maybe just talking it out on here will lead me to three points.
I mean I think those "unalienable" rights are still upheld today because every person IMO still has the right to "life" obviously, they have the right to be free and speak what they believe in, even though sometimes it could be consequential they still have that right to liberty, and every man still has the right to pursuit happiness. But like I don't know how to find three points that support this like wtf lol
maybe just talking it out on here will lead me to three points.
I mean I think those "unalienable" rights are still upheld today because every person IMO still has the right to "life" obviously, they have the right to be free and speak what they believe in, even though sometimes it could be consequential they still have that right to liberty, and every man still has the right to pursuit happiness. But like I don't know how to find three points that support this like wtf lol
Maybe your 3 points could be comparing to places where those are not upheld. For example, NHL owners do not have the right to free speech. In fact their speech is pretty damn expensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baarle
Hey Rasky, u mad bro?
I'm doing a Data project where I have to take a Disney short story and incorporate things we learned into it. I'm doing the Rescuers Down Under lol
And how the hell is that related to data? I can't think of any connections haha.
This person is in a show (no longer making new episodes) that I'm sure you have all seen.
And how the hell is that related to data? I can't think of any connections haha.
You have to add stuff to it to relate. Like our example is the 3 little pigs. First pig builds house. House can be made out of 3 products, 2 floor plans and in 3 areas. How many combinations? Its ****ed I know haha
You have to add stuff to it to relate. Like our example is the 3 little pigs. First pig builds house. House can be made out of 3 products, 2 floor plans and in 3 areas. How many combinations? Its ****ed I know haha
It sounds to me like the teacher was trying to make it a 'fun' assignment by making you do it related to a disney short story. To me it just seems like having to do more work for something that is fairly simple.
It sounds to me like the teacher was trying to make it a 'fun' assignment by making you do it related to a disney short story. To me it just seems like having to do more work for something that is fairly simple.
Maybe your 3 points could be comparing to places where those are not upheld. For example, NHL owners do not have the right to free speech. In fact their speech is pretty damn expensive.
**** my laptop just shut off for like 40 minutes, and wouldn't turn on. Honestly I have the worst luck sometimes, like why would it do this tonight. And hm, this is interesting, but like how am I proving my point by comparing it with the NHL lol. And that's only one point, idk **** this is frustrating as ****. Don't think I don't appreciate the help tho Grant I'm just pissed off right now.
**** my laptop just shut off for like 40 minutes, and wouldn't turn on. Honestly I have the worst luck sometimes, like why would it do this tonight. And hm, this is interesting, but like how am I proving my point by comparing it with the NHL lol. And that's only one point, idk **** this is frustrating as ****. Don't think I don't appreciate the help tho Grant I'm just pissed off right now.
It kind of proves your point by showing it is worse elsewhere. Not the best method by any means, but kind of does the job. Like I said before, I think as long as you are firm in your stance you will be fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Predaleafs
Please explain cuz im drawing a blank?
Just try and guess where you recognize her from haha. Because I think she looks way different in that than her role in the tv show she was in.
I don't know man I can't even think straight right now. And this essay is already late, school is honestly becoming too much to handle right now and it's really stressing me out.
It kind of proves your point by showing it is worse elsewhere. Not the best method by any means, but kind of does the job. Like I said before, I think as long as you are firm in your stance you will be fine.
Just try and guess where you recognize her from haha. Because I think she looks way different in that than her role in the tv show she was in.
Shes the chick from Zoey 101 ahah i googled her to find out! As someone who is 21 and 5 months younger than her she grow up to be really hot, i had a massive crush on her thats how i remember her!
Shes the chick from Zoey 101 ahah i googled her to find out! As someone who is 21 and 5 months younger than her she grow up to be really hot, i had a massive crush on her thats how i remember her!
holy **** the nerdy one right? hahahaaha that's awesome
I don't know man I can't even think straight right now. And this essay is already late, school is honestly becoming too much to handle right now and it's really stressing me out.
Aren't you in high-school? It just gets harder man, take these problems you have now as a stepping-stone towards self-improvement. Seriously, that's the only way you will see it as worth it. You're like the Olympic athlete who wants to win a gold medal but doesn't want to go through the training process.
As for your question, this is a possible outline:
Start in your introductory paragraph by defining what unalienable rights of individuals as stated in the Declaration (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) constitute. Afterwords, your thesis will be a simple statement in terms of yes/no of the definition your provided, and if it is upheld today. So, for example, mine is: "I will argue that the unalienable rights of individuals are not upheld today". Next, state how you will argue it. So, for example, mine again: I will argue this by first showing the discrepancy between the rich and poor, and how the same rights that are suppose to be equal for all citizens are not actually equally for all citizens. I will then show how these unalienable rights are continually infringed upon by corporations and government officials (Patriot Act, War on Terrorism, Airport Security, etc.) Lastly, I will show how the unalienable rights have never really been there to begin with (I made a huge post on this a couple lounge pages back).
So, to summarize what I said:
Introduction:
-Definition of what unalienable rights of individuals as stated in the Declaration (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) constitute.
-Thesis statement: Simple yes or no based on your definition if you think it is upheld today.
-How you will argue for your thesis: state what the topic of each body paragraph will be.
Body Paragraphs:
- Introduce the topic heading/what you will be arguing in the paragraph.
-Give two arguments in support of it (I said two arguments since I believe you said the paper is only 500-700 words; you might only need one argument per point per paragraph. I dunno.).
-Conclusion sentence for the paragraph.
Repeat this 3 times.
Conclusion:
-Basically here, since your format is already clear and it makes no sense to restate your arguments, summarize what the argument amounts to. So, what does it mean for America if unalienable rights are not upheld? Think big picture stuff.
Shes the chick from Zoey 101 ahah i googled her to find out! As someone who is 21 and 5 months younger than her she grow up to be really hot, i had a massive crush on her thats how i remember her!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baarle
holy **** the nerdy one right? hahahaaha that's awesome
Yeah the nerdy one. Take off those glasses and there is a huge transformation haha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrence
How's it going?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epictetus
Aren't you in high-school? It just gets harder man, take these problems you have now as a stepping-stone towards self-improvement. Seriously, that's the only way you will see it as worth it. You're like the Olympic athlete who wants to win a gold medal but doesn't want to go through the training process.
As for your question, this is a possible outline:
Start in your introductory paragraph by defining what unalienable rights of individuals as stated in the Declaration (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) constitute. Afterwords, your thesis will be a simple statement in terms of yes/no of the definition your provided, and if it is upheld today. So, for example, mine is: "I will argue that the unalienable rights of individuals are not upheld today". Next, state how you will argue it. So, for example, mine again: I will argue this by first showing the discrepancy between the rich and poor, and how the same rights that are suppose to be equal for all citizens are not actually equally for all citizens. I will then show how these unalienable rights are continually infringed upon by corporations and government officials (Patriot Act, War on Terrorism, Airport Security, etc.) Lastly, I will show how the unalienable rights have never really been there to begin with (I made a huge post on this a couple lounge pages back).
So, to summarize what I said:
Introduction:
-Definition of what unalienable rights of individuals as stated in the Declaration (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) constitute.
-Thesis statement: Simple yes or no based on your definition if you think it is upheld today.
-How you will argue for your thesis: state what the topic of each body paragraph will be.
Body Paragraphs:
- Introduce the topic heading/what you will be arguing in the paragraph.
-Give two arguments in support of it (I said two arguments since I believe you said the paper is only 500-700 words; you might only need one argument per point per paragraph. I dunno.).
-Conclusion sentence for the paragraph.
Repeat this 3 times.
Conclusion:
-Basically here, since your format is already clear and it makes no sense to restate your arguments, summarize what the argument amounts to. So, what does it mean for America if unalienable rights are not upheld? Think big picture stuff.
Aren't you in high-school? It just gets harder man, take these problems you have now as a stepping-stone towards self-improvement. Seriously, that's the only way you will see it as worth it. You're like the Olympic athlete who wants to win a gold medal but doesn't want to go through the training process.
As for your question, this is a possible outline:
Start in your introductory paragraph by defining what unalienable rights of individuals as stated in the Declaration (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) constitute. Afterwords, your thesis will be a simple statement in terms of yes/no of the definition your provided, and if it is upheld today. So, for example, mine is: "I will argue that the unalienable rights of individuals are not upheld today". Next, state how you will argue it. So, for example, mine again: I will argue this by first showing the discrepancy between the rich and poor, and how the same rights that are suppose to be equal for all citizens are not actually equally for all citizens. I will then show how these unalienable rights are continually infringed upon by corporations and government officials (Patriot Act, War on Terrorism, Airport Security, etc.) Lastly, I will show how the unalienable rights have never really been there to begin with (I made a huge post on this a couple lounge pages back).
So, to summarize what I said:
Introduction:
-Definition of what unalienable rights of individuals as stated in the Declaration (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) constitute.
-Thesis statement: Simple yes or no based on your definition if you think it is upheld today.
-How you will argue for your thesis: state what the topic of each body paragraph will be.
Body Paragraphs:
- Introduce the topic heading/what you will be arguing in the paragraph.
-Give two arguments in support of it (I said two arguments since I believe you said the paper is only 500-700 words; you might only need one argument per point per paragraph. I dunno.).
-Conclusion sentence for the paragraph.
Repeat this 3 times.
Conclusion:
-Basically here, since your format is already clear and it makes no sense to restate your arguments, summarize what the argument amounts to. So, what does it mean for America if unalienable rights are not upheld? Think big picture stuff.
Hope this helps.
Best,
Epic
Thanks Epic, so in your example these would be your three points?
Quote:
showing the discrepancy between the rich and poor, and how the same rights that are suppose to be equal for all citizens are not actually equally for all citizens. I will then show how these unalienable rights are continually infringed upon by corporations and government officials (Patriot Act, War on Terrorism, Airport Security, etc.) Lastly, I will show how the unalienable rights have never really been there to begin with
- The discrepancy between the rich and poor and how the same rights aren't actually equal for all citizens.
- Corporations and government officials continually breaking these rights.
- These rights have never really been there to begin with.
?
I appreciate the help, it's finding three points to talk about that support my opinion that I'm ****ing losing it on! I'm not even sure I agree with whether or not the unalienable rights are upheld today!
edit: and yeah I'm in grade 12. Just these past few weeks have been so annoying and I feel like I have so much on my shoulders. Law notes in cue card form due Wednesday, Law essay due on the 7th, Law ISU seminar on the 14th, this history essay due tomorrow, 6+ history questions for homework, visual designs project due tomorrow, ****! And on top of all that it's already always hard enough for me to concentrate on school
