Proposal: Sens would like to add another D - David Savard

[Nikita Filatov]

Originally Posted by 19sens11

Methot = 3rd pairing defenseman on the worst team in the league. He's also overpaid. In what world is he worth those players?

Similar situation with Savard. He's not worth a young top 6 forward like Foligno at the moment, though fair enough if that's what it would take to get him.

While I did mean Savard/Moore for Foligno, Methot isn't quite as bad as you're making him out to be. He has been at the world hockey championships the past two years and was penciled into our top four at the beginning of the year when we looked like a potential playoff team. His contract might look a little scary now but a lot of us thought it was at least somewhat deserved after his 2010-2011 season.

[Benny FTW]

I would not trade Foligno for savard or moore or methot... even if they were all packaged together.

[Crisp Breakout]

Originally Posted by The Roffler

I would not trade Foligno for savard or moore or methot... even if they were all packaged together.

No one says you have to. We're just saying that if we move one of our defensemen it needs to be for a useful forward.

What about a Savard for Silfverberg swap?

[guyzeur]

Originally Posted by Crisp Breakout

No one says you have to. We're just saying that if we move one of our defensemen it needs to be for a useful forward.

What about a Savard for Silfverberg swap?

If you put aside the fact that you may ask for an overpayment...

Do you think the value is close in a 1 for 1 trade between Silverberg and Savard?

[Crisp Breakout]

Originally Posted by guyzeur

If you put aside the fact that you may ask for an overpayment...

Do you think the value is close in a 1 for 1 trade between Silverberg and Savard?

I'm not too concerned with value... It looks (at least to me) that Savard is going to be a #3-#4 defenseman who can run a powerplay. If I'm going to trade a kid like this I want someone who looks like a top-6 forward. Otherwise, I'm content to wait for him to develop another year or two to increase his value.

[guyzeur]

Originally Posted by Crisp Breakout

I'm not too concerned with value... It looks (at least to me) that Savard is going to be a #3-#4 defenseman who can run a powerplay. If I'm going to trade a kid like this I want someone who looks like a top-6 forward. Otherwise, I'm content to wait for him to develop another year or two to increase his value.

I think I should start threads with other teams, you sir have way too much common sense.