HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

CBJ - VAN - FLA (Luongo & Nash)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
06-27-2012, 09:29 PM
  #1
JacketsWin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8
vCash: 500
CBJ - VAN - FLA (Luongo & Nash)

Lets start this off saying I dont normally post these and I understand a three way trade is very very very hard to pull off. I do believe that it may be the best way for Nash to get moved as there are multiple prospect pools to get a return from and you wouldn't be gutting one teams prospects. It also will help get Luongo where he wants to go. Here is a basis of trade proposal. Tweeks could be made with picks if some sides are not happy with it.

To Vancouver:

Rick Nash
2nd Round Pick - From FLA

To Florida:

Roberto Luongo

To Columbus:

David Booth (Top 6 winger and high salary(Kind of Cap Dump?)) - From VAN
Nicklas Jenson (Forward Prospect with good upside) - From VAN
Nick Bjugstad (Forward Prospect with good upside) - From FLA
2013 1st Round Pick - From VAN
Another piece from FLA?

This trade would get Luongo to FLA, Nash to VAN, and CBJ will get closer to the return they want for Nash. Jackets would want Huberdeau, but would need to add to get him. Could be the basis for something here. Let me know if I am way off.

JacketsWin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:33 PM
  #2
Vankiller Whale
Tippett or bust
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,308
vCash: 50
I can tell you right away Florida will say no.
Most Vancouver fans would also say no. You might get Jensen our a 1st from us, but not both. We won't sell the farm to get Nash, as good a piece as he is. And Florida is really high on Bjugstad.

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:36 PM
  #3
MeatTornado
I was born ready
 
MeatTornado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,378
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to MeatTornado
Luongo, Jensen, Booth and a 1st for Nash and a 2nd seems like a lot. Also from what I gathered FLA fans are pretty against dealing Bjugstad

MeatTornado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:40 PM
  #4
KittysGotClaws
We See Red
 
KittysGotClaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 561
Country: United States
Posts: 1,430
vCash: 500
Panthers give Bjugstad and a 2nd for Luongo? Definite pass.

KittysGotClaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:44 PM
  #5
CommonMeans*
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,087
vCash: 500
The Jackets make out like bandits in this trade.

CommonMeans* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:49 PM
  #6
Mayor Bee
Jarmo H. Christ
 
Mayor Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11,127
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonMeans View Post
The Jackets make out like bandits in this trade.
Really? Looks to me like the Jackets get a bunch of futures and absolutely nothing in the present. It would be 2015 (or later) before there's any real production coming from this, and Booth logging Nash's minutes represents a downgrade anyway.

Mayor Bee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:54 PM
  #7
Gudbranson4Prez
Yu - Behr - Doe
 
Gudbranson4Prez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,946
vCash: 500
Man.. That's bad

Gudbranson4Prez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:56 PM
  #8
JacketsWin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittysGotClaws View Post
Panthers give Bjugstad and a 2nd for Luongo? Definite pass.
I had a pick from CBJ going there as well, but I thought it was overpayment. Would love to give up another piece from the jackets to upgrade the prospect to Huberdeau, but I thought that was making the deal too far fetched and complicated.

Tweek the deal to make it fit your team and we can see how it works. I just think if the CBJ pull prospects from multiple teams it will help get a better return for them as well as not make those other teams feel like they gave up all their futures.

JacketsWin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 09:59 PM
  #9
eklunds source
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: cannot disclose
Posts: 6,528
vCash: 500
I'm literally 100% certain the Canucks have no interest in acquiring Nash.

$47.4m over the next 6 years for a player that needs to be sheltered in order to produce 70'ish points? A guy with a back-loaded contract who would immediately become the highest paid player on the team (by $1.7m) and would play on the 2nd line?

Rick Nash Facts

That's not how Gillis builds his hockey team.

eklunds source is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:02 PM
  #10
Vankiller Whale
Tippett or bust
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,308
vCash: 50
What I feel is fair value:

To Florida: Luongo, Van 2nd
To Columbus: Van 1st, Booth, Petrovic(maybe Robak if neccessary), Upshall(actual cap dump, as Booth is payed to score goals, and he does)
To Vancouver: Florida 1st, Nash

Although looking on it after the fact, there's no way Howson would do this, as he wants significant overpayment. I don't see a deal like this working out.

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:05 PM
  #11
FANonymous
Registered User
 
FANonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by eklunds source View Post
I'm literally 100% certain the Canucks have no interest in acquiring Nash.

$47.4m over the next 6 years for a player that needs to be sheltered in order to produce 70'ish points? A guy with a back-loaded contract who would immediately become the highest paid player on the team (by $1.7m) and would play on the 2nd line?

Rick Nash Facts

That's not how Gillis builds his hockey team.
Hahahaha what a worthless link.

FANonymous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:06 PM
  #12
eklunds source
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: cannot disclose
Posts: 6,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
What I feel is fair value:

To Florida: Luongo, Van 2nd
To Columbus: Van 1st, Booth, Petrovic(maybe Robak if neccessary), Upshall(actual cap dump, as Booth is payed to score goals, and he does)
To Vancouver: Florida 1st, Nash

Although looking on it after the fact, there's no way Howson would do this, as he wants significant overpayment. I don't see a deal like this working out.
Not only are you suggesting the Canucks add Nash, but trade Booth to get him?

Have a read of this... Booth is a two-way threat

eklunds source is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:07 PM
  #13
eklunds source
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: cannot disclose
Posts: 6,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FANonymous View Post
Hahahaha what a worthless link.
People like you who don't believe in numbers are how people like me continue to make good money betting on hockey using those numbers.. Cheers =)


also, you posted that 6 minutes after I did... and there's no way you read the article in 6 minutes. Good job skipping it over.

eklunds source is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:11 PM
  #14
JacketsWin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
What I feel is fair value:

To Florida: Luongo, Van 2nd
To Columbus: Van 1st, Booth, Petrovic(maybe Robak if neccessary), Upshall(actual cap dump, as Booth is payed to score goals, and he does)
To Vancouver: Florida 1st, Nash

Although looking on it after the fact, there's no way Howson would do this, as he wants significant overpayment. I don't see a deal like this working out.
Defense prospects to CBJ don't really make sense (Murray, Moore, Savard, Goulubef, Reily, Weber, etc)

Jackets need forward prospects with top 6 potential.

JacketsWin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:14 PM
  #15
Vankiller Whale
Tippett or bust
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,308
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacketsWin View Post
Defense prospects to CBJ don't really make sense (Murray, Moore, Savard, Goulubef, Reily, Weber, etc)

Jackets need forward prospects with top 6 potential.
So maybe you get Jensen and we get Petrovic?

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:14 PM
  #16
ProstheticConscience
Nihil
 
ProstheticConscience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canuck Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,132
vCash: 500
No thanks from Vancouver. Too much. Way too much.

ProstheticConscience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:17 PM
  #17
punk_o_holic
 
punk_o_holic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N. Vancouver, B.C.
Country: Japan
Posts: 5,920
vCash: 50
Luongo wants to go to Florida but I don't think Florida has a serious interest in him. I'm sure they would rather stick with Theodore/Clemenssen(pending UFA who they might want back)/Markstrom and not give up a lot of assets then bring in Luongo.

punk_o_holic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:18 PM
  #18
thrillermiller89
Registered User
 
thrillermiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 1,311
vCash: 500
I like the parameters of a deal where FLA gets Luongo, VAN gets Nash, and CLB gets Booth and some picks/prospects.

This could be a very successful 3 way trade for all parties involved.

thrillermiller89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:20 PM
  #19
Socratic Method Man
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,165
vCash: 500
yeah... this isn't a very fair proposal.

For one, I think Florida wants to hold on to their prospects.

For another, Vancouver gets bent over. Luongo is an all star goalie, he is elite talent. And he holds a cap hit of 5.3. Rick Nash is a terrific forward and great goal scorer, but keep in mind he has a cap hit of - what is it, almost 7? That's huge from a Vancouver standpoint, and for that reason alone, Vancouver realistically probably couldn't add Nash to the team. Just because the Sedins are at 6.1.

But even if the cap hit was no concern to Van, a swap of Luongo and Nash is a swap of elite talent. I don't see any scenario where Van would have to add Booth, Jensen, and a 1st to make this deal.

Socratic Method Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:23 PM
  #20
Haj
Registered User
 
Haj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,343
vCash: 500
Now I remember why I don't read trade proposal threads

Haj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:35 PM
  #21
FANonymous
Registered User
 
FANonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by eklunds source View Post
People like you who don't believe in numbers are how people like me continue to make good money betting on hockey using those numbers.. Cheers =)


also, you posted that 6 minutes after I did... and there's no way you read the article in 6 minutes. Good job skipping it over.
I read enough to know that it's complete crap. His first point argues that Rick Nash isn't elite, whatever that means. Elite is such a broad term with every person holding their own definition that it seems silly to argue it at all.

Then he argues that Nash hasn't had poor teammates, which is above retarded. His teammates have been well below average first line talent. In the same argument he says that Nash doesn't elevate his linemates production at all, except when he does. The whole 2nd point is so full of flip flopping and backpedaling it's hilarious.

As soon as I read "Rick Nash is on the decline" I completely skipped that part because I haven't seen or heard anyone bother to make that claim.

And I don't bet money on hockey so you're making no money off of me. I don't need cash to enjoy the greatest sport on the planet.

FANonymous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 10:43 PM
  #22
King Canuck
Heart Of A Canuck
 
King Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,962
vCash: 50
Send a message via MSN to King Canuck
No thanks.

King Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 11:26 PM
  #23
HockeyRX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 199
vCash: 500
i like nash but he is not worth what columbus is asking for him. his cap hit is too high and there is a clear downward trend in his stats since 08/09 season. we could maybe excuse him if he had one down year, but three in a row just doesn't fly. it is more likely than not that he continues to produce at a low level (for his salary). imo for his salary he should be at 80-85 points at least.

HockeyRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2012, 11:42 PM
  #24
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,165
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
Panthers have depth in net. They're not going to pay a lot of Luongo.

No way Columbus gets that much for Nash. He isn't Wayner.

thadd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:26 AM
  #25
Kessely Snipes
Great White North
 
Kessely Snipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,801
vCash: 500
Couldn't see Vancouver or Florida wanting to do this.

Kessely Snipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.