Go read the thread on the main board where I was discussing this, go look at when Toronto won the 2 "extra" cups and tell me how on earth those cups should be counted in a league with a 90 year history as reason for Toronto having better alumni.
18 and 22 before Detroit, Chicago or Boston were even in the league. Those 2 cups arent a good argument to say that Toronto has better alumni at all.
Theoretically wasn't Detroit there??
But the only team out of the three who really had to build from scratch was the Bruins (*no team was moved).The Wings (Cougars) and Hawks (Rosebuds) were pretty much absorbed and their players as well. I truly think the Alumni are a wash if considering the ones on the Leafs end who have expired or are in their winter months. The argument itself is completely subjective.