Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke49
It's not preferring a bigger 3rd line over 3 bigger centers. It's the fact that getting a bigger and better 3rd line in general will be the first step to being a playoff team. It will give us more depth and size at the same time. Plus, it's much easier to find quality 3rd liners then big top 6 centers. Oh, and cheaper. That's more what I was getting at. Also, how many teams have 3 big centers in their top 9?
|
I just want to be clear, i agree 100%.
I'm not quite sure why i posted my original statement, unless I mistakenly took your post as advocating a big third line being "better" (which, rereading your post i don't really know how i would have gotten that) and merely wanted to shed light on the logic behind "big down the middle".
I totally agree we would be very well served to have a big, tough, third line that can contribute at a decent pace (as ps mentioned, somewhere around 35+ pts each would be ideal) and it could very likely be the difference between this team playing in the post season and not.
also agree that on paper Cormier, Antropov, Machacek looks like it could definitely be that line.