HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Chicago Blackhawks
Notices

Habs interested in Sharp...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-04-2012, 01:57 PM
  #26
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 23,872
vCash: 500
rumor is dead, I would have only accepted Price as return

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:19 PM
  #27
No Fun Shogun
Global Moderator
34-38-61-10-13
 
No Fun Shogun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 24,448
vCash: 50
Who do the Habs legitimately have to offer for Sharp? Can't really think of anyone that they'd willingly put on the trading block that would make me think for so much as a second to trade for Sharp.

No Fun Shogun is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:22 PM
  #28
madgoat33
Registered User
 
madgoat33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12,336
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Fun Shogun View Post
Who do the Habs legitimately have to offer for Sharp? Can't really think of anyone that they'd willingly put on the trading block that would make me think for so much as a second to trade for Sharp.
I told you bro, Gomez straight up. he's paid a lot , he's gotta be good.

madgoat33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:25 PM
  #29
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,825
vCash: 500
Price is the only player I would want from the Habs in exchange for Sharp, and that's not happening.

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:27 PM
  #30
madgoat33
Registered User
 
madgoat33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12,336
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkaholic View Post
Price is the only player I would want from the Habs in exchange for Sharp, and that's not happening.
I'd take mr PK Subban as well, but outside of those two, the habs ain't got **** I care about at all.

madgoat33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:27 PM
  #31
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,773
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by madgoat33 View Post
I told you bro, Gomez straight up. he's paid a lot , he's gotta be good.
Is this supposed to be a Bowman joke?

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:48 PM
  #32
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,825
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by madgoat33 View Post
I'd take mr PK Subban as well, but outside of those two, the habs ain't got **** I care about at all.
For Sharp?

Hell no. I wouldn't even trade Bolland for PK.

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 05:51 PM
  #33
Crazy_Ike
Cookin' with fire.
 
Crazy_Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,497
vCash: 500
I am quite sure every team would be interested in Sharp, but if we moved him we'd just have another hole to fill.

Crazy_Ike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 05:23 PM
  #34
DayNah
Ship it donk!
 
DayNah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,885
vCash: 500
What about Bolland/Hammer for Plekanec/2nd rounder?

DayNah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 05:24 PM
  #35
MagicSlap*
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,471
vCash: 500
No, 3C hole, top 4 d hole. Nobody can fill those holes.

MagicSlap* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 05:37 PM
  #36
Retail1LO
Registered User
 
Retail1LO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Country: United States
Posts: 5,137
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Retail1LO Send a message via AIM to Retail1LO Send a message via MSN to Retail1LO
I'm more vehemently opposed to trading Sharp than I am any other Hawk except Toews. I'd want a lot out of Montreal for Sharp. Not limited to but including Subban and Eller.

Retail1LO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 08:16 PM
  #37
LarmerSavardSecord
Registered User
 
LarmerSavardSecord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wicker Park
Posts: 624
vCash: 500
It was written that the MTL had TT rated #2 on their draft board. If they really do value the kid that high, it could be worth it to move him the Habs at some point to improve the NHL roster.

LarmerSavardSecord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 03:13 AM
  #38
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 23,872
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DayNah View Post
What about Bolland/Hammer for Plekanec/2nd rounder?
done.

Pleks is better than Bolland and getting a 2nd for Hjammer is OK in my book if we get Plekanec.

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 03:16 AM
  #39
Sarava
Moderator
 
Sarava's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 8,418
vCash: 500
Can't trade Hammer without Suter coming here. They just can't. If you need to move someone, move Montador or Leddy.

Sarava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 03:23 AM
  #40
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 23,872
vCash: 500
I'd trade Monty, but Kuc said
Quote:
Seems like Hjalmarsson is on the block. Maybe for Gagner? Just a guess
Gagner is just a guess on his side.

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 03:28 AM
  #41
Sarava
Moderator
 
Sarava's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 8,418
vCash: 500
I don't see how you can trade your clearcut #3 defensemen, with nothing to replace him with. We'd then have 4 bottom pair quality guys filling out our #3-6 spots. what are we going to do, have Dunc and Seabs play 35 minutes per game?

Trading Hammer made sense when they were going after Suter. They needed to move salary, and a far better player would have come back. That's no longer the case. They don't need to move his salary (which suddenly is a nice price given all the recent deals).

If you want to move a dman towards getting a #2 or #3 center, Leddy is the guy to move.

Sarava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 04:38 AM
  #42
Spectra
Registered boozer
 
Spectra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 976
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarmerSavardSecord View Post
It was written that the MTL had TT rated #2 on their draft board. If they really do value the kid that high, it could be worth it to move him the Habs at some point to improve the NHL roster.
If they really did, one wonders why they didn't try to aquire the pick to get him when he fell to #18?

Would gladly have traded our 1st for Plekanec if that ever was an option.

Spectra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 07:32 AM
  #43
UsernameWasTaken
Let's Go Blue Jays!
 
UsernameWasTaken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarava;52206523[B
]I don't see how you can trade your clearcut #3 defensemen, with nothing to replace him with. [/B]We'd then have 4 bottom pair quality guys filling out our #3-6 spots. what are we going to do, have Dunc and Seabs play 35 minutes per game?

Trading Hammer made sense when they were going after Suter. They needed to move salary, and a far better player would have come back. That's no longer the case. They don't need to move his salary (which suddenly is a nice price given all the recent deals).

If you want to move a dman towards getting a #2 or #3 center, Leddy is the guy to move.
I agree...not weakening our D is more important that getting a new 2c. I'm also not sold on Gagner...not one bit.

UsernameWasTaken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 01:12 PM
  #44
Jeffrey Lebowski
Luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
 
Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Side
Country: United States
Posts: 5,183
vCash: 500
If Sharp is traded to Montreal... Price better be coming back.

Jeffrey Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 04:01 PM
  #45
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,773
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarava View Post
I don't see how you can trade your clearcut #3 defensemen, with nothing to replace him with. We'd then have 4 bottom pair quality guys filling out our #3-6 spots. what are we going to do, have Dunc and Seabs play 35 minutes per game?

Trading Hammer made sense when they were going after Suter. They needed to move salary, and a far better player would have come back. That's no longer the case. They don't need to move his salary (which suddenly is a nice price given all the recent deals).

If you want to move a dman towards getting a #2 or #3 center, Leddy is the guy to move.

No, Leddy is not the guy. That guy would be Hjalmarsson. Unlike Leddy, who's puck-moving and skating ability can not be found within the organization, Hammer could be replaced by Olsen in the next year or two, or even by Dahlbeck/Johns when they're ready to contribute in the NHL.. especially if Chicago views Hammer as a #5 Dman at this point which, judging by how Q had the pairings down the stretch and into the playoffs, I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 08:59 PM
  #46
LarmerSavardSecord
Registered User
 
LarmerSavardSecord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wicker Park
Posts: 624
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectra View Post
If they really did, one wonders why they didn't try to aquire the pick to get him when he fell to #18?

Would gladly have traded our 1st for Plekanec if that ever was an option.
Yeah, I was aware of that and that's why i said "at some point." The rationale would be that they didn't want to give up big NHL assets at the draft, they wanted to see what they could do in the season before going rebuild. It's Montreal.But if their season went south, he would be an highly-valued asset to work a trade around.

LarmerSavardSecord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 02:33 AM
  #47
Sarava
Moderator
 
Sarava's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 8,418
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HossTheBoss View Post
No, Leddy is not the guy. That guy would be Hjalmarsson. Unlike Leddy, who's puck-moving and skating ability can not be found within the organization, Hammer could be replaced by Olsen in the next year or two, or even by Dahlbeck/Johns when they're ready to contribute in the NHL.. especially if Chicago views Hammer as a #5 Dman at this point which, judging by how Q had the pairings down the stretch and into the playoffs, I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.
I would think it's more likely Clendening replaces Leddy than any of Olsen or Johns replacing Hammer anytime soon.

Sarava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 03:21 AM
  #48
Paul Allen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 211
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarava View Post
I would think it's more likely Clendening replaces Leddy than any of Olsen or Johns replacing Hammer anytime soon.
Definitely think Leddy will be around for the long haul. Hammer gets a new contract in 2 summmers. Even with a new cba I think he will get at least 4M a year. Leddy has greater potential anyway. Hammer is easily replaceable, leddy is not- especially since he is still an rfa next year

Paul Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 11:47 AM
  #49
Crazy_Ike
Cookin' with fire.
 
Crazy_Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,497
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarava View Post
I would think it's more likely Clendening replaces Leddy than any of Olsen or Johns replacing Hammer anytime soon.
IMO, Leddy's potential is higher than any defenseman prospect we have in the system. I don't think he'll be replaced by anyone from within.

He is just suffering from unrealistic expectations from everyone. Not every player in the league is going to be a two way superstar.

Crazy_Ike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 11:58 AM
  #50
TorMenT
Go Blackhawks!
 
TorMenT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rockford, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,826
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy_Ike View Post
IMO, Leddy's potential is higher than any defenseman prospect we have in the system. I don't think he'll be replaced by anyone from within.

He is just suffering from unrealistic expectations from everyone. Not every player in the league is going to be a two way superstar.
Especially when they are as young as Leddy.

TorMenT is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.