HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Taking a stab on weber + fla

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-10-2012, 11:47 AM
  #26
TrueCanuckle
Registered User
 
TrueCanuckle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 351
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheddabombs View Post
The better question, based on your proposal, is who wouldnt be included in this trade from the Canucks to get Weber?
lol

TrueCanuckle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 11:50 AM
  #27
WinterEmpire
Unregistered User
 
WinterEmpire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,852
vCash: 500
Weber isn't getting traded for a long long time unless the package includes both Malkin and Crosby. They are paying him 26 mil in the next calender(When they can't trade him at all). Why Nashville give up on the sweet deal of a contract that follows. That would be terrible asset management.

WinterEmpire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 12:01 PM
  #28
ShootIt
Registered User
 
ShootIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 561
Country: United States
Posts: 8,407
vCash: 500
Haha, yes lets bring back Luongo and have the same amount, probably worse, offensive players than when he was back here in 2005.

Pass

ShootIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 12:03 PM
  #29
nhlfan9191
Registered User
 
nhlfan9191's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,868
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittysGotClaws View Post
Panthers definitely say no. Flash is probably our most talented offensive player at the moment, and we have little offense as it stands now.

After all of these proposals, I don't want Luongo anymore.
The Canuck fans want to rip apart our team

nhlfan9191 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 12:16 PM
  #30
Petes2424
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,172
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony d View Post
I can see Weber going to Vancouver but I can't see them trading for him unless they get him to sign a long term deal first.

That said if that happens here's the deal I see happening:

To Van: Weber
To Nash: Edler, Kesler, 2013 1st and Chris Tanev
If they could get him to sign a 14 year extension, Im with you.

Petes2424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 12:29 PM
  #31
bikesbikesbikes
Registered User
 
bikesbikesbikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 147
vCash: 500
You can't just trade 5 or 6 players for another team's star. When they're the top player and the face of the franchise, it's not a question of 'what would it take', more like 'would they even consider moving him'. In Nashville's case, no. Even if they would, why gut our team to get him?

Beyond all that, I think Weber has a crippling contract. He's a great player, but look at the Luongo contract. I'd never willingly take on another one beyond 6 years.

bikesbikesbikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.