So you think he should of followed his guy(the guy who dropped the puck) and just left the shooter all alone? With no backcheckers even close? What I'm saying, is he should of left his guy and pressured the shooter. Do you understand? I know he could of got burnt on that aswell, all I'm saying is he COULD of played it different. No need to act like a child.
So you think he should of followed his guy(the guy who dropped the puck) and just left the shooter all alone? With no backcheckers even close? What I'm saying, is he should of left his guy and pressured the shooter. Do you understand? I know he could of got burnt on that aswell, all I'm saying is he COULD of played it different. No need to act like a child.
this makes absolutely no sense. the third guy high is not "the shooter" until the puck is on his stick. Rielly did have the shooter covered, who then passed it off to a third man who was supposed to be covered by the backchecker. if he was to have pressured the high man like you wanted, that leaves the ACTUAL shooter with a wide open look. the most dangerous guy is always the one with the puck.
this makes absolutely no sense. the third guy high is not "the shooter" until the puck is on his stick. Rielly did have the shooter covered, who then passed it off to a third man who was supposed to be covered by the backchecker. if he was to have pressured the high man like you wanted, that leaves the ACTUAL shooter with a wide open look. the most dangerous guy is always the one with the puck.
I know, but like I've said several times, I thought once the player passed it off is when Rielly should of stopped following the player,and pressured the player who scored the goal/took the drop pass. Whatever though, I probably need to rewatch the play, I guess I didn't see it right.
