Trade Rumors and Free Agent TalkTrade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.
To Buffalo: Patrick Kane + VAN 1st + Niklas Hjalmarsson
To Chicago: A certain goalie + Manny Malhotra + Robyn Regehr
To Vancouver: Thomas Vanek + CHI 2nd
prepare to feel the wrath of Chicago fans everywhere
It would be closer in value if Miller went to Chicago and a certain goalie went to Buffalo. Still don't think Chicago fans will like it and probably not a lot of Sabre fans either.
Last edited by sabrescupbound: 10-09-2012 at 06:07 PM.
To Buffalo: Patrick Kane + VAN 1st + Niklas Hjalmarsson
To Chicago: A certain goalie + Manny Malhotra + Robyn Regehr
To Vancouver: Thomas Vanek + CHI 2nd
LOL, Buffalo makes out like bandits, Chicago gets ass ****ed, Vancouver comes out decently I guess.
LOL, Buffalo makes out like bandits, Chicago gets ass ****ed, Vancouver comes out decently I guess.
I actually think its a good deal all around. I'd prefer Kane in Vancouver to Vanek, but the reality is Kane is from the Buffalo area and probably would want to play there so it's doubtful he would re-sign in Vancouver anyways. It's a deal that addresses every teams needs.
__________________
I told ya so. I was right all along!
I actually think its a good deal all around. I'd prefer Kane in Vancouver to Vanek, but the reality is Kane is from the Buffalo area and probably would want to play there so it's doubtful he would re-sign in Vancouver anyways. It's a deal that addresses every teams needs.
Yeah, it addresses every team's needs except Chicago's.
I actually think its a good deal all around. I'd prefer Kane in Vancouver to Vanek, but the reality is Kane is from the Buffalo area and probably would want to play there so it's doubtful he would re-sign in Vancouver anyways. It's a deal that addresses every teams needs.
That is an absolutely terrible deal for Chicago, don't kid yourself.
Yup, lets trade a guy who is our only right handed top 6er and who just signed a long term contract with a NMC.
Crawford can be a good goalie, as any goalie at the NHL level can be, when a strong team defence is played in front of him. This is clearly what Chicago is trying to accomplish with their recent, albeit small, moves.
Change our 1st to a 2nd and I'd do it. Sharp + 2nd shouldn't return Miller, Leopold, Adam, and a 1st.
Yeah but figure it this way, your getting Vanek and a third for Luo, Malhotra and a first. Your making out like bandits IMO
Your losing a contract you don't want, losing a forth line center third at best, and changing a first to a third. And with the talent on your first line Vanek becomes a 40 goal scorer again easy. Which reminds me, Who would want to play against the Sedin twins and Vanek. That would suck
Last edited by sabrescupbound: 10-09-2012 at 06:57 PM.
Yeah but figure it this way, your getting Vanek and a third for Luo and a first. Your making out like bandits IMO
And Malhotra, and the difference between Luongo and Vanek is definitely not a 1st. Our prospect pool is still fairly shallow, and I don't think Chicago is that interested in futures anyways.
To Buffalo- Sharp, Malhotra, a certain goalie, Chi 2nd
To Chi- Miller, Leopold, Adam, Vans 1st
to Van- Vanek, Buf 3rd
Is this getting closer?
Sharp and a 2 for Ryan Miller, Jordan Leopold, Luke Adam and a 1? Don't know how Chicago fans would dislike that.
Honestly I like the trade from Vancouver's end (must be the first time I've said this lol). Hurts adding the 1, but getting back a 3 helps and getting rid of Malhotra's $2.5M salary helps too. Nice proposal.
And Malhotra, and the difference between Luongo and Vanek is definitely not a 1st. Our prospect pool is still fairly shallow, and I don't think Chicago is that interested in futures anyways.
I just don't get it. So your telling me, although good, you still have a 34 yo goalie that you don't need, with a huge salary until he's 40, and the price between him and one of the best scoring wingers of the NHL isn't sliding from a 1st to a third?
I totally give up. I don't ever want to hear that freaken goalies name again. I tried, I've said my piece, I will never put him in a trade scenario again. He's obviously worth way to much for my taste.
EDIT: Sorry, lost my cool for a second. But if that don't work for the Nuck's, nothing will.
Last edited by sabrescupbound: 10-09-2012 at 07:12 PM.
Sharp and a 2 for Ryan Miller, Jordan Leopold, Luke Adam and a 1? Don't know how Chicago fans would dislike that.
Honestly I like the trade from Vancouver's end (must be the first time I've said this lol). Hurts adding the 1, but getting back a 3 helps and getting rid of Malhotra's $2.5M salary helps too. Nice proposal.
We're not giving up a 1st in this draft. If we want any chance of landing future talent to supplant our core, this is the draft to do it.
I just don't get it. So your telling me, although good, you still have a 34 yo goalie that you don't need, with a huge salary until he's 40, and the price between him and one of the best scoring wingers of the NHL isn't sliding from a 1st to a third?
I totally give up. I don't ever want to hear that freaken goalies name again. I tried, I've said my piece, I will never put him in a trade scenario again. He's obviously worth way to much for my taste.
1) Luongo's 33.
2) He's probably a better player than Vanek.
3) He's on a much cheaper cap hit than Vanek
4) Why don't we see if Chicago fans are okay with a 2nd instead of a first before blasting me. We need to get future talent to help supplant our core, and currently Chicago has a much better prospect pool than us. It holds more value to us than it does to them, so it makes no sense to include it.
A deal with those main pieces? Sharp's value would entail a hell of a + on the Caps side.
