:44 AM
  #24
Krishna
Registered User
 
Krishna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: Canada
Posts: 82,054
vCash: 50
Definitely Fleury

Krishna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-24-2012, 04:47 AM
  #25
Hackett
HF Needs Feeny
 
Hackett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,536
vCash: 500
Rinne, Smith, Schneider, Quick, Anderson, Lundqvist.... Its really tough to give one the edge over the other.

Hackett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.