HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > Other Sports > Soccer
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Soccer Discuss leagues around the world and the World Cup

Can the FA become a bigger joke?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-19-2013, 12:43 PM
  #1
Shameus
Moderator
 
Shameus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Middle of a Migraine
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,684
vCash: 500
Can the FA become a bigger joke?

The FA has announced that there will be no fines or suspension for Callum McManaman for his tackle on Massido Haidara during the Wigan v Newcastle match. The FA did not contact Newcastle or Wigan either to make this known. Both clubs were made aware by the press calling wanting their reactions to the news.
Link

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. If this tackle would have been on Bale, or Van Persie, or Lampard, etc I guarentee there would have been a suspension.

Newcastle is considering pressing charges against McManaman the way Everton did against Cabaye a few seasons ago. Cabaye and the club ended up having to pay Everton and Anichebe a mid 6 figure sum so the precedent has already been set.

Shameus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 04:04 PM
  #2
Evilo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: France
Country: France
Posts: 27,555
vCash: 500
And Ibra got a 2 game suspension for stepping on someone's toe.

Evilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 04:28 PM
  #3
Hesher
down on the upside
 
Hesher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: middle of nowhere
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 2,254
vCash: 1060
From the BBC: ...the FA cannot take action as an official saw the incident

That official needs to get sacked

Hesher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 04:56 PM
  #4
vsk92
Alltid IFK
 
vsk92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scotland.
Country: Finland
Posts: 7,096
vCash: 500
Amazing level of stupidity

This only makes it worse, it could lead to players seeking some kind of payback themselves (if they situation occurs - 50/50 challenge with maliciousness)

^ Hopefully that's just me being cynical

vsk92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 05:33 PM
  #5
Everlasting
Registered User
 
Everlasting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Somwhere in time
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,527
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsk92 View Post
Amazing level of stupidity

This only makes it worse, it could lead to players seeking some kind of payback themselves (if they situation occurs - 50/50 challenge with maliciousness)

^ Hopefully that's just me being cynical
That actully sounds great if you ask me.

Actions like that could lead to very needed improvements.

Everlasting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 05:44 PM
  #6
O23L
Worst tank ever.
 
O23L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Country: United States
Posts: 5,342
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilo View Post
And Ibra got a 2 game suspension for stepping on someone's toe.
That was UEFA, not the FA. Right?

O23L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 06:42 PM
  #7
BritSabre
Registered User
 
BritSabre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Reading, UK
Country: England
Posts: 2,425
vCash: 500
Disgrace. This no retrospective action rule is ridiculous. Why ignore overwhelming evidence provided by 10s of cameras from multiple angles? The officials didn't see the incident properly and didn't deal with it appropriately on the field. Upholding the wrong judgement is just insane. The mind boggles.

BritSabre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 07:52 PM
  #8
Shameus
Moderator
 
Shameus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Middle of a Migraine
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,684
vCash: 500
Some former refs have come out in the press and called for the ref from this match to retire and that his performance, missing the tackle specifically, has caused the profession to suffer a black eye.

Shameus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 08:01 PM
  #9
Live in the Now
YNWA
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: LA
Country: United States
Posts: 31,778
vCash: 500
Awards:
The FA was already one of the biggest jokes in sports. I can't understand why a tackle like that would go unpunished.

Live in the Now is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 09:23 PM
  #10
TheMoreYouKnow
Registered User
 
TheMoreYouKnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eire
Posts: 8,937
vCash: 500
Not sure what people want, a clumsy tackle but no malice. Yellow card, end of story.

TheMoreYouKnow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 09:27 PM
  #11
vsk92
Alltid IFK
 
vsk92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scotland.
Country: Finland
Posts: 7,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Not sure what people want, a clumsy tackle but no malice. Yellow card, end of story.
That's more than clumsy, it's reckless and dangerous.

Clumsy would be getting someone's shins, not above the knee there is no excuse for a tackle to be that high

Also I've never heard or seen a tackle like that, that doesn't warrant a straight red and a banning

vsk92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 09:29 PM
  #12
TheMoreYouKnow
Registered User
 
TheMoreYouKnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eire
Posts: 8,937
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsk92 View Post
That's more than clumsy, it's reckless and dangerous.

Clumsy would be getting someone's shins, not above the knee there is no excuse for a tackle to be that high
He had his boot up because he tried to hit the ball, I think he actually touched the ball a bit. He missed it by half a second and that's clumsy.

TheMoreYouKnow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-19-2013, 09:35 PM
  #13
vsk92
Alltid IFK
 
vsk92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scotland.
Country: Finland
Posts: 7,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
He had his boot up because he tried to hit the ball, I think he actually touched the ball a bit. He missed it by half a second and that's clumsy.
That tackle is wrose that both of these which are red's too




vsk92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 02:34 AM
  #14
Evilo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: France
Country: France
Posts: 27,555
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhXcoyotes View Post
That was UEFA, not the FA. Right?
Yes. But football rules are the same everywhere.

Evilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 06:34 AM
  #15
JJTT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oulu
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,778
vCash: 500
Looks like that the haidara's injury is not career threatening

http://www.nufcblog.com/2013/03/20/p...omment-page-1/

JJTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 07:02 AM
  #16
Shameus
Moderator
 
Shameus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Middle of a Migraine
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,684
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjtt View Post
Looks like that the haidara's injury is not career threatening

http://www.nufcblog.com/2013/03/20/p...omment-page-1/
It says the first scan was inconclusive and the hope is the second scan will show no damage. One can only hope it's not career threatening but I'm not getting my hopes up that no serious damage was done until a conclusive scan can be done.

Oh, I got the Everton incident wrong I listed above, it was Nolan not Cabaye.

Shameus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 10:18 AM
  #17
xavi4life
Mr. Irreverent
 
xavi4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,344
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Not sure what people want, a clumsy tackle but no malice. Yellow card, end of story.
The argument isn't intent. It's reckless and players should be ****ing responsible for their actions. It was a clumsy and stupid challenge that doesn't belong in the game.

xavi4life is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-21-2013, 02:21 PM
  #18
Shameus
Moderator
 
Shameus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Middle of a Migraine
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,684
vCash: 500
Haidara was interviewed today by the Newcastle Evening Chronicle. They went ahead and did the new scans this morning. The scan revealed that surgery will not be required. Haidara's comments though are interesting and show the kids got a pretty good head on his shoulder:

Quote:
“I underwent some further tests yesterday morning.” “The ligaments in the knee are undamaged.” “It’s a massive relief.” “I was very worried when it happened.”

“I thought he’d broken my leg or smashed up my knee.” “The pain was unbearable, I couldn’t bend my knee. It was really horrible.” “But, God was on my side.”

“I remember it all. I can still see it in my mind’s eye.” “The ball came to me, I controlled it.” “I thought I had the time to run around him but he came at me like a bullet.”

“It all went so fast. I didn’t think he’d tackle me, especially not above the knee.” “And then I felt his studs crash into my knee and remember feeling excruciating pain.” “I was in so much pain I couldn’t think of anything.” “I was so shocked.”

“I still am actually.” “When, afterwards, you think of everything.” “I told myself that perhaps I’d never be able to play football again or that I’d be able to play but never with the same level of ability.”

“It was a tough time. Once I was in the ambulance.” “I started to think of my family. I knew my brother was watching the match live.”

“Yesterday I was told McManaman wanted to speak with me. For the time being, we haven’t talked.” “There is a language barrier but I think we will try to meet up next week with an interpreter.”

“At the time, I was very angry. I thought he’d ended my career. Now, I know I escaped a serious injury, I have taken time to stand back from it and I am not angry. I simply hope that it will serve as a lesson for him and the next time he will think twice before making a tackle like that.”

“I hope, when he watched it back, he told himself that wasn’t who he really was.”
I'll try to find the link but Newcastle fans have started a petition that they hope fans of other teams will join them in signing to get the FA to change the policy that they hid behind to not make a judgement.

Shameus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-21-2013, 03:10 PM
  #19
Cin
Eurosnob.
 
Cin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Country: Thailand
Posts: 7,779
vCash: 500
Somebody may have deeper pockets now.

Cin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-24-2013, 05:34 PM
  #20
vsk92
Alltid IFK
 
vsk92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scotland.
Country: Finland
Posts: 7,096
vCash: 500
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...npunished.html

vsk92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-24-2013, 06:36 PM
  #21
Jussi
No strings on me
 
Jussi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Finland
Posts: 45,162
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsk92 View Post
Quote:
They want the definition of what constitutes “exceptional circumstances” widened, having agonised for two days last week over whether McManaman could be charged under the present restricted framework.
The FA are stunned at the stance taken this week by some of the 'stakeholders’ – specifically the PFA and Premier League – who expressed surprise that McManaman was not charged. The two organisations had opposed a rule change last summer.
So basically the FA wanted the rule changed last summer so they could punish in incidents like this but the PFA and the League opposed it.

Jussi is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.