HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Detroit Red Wings
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Brunner Signing

View Poll Results: Was Damien Brunner a good or bad signing?
Good signing 39 92.86%
Bad signing 3 7.14%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-28-2012, 11:01 PM
  #1
The Nose
#FireHolland
 
The Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 6,574
vCash: 500
Brunner Signing

I've been thinking about the signing of Brunner and the possible lines for the upcoming season (if there is one). The more and more I think about it, the more I feel that Brunner was a bad signing:

Brunner is basically guaranteed a top-six spot by Babcock, so I'm having trouble finding a spot for Nyquist. I don't want Nyquist to spend another year in GRR but I don't expect KH to cut anyone, so there really isn't any room for him. Judging from the reports and videos I have watched/read on Brunner, I don't expect him to be anything special. Nyquist has the potential to be something special but Brunner is taking his spot on the club, so I don't like the signing.

You guys might have different feelings about Brunner & Nyquist's ability/potential, so I was wondering what you thought of the signing.

Was Damien Brunner a good or bad signing?

The Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-28-2012, 11:08 PM
  #2
jaster
glendeningforcaptain
 
jaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 6,125
vCash: 500
Babcock implied that Brunner would be given a shot in the top-6 in camp and the preseason. I've seen nothing to indicate that Brunner is guaranteed a top-6 spot for the season, so I don't think he is taking Nyquist's spot. I've been following Nyquist since his freshman year in Orono, I'm a really big fan of his, and I have faith that he'll carve an appropriate spot onto the team, whether there is an obstacle like Brunner in front of him or not.

That all aside, it's probably a moot point. I don't think there will be a season, and so Brunner will likely never play for Detroit anyway. And even if he does sign again for a year, there will be more roster openings for 2013-14 anyway.

jaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-28-2012, 11:39 PM
  #3
Harnessed in Slums
Registered User
 
Harnessed in Slums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the Garage
Posts: 9,376
vCash: 500
Good signing, he is going to tear **** up in Grand Rapids this season.

Harnessed in Slums is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-28-2012, 11:55 PM
  #4
sully61
Unregistered User
 
sully61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,437
vCash: 500
If I'm Kenny or Mike, I do what it takes to win. If brunner is better than Nyquist, I play Brunner

sully61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 12:36 AM
  #5
RedWingsNow*
SaskatoonDeathSquad
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,356
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully61 View Post
If I'm Kenny or Mike, I do what it takes to win. If brunner is better than Nyquist, I play Brunner
Shortsighted.

RedWingsNow* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 12:54 AM
  #6
Big Poppa Puck
Bring back JTG!
 
Big Poppa Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Philly
Country: United States
Posts: 15,225
vCash: 500
Not much risk involved so I say good regardless.

Big Poppa Puck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 01:12 AM
  #7
Z40
High Compete Level
 
Z40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Detroit
Country: United States
Posts: 719
vCash: 500
I'll let you know after he has played a full season for us.

Z40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 08:51 AM
  #8
Melbourne Ice
Happy Happy Happy!
 
Melbourne Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melbourne
Country: Australia
Posts: 968
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Melbourne Ice
How can you know at this point?

Melbourne Ice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 09:29 AM
  #9
Shoalzie
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Portland, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 14,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fabricoh View Post
Good signing, he is going to tear **** up in Grand Rapids this season.


Not during the lockout...he signed with his old club Zug. His notable teammates include former Oiler goalie Jussi Markkanen, Linus Omark and Raphael Diaz (lockout deal).

Shoalzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 09:51 AM
  #10
jroc86
Registered User
 
jroc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 337
vCash: 500
Good signing. Low risk that could prove a pretty quick and noticable return. WC isnt the NHL playoffs but Brunner managed to be an impact player every game over there. If Tampa or someone else snagged him and he throw up 40-60 points this year we'd all by burying Holland for not getting him. Nyquist will get his opportunities.

jroc86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 10:27 AM
  #11
Harnessed in Slums
Registered User
 
Harnessed in Slums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the Garage
Posts: 9,376
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoalzie View Post
Not during the lockout...he signed with his old club Zug. His notable teammates include former Oiler goalie Jussi Markkanen, Linus Omark and Raphael Diaz (lockout deal).
Yeah, I just think there's a good shot he ends up in GR when all is said and done. We have way too many forwards and far too few spots in the lineup.

Harnessed in Slums is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 03:26 PM
  #12
MBauer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: MI
Country: United States
Posts: 741
vCash: 500
low risk for possible high reward, so it's a good signing. 5 point game for Brunner today for zug.

MBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 03:31 PM
  #13
Nyquist
Registered User
 
Nyquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 4,325
vCash: 500
He hasn't even played yet and two people already think it's a bad signing lmao. At this point there's no way you can say it's a bad signing. He's young and has potential to be a top six player this year. Babcock said he'll give him opportunities to be a top six player, not that his spot there is guaranteed. If there's a season and he plays bad, then call it a bad signing. As of right now, it's a great signing.

Nyquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 03:34 PM
  #14
joe89
#5
 
joe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Country: Sweden
Posts: 16,905
vCash: 500
How could it possibly be bad? Anytime you can get your hands on a "prospect"(ELC, at least) without using a draft pick it's a chance worth taking.

joe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 04:01 PM
  #15
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,576
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe89 View Post
How could it possibly be bad? Anytime you can get your hands on a "prospect"(ELC, at least) without using a draft pick it's a chance worth taking.
Because it's part of what led to getting rid of a proven 50+ point scorer who is only slightly older and has strong chemistry with the team's top forwards. Yeah I know, here come the "blah blah, eva posting about Hudler again" responses. But do you think Hudler is gone if Brunner isn't signed, even WITH the Samuelsson signing? If any one of Sammy, Bert, or Brunner doesn't sign, Hudler is still a Wing. And he's easily more valuable than any of those three.

That said, I'd have rather swapped out Bert for Brunner than not signed Brunner; giving Bert the "two-year, too much" extension at the time he got it was ridiculous, especially given that Helm, Abs, and Hudler were not being worked with (at least not seriously). WTF Kenny?

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 04:04 PM
  #16
Frk It
#FireHolland
 
Frk It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 9,819
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Because it's part of what led to getting rid of a proven 50+ point scorer who is only slightly older and has strong chemistry with the team's top forwards. Yeah I know, here come the "blah blah, eva posting about Hudler again" responses. But do you think Hudler is gone if Brunner isn't signed, even WITH the Samuelsson signing? If any one of Sammy, Bert, or Brunner doesn't sign, Hudler is still a Wing. And he's easily more valuable than any of those three.

That said, I'd have rather swapped out Bert for Brunner than not signed Brunner; giving Bert the "two-year, too much" extension at the time he got it was ridiculous, especially given that Helm, Abs, and Hudler were not being worked with (at least not seriously). WTF Kenny?
Hudler was going to go regardless, you gotta let that one go.

Frk It is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 04:21 PM
  #17
Nyquist
Registered User
 
Nyquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 4,325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Because it's part of what led to getting rid of a proven 50+ point scorer who is only slightly older and has strong chemistry with the team's top forwards. Yeah I know, here come the "blah blah, eva posting about Hudler again" responses. But do you think Hudler is gone if Brunner isn't signed, even WITH the Samuelsson signing? If any one of Sammy, Bert, or Brunner doesn't sign, Hudler is still a Wing. And he's easily more valuable than any of those three.

That said, I'd have rather swapped out Bert for Brunner than not signed Brunner; giving Bert the "two-year, too much" extension at the time he got it was ridiculous, especially given that Helm, Abs, and Hudler were not being worked with (at least not seriously). WTF Kenny?
He's only had two fifty point seasons and one was four years ago. I'm actually a fan of Hudler, but I don't think the Brunner signing had any effect on Hudler leaving.

Nyquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 05:06 PM
  #18
RedWingsNow*
SaskatoonDeathSquad
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,356
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Datsyuk Dangles View Post
He hasn't even played yet and two people already think it's a bad signing lmao. At this point there's no way you can say it's a bad signing. He's young and has potential to be a top six player this year. Babcock said he'll give him opportunities to be a top six player, not that his spot there is guaranteed. If there's a season and he plays bad, then call it a bad signing. As of right now, it's a great signing.
How many people have said it's a bad signing.

I'm for the Brunner signing, if you don't sign Sammy.

I'm against the Brunner signing if you sign Sammy and it means Nyquist gets stuck in the AHL.

So really, this is kind of dumb question that can't be answered "Yes" or "No" at this point, in my book.

RedWingsNow* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 05:12 PM
  #19
Nyquist
Registered User
 
Nyquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 4,325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bob View Post
How many people have said it's a bad signing.

I'm for the Brunner signing, if you don't sign Sammy.

I'm against the Brunner signing if you sign Sammy and it means Nyquist gets stuck in the AHL.

So really, this is kind of dumb question that can't be answered "Yes" or "No" at this point, in my book.
Two have voted Brunner was a bad signing so far. If Nyquist ends up in Grand Rapids I will be unbelievably ****ed, but until that happens (and I don't think it will) you can't blame Brunner for it. It's a hard question to give a firm answer on because he hasn't played for us yet obviously. Maybe a question more like this would be better: If you were the GM, would you have signed Damien Brunner?

Nyquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 05:25 PM
  #20
RedWingsNow*
SaskatoonDeathSquad
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,356
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Datsyuk Dangles View Post
Two have voted Brunner was a bad signing so far. If Nyquist ends up in Grand Rapids I will be unbelievably ****ed, but until that happens (and I don't think it will) you can't blame Brunner for it. It's a hard question to give a firm answer on because he hasn't played for us yet obviously. Maybe a question more like this would be better: If you were the GM, would you have signed Damien Brunner?
And for me, the answer is probably no.
Not with Nyquist and Tatar ready to go.

Now, neither of those guys are right-handed. ...

IMO, if it was up to me, our lineup would have looked like this, next year.

Nyquist Datsyuk Semin
Filppula Zetterberg Franzen
Bertuzzi Helm Cleary
Tatar Abdelkader Mursak

So, as much as I like the idea of Brunner and Tootoo... No, I don't think I would have signed them.
Then again, i wouldn't have brought back Bertuzzi, either... So you could pencil in a line of Cleary Helm Tootoo

Nyquist Datsyuk Semin
Filppula Zetterberg Franzen
Cleary Helm Tootoo
Tatar Abdelkader Mursak

Basically, three rookie forwards... would be kind of rough at times... But this is the kind of thing we need to do... Instead...

It's quite likely we have zero rookie forwards except Brunner.

RedWingsNow* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 05:39 PM
  #21
Nyquist
Registered User
 
Nyquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 4,325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bob View Post
And for me, the answer is probably no.
Not with Nyquist and Tatar ready to go.

Now, neither of those guys are right-handed. ...

IMO, if it was up to me, our lineup would have looked like this, next year.

Nyquist Datsyuk Semin
Filppula Zetterberg Franzen
Bertuzzi Helm Cleary
Tatar Abdelkader Mursak

So, as much as I like the idea of Brunner and Tootoo... No, I don't think I would have signed them.
Then again, i wouldn't have brought back Bertuzzi, either... So you could pencil in a line of Cleary Helm Tootoo

Nyquist Datsyuk Semin
Filppula Zetterberg Franzen
Cleary Helm Tootoo
Tatar Abdelkader Mursak

Basically, three rookie forwards... would be kind of rough at times... But this is the kind of thing we need to do... Instead...

It's quite likely we have zero rookie forwards except Brunner.
Even if we only have Brunner, doesn't that mean he outplayed Nyquist? Wouldn't that be a successful signing then? I mean unless both of them suck, Brunner outplaying Nyquist would hopefully solve our top six void left by Hudler.

Nyquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 05:56 PM
  #22
SoupNazi
Global Moderator
No Soup for You!!!
 
SoupNazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kramerica Industries
Country: Argentina
Posts: 16,828
vCash: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Because it's part of what led to getting rid of a proven 50+ point scorer who is only slightly older and has strong chemistry with the team's top forwards. Yeah I know, here come the "blah blah, eva posting about Hudler again" responses. But do you think Hudler is gone if Brunner isn't signed, even WITH the Samuelsson signing? If any one of Sammy, Bert, or Brunner doesn't sign, Hudler is still a Wing. And he's easily more valuable than any of those three.

That said, I'd have rather swapped out Bert for Brunner than not signed Brunner; giving Bert the "two-year, too much" extension at the time he got it was ridiculous, especially given that Helm, Abs, and Hudler were not being worked with (at least not seriously). WTF Kenny?
Hudler was gone no matter what. Let Hudler go already.

SoupNazi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 05:57 PM
  #23
SoupNazi
Global Moderator
No Soup for You!!!
 
SoupNazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kramerica Industries
Country: Argentina
Posts: 16,828
vCash: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melbourne Ice View Post
How can you know at this point?
You can't.

SoupNazi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 07:04 PM
  #24
RedWingsNow*
SaskatoonDeathSquad
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,356
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Datsyuk Dangles View Post
Even if we only have Brunner, doesn't that mean he outplayed Nyquist? Wouldn't that be a successful signing then? I mean unless both of them suck, Brunner outplaying Nyquist would hopefully solve our top six void left by Hudler.
At some points, you give your spot to the rookie and give him a chance to keep it or lose it.

RedWingsNow* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-29-2012, 07:37 PM
  #25
Bench
Moderator
Realgud!
 
Bench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Monk's
Posts: 7,270
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupNazi View Post
Hudler was gone no matter what. Let Hudler go already.
Cue theme to Titanic.

Bench is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.