HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Should defensemen go on the attack more?

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-29-2004, 02:52 AM
  #1
KOVALEV10*
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Simply the best!
Posts: 3,314
vCash: 500
Should defensemen go on the attack more?

Hey.. this past few weeks I have been watching classic games from the late 1970-s to end 80-s such as the MTL teams, Oiler teams, Islander teams, Flames teams even Penguin's teams and in all of their games they have defensemen who really go on the attack a lot lot more then defensemen do now. Back in those days, defenders took chances unlike now but most times it worked unlike nowadays where almost all the goals come from forwards in important playoff games. What happened to defenders playing like a Bobby Orr or a Guy Lapointe or a Serge Savard or a Larry Rabinson...even more a Paul Coffee.. Denis Potvin... Raymond Bourque... hell even Al Macinnis! And I've noticed that the fact that those defensemen and a lot lot more then just these few that went on the attack often really helped their teammates. Think about it the big tree really helped the MTL team of the late 70-s... Denis Potvin really helped the Islander's attack in the early 80-s.. Paul Coffee really helped the great one and its almighty Oilers as well as Mario and the pens years later... Al MacInnis really helped Calgary.. etc etc.

Now do you think defensemen should be like the old days and go on the offense a lot more or should they continue playing conservatively and a safer style of play?

KOVALEV10* is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 03:01 AM
  #2
hockeyfan125
HFB Partner
 
hockeyfan125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,019
vCash: 500
I think it depends on the team. The Canuck defenders always join the rush. That is one of the main ways we generate our goals.

hockeyfan125 is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 03:32 AM
  #3
Cloned
Dial M for Michelle
 
Cloned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,394
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtuzzi21
I think it depends on the team. The Canuck defenders always join the rush. That is one of the main ways we generate our goals.
I agree. In practice it depends on the team -- the type of defensemen they have, the coaches, the system, etc.

In theory, most of us would probably like defensemen to join the rush more, to make the game more exciting. From that standpoint the answer would probably be yes, IMO.

Cloned is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 03:34 PM
  #4
Bring Back Bucky
Registered User
 
Bring Back Bucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Delicieux!
Country: Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 7,833
vCash: 968
If they want to skate into a neutral zone clogged up with 6 robots taking up space, I say have at it. Unfortunately the grace of a Paul Coffey would be limited in today's age of behemoths taking up space and causing obstruction between the blue lines.

Bring Back Bucky is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 03:43 PM
  #5
Higgy4
Registered User
 
Higgy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 7,548
vCash: 500
I think all skaters should have the mindset to always be on "the attack". For years the object was to score more goals than your opponent. These days it has changed to give up fewer goals than your opponent.

So, yes...I think defensmen should jump into the attack ALOT more.

Higgy4 is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 04:03 PM
  #6
Russian_fanatic
Registered User
 
Russian_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,638
vCash: 500
Canucks d-men always join in the attack.

Russian_fanatic is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 04:35 PM
  #7
OlTimeHockey
Registered User
 
OlTimeHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: home
Country: China
Posts: 16,036
vCash: 500
Back when I was a kid, and an adult....well, up until the Devils trap became religeon....

a defenseman stayed back and a defenseman went up. A foreward would help and backcheck and guys had roleS.

Now every player has the X and O mentality, playing the systematic bludgeoning of the game.

MacInnis and Potvin and Coffey and others could play fourth foreward and play defense as well. Now every defenseman has the same instructions from the 20+ inept and uncreative coaches who sold the game out for trap success.

So yes, I think it is a great idea to let a defenseman's talent be used to the limit, but not if we can't get nap time during trapfest.

I need my z's.

OlTimeHockey is offline  
Old
12-29-2004, 05:34 PM
  #8
BLONG7
Registered User
 
BLONG7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 13,094
vCash: 500
The D should help out more on the attack...it definitely helps a team create more offence. The coaches just don't allow it anymore, they are too busy preaching D first, therefore we get more boring, and cautious played games. If they were to give the coaches five year contracts, then you would see them let the reigns loose on the offensive D men and we would see more scoring, and more 2 on 1's going back the other way...Coaches are the one's who have to coach a boring style of play, because they can be fired at the first site of a losing streak, but if they were given a vote of confidence by the GM and owner with a longer contract, you would see better hockey!!!

BLONG7 is online now  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.