Kane's a much, much better playmaker than Praise aswell.. so when you look at total offense, and not just goal-scoring ability (in general) than it's Kane as an offensive player.. Parise brings more to the table as an all-round player.. but, like I said, hopefully if we do sign Parise there won't have to be a choice made between the two.
Nah Q just needs to pull his head out of you know where and put Bolland @ #2 center, then let the chips fall for 3rd center (Kruger, McNeill, whatever...).
So you want to put Bolland in a more offensive role, for a team that already has defensive and goalie issues? No thanks, even with the slightly improvement we'll make via puck possession with Parise. Although without Kane, the difference might not even be that much. Hell, I'd rather see Pirri given a shot at the 2C spot rather than see Toews-Bolland-Kruger-Mayers down the middle. That's a pretty ****** C group, not to mention you have injury issues with Bolland, and Mayers wore out after about 35 games last year. Not even going to touch the Kruger part... but let me just say I'm not a fan.
McNeil is at least a year and a half away, and TT is at least two years away while on the subject of potential prospects to fill the void.
The Lemonheads one is ok and the Chevy pinball one is ok too, but the Chevy one where they're standing in front of a green screen and the graphics on the car change multiple times is the worst POS I've ever seen.