HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Prospects
Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

2013 NHL Draft in case of Lockout

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
09-14-2012, 11:52 AM
  #76
Pravi83Oil
Registered User
 
Pravi83Oil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 715
vCash: 500
So there's 50 balls from my count in total. Each ball has a 2% chance of being pick. Team with most balls is Columbus with 5, so 10% chance to win.

But really its just a 90% chance to lose. If this is the way they draft this year, its really a crapshoot, for all we know, Detroit could replace Lidstrom with Jones, Nashville replace Suter, NJ could offset the loss of Parise with Mckinnon, Pittsburgh could add another elite C to their arsenal, Toronto could finally have a #1C, Anahiem could finally get a 1B, Edmonton could get their #1 D man, Cbus can get another franchise player, the list goes on.

Its anybodies game.

Pravi83Oil is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 03:35 PM
  #77
KingJet*
Welcome Back
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,651
vCash: 500
Who knows, Columbus could have the same story as Pittsburgh, lost 1st overall which was a russian, end up with 1st pick during lockout and take the kid from Nova Scotia.

KingJet* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 03:41 PM
  #78
Double Dion
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,136
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viqsi View Post
This sort of dismissal would be a large part why...



...and this isn't true, unless you consider being constantly told you don't deserve a team and it should be removed from the league to somehow not be "ill will".

I'm just more bitter than usual of late 'cause for way too many people, the solution to "we might all lose hockey for a while!" is "just take away hockey forever for these other second-class fans, they won't miss it."
I actually think CBJ has pretty good fans. Horrible management and scouting. But the fans have stuck around exceptionally well for how pathetic the franchise has been. I think they've been as loyal as any market would be outside of a very select few.

Double Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 03:44 PM
  #79
HossTheBoss
Playoffs Baby!
 
HossTheBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12,371
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by slightlystewpid420 View Post
Pick 1: CHICAGO
Pick 2: COLUMBUS
Pick 3: WINNIPEG
Pick 4: NEW JERSEY
Pick 5: WASHINGTON
Pick 6: NEW YORK RANGERS (cbj)
Pick 7: CAROLINA
Pick 8: CALGARY
Pick 9: MINNESOTA
Pick 10: BOSTON
Pick 11: ANAHEIM
Pick 12: TORONTO
Pick 13: DETROIT
Pick 14: NEW YORK ISLANDERS
Pick 15: PHOENIX
Pick 16: FLORIDA
Pick 17: DALLAS
Pick 18: BUFFALO
Pick 19: MONTREAL
Pick 20: PHILADELPHIA
Pick 21: TAMPA BAY
Pick 22: VANCOUVER
Pick 23: OTTAWA
Pick 24: COLORADO
Pick 25: PITTSBURGH
Pick 26: SAN JOSE
Pick 27: ST. LOUIS
Pick 28: NASHVILLE
Pick 29: EDMONTON
Pick 30: LOS ANGELES (cbj)

I like it. CBJ with 2 top 6 picks.

what i dont like is washington with a top 10 pick and chicago with the #1...
The only reason to hope there actually is a year lockout.

Saad - Toews - Kane
Sharp - MacKinnon - Hossa


HossTheBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 05:09 PM
  #80
CBA
Registered User
 
CBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 498
vCash: 500
Pick 1: Toronto
Pick 2: Florida
Pick 3: Ottawa
Pick 4: Dallas
Pick 5: Calgary
Pick 6: Carolina
Pick 7: San Jose
Pick 8: New York (Columbus)
Pick 9: Boston
Pick 10: Minnesota
Pick 11: Vancouver
Pick 12: Los Angeles (Columbus)
Pick 13: Phoenix
Pick 14: Washington
Pick 15: Winnipeg
Pick 16: St. Louis
Pick 17: Anaheim
Pick 18: Detroit
Pick 19: Columbus
Pick 20: Pittsburgh
Pick 21: Chicago
Pick 22: Tampa Bay
Pick 23: Nashville
Pick 24: Phillidalpheia
Pick 25: New Jersey
Pick 26: Colorado
Pick 27: New York (I)
Pick 28: Montreal
Pick 29: Edmonton
Pick 30: Buffalo

Didn't work out too well for CBJ

CBA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 05:17 PM
  #81
Smallz
Registered User
 
Smallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,057
vCash: 500
One thing is for sure: if there is an actual lottery Columbus should do pretty well with 3 1sts compared to everyones 1

Smallz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 08:17 PM
  #82
Metalcommand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country:
Posts: 350
vCash: 500
Image if NYR, LA and CBJ were the top-3 picks. Talk about an instant rebuild

Metalcommand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 08:25 PM
  #83
HossTheBoss
Playoffs Baby!
 
HossTheBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12,371
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metalcommand View Post
Image if NYR, LA and CBJ were the top-3 picks. Talk about an instant rebuild
The only debate would be who'd go third overall. MacKinnon, Jones and... Shinkaruk?

HossTheBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 09:41 PM
  #84
Viqsi
battered but unbowed
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 17,735
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallz View Post
One thing is for sure: if there is an actual lottery Columbus should do pretty well with 3 1sts compared to everyones 1
Not really. As previously stated, if such a lottery follows the same format as 2005, we end up with a 10% chance of getting the 1st overall - as opposed to 50/50 this past year.

And lottery luck and the Blue Jackets are concepts that have never met.

__________________
Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 11:01 PM
  #85
Ashasx
Registered User
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,020
vCash: 500
They'll get 3 picks in what seems to be a very deep draft.

Even if they don't draft top 5, they'll get some good players to speed up the rebuild process.

Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-14-2012, 11:37 PM
  #86
Vankiller Whale
Good luck Sharks
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,911
vCash: 540
Seth Jones on the Canucks. Our first ever franchise defenseman. Make it happen, Bettman.(Obviously I do not want nor endorse a lockout, BUT if it were inevitable...)

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 12:23 AM
  #87
RJQuack
Stef Furrrrnier. Ugh
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,452
vCash: 4683
Quote:
Originally Posted by HossTheBoss View Post
The only reason to hope there actually is a year lockout.

Saad - Toews - Kane
Sharp - MacKinnon - Hossa

Drool indeed

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 12:25 AM
  #88
RJQuack
Stef Furrrrnier. Ugh
 
RJQuack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,452
vCash: 4683
Quote:
Originally Posted by HossTheBoss View Post
The only debate would be who'd go third overall. MacKinnon, Jones and... Shinkaruk?
Misewell pick up Drouin with #3 to get the Moose duo

RJQuack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 02:15 PM
  #89
MiGician
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Country: Finland
Posts: 171
vCash: 500
1. Winnipeg - Nathan MacKinnon
2. Ottawa - Seth Jones
3. Columbus - Aleksander Barkov
4. Minnesota - Hunter Shinkaruk
5. Florida - Sean Monahan
6. Phoenix - Curtis Lazar
7. Tampa Bay - Ryan Pulock
8. Detroit - Rasmus Ristolainen
9. Anaheim - Elias Lindholm
10. NY Islanders - Jonathan Drouin
11. Colorado - Max Domi
12. Columbus (from NYR) - Kerby Rychel
13. Buffalo - Ryan Kujawinsky
14. Dallas - Robert Hägg
15. Chicago - Hudson Fasching
16. Montreal - Anthony Duclair
17. Carolina - Nick Sörensen
18. Philadelphia - Josh Morrissey
19. Columbus (from LAK) - Artturi Lehkonen
20. New Jersey - Valeri Nichushkin
21. Edmonton - J.T. Compher
22. Nashville - Adam Erne
23. Calgary - Jacob De La Rose
24. Toronto - Bo Horvat
25. St. Louis - Zack Fucale
26. Boston - Will Butcher
27. San Jose - Anthony Mantha
28. Washington - Nikita Zadorov
29. Vancouver - Tyler Motte
30. Pittsburgh - Oliver Björkstrand

MiGician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 04:38 PM
  #90
catgoldfish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,570
vCash: 500
What happens to the NHL Draft 2012/2013 if the lockout wipes out the entire season?

How is the placements of the draft determined if there is a lock out for the whole year (I hope it doesn't go that far). Which team picks in what position? Based on the previous year?

catgoldfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 04:43 PM
  #91
LEAFS FAN 4 EVER
GO LEAFS GO
 
LEAFS FAN 4 EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,026
vCash: 500
I would assume they have the same system used for the 2005 Draft where teams get a certin number of balls based on how many times they made the Playoffs, how many times they won the 1st overall pick and how many times in a row they missed the Playoffs. So a team like the Leafs would have one of the best chances at the #1 pick and I can't see what other system they could use to determine the 2013 Draft order.

LEAFS FAN 4 EVER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 04:45 PM
  #92
eva unit zero
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,580
vCash: 500
Detroit gets to pick 1st overall because Lidstrom retired and the whole realignment screwjob.

eva unit zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 04:45 PM
  #93
Marc the Habs Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Longueuil
Country: Canada
Posts: 42,540
vCash: 280
How many more threads on this do we need? No one knows what would happen, but likely would be something close to 2005 lottery.

Marc the Habs Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 04:46 PM
  #94
jmdubois585
Registered User
 
jmdubois585's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,910
vCash: 500
I hope they change the system so that the teams that sucked last year have a better chance at winning. Not only if you sucked 2 or 3 years in a row.

jmdubois585 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 04:47 PM
  #95
VinnyC
tries his best
 
VinnyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: B-Town
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,232
vCash: 500
MacKinnon



Seth Jones


VinnyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 05:12 PM
  #96
Viqsi
battered but unbowed
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 17,735
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1244645

Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 06:49 PM
  #97
catgoldfish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,570
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viqsi View Post
Sweet thanks for the info.

catgoldfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 06:51 PM
  #98
SimplySensational
M-V-P
 
SimplySensational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: VA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,119
vCash: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmdubois585 View Post
I hope they change the system so that the teams that sucked last year have a better chance at winning. Not only if you sucked 2 or 3 years in a row.
So teams that already got early picks should be entitled to more early picks?

SimplySensational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 07:10 PM
  #99
rypper
Registered User
 
rypper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver area
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,905
vCash: 500
Every team should have the same number of chances to win 1st overall.

rypper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-15-2012, 07:47 PM
  #100
Ceremony
Trust the hair
 
Ceremony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 25,319
vCash: 1586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberation View Post
So teams that already got early picks should be entitled to more early picks?
The Oilers need a defenseman 1st overall to compliment all the forwards

__________________
“It’s embarrassing. I’m embarrassed to be here right now. It’s not even funny. And it’s just embarrassing, the way we, you know, the energy we have in the room and the way we approach practices and the way we approach this game. It’s not how you’re going to win any games in this league." - Jean-Sebastien Giguere, April 8 2013
Ceremony is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.