HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Vancouver - Fla + Toronto + Chicago [No goalies]

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-09-2012, 11:20 PM
  #1
Ho Borvat
Registered User
 
Ho Borvat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,467
vCash: 500
Vancouver - Fla + Toronto + Chicago [No goalies]

So theres countless proposals sending a goalie to these teams from Vancouver.
Im gonna try to make a set of proposals to each team that doesnt involve goaltending.
(Yes they may not be that perfect, but some potentially discussion that isnt just "lulongo is overpaidz")

Florida
Mason Raymond
Andrew Alberts


Vancouver
Shawn Matthias
Mike Weaver

Fla gets some added offense in the top-6.
Weaver has shown success with Garrison in the past, and at the very least gives us an imorovement over Alberts. (Wever/Alberts match salaries).

Toronto
Chris Tanev
3rd Round 2013

Vancouver
Carter Ashton
Cody Franson

Vancouver gets a winger who could be #1 callup, and a future Higgins replacement.
Toronto gets an NHL ready d-man who could play a top-4 role next to Gardiner next season.
Franson gives Vancouver an improvemet in defensive depth and gives them some extra insurance in the event of injuries.

Chicago
Jordan Schroeder

Vancouver
Kyle Beach

With Matthias and Gaunce in the system, Schroeder becomes fairly expendable.

Chicago and Vanxcouver swap prospects, and Vancouver gets a bit of a project winger.



Sedin Sedin Burrows
Booth Kesler Higgins
Hansen Matthias Kassian
Lapierre Manny Beach (Weise, Volpatti etc)

Hamhuis Bieksa
Edler Garrison
Ballard Weaver
Franson


Last edited by Ho Borvat: 09-10-2012 at 12:14 PM.
Ho Borvat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:22 PM
  #2
dubey
~manlets~
 
dubey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,557
vCash: 500
Toronto says thanx but no thanx

dubey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:22 PM
  #3
The Hockey Life
HF Boards Partner
 
The Hockey Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leafs Nation
Posts: 1,289
vCash: 500
No from Tor.

The Hockey Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:23 PM
  #4
roach9
Registered User
 
roach9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,574
vCash: 500
Florida deal slightly favours the 'Nucks. I'd make it a 2nd instead of a 3rd.

Toronto deal looks equal.

Chicago definitely says no to that. I believe Hawk fans still want to see what Beach is about and they have been fairly positive about Carcillo's brief time with the Hawks last year. That said, Canuck fans are interested in how Schroeder will do. The imbalance lies with Weise & Carcillo. Carcillo >> Weise & Schroeder=Beach.

roach9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:24 PM
  #5
BrianTML2011
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 39
vCash: 500
I would not say that Joe Colborne is an NHL Ready prospect.

In saying that the Leafs have a ton of Defensive prospects and need Joe Colborne as a centre prospect.

Leafs say no, even though value wise this would more than likely be pretty fair.

BrianTML2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:37 PM
  #6
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,211
vCash: 5555
Meh, sure.

I don't know if Colborne is NHL ready though,

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:38 PM
  #7
BrianTML2011
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 39
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Meh, sure.

I don't know if Colborne is NHL ready though,
He isn't. He is getting close, but as of the end of last year he was not.

BrianTML2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:40 PM
  #8
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,211
vCash: 5555
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTML2011 View Post
He isn't. He is getting close, but as of the end of last year he was not.
Ah well.

Oh, Kack Zassian, you left your namesake out of the lineup. I'd put him in a top-6 role to start and see how he does.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:41 PM
  #9
Shawnathon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 319
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kack zassian View Post
So theres countless proposals sending a goalie to these teams from Vancouver.
Im gonna try to make a set of proposals to each team that doesnt involve goaltending.
(Yes they may not be that perfect, but some potentially discussion that isnt just "lulongo is overpaidz")

Florida
Mason Raymond
Andrew Alberts
3rd Round 2013

Vancouver
Sean Bergenheim
Mike Weaver

Fla gets some added offense in the top-6.
Weaver has shown success with Garrison in the past, and at the very least gives us an imorovement over Alberts. Basically Raymond for Bergenheim and Weaver for Alberts + 3rd (Wever/Alberts match salaries).

Toronto
Chris Tanev

Vancouver
Joe Colborne

Vancouver gets an NHL ready center prospect who could compete with Schroeder for 3C.
Toronto gets an NHL ready d-man who could play a top-4 role next to Gardiner next season.


Chicago
Jordan Schroeder
Dale Weise

Vancouver
Kyle Beach
Dan Carcillo

With Colborne and Gaunce in the system, Schroeder becomes fairly expendable.

Chicago and Vanxcouver swap prospects, and Vancouver gets a bit of a project winger.

Both teams also swap 4th line aggitators (Schroeder > Beach, Carcillo > Weise).

Sedin Sedin Burrows
Booth Kesler Higgins
Bergenheim Colborne Hansen
Lapierre Manny Carcillo

Hamhuis Bieksa
Edler Garrison
Ballard Weaver
Sean Bergenheim is a great third line player. And Raymond scares the crap out of me TBH. No idea what we'd be getting if we made a deal for him. And we have no use for Alberts at all.

Shawnathon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:41 PM
  #10
ProstheticConscience
WWIII
 
ProstheticConscience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canuck Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,485
vCash: 883
No thanks.

Can't see Florida being interested at all.

lol @ Tanev being top 4 ready and Colbourne being NHL ready.

Chicago deal does especially unpleasant things to my stomach.

ProstheticConscience is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-09-2012, 11:50 PM
  #11
MillarWithASave
HUBY DOOBY SHUTUP
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,143
vCash: 500
Raymond = Bergenheim
Weaver >> Alberts
3rd round pick

It's not too bad, it's definitely not the worst proposal I have seen. And thanks for changing it up a little bit for the sake of all of these Luongo proposals.

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 12:32 AM
  #12
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,749
vCash: 500
Are not the Leafs in need of a big C and if Joe Colborne was NHL ready you would think the Leafs would want to keep him.

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 01:03 AM
  #13
Back in 94
In Gillis I trust
 
Back in 94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,477
vCash: 500
Florida fans were pretty high on Bergenheim last season IIRC, not sure why they would wanna trade him to the Canucks for Mason Raymond, the most hated man in Vancouver.

Colborne is someone I'm interested in as a Canuck fan. That being said, Tanev has more value than him IMO.

Lastly I don't see any Chicago fans liking that deal.

Back in 94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 01:07 AM
  #14
smoke meat pete*
VoiceofReason
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,905
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTML2011 View Post
I would not say that Joe Colborne is an NHL Ready prospect.

In saying that the Leafs have a ton of Defensive prospects and need Joe Colborne as a centre prospect.

Leafs say no, even though value wise this would more than likely be pretty fair.
agreed with this.

smoke meat pete* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 01:15 AM
  #15
StringerBell
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,000
vCash: 500
I like the Florida deal for us. The others seem to be trades for the sake of making trades.

StringerBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 01:29 AM
  #16
Double Dion
Jets fan 30/06/2013
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,255
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kack zassian View Post
So theres countless proposals sending a goalie to these teams from Vancouver.
Im gonna try to make a set of proposals to each team that doesnt involve goaltending.
(Yes they may not be that perfect, but some potentially discussion that isnt just "lulongo is overpaidz")

Florida
Mason Raymond
Andrew Alberts
3rd Round 2013

Vancouver
Sean Bergenheim
Mike Weaver

Fla gets some added offense in the top-6.
Weaver has shown success with Garrison in the past, and at the very least gives us an imorovement over Alberts. Basically Raymond for Bergenheim and Weaver for Alberts + 3rd (Wever/Alberts match salaries).

Toronto
Chris Tanev

Vancouver
Joe Colborne

Vancouver gets an NHL ready center prospect who could compete with Schroeder for 3C.
Toronto gets an NHL ready d-man who could play a top-4 role next to Gardiner next season.


Chicago
Jordan Schroeder
Dale Weise

Vancouver
Kyle Beach
Dan Carcillo

With Colborne and Gaunce in the system, Schroeder becomes fairly expendable.

Chicago and Vanxcouver swap prospects, and Vancouver gets a bit of a project winger.

Both teams also swap 4th line aggitators (Schroeder > Beach, Carcillo > Weise).

Sedin Sedin Burrows
Booth Kesler Higgins
Bergenheim Colborne Hansen
Lapierre Manny Carcillo

Hamhuis Bieksa
Edler Garrison
Ballard Weaver
Pretty good proposals in terms of value.

I bet Florida would think long and hard about that one. If I was them I'd do it.

I think the value is fairly close on the Leafs offer, but the last thing they need is another defenseman. The thing they need is a center, so I think they'd decline.

Again, good valuation on the Chicago trade, but I think they decline as well because they need organizational toughness. This trade is counter productive to that.

Double Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 02:01 AM
  #17
bobg1
Registered User
 
bobg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: bc
Country: Canada
Posts: 490
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back in 94 View Post
Florida fans were pretty high on Bergenheim last season IIRC, not sure why they would wanna trade him to the Canucks for Mason Raymond, the most hated man in Vancouver.

Colborne is someone I'm interested in as a Canuck fan. That being said, Tanev has more value than him IMO.

Lastly I don't see any Chicago fans liking that deal.
What makes Raymond the "most hated man in Vancouver?" I thought that was Luongo

bobg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 03:50 AM
  #18
Leaf Rocket
Leaf Fan Till I Die
 
Leaf Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: India
Posts: 70,612
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubey View Post
Toronto says thanx but no thanx
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHockeySanctuary View Post
No from Tor.
Pretty much.

I still think this guy is well liked within our organization and if he puts it together could be a pleasant surprise for the second line role. It would be a miracle if he can become that first liner he was predicted to be.

__________________
Leaf Rocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 03:55 AM
  #19
Laus723
Future Now
 
Laus723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 27,044
vCash: 500
Florida says no, Bergenheim was awesome last season and this doesn't upgrade us at all, no reason to do this.

__________________
So you're saying there's a chance!
Laus723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 04:07 AM
  #20
Leaf Rocket
Leaf Fan Till I Die
 
Leaf Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: India
Posts: 70,612
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laus723 View Post
Florida says no, Bergenheim was awesome last season and this doesn't upgrade us at all, no reason to do this.
Would also insulate the transition of Huberdeau and Howden.

Leaf Rocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 04:38 AM
  #21
Reverend Mayhem
Freeway's closed man
 
Reverend Mayhem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,039
vCash: 940
Send a message via Skype™ to Reverend Mayhem
As a Canucks fan:

would do deal 1
would not do deal 2 and 3

Reverend Mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 05:32 AM
  #22
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,084
vCash: 500
why should TOR agree to this?
why should the Hawks agree to this?

what does this offer those teams when you take something they need and give them something they already have?

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 07:18 AM
  #23
Sevanston
Moderator
 
Sevanston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,572
vCash: 500
Chicago doesn't want Schroeder at the price of Beach, and I don't even think all that highly of Beach. But because his kind of talent is such a need in our organization, we're going to hold onto him until we're sure he does or doesn't have the stuff. And if he doesn't, we'll trade him to the highest bidder (probably Dale Tallon)

Throwing in Carcillo doesn't help matters, since he's been solid in his role since arriving here, and is better than Weise.

Sevanston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 07:52 AM
  #24
TOGuy14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,079
vCash: 500
I like Tanev but he wouldn't displace any of Phaneuf, Gardiner, Gunnar, or Liles so he wouldn't be top 4 for us...

TOGuy14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-10-2012, 09:12 AM
  #25
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Why would Chicago even think about this?

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.