HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jay Bouwmeester to Edmonton?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-04-2012, 10:33 PM
  #1
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,395
vCash: 50
Jay Bouwmeester to Edmonton?

We can give you Whitney straight up...

Jokininen is gone, we can give you Sam Gagner or Shawn Horcoff plus??

What would Jay Feaster want?

lakai17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 10:47 PM
  #2
Dr Danglefest
Vindication
 
Dr Danglefest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Beantown
Country: United States
Posts: 2,375
vCash: 500
I could see a deal around gagner and Jay Bo

In before someone says eberle...

Dr Danglefest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 10:55 PM
  #3
InfinityIggy
No Longer Flammable
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,718
vCash: 150
No thanks. No incentive for the Flames to trade him for Gagner.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 10:56 PM
  #4
hfboardsuser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,281
vCash: 500
----


Last edited by hfboardsuser: 07-15-2012 at 12:14 AM.
hfboardsuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:02 PM
  #5
9GWG9
Registered User
 
9GWG9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 813
vCash: 500
Say no to Bouw!

We do not want him.

9GWG9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:04 PM
  #6
Izzy
Moderator
JuhaMetsolaForVezina
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 55,645
vCash: 50
Helpful to continue his 0 playoff games.

Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:06 PM
  #7
wahoyaho
Registered User
 
wahoyaho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,413
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Bugg View Post
Whitney for Bouwmeester. I think it's fair- Whitney is obviously the bigger health risk, but he plays an up-tempo offensive game and had just nine fewer points in 30 fewer games. The Flames also gain nearly $3M in cap space in 2012-13, with Whitney coming off the books next summer.

Edmonton's impetus would be gaining an unspectacular minute-muncher who would pair well with either Jeff Petry or Justin Schultz.

Giordano-Wideman
Whitney-Babchuk
Butler-Sarich
Smith

Smid-Petry
Bouwmeester-J. Schultz
Sutton-N. Schultz
Potter
Maybe add a 2nd or something

wahoyaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:08 PM
  #8
Trae
Registered User
 
Trae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,303
vCash: 500
If you think Bouw is going to be traded for a year of Whitney, you are way off the mark.

Especially to a rival, and especially in a dry market where top defenseman hold high value right now.

Trae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:13 PM
  #9
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,395
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by fst6 View Post
Helpful to continue his 0 playoff games.
what are you trying to say?

lakai17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:16 PM
  #10
Henrik To Daniel
Registered User
 
Henrik To Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,948
vCash: 500
Flames aren't going to trade a top pairing dman to their biggest rival (a division rival at that) unless it's a huge overpayment.

Start with next years 1st, Gagner, MPS and that should get Feaster listening.

Henrik To Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:18 PM
  #11
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,180
vCash: 50
Whitney + Gagner

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:18 PM
  #12
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,227
vCash: 500
Wouldn't take him for free. No, I wouldn't take him if the Flames paid us. He has zero playoff games. I don't think isn't a coincidence. The guy has no heart. Tons of skill. But no heart.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:22 PM
  #13
JSC
Registered Sniper
 
JSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,059
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik To Daniel View Post
Flames aren't going to trade a top pairing dman to their biggest rival (a division rival at that) unless it's a huge overpayment.

Start with next years 1st, Gagner, MPS and that should get Feaster listening.
Yeah, any of those pieces for Bouw is a hugh overpayment. If that's what it's going to take to get an albatross contract, I'd rather stay away.

JSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:25 PM
  #14
Henrik To Daniel
Registered User
 
Henrik To Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,948
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSC View Post
Yeah, any of those pieces for Bouw is a hugh overpayment. If that's what it's going to take to get an albatross contract, I'd rather stay away.
Bouw's only on the books for two more years and last time I checked, Edmonton wasn't anywhere near $70.2M in cap.

Also with the addition of Bouwmeester, your defense wouldn't be the laughing stock of the league.

Actually, it probably still would.

Henrik To Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:26 PM
  #15
nzoilerfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 520
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik To Daniel View Post
Flames aren't going to trade a top pairing dman to their biggest rival (a division rival at that) unless it's a huge overpayment.

Start with next years 1st, Gagner, MPS and that should get Feaster listening.
Good luck with that one.

Bouwmeesters contract severely lowers the trade value.

nzoilerfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:29 PM
  #16
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,227
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik To Daniel View Post
Bouw's only on the books for two more years and last time I checked, Edmonton wasn't anywhere near $70.2M in cap.

Also with the addition of Bouwmeester, your defense wouldn't be the laughing stock of the league.

Actually, it probably still would.
No need to burn up cash and cap space on a guy who we won`t want when we`re fighting for the division title in a couple of years.

Nice attempt at trolling to dude. In case you aren't aware (and its obvious that you aren't), the Oilers have a glut of defense prospects, many of who should end up as pretty solid NHL'ers, a couple of potential top pair guys. We are in the business of building from within, not taking other teams bad contracts.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:30 PM
  #17
oilinblood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,825
vCash: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Wouldn't take him for free. No, I wouldn't take him if the Flames paid us. He has zero playoff games. I don't think isn't a coincidence. The guy has no heart. Tons of skill. But no heart.
^^^^^^^^^
I said it when he was a UFA, i keep saying it. DO NOT WANT. DO NOT WANT. DO NOT WANT.
i dont even think he has that much skill. he isnt that great of a skater for rushes, he has a long stride though. the assets that he has are his physical frame and long reach, long stride... putting that to use to be more than - at his very best- an Eric Brewer circa 08...is his issue. The best he will ever be is Eric Brewer circa 08.


Last edited by oilinblood: 07-04-2012 at 11:38 PM.
oilinblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:31 PM
  #18
Henrik To Daniel
Registered User
 
Henrik To Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,948
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
No need to burn up cash and cap space on a guy who we won`t want when we`re fighting for the division title in a couple of years.
Like I said, he only has 2 years left on his deal and the Oilers are below the cap floor right now.

Henrik To Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:37 PM
  #19
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,227
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik To Daniel View Post
Like I said, he only has 2 years left on his deal and the Oilers are below the cap floor right now.
We're 3.5 million under the cap. We haven't signed Yakupov yet, and he'll almost certainly get the 3.75 cap hit that RNH got. Plus we have to re-sign RFA's Gagner, Petry, Dubnyk, Peckham and Vande Velde. 4 of those are NHL'ers. We won't be below the cap floor. And there is no reason to add a big hit of a guy who we don't want.

And like I said, when we're contending for the division title in a few years (ie, the year after this coming season), we won't Bouwmeester's loser mentality crapping up the system.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:39 PM
  #20
oilinblood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,825
vCash: 553
Volchenkov>>>>>>>>>>boumeester

oilinblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:41 PM
  #21
Asher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,014
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik To Daniel View Post
Flames aren't going to trade a top pairing dman to their biggest rival (a division rival at that) unless it's a huge overpayment.

Start with next years 1st, Gagner, MPS and that should get Feaster listening.
I'm guessing the Flames will get less for JayBo than they got for Phaneuf.

Asher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:41 PM
  #22
Stewie Griffin
Moderator
Stewie Hockey™
 
Stewie Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Salt Mines
Country: Bermuda
Posts: 8,920
vCash: 0
There's a reason that there has only been one Edmonton / Calgary trade in history.


Bouwmeester won't be involved in the 2nd one.

Stewie Griffin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:42 PM
  #23
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,180
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asher View Post
I'm guessing the Flames will get less for JayBo than they got for Phaneuf.


is that really possible?

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:43 PM
  #24
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,227
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
is that really possible?
Yep. Because nobody will trade for him, and then the Flames lose him to free agency.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-04-2012, 11:44 PM
  #25
Asher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,014
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
is that really possible?
Yes. Just wait and see.

Asher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.