Van - Tor - Nash

TrueCanuckle · 09-15-2012, 09:06 PM

i'll most likely get bashed for this.

Weber

Luongo

Gardiner
Ballard
Schroeder
Toronto's 3rd
Vancouver's 1st
Vancouver's 1st

Vankiller Whale · 09-15-2012, 09:11 PM

Oh dear.

Neither Weber nor Gardiner are going anywhere right now, value aside.

TheLeastOfTheBunch · 09-15-2012, 09:12 PM

Don't see why Nashville does this. Nope from TO

H0MER · 09-15-2012, 09:14 PM

No thanks from the Leafs, had Luongo been 5-7 years younger could have considered it

worstfaceoffmanever · 09-15-2012, 09:15 PM

Mother of... NO!

**SuperJayMann** · 09-15-2012, 09:17 PM

Hurry, erase this proposal quickly before people see.

jmart21 · 09-15-2012, 09:18 PM

As a matched RFA, is Weber not trade inept for one calendar year?

tsujimoto74 · 09-15-2012, 09:19 PM

Weber can't be traded for at least a year, and everybody besides Vancouver says no anyway.

**Laus723** · 09-15-2012, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmart21

As a matched RFA, is Weber not trade inept for one calendar year?

Inept? No, Think you have the wrong word. He can't be traded for a year though.

Sloth Slothersons · 09-15-2012, 09:21 PM

Would Toronto even do Gardiner for Luongo straight up? Not enough for Weber either imo.

edruga · 09-15-2012, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OilFan91

Would Toronto even do Gardiner for Luongo straight up? Not enough for Weber either imo.

Nope.

RJQuack · 09-15-2012, 09:25 PM

Ballard, Schroeder and a 1st for Weber? No way. VAN makes out like bandits, others say no.

Viqsi · 09-15-2012, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueCanuckle

i'll most likely get bashed for this.

Weber

That's all I had to see, really.

That · 09-15-2012, 09:32 PM

Terrible for Nashville. Terrible for Toronto. Excellent for Vancouver.

Silverback91 · 09-15-2012, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks

Ballard, Schroeder and a 1st for Weber? No way. VAN makes out like bandits, others say no.

Guessing Luongo was already a Leaf and u have no idea why Gardiner is added in this deal and that 2nd 1st doesn't exist?

Its Luongo Ballard Schroeder and 2 1sts for Weber. Not as bad as u make it sound but still not good enough to land Weber.

If we got Gardiner for Lou and flipped him for Weber, it would have to be Gardiner + Tanev + one of Kassian/Jensen + a 1st and then more.

RJQuack · 09-15-2012, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverback91

Guessing Luongo was already a Leaf and u have no idea why Gardiner is added in this deal and that 2nd 1st doesn't exist?

Its Luongo Ballard Schroeder and 2 1sts for Weber. Not as bad as u make it sound but still not good enough to land Weber.

If we got Gardiner for Lou and flipped him for Weber, it would have to be Gardiner + Tanev + one of Kassian/Jensen + a 1st and then more.

I was just talking about what VAN gives up. Luongo, Ballard, Schroeder and a 1st.... but yes, still a no from NSH.

Silverback91 · 09-15-2012, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks

I was just talking about what VAN gives up. Luongo, Ballard, Schroeder and a 1st.... but yes, still a no from NSH.

I know and u missed Luongo who is the biggest piece and another 1st.

Zippy316 · 09-15-2012, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueCanuckle

i'll most likely get bashed for this.

Weber

Luongo

Gardiner
Ballard
Schroeder
Toronto's 3rd
Vancouver's 1st
Vancouver's 1st

Other than the fact that Weber can't be traded, which makes this thread irrelevant but anyways.

From each teams perspective.

VAN: Ballard, Schroeder, 2 1sts for Weber.
TOR: Gardiner and a 3rd for Luongo
NSH: Weber for all that.

Now I can see VAN and NSH liking the deal, but why would Toronto do this? Hell, if they really wanted Luongo, I'm sure they would've traded Gardiner to the Canucks already, for that reason, this deal doesn't make sense.

Maybe if you restructured the Toronto part. Maybe they add a forward prospect and a lesser D instead. Like if it was Bozak+Franson, and a second. That'll make more sense, but I doubt Nashville would like that. Take out Schroeder and a first and add in Booth or someone proven like that, then I can see Nashville doing it. Change it to NSH getting...Bozak/Kadri, Booth, Franson (or similar guy), Ballard, 1st and a 3rd and that's a pretty fair deal.

KevinBieksa3* · 09-15-2012, 10:12 PM

Not happening

RJQuack · 09-15-2012, 10:26 PM

Does 2 1sts = 2013, and 2014 from VAN?

Vankiller Whale · 09-15-2012, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks

Does 2 1sts = 2013, and 2014 from VAN?

Presumably.

7thOverdrive · 09-15-2012, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H0MER

No thanks from the Leafs, had Luongo been 5-7 years younger could have considered it

Uhh, if Luongo's 5-7 years younger, you guys add... a lot.

And as stated by others, Vancouver loves this, Nashville likes it and Toronto dislikes it.

Top 6 Spaling · 09-15-2012, 11:19 PM

Can someone please explain to me why Nashville "likes" this? Just...no. The best D man in the world for Gardiner, a spec, and overpaid 3rd pairing D, and two very late 1sts? Weber could get so much more than that.

thadd · 09-16-2012, 12:16 AM

Vancouver says yes. Nobody says no. Absolutely nobody. They get rid of two possibly unwanted contracts, a few late rounders and end up with the most wanted d-man out there. Weber and Hamuis would scare the living bejesus out of everyone.

Toronto politely declines. Leafs fans say that they don't want to let go of Gardiner. Burke probably doesn't want any part of that contract unless another big contract is coming off of the books. Can't imagine what it would be.

Nashville laughs their ass off and puts a giant neon sign out in front of their stadium which reads "we're not in the middle of a rebuild.

AtlantaWhaler · 09-16-2012, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7thOverdrive

Uhh, if Luongo's 5-7 years younger, you guys add... a lot.

And as stated by others, Vancouver loves this, Nashville likes it and Toronto dislikes it.

No way on this planet does Nashville like this.