Sens Board Prospect Rankings 2012 (17th)

[Lehner]

Sens Prospect Rankings:

1. Jakob Silfverberg F (Brynäs IF, SEL) 52.60%
2. Mika Zibanejad F (Djurgården IF, SEL) 62.79%
3. Robin Lehner G (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 80.95%
4. Mark Stone F (Brandon Wheat Kings, WHL) 54.86%
5. Cody Ceci D (Ottawa 67's, OHL) 58.47%
6. Stefan Noesen F (Plymouth Whalers, OHL) 88.14%
7. Matt Puempel F (Peterborough Petes, OHL)33.81%
8. Shane Prince F (Ottawa 67s, OHL) 46.15%
9. Mark Borowiecki D (Binghamton Senators, AHL)32.09%
10. Stephane Da Costa F (Binghamton Senators, AHL)38.24%
11. Mike Hoffman F (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 45.00%
12. Andre Petersson F (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 27.83%
13. Jim O'Brien F (Ottawa Senators, NHL)40.34%
14. Patrick Wiercioch D (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 67.47%
15. Jean-Gabriel Pageau F (Chicoutimi Sagueneens, QMJHL) 41.67%
16. Jarrod Maidens F (Owen Sound Attack, OHL)43.81%

Senators Prospects Top 40 (2011) + Past Rankings:
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh...745&highlight=

Who would you like added next?

[Lehner]

I think Filatov now

[Emerica]

Claesson.

[source]

Filatov could make more money than the rest of these players combined, over the course of their respective careers. It's likely he makes his money in Russia however.

[WasTeD]

Its getting tougher.

Went with Grant. If the stars align he could be a good one.

[ReginKarlssonLehner]

Claesson, highest potential of the bunch. Then Filatov then Grant.

[Ed Wood]

Gryba. I just noticed Louie Caporusso isn't even listed. He was once one of our top three or four prospects. Major fall from grace.

[WasTeD]

Originally Posted by ReginKarlssonLehner

Claesson, highest potential of the bunch. Then Filatov then Grant.

Most things I read is if he makes the NHL as a bottom pairing dman he'll be lucky. How is that higher potential then Grant, Filatov, et al?

[MandyAlwaysKnows]

Originally Posted by IloveChrisNeil

Most things I read is if he makes the NHL as a bottom pairing dman he'll be lucky. How is that higher potential then Grant, Filatov, et al?

Because Filatov won't make the NHL, and Grant will be lucky to make it as a 4th liner.

Claesson has 4/5 potential

[N Bahn Ahden]

I really don't think Filatov should be included in this at all. What does it add to the list having him ranked #23 or something like that? We all know he's an exceptional case.

For now, Gryba, due to proximity to the NHL (though I expect he'll only get real a shot in another organization).

[Fenix Rises 2026]

I'm 100% sure that Darren Kramer will be a star










...amongst the "jar and jar accessory" community

[Benny FTW]

Grant. Could be a good 3rd liner, plus he tweets a lot.

[Lehner]

Originally Posted by N Bahn Ahden

I really don't think Filatov should be included in this at all. What does it add to the list having him ranked #23 or something like that? We all know he's an exceptional case.

For now, Gryba, due to proximity to the NHL (though I expect he'll only get real a shot in another organization).

It seems you guys dont want anyone added, first JOB, now Filatov. They're both prospects by HF standards and thats what we use.

[The Waffler]

Voted Filatov.

Can't deny skill.

Add Locke.

[Lyndon Slewidge]

some of you have obviously never played nhl 12 be a gm.. Claesson high 80's everytime, 2nd coming of Volchenkov

[Quo]

Kramer seems to be making good progress. If he can bring something approaching what Neil brings, that's pretty important.

[GreeningSingleLady]

Claesson

[jordan7hm]

Originally Posted by source

Filatov could make more money than the rest of these players combined, over the course of their respective careers. It's likely he makes his money in Russia however.

Yep.

[Senateurs]

Chris Wideman will surprise a lot of people in the next two years. By far the player that surprised me the most during the rookie camp.

[WasTeD]

Originally Posted by 19sens11

Because Filatov won't make the NHL, and Grant will be lucky to make it as a 4th liner.

Claesson has 4/5 potential

As 'potential' goes, if Claesson, Filatov and Grant all reach max potential, I'd have Claesson last.

You're talking expectations with 2 and potential with the other. Apples and oranges kid.

[ReginKarlssonLehner]

Originally Posted by IloveChrisNeil

As 'potential' goes, if Claesson, Filatov and Grant all reach max potential, I'd have Claesson last.

You're talking expectations with 2 and potential with the other. Apples and oranges kid.

Potential in terms of skill level and likeliness to reach that potential. Filatov has the most potential of any of our prospects but his likeliness to reach it is also decreasing drastically. Grant not only has to face tough competition at the NHL level but also at the AHL level. Less ice-time, less development and harder roster to crack at that position.

Claesson is smooth defender who can show consistency, no wow factor. Can be a Mike Lundin, imo.

Originally Posted by 19sens11

Because Filatov won't make the NHL, and Grant will be lucky to make it as a 4th liner.

Claesson has 4/5 potential

He gets it.

[WasTeD]

These debates are moot. Too many people have too many different definitions of these things.

[CanadianHockey]

I find it hilarious some of you are pimping Claesson to have #4 potential while Grant would only be lucky to be a 4th liner. Grant has 3C potential - he might not make it, but Claesson's not exactly a sure thing to be a #4 either.

[WasTeD]

Originally Posted by CanadianHockey

I find it hilarious some of you are pimping Claesson to have #4 potential while Grant would only be lucky to be a 4th liner. Grant has 3C potential - he might not make it, but Claesson's not exactly a sure thing to be a #4 either.

Thats what I was trying to get at.

[MandyAlwaysKnows]

Originally Posted by CanadianHockey

I find it hilarious some of you are pimping Claesson to have #4 potential while Grant would only be lucky to be a 4th liner. Grant has 3C potential - he might not make it, but Claesson's not exactly a sure thing to be a #4 either.

Grant has never ever shown the offensive upside needed to be a 3rd liner.