HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

TJ Galiardi files for arbiration; avoids hearing, re-signed (post #88); $950k

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-05-2012, 07:07 PM
  #1
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 56,803
vCash: 500
TJ Galiardi files for arbiration; avoids hearing, re-signed (post #88); $950k

PollakOnSharks 3:48pm via Web TJ Galiardi the lone #sjshark on list of 16 players taking teams to aribtration. He earned $700K a year ago.


The good: he will be under contract (no hold out) for season.


The (potential) bad: irreconcilable issues from confrontation @ arbitration hearing


Last edited by SpinTheBlackCircle: 07-07-2012 at 07:54 PM.
LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:08 PM
  #2
Kitten Mittons
Registered User
 
Kitten Mittons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Country: Armenia
Posts: 47,632
vCash: 500
You son of a *****!

Kitten Mittons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:16 PM
  #3
Tomahawk214
i'm not even mad
 
Tomahawk214's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Davis, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,162
vCash: 500
Glad to see things have gotten off to a good start.

Tomahawk214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:16 PM
  #4
Shape
Go Sharks :(
 
Shape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Across from the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 5,480
vCash: 500
Ah man what a darsh.

Shape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:18 PM
  #5
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,715
vCash: 500
I'm not 100% up on the NHL's arbitration rules but I believe they can still negotiate right up to just before the decision of the arbitrator is announced...and I think San Jose can walk away from the decision because the player selected arbitration. (SJ gets matching rights up to a certain percentage of the award...80%, maybe?)

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:22 PM
  #6
BrianSmith
Chokers
 
BrianSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,146
vCash: 500
I want Jamie back! Wow I hate this trade.... it's the trade that keeps on giving.

BrianSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:22 PM
  #7
matt trick
Registered User
 
matt trick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 7,880
vCash: 500
So does this mean we cqn buyout Zues? Also, in response to ls, wasn't korky really surprised.when the negatives never came in his arb case. Also Michael Backlund just signed for under 800k.

matt trick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:24 PM
  #8
Gene Parmesan
Spider 2 Y Banana.
 
Gene Parmesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 38,467
vCash: 500
not that big of a deal...they'll get him on a fair deal..McGinn also went to arbitration.

Gene Parmesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:25 PM
  #9
do0glas
Registered User
 
do0glas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,394
vCash: 500
if we walk away from his contract it will be stupid, imo.

hes only on 700k, what was the QO? 770,000? id feel okay giving him 850-900.

do0glas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:27 PM
  #10
Shape
Go Sharks :(
 
Shape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Across from the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 5,480
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 210 View Post
I'm not 100% up on the NHL's arbitration rules but I believe they can still negotiate right up to just before the decision of the arbitrator is announced...
I'm pretty sure Lincecum and the Giants did this same thing. But yeah, I'm not sure if it's the same for the NHL.

Shape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:28 PM
  #11
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,715
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shape View Post
I'm pretty sure Lincecum and the Giants did this same thing. But yeah, I'm not sure if it's the same for the NHL.
Arbitration never comes up for minor league players so I generally just skim the rules...I'm sure someone will know for certain and post what the rules are.

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:29 PM
  #12
The Nemesis
Global Moderator
Semper Tyrannus
 
The Nemesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 48,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 210 View Post
I'm not 100% up on the NHL's arbitration rules but I believe they can still negotiate right up to just before the decision of the arbitrator is announced...and I think San Jose can walk away from the decision because the player selected arbitration. (SJ gets matching rights up to a certain percentage of the award...80%, maybe?)
Yes, the Sharks and Galiardi can negotiate up to the arbitration date and potentially agree to a contract on their own, and they (the team) can choose to walk on the decision if they want to. They are also the ones that get to decide if the arb award will be for a 1 or 2 year contract (must decide before the hearing commences).

If the awarded contract is for 1 year and is more than a set amount (I don't know what the threshold is now. It was like $1.6m coming out of the lockout and that amount scales based on league revenues) they walk away and the player becomes an UFA.

If it's a 2 year award under the same salary circumstances, the team's "walk away" rights instead cut the contract down to 1 year, upon completion of which the player becomes an UFA.

I don't believe there's any sort of matching right/offer sheet setup designed around arbitration.

__________________

"Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent."
'14-15 Sharks CI Tracker: 23 GP, 9-10-4 (home-away-Nat'l/In-Region)
Sorry, I am not taking signature requests at this time.
The Nemesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:36 PM
  #13
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,715
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Nemesis View Post
I don't believe there's any sort of matching right/offer sheet setup designed around arbitration.
Cool...

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:36 PM
  #14
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 56,803
vCash: 500
As the player elected arbitration, the team can set the length (1 or 2 years, up to date of UFA eligibility).


The matching ability, should the Sharks be able to walk away, is not part of 2005 CBA (current one).

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:38 PM
  #15
VP and GM
Bill Says Hey Baby!
 
VP and GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: at home
Country: United States
Posts: 5,473
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt trick View Post
So does this mean we cqn buyout Zues? Also, in response to ls, wasn't korky really surprised.when the negatives never came in his arb case. Also Michael Backlund just signed for under 800k.
buy out date has passed to buy out zues - we can only hope he's part of package outbound or decides to play overseas. we need the cap space. zues has nothing to do with TJ except they are sharks and fit under the same cap.

VP and GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:40 PM
  #16
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,280
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSmith View Post
I want Jamie back! Wow I hate this trade.... it's the trade that keeps on giving.
McGinn chose arbitration too. Does this perhaps make some of you rethink McGinns performance? It would be funny if Col walked away.

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:48 PM
  #17
Fistfullofbeer
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: India
Posts: 8,132
vCash: 500
http://www.fearthefin.com/2012/7/5/3...ry-arbitration

Man .. if he gets close to 1.5M I would not be surprised if DW walks away.

__________________
What?! Look, he thinks he's people!
Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:49 PM
  #18
Rickety Cricket
Registered User
 
Rickety Cricket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Not Kent Huskins
Country: United States
Posts: 28,499
vCash: 500
Didn't Milbury make Tommy Salo cry during his arbitration? We should get him.

Rickety Cricket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:50 PM
  #19
BrianSmith
Chokers
 
BrianSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,146
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WantonAbandon View Post
McGinn chose arbitration too. Does this perhaps make some of you rethink McGinns performance? It would be funny if Col walked away.
Not at all. I can see where McGinn is coming from. He lit it up with Colorado - he is away from a team that he loved and his BFF in Couture - why not go for the money? For Galiardi to go to arb just doesn't make sense to me. He did NOTHING for the Sharks while he was here. One goal - yay.

I wish the trade never happened - IMO McGinn wouldn't have gone to arbitration with the Sharks, and would have followed the DW model of "okay, you are starting to come around, now sign a fair contract and show me what you got" model.

PS: I would LOVE it if Colorado walked away - I just don't see it happening though. This is random but could the Sharks and Avalanche theoretically trade Galiardi and McGinn back to each other?

BrianSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:53 PM
  #20
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,280
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSmith View Post
Not at all. I can see where McGinn is coming from. He lit it up with Colorado - he is away from a team that he loved and his BFF in Couture - why not go for the money?
Sure with good linemates and against the weakest competition possible. And he still couldn't push the play.

If Colorado does in fact walk away from McGinn, I really do look forward in seeing how this board reacts. Will people choose to ignore this event entirely and still whine about McGinn or will they try and claim the Avs are stupid too?

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:53 PM
  #21
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 56,803
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by VP and GM View Post
buy out date has passed to buy out zues - we can only hope he's part of package outbound or decides to play overseas. we need the cap space. zues has nothing to do with TJ except they are sharks and fit under the same cap.
The team has the option of buying out (any) contract 72 hours after arbitration award/deal reached. (A second buyout window)


But the Sharks do not seem to be in the buyout business. They buried Kyle McLaren in minors rather than buy him out.

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:55 PM
  #22
SJeasy
Registered User
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,463
vCash: 500
It's possible that SJ offered a two-way contract and Galiardi want one way. Sometimes this is the issue rather than NHL salary.

I do have a question. Isn't there a $ threshhold where the team cannot walk away? Basically, if it is low enough, I thought the walkaway rights were not there.

SJeasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:57 PM
  #23
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,715
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJeasy View Post
It's possible that SJ offered a two-way contract and Galiardi want one way. Sometimes this is the issue rather than NHL salary.

I do have a question. Isn't there a $ threshhold where the team cannot walk away? Basically, if it is low enough, I thought the walkaway rights were not there.
His 11-12 contract year wasn't two way...could they still offer him a two-way contract?

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 07:59 PM
  #24
LeeIFBB
Teflon Doug
 
LeeIFBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tanning Bed
Posts: 1,534
vCash: 500
The trade that keeps on giving.

LeeIFBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-05-2012, 08:00 PM
  #25
The Nemesis
Global Moderator
Semper Tyrannus
 
The Nemesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 48,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJeasy View Post
It's possible that SJ offered a two-way contract and Galiardi want one way. Sometimes this is the issue rather than NHL salary.

I do have a question. Isn't there a $ threshhold where the team cannot walk away? Basically, if it is low enough, I thought the walkaway rights were not there.
Yeah, there is. Coming out of the lockout it was a little over a million dollars (I said $1.6 earlier, but I have no idea where I got that figure from ), but it's supposed to scale with league-wide revenues and I have no idea what the current # is.

The Nemesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.