HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Mtl-sjs

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-29-2012, 11:07 AM
  #1
Cradorium
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 62
vCash: 500
Mtl-sjs

To Mtl : Vlasic+Demers

To Sj : Subban+Webber+Diaz

I think good trade for both

Cradorium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 11:08 AM
  #2
Habsterix*
@Habsterix
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,475
vCash: 500
No thanks.

Habsterix* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 11:09 AM
  #3
alpine4life
Registered User
 
alpine4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moncton, NB
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,505
vCash: 500
I pretty sure MTL fans won like that at all, but I would say its close to a fair deal.

alpine4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 11:29 AM
  #4
Hatrick Marleau
Nikolay GOALdobin
 
Hatrick Marleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: With JR
Posts: 4,308
vCash: 500
Why? Vlasic is our #2 defenseman and is one of the best young Dmen in the league. Demers is a PMD with Top 4 potential. We are better with Vlasic and Demers than with one very good dman and two 3rd pairing Dman. Also, we don't need more Dmen.

Hatrick Marleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 11:42 AM
  #5
montreal
Go Habs Go
 
montreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: Sark
Posts: 23,317
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cradorium View Post
To Mtl : Vlasic+Demers

To Sj : Subban+Webber+Diaz

I think good trade for both
I don't see why either team does this

montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 11:42 AM
  #6
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,615
vCash: 500
Honestly you can just take Weber and Diaz out because I have zero interest in either of them.

For Subban I would offer them some combination of Pavelski, Clowe, Murray, or Boyle. I still doubt they bite unless there really are some internal issue with Subban.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 12:04 PM
  #7
Clipitar
Registered User
 
Clipitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
Honestly you can just take Weber and Diaz out because I have zero interest in either of them.

For Subban I would offer them some combination of Pavelski, Clowe, Murray, or Boyle. I still doubt they bite unless there really are some internal issue with Subban.
Not much interest in Demers neither.

Montreal has as much issues with Subban as you guys have with Vlasic and Thornton.

Murray could be a decent target for the Habs though. What kind of reasonable return would guys be looking at?

Clipitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 12:05 PM
  #8
Galchenyuk27
C'est le buuuuuuuuut
 
Galchenyuk27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hawthorne, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 1,300
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Galchenyuk27
I wouldn't do this in a hundred years and I don't see San Jose doing it in even longer.

Galchenyuk27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 12:12 PM
  #9
RainbowDash
20% Cooler
 
RainbowDash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Equestria
Posts: 2,016
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipitar View Post
Murray could be a decent target for the Habs though. What kind of reasonable return would guys be looking at?
We're pretty much looking at a return similar to what you got for Hal Gill or as a piece to upgrade our top 6.

RainbowDash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 12:28 PM
  #10
FlyingKostitsyn
Registered User
 
FlyingKostitsyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Quebec
Country: Australia
Posts: 8,036
vCash: 500
Perfect example of a deal that makes no sense for either teams.

FlyingKostitsyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 12:57 PM
  #11
DuckEatinShark
GET ALL THE PPs!!!!
 
DuckEatinShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,423
vCash: 50
Both teams easily say no.

DuckEatinShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 01:26 PM
  #12
Mafoofoo
:facepalm:
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 12,974
vCash: 500
....why should SJ or the Habs do this?

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 01:37 PM
  #13
Inub0i
I will Q
 
Inub0i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UC Irvine, Irvine
Country: United States
Posts: 8,615
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Inub0i Send a message via MSN to Inub0i Send a message via Skype™ to Inub0i
I think it's safe to say neither team does this

Inub0i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 01:37 PM
  #14
Clipitar
Registered User
 
Clipitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniversalRemonster View Post
We're pretty much looking at a return similar to what you got for Hal Gill or as a piece to upgrade our top 6.
Palushaj/Geoffrion and NSH 2nd?

Clipitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 01:41 PM
  #15
Miller Time
Registered User
 
Miller Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,176
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cradorium View Post
To Mtl : Vlasic+Demers

To Sj : Subban+Webber+Diaz

I think good trade for both
terrible deal for Montreal...

SanJose would be nuts not to jump all over this.

#1 dmen fetch way more than that, regardless of what you think of Diaz/Weber (whom I think many people are underrating in this thread).

Miller Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 02:39 PM
  #16
mytor4*
 
mytor4*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,175
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller Time View Post
terrible deal for Montreal...

SanJose would be nuts not to jump all over this.

#1 dmen fetch way more than that, regardless of what you think of Diaz/Weber (whom I think many people are underrating in this thread).
This guy understands it.

mytor4* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 02:54 PM
  #17
Habsterix*
@Habsterix
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,475
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniversalRemonster View Post
We're pretty much looking at a return similar to what you got for Hal Gill or as a piece to upgrade our top 6.
I don't know how to break that out to you but Murray would not fetch a top 6, unless it's someone overpaid or under performing.

Habsterix* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:00 PM
  #18
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,331
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habsterix View Post
I don't know how to break that out to you but Murray would not fetch a top 6, unless it's someone overpaid or under performing.
Notice how he put "as a piece to upgrade" as in, part of a package?

Arrch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:13 PM
  #19
Sharks4Life
Registered User
 
Sharks4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Bay, Ca
Country: United States
Posts: 477
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller Time View Post
terrible deal for Montreal...

SanJose would be nuts not to jump all over this.

#1 dmen fetch way more than that, regardless of what you think of Diaz/Weber (whom I think many people are underrating in this thread).
Then call us nuts. Not to belittle subban at all as i think he is a great player, the sharks don't get any better by trading away two NHL defensemen for one, and yes diaz/weber is in the deal which are pieces san jose in no way wants. In essence we lose defensive ablility to get a guy who is redundent with the pieces we already have.

Sharks4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:14 PM
  #20
Benny FTW
Head Light Fluid
 
Benny FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,194
vCash: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller Time View Post
terrible deal for Montreal...

SanJose would be nuts not to jump all over this.

#1 dmen fetch way more than that, regardless of what you think of Diaz/Weber (whom I think many people are underrating in this thread).
There are no #1 dman in the proposal?

Benny FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:15 PM
  #21
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharks4Life View Post
Then call us nuts. Not to belittle subban at all as i think he is a great player, the sharks don't get any better by trading away two NHL defensemen for one, and yes diaz/weber is in the deal which are pieces san jose in no way wants. In essence we lose defensive ablility to get a guy who is redundent with the pieces we already have.
Uhh, what defensive ability do the Sharks lose?

And in what world is Subban redundant with the pieces the Sharks have?

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:17 PM
  #22
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,615
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
Uhh, what defensive ability do the Sharks lose?

And in what world is Subban redundant with the pieces the Sharks have?
Vlasic was one of the best defensive defensemen in the NHL last season.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:19 PM
  #23
UniverStalinGraduate*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,253
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
Vlasic was one of the best defensive defensemen in the NHL last season.
Come again?

UniverStalinGraduate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:22 PM
  #24
HABsurde
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,400
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharks4Life View Post
Then call us nuts. Not to belittle subban at all as i think he is a great player, the sharks don't get any better by trading away two NHL defensemen for one, and yes diaz/weber is in the deal which are pieces san jose in no way wants. In essence we lose defensive ablility to get a guy who is redundent with the pieces we already have.

2 NHL defenseman for 1 ? your funny

demers 183-10-48-58 (57-4-9-13 last year)

Weber 109-5-25-30 (60-4-14-18 last year, with the worst team in the east)

Diaz 59-3-13-16 last year

yeah, you are funny

HABsurde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2012, 03:23 PM
  #25
Oppa
#FunMustBeAlways
 
Oppa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,544
vCash: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverStalinGraduate View Post
Come again?
Vlasic was one of the best defensive defensemen in the NHL last season.

Oppa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.