HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Dallas - Toronto

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-12-2012, 06:15 PM
  #26
Pay Carl
don't lose touch
 
Pay Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vermont
Country: United States
Posts: 10,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoTrades View Post
Kadri value > Glennie value


usually why 1for1 deals get turned down... one player is more valuable than the other.
Kadri still has value?

He cant even crack one of the worst rosters in the league haha

Pay Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:15 PM
  #27
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by QMJHLfollower View Post
You said:

What has Kadri done so far in his professional career to warrant giving up Glennie for him?

The answer is: A lot more than Glennie, both in the NHL and AHL.
Kadri has done nothing to justify the Stars trading Glennie for him.

As the stars poster above me says, it's a lateral move for the Stars and HARDLY a guarantee of improving their team either now, or in the future...so why would they trade a guy with Glennie's size and potential scoring touch?

Maybe if it was Kadri and another asset...but straight up it's simply an illogical trade for the Stars to make.

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:16 PM
  #28
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pi View Post
Let's see: "BLAH BLAH BLAH"

Makes sense now?
Nothing you say there explains how it's a logical move for the Stars to trade Glennie for Kadri.

Neither have accomplished anything in the NHL, both are young and have a long career ahead of them.

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:17 PM
  #29
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Rather Ott but not sure that would happen..

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:17 PM
  #30
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wKetch22 View Post
Kadri still has value?

He cant even crack one of the worst rosters in the league haha


That just show how you're a troll and don't know anything about hockey.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:19 PM
  #31
Tommy Torini
Hell of a thing baby
 
Tommy Torini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mississauga
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,602
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
Kadri has done nothing to justify the Stars trading Glennie for him.

As the stars poster above me says, it's a lateral move for the Stars and HARDLY a guarantee of improving their team either now, or in the future...so why would they trade a guy with Glennie's size and potential scoring touch?

Maybe if it was Kadri and another asset...but straight up it's simply an illogical trade for the Stars to make.
Not like the Leafs would make this trade either champ.

Tommy Torini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:19 PM
  #32
Pay Carl
don't lose touch
 
Pay Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vermont
Country: United States
Posts: 10,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by QMJHLfollower View Post


That just show how you're a troll and don't know anything about hockey.
haha no for real

he cant even stay up on the big club

Pay Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:19 PM
  #33
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
Kadri has done nothing to justify the Stars trading Glennie for him.

As the stars poster above me says, it's a lateral move for the Stars and HARDLY a guarantee of improving their team either now, or in the future...so why would they trade a guy with Glennie's size and potential scoring touch?

Maybe if it was Kadri and another asset...but straight up it's simply an illogical trade for the Stars to make.
If you say so.

I don't understand your point, but still.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:20 PM
  #34
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli View Post
Not like the Leafs would make this trade either champ.
The Leafs would be more inclined to make it than the Stars...slugger.

Since last year they probably had the softest top 6 in the whole league.

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:20 PM
  #35
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas A&M
Country: Estonia
Posts: 20,965
vCash: 500
Only reason I'd even slightly consider this is because he's a center, but it sounds like he's more a winger now.

No reason to do this, really.

LatvianTwist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:21 PM
  #36
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wKetch22 View Post
haha no for real

he cant even stay up on the big club
LOL, it's called not rushing a 21 years old prospect with a not NHL ready size.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:22 PM
  #37
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by QMJHLfollower View Post
If you say so.

I don't understand your point, but still.
What about my point don't you understand?

With Glennie's size and potential trading him for someone who has accomplished nothing in the NHL (and doesn't have his size) makes ZERO sense for the Stars.

It doesn't really have anything to do with one player having way more value in a trade than the other, but the fact that trading Glennie for a guy who has 19 points in his career really makes no sense for the Stars team.

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:22 PM
  #38
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
The Leafs would be more inclined to make it than the Stars...slugger.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:23 PM
  #39
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
Only reason I'd even slightly consider this is because he's a center, but it sounds like he's more a winger now.

No reason to do this, really.
Exactly.

This is something that Leafs fans refuse to acknowledge.

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:23 PM
  #40
Pay Carl
don't lose touch
 
Pay Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vermont
Country: United States
Posts: 10,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by QMJHLfollower View Post
LOL, it's called not rushing a 21 years old prospect with a not NHL ready size.
By 21 you are pretty damn close to being done growing

Pay Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:24 PM
  #41
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
What about my point don't you understand?

With Glennie's size and potential trading him for someone who has accomplished nothing in the NHL (and doesn't have his size) makes ZERO sense for the Stars.

It doesn't really have anything to do with one player having way more value in a trade than the other, but the fact that trading Glennie for a guy who has 19 points in his career really makes no sense for the Stars team.
Kadri is clearly the better prospect. He was better a every level than Glennie. He has the better protential. That's some easy reasons to do this trade from a Stars position.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:24 PM
  #42
TorontoTrades
Registered User
 
TorontoTrades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,609
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
Nothing you say there explains how it's a logical move for the Stars to trade Glennie for Kadri.

Neither have accomplished anything in the NHL, both are young and have a long career ahead of them.
sweet.

brb trading D'Amigo for Kuznetsov
brb trading Carrick for Schwartz
brb trading Abbot for Huberdeau

it's ok cause none of them have accomplished anything in the NHL so they're all even.

TorontoTrades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:24 PM
  #43
Pi
Registered User
 
Pi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,736
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
The Leafs would be more inclined to make it than the Stars...slugger.

Since last year they probably had the softest top 6 in the whole league.
OMG!! Get more size!! Time to trade Kessel for Penner?

You make it sound like Glennie is really the prophet. Take a break mate.

Pi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:25 PM
  #44
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wKetch22 View Post
By 21 you are pretty damn close to being done growing
Many people are stuck in the 70's and 80's mindset where these kids were drafted and suddenly learned a world of knowledge about training, and nutrition and all that.

There is growing to be done for sure, but it's not anywhere near as significant as some like to think it is.

Re: Schenn's potential

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:25 PM
  #45
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wKetch22 View Post
By 21 you are pretty damn close to being done growing
Yeah, every players are 200 pounds at 21 years old.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:26 PM
  #46
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pi View Post
OMG!! Get more size!! Time to trade Kessel for Penner?

You make it sound like Glennie is really the prophet. Take a break mate.
Yeah...it's the non leafs fans overrating a prospect in this thread.

Not the other way around.

Pretty amazing what a significant difference 19 career points and 1 draft slot makes.

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:28 PM
  #47
Pay Carl
don't lose touch
 
Pay Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vermont
Country: United States
Posts: 10,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by QMJHLfollower View Post
Yeah, every players are 200 pounds at 21 years old.
Better said RNH and Couturier back to juniors then

Pay Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:29 PM
  #48
Pi
Registered User
 
Pi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,736
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
Yeah...it's the non leafs fans overrating a prospect in this thread.

Not the other way around.

Pretty amazing what a significant difference 19 career points and 1 draft slot makes.
Not really.

You say that neither has accomplished anything in the NHL. I get that okay.

Then you go onto say that the Leafs would have to add...now that is laughable.

You don't stop there, you go onto say that since they both have accomplished nothing in the NHL they're just about equal value.

Does that mean I can trade Jerry D'Amigo for Jonathan Huberdeau? Clearly both have accomplished zilch in the NHL and therefore have equal value.

It's fair right? D'Amigo for Huberdeau.

Pi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:30 PM
  #49
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas A&M
Country: Estonia
Posts: 20,965
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoTrades View Post
sweet.

brb trading D'Amigo for Kuznetsov
brb trading Carrick for Schwartz
brb trading Abbot for Huberdeau

it's ok cause none of them have accomplished anything in the NHL so they're all even.


Are you really saying the difference in potential between Kadri and Glennie is the same as any of these three?

LatvianTwist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-12-2012, 06:31 PM
  #50
Pay Carl
don't lose touch
 
Pay Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vermont
Country: United States
Posts: 10,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoTrades View Post
sweet.

brb trading D'Amigo for Kuznetsov
brb trading Carrick for Schwartz
brb trading Abbot for Huberdeau

it's ok cause none of them have accomplished anything in the NHL so they're all even.
pretty sure Kadri's junior numbers are not that much better than Glennie's if at all

thats the only real comparrison right now

Pay Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.