HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Chicago - Boston

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-06-2012, 01:42 PM
  #51
dredeye
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
dredeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectra View Post
Take out the picks and it's a deal.
Yeah because that's the biggest problem with this prosposal. Make a bad trade worse for the team that loses in the original.

dredeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 01:42 PM
  #52
BergyWho37
Registered User
 
BergyWho37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 854
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by b in vancouver View Post
Imagine Toews and Bergeron on the same team! They'd both be around the 70% face-off range as other teams would have to put there 2nd and 3rd best faceoff men out against one of them all game. Puck possession!
And both being the epitome of 'hockey'
Drat. Now I want to see them on the same team.

How about -
Krejci (Toews replacement)
Marchand (so the Hawks can troll Vancouver)
Rask (you kinda need a goalie)
for
Toews
You had me thinking until you added Rask ... maybe they take M..Subban instead ? and add a pick

BergyWho37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 01:50 PM
  #53
BergyWho37
Registered User
 
BergyWho37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 854
vCash: 500
I would probably throw Krejci and Marchand at Kane .. probably get hate mail from both teams though for saying it

BergyWho37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 01:56 PM
  #54
dredeye
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
dredeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHawksFan View Post
Hossa + Leddy

for

Krejci + Boychuk
This one is definitely worth a 2nd look

dredeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 02:26 PM
  #55
unifiedtheory
Registered User
 
unifiedtheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by b in vancouver View Post

How about -
Krejci (Toews replacement)
Marchand (so the Hawks can troll Vancouver)
Rask (you kinda need a goalie)
for
Toews
I'd want Chiarelli's head on a pike in my backyard. That is an awful trade from a Bruins perspective.

unifiedtheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 04:23 PM
  #56
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDJ View Post
Don't touch this one either as a B's fan.
Seriously? I wouldn't trade Saad or Leddy in a package for Krejci.. nevermind both.. and it's not even to say I don't like Krejci, that's just too high a cost.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 05:55 PM
  #57
Schalkenullvier*
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: tief im westen
Country: Germany
Posts: 4,591
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHawksFan View Post
Hossa + Leddy

for

Krejci + Boychuk
Done, I'll call Chia. You take care of Bowman?

Schalkenullvier* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:01 PM
  #58
BrainOfJ
Call it a comeback
 
BrainOfJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: State St.
Country: United States
Posts: 14,723
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHawksFan View Post
Hossa + Leddy

for

Krejci + Boychuk
I do this yesterday...and I'd even chip in on Leddy and Hossa's rent.

BrainOfJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:04 PM
  #59
deytookerjaabs
Registered Smut User
 
deytookerjaabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrainOfJ View Post
I do this yesterday...and I'd even chip in on Leddy and Hossa's rent.
It's basically

Insert what Eastern Team needs: Puck Mover + Puck Possession Forward

Insert what Western Team needs: Physical Dman + Physical Forward

Good deal on both ends.

deytookerjaabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:15 PM
  #60
8spokesontheB
Cry Havoc!
 
8spokesontheB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,830
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by deytookerjaabs View Post
It's basically

Insert what Eastern Team needs: Puck Mover + Puck Possession Forward

Insert what Western Team needs: Physical Dman + Physical Forward

Good deal on both ends.
No. The Bruins don't need a "puck possession forward"...what they lack is a sniper. I don't like any of the deals proposed except the idea of Sharp for Krejci, and Hawks fans seem to think they can't let go of Sharp, so to me that's that.

8spokesontheB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:18 PM
  #61
Iceman48
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 28
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by b in vancouver View Post
How about -
Krejci (Toews replacement)
Marchand (so the Hawks can troll Vancouver)
Rask (you kinda need a goalie)
for
Toews
Toews is a very good player but, there's no way I would give up that much for him. And, umm, the Bruins "kinda need a goalie" too. Rask is untouchable right now because of the Thomas fiasco. Who would be the #1 goalie? Khudobin? No way.

Iceman48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:34 PM
  #62
HawksTillDeath
Registered User
 
HawksTillDeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndgt10 View Post
Chicago says YES!

Boston with a hell no.
boston would never --- chicago would definitely

HawksTillDeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:57 PM
  #63
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by deytookerjaabs View Post
It's basically

Insert what Eastern Team needs: Puck Mover + Puck Possession Forward

Insert what Western Team needs: Physical Dman + Physical Forward

Good deal on both ends.
Hossa is far, far more physical than Krejci.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 06:59 PM
  #64
H a w k s
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 372
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8spokesontheB View Post
No. The Bruins don't need a "puck possession forward"...what they lack is a sniper. I don't like any of the deals proposed except the idea of Sharp for Krejci, and Hawks fans seem to think they can't let go of Sharp, so to me that's that.
Sharp could be had. for Lucic. That's about it. If they are moving Sharp they need a very good power forward to pair with Kane.

H a w k s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 07:10 PM
  #65
Chris Hansen
Team Tyrion
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,153
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HossTheBoss View Post
Hossa is far, far more physical than Krejci.
And is also a better player at both ends of the ice than Krejci is. I know that the Hawks need a #2 center, but making that trade just opens up a hole in the roster where Hossa used to be, and fills the original roster gap at #2C with a player not as good as Hossa to begin with.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 07:25 PM
  #66
agreen23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 442
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
And is also a better player at both ends of the ice than Krejci is. I know that the Hawks need a #2 center, but making that trade just opens up a hole in the roster where Hossa used to be, and fills the original roster gap at #2C with a player not as good as Hossa to begin with.
He may not be as good as big Hoss but hes 8 years younger with a lower cap hit for the next 3 seasons and he fills a need. Cant you plug Saad for Hoss? Center depth is more valued and is much harder to find than that of wingers.

agreen23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-06-2012, 07:30 PM
  #67
Chris Hansen
Team Tyrion
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,153
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by agreen23 View Post
He may not be as good as big Hoss but hes 8 years younger with a lower cap hit for the next 3 seasons and he fills a need. Cant you plug Saad for Hoss? Center depth is more valued and is much harder to find than that of wingers.
For sure, Krejci being younger and cheaper is nice. But the Hawks have plenty of cap space and are looking to win in the immediate term, so neither of those are significant.

Personally, if it meant getting Krejci and finally filling the hole at #2C that has been on the Hawks roster for a very, very long time (it was there during the Cup season too and Sharp filled it - I have no idea why he doesn't play there anymore, but it seems like he and the coaches are intent on keeping it that way)... then I'd give up Saad. But I feel like I'm one of the few Hawks fans that would do that, because prospects are tremendously overrated with our HF fanbase... just like with every other HF fanbase

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 10:38 AM
  #68
BergyWho37
Registered User
 
BergyWho37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 854
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
And is also a better player at both ends of the ice than Krejci is. I know that the Hawks need a #2 center, but making that trade just opens up a hole in the roster where Hossa used to be, and fills the original roster gap at #2C with a player not as good as Hossa to begin with.
Krejci is underated by this guy .. krejci is very good at both ends of the ice and you seem to forget Hossa could be 1 hit away so value drops maybe not fair but its the same as us if we trying to trading Horton !!

BergyWho37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 10:42 AM
  #69
CDJ*
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cape Cod
Country: United States
Posts: 8,595
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HossTheBoss View Post
Seriously? I wouldn't trade Saad or Leddy in a package for Krejci.. nevermind both.. and it's not even to say I don't like Krejci, that's just too high a cost.
I like both guys a lot. It just doesn't help Boston all that much. We would have to have a sufficient replacement lined up for Krejci for me to think about it.

And to say you wouldn't trade Saad in a package for Krejci....come on. Krejci had a down year and still put up 60+ points if I do recall. And he is still youthful.

(I totally understand about Leddy though- hell of a player)

CDJ* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 11:26 AM
  #70
GoBs
Registered User
 
GoBs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 3,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayBannerman View Post
2 Top 6 forwards, a top 4 dman and a 2nd is a lowball offer? Keep pouting. Sharp won't waive his NMC to go to Boston.
2 3rd liners and a top 4 dman don't get you a 1st line center

GoBs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 12:16 PM
  #71
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 20,841
vCash: 1625
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBs View Post
2 3rd liners and a top 4 dman don't get you a 1st line center
I'm going to be very blunt with this. If you're playing Jeremy Morin on the 3rd line, you don't know how to construct a hockey team.

MurrayBannerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 12:21 PM
  #72
Chris Hansen
Team Tyrion
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,153
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BergyWho37 View Post
Krejci is underated by this guy .. krejci is very good at both ends of the ice and you seem to forget Hossa could be 1 hit away so value drops maybe not fair but its the same as us if we trying to trading Horton !!
I know how good Krejci is. Just because I think Hossa is better (he is) doesn't mean I underrate Krejci.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 12:23 PM
  #73
agreen23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 442
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayBannerman View Post
I'm going to be very blunt with this. If you're playing Jeremy Morin on the 3rd line, you don't know how to construct a hockey team.
Thats funny, hes not on Chi's top 6 either.. Maybe because hes only played 12 NHL games ever.

On the other hand, every player in the Bruins top 6 had more than 50 points. Morin? Hes had 3 points in 12 games.

He very may well develop into a top 6 player but at this point in his career, he is not even close.

agreen23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 12:26 PM
  #74
The Red Line
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,153
vCash: 500
Lol horrible trade for Boston.

The Red Line is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-07-2012, 12:38 PM
  #75
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 20,841
vCash: 1625
Quote:
Originally Posted by agreen23 View Post
Thats funny, hes not on Chi's top 6 either.. Maybe because hes only played 12 NHL games ever.

On the other hand, every player in the Bruins top 6 had more than 50 points. Morin? Hes had 3 points in 12 games.

He very may well develop into a top 6 player but at this point in his career, he is not even close.
He absolutely cannot play on the bottom six, that's why. You don't put snipers on the bottom six. That doesn't make a lick of sense.

MurrayBannerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.